EFTA00844787.pdf

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joi Ito , Reid Hoffman < >, Peter Thiel Subject: Fwd: FW: CFTC Asserts Jurisdiction in Bitcoin Markets (Attorney Advertising) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:14:09 +0000 September 30, 2015 CFTC Asserts Jurisdiction in Bitcoin Markets The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) recently took a series of actions confirming views expressed late last year by CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad that" [djerivatives contracts based on a virtual currency represent one area within [the CFTC's] responsibilities."1 With very limited exceptions, the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) grants the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over the trading of futures, options and swaps on "commodities." The CEA contains an expansive definition of "commodity" to include "goods and articles ... and all services, rights and interests On September 17, 2015, the CFTC issued a settlement order (the CFTC Order) in an enforcement action finding for the first time that "Bitcoin and other virtual currencies are encompassed in the definition and properly defined as commodities."3 In what the CFTC described as its first action against an unregistered Bitcoin options trading platform, the CFTC charged Coinflip, Inc. and its founder and chief executive officer with failures to comply with the CEA or CFTC regulations for operating a facility for trading or processing "commodity options." Among other EFTA00844787 findings, the CFTC Order found that from at least March 2014 through July 2014, Coinflip operated a facility for the trading of swaps without registering as a swap execution facility (SEF)4 or a designated contract market.! Albeit in footnotes, but perhaps most significantly, the Coinflip case put the CFTC on record as concluding that Bitcoin, while a commodity, is not a currency! In summarizing the facts of the case, the CFTC explained that Bitcoin is "distinct from 'real currencies- of the Unites States or another country? In addition, the CFTC Order in the Coinflip settlement specifically noted that the Bitcoin options were not eligible for the CFTC's "trade option exemption" in CFTC Rule 32.3.8 Since the CFTC's trade option exemption can only be claimed for an option that would result in delivery of an "exempt" or agricultural commodity, this violation in effect serves as the CFTC's finding that it will not treat Bitcoin as a currency. This is because the term "exempt" commodity includes metals, energy, weather events and certain other commodities, but explicitly excludes currency, The CFTC finding that Bitcoin is an exempt commodity and not a currency will have regulatory consequences as more Bitcoin issues come before the CFTC. For example, if Bitcoin is not a currency, then Bitcoin forwards and Bitcoin swaps that involve the exchange of Bitcoin for another currency will not fall under the statutory definitions of the more lightly regulated foreign exchange forwards or foreign exchange swaps.18 Likewise, retail trading of Bitcoin derivatives will be limited to designated contract markets, rather than subject to the retail foreign exchange dealer regulations.11 Treating Bitcoin as a commodity that is not a currency dovetails with the stances taken by other U.S. regulators such as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) (virtual currency does not have all of the attributes of real currency)12, the Securities and Exchange Commission (Bitcoin investments are investment contracts because Bitcoin is a form of money)13 and the Internal Revenue Service (treating Bitcoin as property for tax purposes)._ 10 By treating Bitcoin as a commodity, but not a currency, the CFTC has opened the door to greater CFTC regulation of Bitcoin derivatives in certain, but not all, respects. For example, as an exempt commodity, forward contracts on Bitcoin between commercial market EFTA00844788 participants could be excluded from the CEA. A large retailer could enter into Bitcoin forwards with a Bitcoin merchant (te., a financial institution) — where one party pays a fixed U.S. dollar amount and the other pays in Bitcoin — and be excluded from the CEA. Likewise, if the trade is structured like a typical FX swap (the merchant pays a fixed U.S. dollar amount and the retailer pays a floating Bitcoin amount, for example), arguably the swap would be an excluded forward as long as Bitcoin was physically delivered. Continuing its entry into Bitcoin regulation, one week after the Coinflip action, on September 24. 2015, the CFTC again brought and settled charges related to Bitcoin, this time against TeraExchange LLC (Tera), a provisionally registered SEF, for failing to enforce its prohibition on wash trading and prearranged trading.15 At issue was a U.S. dollar — Bitcoin swap transaction from October 2014 between the only two market participants then authorized to trade on Tera. The CFTC focused on the Tera employees, which facilitated the alleged prearranged wash trade between the only two authorized traders on the Tera SEF. The Tera employees allegedly suggested a transaction would be used to test the SEF systems and would immediately be unwound at the same price and volume. After the transaction was executed, Tera issued a press release that the swap 'was the first Bitcoin derivative transaction to be executed on a regulated exchange' without disclosing that the Bitcoin swap transaction did not represent actual liquidity. Although the Tera action sends a message to any SEF that the CFTC expects SEFs to enforce SEF rules against illegal trading practices, this CFTC action is yet another signal to the Bitcoin industry that the CFTC is poised to regulate Bitcoin derivatives.16 1 Testimony of CFTC Chairman Timothy Massed before the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture. Nutrition and Forestry (Dec. 10. 2014). 2 Only onions and motion picture box office receipts are excluded from the definition or commodity.' See CEA Section 1(a)(9). 3 In re Cantle). Ina. Dkt No. 15-29 (C.F.T.C. Sept. 17. 2015). 4 A SEF is a trading system or platform (other than a futures exchange) in which multiple participants have the ability to EFTA00844789 execute or trade swaps by accepting bids and offers made by multiple participants on the facility. See CEA la(50) 5 Under the terms of settlement. the defendants agreed to cease and desist from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations. however. no financial penalty was imposed 6 The CFTC Order came a week after the CFTC granted Ledger X LLC. an institutional trading and clearing platform for options on Bitcom. temporary registration as a SEF. The only product subject to the Ledger% SEF application is options on Sitcom. The CFTC's grant of temporary registration will be (plowed by a CFTC review of the Ledger% submission for listing options on Bacoin as a product for trading on the SEF. which also requires CFTC approval. In addition. LedgerX has filed an application for registration as a Derivatives Clearing Organization (OCO) to clear options on Bitcoin. which remains pending with the CFTC. 7 CFTC Order at In 2 stating 'Sitcom and other virtual currencies are distinct from 'rear currencies. which are the coin and paper money of the Unites States or another country that are designated as legal tender. circulate. and are customarily used and accepted as a medium of exchange ,n the country of tssuance • 8 The CFTC Order appears to be based on a failure to meet the conditions in CFTC Rule 32.3 that limit who can be an offeror and offeree to the <plan. See Order at fn. 5 9 See CEA Sections la(19) and la(20). 10 See CEA Sections la(24). 1a(25). and la(47)(E)-(F). 11 See CFTC Part 5. 17 CFR Pad 5 12 See FinCEN Guidance. Application of FinCEN's Regulations to Persons Aceninistenng. Exchanging or Using Virtual Currencies. FiN-2013-G001 (March 18. 2013). 13 SEC v Shavers. No. 4:13-00-00416 ( Texas. Aug. 6. 2013). 14 See IRS Notice 2014-21 (March 25. 2014). 15 In re TeraExchange LLC. Okt. No. 15-33 (C.F.T.C. Sept. 24. 2015). Similar to the Coinfhp settlement. under the Tera settlement. the defendants agreed to cease and desist from violating the CEA and CFTC regulations. Like the Coinfhp settlement. no financial penalty was imposed. causing one CFTC commissioner to dissent. 16 The CFTC also granted Ledger X LLC temporary registration as a SEF one week before the Coinfhp settlement. The only product subject to the Ledger X SEF application is options on Sitcom. The CFTC's grant of temporary registration win be followed by a CFTC review of the Ledger% submission for listing options on Sitcom as a product for trading on the SEF. which also requires CFTC approval. In addition. LedgerX has filed an application for EFTA00844790  registration as a DCO to clear options on Bitcoin, which remains pending with the CFTC. Contacts Mark D. Maureen A. Theodore M. Young Donley Kneller Washington. Washington. Washington. 202.371.768O 202.371.7570 202.371.7264 vcard I email vcard / email vcard / email Trevor A. Levine Washington, 202.371.7577 vcard r email This memorandum is provided by Skadden. Arps. Slate. Meagher & Flom LLP and its affiliates for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This memorandum is considered advertising under applicable stale laws. Skadden. Arps. Slate. Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates / Four Times Square / New York. NY 10036 unsubscri”c nr please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00844791