podesta-emails

podesta_email_00512.txt

podesta-emails 6,885 words email
P17 P22 V11 P20 V12
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *Main Topics: *Sarah Palin as McCain's Surprise V.P. Choice, Palin Interviewed, Maverick or Gimmick? Summary of Shift: With the announcement of McCain's vice presidential nominee, a slew of speculation has arisen as to Sarah Paulin's ability to chair the position of commander in chief if McCain passes. The strongest arguments against her remain her inexperience (2 years as governor and small-town mayor), her limited relationship with McCain, as well as the current investigation due to her firing a commissioner under questionable intentions. Barack Obama's speech at the DNC has continued to be highlighted. In other news, the Gulf Coast prepares for the worst as Gustav is predicted to become a category 4 hurricane. The death toll continues to rise in India amidst severe flooding during the monsoon season. The Kremlin announced that it intends to absorb South Ossetia into 'one united Russian state'. Highlights: 1. FNC: Pfotenhauer ignorant on McCain's and Palin's short relationship 2. CNN: Jack Cafferty frowns upon Palin's domestic and international inexperience 3. FNC: Tucker Bounds dances around question on Paulin's foreign relations experience 4. MSNBC: Senator Lindsey Graham on McCain's Choice of Sarah Palin 5. MSNBC: Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd Discuss Palin's Risk 6. MSNBC: Hardball discusses if Palin's Selection is Just a Gimmick 7. MSNBC: Countdown Investigates If Palin Will Be Able to Draw Clinton Voters 8. MSNBC: Rachel Maddow Highlights Palin's Bridge to Nowhere Flip-Flop 9. MSNBC: Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz Blasts Palin as Anti-Women Issues 10. MSNBC: Rep. Eric Cantor Supports Sarah Palin's Experience 11. MSNBC: Race to the White House Asks If Sarah Palin is the New Dan Quayle 12. CNBC: Sarah Palin Interview Discusses Energy and ANWR Drilling Highlights, No YouTubes: 1. MSNBC: Mike Murphy gave the Bush presidency a "C" grade 2. MSNBC - DAN SCHNUR: "I think, like everybody else in the universe, I am extremely surprised. Earlier this summer when McCain was running 10, 12, 15 points behind Obama a pick like this, a gamble like this would have made more sense. Conventional wisdom suggested that in a race that's essentially tied, he would have done something safer. But I think what it show's you Andrea is how much John McCain values his reputation as a Maverick. He's very steadily come back in the polls over the last couple of weeks, but it's been by running a very conventional campaign. I think given the choice of being a maverick and being president, John McCain would rather be president. A pick like this, potentially at least, gives him the opportunity to do both." 3. MSNBC - RACHEL MADDOW: On the temperament issue, I think that we'll keep hearing it because I think that McCain keeps demonstrating it. I mean, when he said "we are all Goergian's now", that may have sounded like big tough rhetoric, but he's essentially saying, let's treat Georgia like it was a member of NATO. Which means, let's treat Georgia as if it were Nebraska that just got invaded by the Russians. Let's go bomb Moscow. To have that sort of reaction, that sort of hair trigger reaction, on a very sensitive on-going policy dispute, where our own government is taking a very different attack, yeah, no matter who says that, I think temperament ought to be an issue. He keeps bringing it up himself. 4. MSNBC - PHIL MUSTER: "Well, look, I think the bottom line on experience here is she's had more experience as a chief executive as the Governor of Alaska than Barack Obama has in the United States Senate. So people grow into new jobs as they develop and take them. But her record as a chief executive in Alaska has been great. She's reached out across the board, just like John McCain has worked in a bi-partisan fashion in Washington, she's worked in a bi-partisan fashion in Alaska. She hasn't been afraid to challenge those within her own party who are wrong. Take for example, the fact that she's been outspoken in supporting a primary challenge to Don Young who sponsored the bridge to no where in our party. She calls them like she sees them, and I think America might fall in love with this woman who really brings a real common touch." 5. MSNBC - MICHAEL MOORE: […] I don't know if you showed the cake there, that they had three years ago today with McCain and Bush. When Marie Antoinette, when she said let them eat cake, I think she was speaking figuratively, they literally were, while New Orleans was drowning, eating cake. 6. MSNBC - KEITH OLBERMAN: But our winner [Worst Person in the World] Senator John McCain. In the last twenty days, suicide bombers have killed at least 78 people in Iraq. Wounded countless others. Yet the Senator told Time Magazine, in an extraordinary and frightening interview, that as to Iraq, "It's a peaceful and stable country now." The reporters asked the natural follow-up, "It is? But you wouldn't say you've achieved victory now?" He answered, "Yes, I would say that the surge is succeeding and we are winning." So an average of four people a day dead in suicide bombings means that a country is peaceful and stable. But a peaceful and stable country does not mean victory has been achieved and we can get our men and women out of there. One way or another, you are witnessing a man suffering from at least from one actual delusion. To say nothing of an utter disrespect of the meaning of the loss of life. It is not funny, it is shameful. John McCain, today's worst person in the world. Clips: Highlight #1 *Pfotenhauer Doesn't Know the Extent or Length of McCain's and Paulin's Relationship* (FNC 08/29/08 10:08am) BILL HEMMER: […] Tell me about the relationship between McCain and Palin. How much time have they spent together? How well do they know one another? PFOTENHAUER: *You're running flat into the wall of my ignorance here, Bill. I just, I truly, um, no indication whatsoever of the extent of a relationship that exists with the governor of Alaska.* And you know there are several other folks […] and they have been at the forefront of the scene the last several months. HEMMER: You know, Nancy, if I could just stop you there, maybe that answer itself is *a bit revealing of the fact that they don't have much of a relationship*. Is that a fair reading? PFOTENHAUER: No, no, no. It's revealing of my ignorance. Not of their relationship. Highlight #2 *Jack Cafferty on Sarah Paulin's Inexperience with International and Domestic Issues *(CNN 08/29/08 6:39pm) GLORIA BORGER: […] I've been talking to some democrats who are now expecting that Senator McCain will soon name his Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense to try and relay questions about this sort of military industrial complex in his administration, should anything happen to him. […] STEVEN HAYES: […] It's legitimate to wonder whether she would have this experience; but look at what she's done in Alaska. You can't just ignore her record in Alaska. She up-ended the establishment. The republican party establishment in Alaska taking on people in her own party, she's governed effectively, she's cut taxes, she's done all of these things that won her an 80% approval rating. It is absolutely not crazy to pick her. […] JACK CAFFERTY: The state of Alaska has the population of Austin, Texas. What does she know about inner-city poverty? The war on drugs? What does she know about the Middle East? You want to put her up against Putin, Achmajenidad? She was the mayor of a town of 7,000 people in Alaska. […] Most of the republicans I heard from, including a lot of women, how dare John McCain presume because he names an inexperienced woman from Alaska, that he can start collecting the 18 million votes that were cast for Hillary Clinton? They're on opposite sides of all the issues, people are outraged. This is a joke. Highlight #3 *Bounds Deflects Question About Palin's Foreign Experience* (FNC 08/29/08 1:35pm) TUCKER BOUNDS: […] It's an exciting pick for us. Both of these candidates share a passion for change in government, they have records of reform, and we can think of no better person to be joining us here at the campaign other than governer Palin of Alaska. So many of the issues, she has expertise on. We are important to American voters that are facing skyrocketing gas prices. She's an expert on energy issues. She understands that we need to transition to alternative fuels, renewable energies. But she also understands the importance of drilling; making sure we have those short shock measures to fight energy prices that are skyrocketing, pinching families. TRACE GALLAGHER: […] the democrats are already on the attack here. You know they're going to go after her foreign credentials, and how do you retaliate against that? BOUNDS: […] for them to completely ignore that Governor Palin is a governor and executive and reformer in the state of Alaska, and to belittle her, to try and say that small-town Americans , a mayor wasn't befitting of a vice presidential nominee. […] America's built on small towns. Small town Americans may have taken offense. I know I certainly did. GALLAGHER: […] How do you respond to the democrats when they attack her foreign relations credentials? BOUNDS: Well, Senator McCain is running for president of the United States, and I don't think anyone would disagree that in this campaign, there is no one with more experience, more understanding of the international stage, foreign affairs than John McCain. That's why Americans are gonna support him in the fall; is because he understands that we need to take the right approach overseas […] Highlight #4 *Senator Lindsey Graham on McCain's Choice of Sarah Palin* (MSNBC 08/29/08 4:33pm) PETER ALEXANDER: First question, perhaps in the case of an unforeseen tragedy, John McCain comes into office at the age of 72, would be the oldest president to walk into the White House. If for any reason Sarah Palin were to assume the presidency, are you comfortable with her leading this country? SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: Given her life story, yes, absolutely. When you look at what she's accomplished in her life, from a personal point of view and a professional point of view, I don't think there's anything that she can't do. She is tough. She's reformed minded. She's taken a beating for her principles. She's put her political future at risk more than one time challenging her own party. She's a quite extraordinary lady and I would be proud for her to be my president. ALEXANDER: If you're comfortable with her life story, I think a lot of democrats will hear you say that Senator and say, why then aren't the republicans comfortable with Barack Obama's life store? If he lacks experience but he does have a terrific life story, wouldn't that be sufficient for him as a candidate? GRAHAM: I'm not talking just about her life story; I'm talking about her judgment. She has taking on corruption, she has made people mad at her they you would want mad at you if you wanted to reform the government. She has really done things in Alaska that are similar to what john McCain would like to do in Washington. At the end of the day, I had a chance to see senator Obama up close in the immigration debate. We had a comprehensive bipartisan deal where republicans got some things and gave some things to democrats. I saw what he did. We had a temporary worker program as part of the comprehensive bipartisan agreement that republicans wanted, unions hated. And at the end of the day he introduced an amendment to do away with that part of the deal, which was basically killing the deal. So I'm not very impressed with senator Obama, quite frankly, when it comes to doing hard things and telling democrats something they don't want to hear. I'm very impressed with governor Palin taking on her own people at times. That's what John's looking for. Somebody that will come to Washington with him, that will turn the place up side down. And Obama and Biden are not going to do that. ALEXANDER: Senator, have you ever met Governor Palin? GRAHAM: No. Talked to her on the phone. Anybody that hunts moose at 3:00 in the morning is high on my list. ALEXANDER: Alright, then give us a better sense, perhaps, is this pick more of an appeal, do you believe, to the republican base? She's a strong social conservative. Or do you think it plays to independents and disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporters? Who will this sway? GRAHAM: Good question. What I think it's going to do is reinforce what senator McCain would like to do in Washington. You know, when you look at his legislative career he's always pushed the status quo, much to his detriment sometimes. And you've got a governor, a young governor in Governor Palin, who's done exactly the same thing in Alaska. So I think that's the narrative that will resonate in both groups. People are frustrated, the Congress is at 12 percent. People are dying for something new and different, and controlling spending, reforming the way business is done. From the women perspective, I think a lot of young women in this country are going to be inspired by Governor Palin. And Republicans will be inspired by her. She's a solid conservative, but more than anything else, she's taken the status quo and corruption head on. And that's exactly what we need to do in Washington. So I think it's a two-for. I think it helps us with our base, and I think it will help us with independent voters who are looking for somebody, not to talk about change, but who has actually done something to make things change. Highlight #5 *Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd Discuss Palin's Risk* (MSNBC 08/29/08 5:05pm) ANDREA MITCHELL: […] Now it is a high risk, high payoff kind of nomination, because she's got no real national experience. […] She could help with Hillary Clinton voters in the suburbs of some of the big cities, in battleground states, I mean this could be a game changer. That said, the fact that John McCain only met her once, when we get this tick doc just now that, from the McCain, they didn't even know each other. This was not a carefully vetted, personal decision. This was a very calculated, strategic decision to try to change the whole game. CHRIS MATTHEWS: […] Is this niche marketing here? In other words, you're taking a person who doesn't really conform to the profile, the voters you're trying to win over, the women voter, the working women, the very committed woman. This candidate for vice president, now apparently has no real interest in the Iraq war. She said she hasn't given it much thought, which certainly separates her from a lot of democratic women who are vastly against the war. She would outlaw abortion in every circumstance, including cases where a woman had been raped or there was incest involved. Certainly a radical view at odds to, it seems to me, in my experiences with those suburban women that Andrea just mentioned. CHUCK TODD: Well, look, I see this pick as a decision by the McCain campaign to basically say, well, look we can not win on experience alone. Every time there's an election, a change election, and it's change versus experience, change wins and I think they came to that conclusion. Look, I had been told a couple of weeks ago that you can tell what McCain thinks about his chances by the type of running mate he names. […] They've abandoned experience and that's ok, because McCain had not been able to recapture his maverick, change image. This is giving him an opportunity to re-launch. Look, he may not win over a lot of new supporters over the next couple of days. But it's making them take a second look and that's what he needed. He needed a second look, he needed a fresh look. Look the campaign staff is fired up, they're enthusiastic. […] For McCain it's about playing with the news cycle and surprising, do these nice surgical strikes when it comes to the media. Look, it may be a disaster at the end of the day. But McCain thought they had a ceiling going on in the trajectory that they were headed. Highlight #6 *Hardball discusses if Palin's Selection is Just a Gimmick* (MSNBC 08/29/08 5:15pm) CHRIS MATTHEWS: We have a Vice President who's committed almost viscerally to the war in Iraq. Here's a candidate to replace him in a Republican Party who said this, […] "I've been so focused on state government, I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq." I mean here she is running to replace a guy with 60 staff people involved with foreign policy and Intel collection in a very hawkish setting. How can she be a credible successor? […] ANDREA MITCHELL: […] Foreign policy is not why she was chosen. You could argue, politically, tactically, you don't want to replace Dick Cheney with another Dick Cheney. That's not what the Republicans want right now. You've got John McCain, John McCain's your foreign policy guru. Look, there are a couple of pluses and minuses here. She's got five children, […] she will appeal to the soccer moms and the hockey moms, as she describes herself. She's got a lot of color. People are going to talk, people who don't know Alaska who don't know that part of the world, […] she eats moose burgers. This is exciting to a lot of people. Everyone up there eats moose burgers. That's the meal, that's the food, that's the meat that you get, that you shoot. That you bring home. […] She is also a bit of a libertarian. She's not completely consistent on those social conservative issues. I got a Log Cabin email from the Log Cabin Republicans saying her first veto was to protect gay rights for partners. So we need to dig a little deeper into this. […] But the biggest thing is she has no personal relationship with the man that she's running with. CHUCK TODD: The biggest downside, Chris, is that this could look like a gimmick. Cause John McCain only met her twice. Doesn't know her. This goes against everything we think we know about John McCain. He likes to surround himself with people that he's comfortable with, that are loyal to him, and all of a sudden this is a political calculation, and it's gimmicky. And the gimmick could wear out. […] CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let's talk about age. John McCain has just turned 72. John McCain will be 77 in his first term as President. A lot of concern he wouldn't really be running for two terms, which is unique. He'd really be running for one. And there for his running mate would really be running like his successor to be. And you have to wonder whether this is credible. Is John McCain replaceable, effectively by the Governor of Alaska, could something happen in the first term? Is this something that he can honestly say to the American people, that this person after a year in office in Juno, with no foreign policy interest? Not just experience, no interest apparently. Can this person be commander in chief if something happens? MITCHELL: That is going to be the biggest question. […] Highlight #7 *Countdown Investigates If Palin Will Be Able to Draw Clinton Voters* (MSNBC 08/29/08 8:31pm) KEITH OLBERMAN: The Republicans have chosen the least experienced vice presidential candidate, probably in American history. A rabid conservative, seemingly a vague alternative to Hillary Clinton, except that last March the Governor claimed that Senator Clinton was "whining" about the primaries. KEITH OLBERMAN: This wasn't really a bid for Hillary supporters was it? I mean A: If you're trying to poach Clinton women, you would announce this before the democratic heal-a-thon, not the day after it ends. And B: at your own magazine's women in leadership event, […] she felt kind of bad she couldn't support a woman, but she didn't like Clinton's "whining". So the Hillary alternative just called Hillary and the PUMA's whiners? HOWARD FINEMAN: Well Keith, there are a lot of pro-drilling and anti-polar bear and anti-abortion women among those 18 million Hillary supporters, I'm sure. I'm being factious, I don't think there's that many left. And I don't think this really is about that. I think in big picture terms, it was about John McCain seeking to change things up to try to re-establish his Maverick credentials. Because, despite her lack of experience, Sarah Palin is sort of a brave political person, having taken on her own political party the way John McCain used to do. He wanted to underscore the desire for change, and the fact that he gets it. And he wanted to, frankly, shake things up and not make it so boring. […] […] OLBERMAN: The experience argument. This had been viewed widely, as maybe Senator McCain's best weapon against Obama. He just turned this in. Why give this up for her? FINEMAN: Well for the reasons I said. Because he hadn't established himself with the grassroots of the Republican Party. Because he wanted to be an agent of change. Because he wanted to restore his maverick credentials. I mean, that's what the McCain people were telling me all day today, the Maverick just picked a maverick. But yes, he's done it at great cost, because the whole Republican Convention, I was told, […] the slogan was going to be, he's not ready to lead, meaning Barack Obama. Well Sarah Palin makes Barack Obama look like John Adams. I mean it's no contest. […] Highlight #8 *Rachel Maddow Highlights Palin's Bridge to Nowhere Flip-Flop* (MSNBC 08/29/08 8:40pm) KEITH OLBERMAN: She said no thanks to the Bridge to Nowhere. But in 2006 one of her spokesman, I guess in Alaska her spokesman, told the Associated Press that she had supported the Bridge. So she just jumps into this national spotlight complete with the Bridge to Nowhere attached to her? Is she the bridge to nowhere? RACHEL MADDOW: Yeah, this is very awkward, because she is out there, in her, you know, I'm the new running mate speech, her debut on the national stage bringing up that bridge to nowhere issue. I went and looked it up in the Anchorage Daily News from 2006, she was asked point-blank about funding for that bridge, and she said yes, I would like to Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist. So as recently as two years ago, she was not only in favor of the Bridge to Nowhere, which she's now saying that she wasn't, but she was also in favor of it on the basis of the fact that Alaska's congressional delegation was in a position that they could do it through earmarks. This is an embarrassing position to have taken. Not only because of the flip-flop, but they're trying to market her as a fiscal conservative who stood up to Alaska's, sort of famously corrupt Republican politicians. Highlight #9 *Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz Blasts Palin as Anti-Women Issues*(MSNBC 08/29/08 6:16pm) DAVID GREGORY: This statement from Hillary Clinton, could this not be interpreted as a message to her own supporters that perhaps this new Republican ticket ought to warrant a new look? REP. DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: No, I don't think that's the message that Hillary Clinton was speaking at all. On the contrary, she made it clear that John McCain and Sarah Palin are wrong on all the issues that matter to women. This is a pick that demonstrates colossally bad judgment on the part of John McCain. You know, we're talking about someone who has less than 18months experience as Governor of a state that has fewer people than my own Congressional district. Someone who was the mayor of a town of 8,000 people. Someone who would have to have their hand on the pillar of our foreign policy, and combat the war on terror, with that colossal lack of experience is frightening. And it demonstrates that John McCain, just like Barack Obama said last night in his acceptance speech, just doesn't get it. […] SCHULTZ: John McCain has failed both tests, experience and judgment. He's chosen someone who totally lacks the experience that we need in a potential President of the United States, and he's demonstrated an unbelievable lack of judgment in choosing her. What he's done here is he's tried to appeal to the women of this country, by choosing someone who simply has the same parts that we do. And what matters to women is not having someone that's the same gender as we are, but we need to make sure that we have someone in office that cares the same issues that we do. Sarah Palin is wrong on a women's right to choose, wrong on equal pay for equal work, wrong on expanding access to children's healthcare. It's insulting, I have to tell you. […] SCHULTZ: […] I'm sure she manages her household with five children very well, but she is not ready to manage this country. Highlight #10 *Rep. Eric Cantor Supports Sarah Palin's Experience* (MSNBC 08/29/08 6:18pm) DAVID GREGORY: Is there the potential […] that John McCain would actually experience a backlash from the very women he's trying to court here, Hillary Clinton supporters and other women around the country? Does this look like pandering? REP. ERIC CANTOR: […] Sarah Palin represents what so many women in this country are about, trying to balance work and raising a family, and all the double income families out there in America, we all feel the strains. And the women often bare the brunt of that. So what we have in Sarah Palin is in individual that has a wealth of experience, not only raising five children, becoming a mayor, and then a governor, but also one of experience. I mean, I find it really unbelievable that the Barack Obama folks are starting to criticize Sarah Palin over lack of experience. She has as much experience as Barack Obama, and even more. She was chief executive of a state, Barack Obama has had no executive experience whatsoever. GREGORY: He's 72 years old, he's actively talked [..] about him just pursuing one term as president. […] Now he's got someone who's 44 years old, only been Governor since 2006, will Americans look to her and think, yeah she can do the job if anything happens to him. CANTOR: I think Americans will pull the level when they go into the ballot booth in November, they'll put it based on Barack Obama versus John McCain. Highlight #11 *Race to the White House Asks If Sarah Palin is the New Dan Quayle* (MSNBC 08/29/08 6:46pm) RACHEL MADDOW: This feels a little Dan Quayle like to me. I mean, I guess it would be Daniel Quayle. Have they ever been seen together before? Are there any pictures of them together? Is there any evidence that they've ever spoken? In an interview today, Sarah Palin did not know what John McCain's plan is on Iraq. I mean, the reason that Dan Quayle was a bad choice is that it was a transparent electoral choice. I think this guy will make me look younger, I think this guy will make me look more like the future. And there was not even lip service paid, either with Dan Quayle or with Sarah Palin. To the idea that these two politicians want to govern together, that they even know each other, or that the McCain campaign really thinks she can be the best president, out of everybody else in the country, other than John McCain. It just doesn't feel right, it doesn't smell right, it seems a little insulting. DAVID GREGORY: Is this stage craft first? JOHN HARWOOD: Yes. […] He has a much narrower margin for error than other recent Republican nominees. He's got to have everything go right. And if people look at her and say, hey this was a real reach that was made for political reasons to try to appeal to those Hillary supporters, that's going to hurt him. […] Highlight #12 *Sarah Palin Interview Discusses Energy and ANWR Drilling* (CNBC 08/29/08) SARAH PALIN: Economically speaking though, it's about 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy is produced up on the north slope up in Prudo. So it's very, very significant economically, physically, it's a tiny little foot. MARIA BARTIROMO: So you're saying it's a tiny little footprint, actually the operations in Prudo Bay, but people think of it as so expansive and so massive that it's going to have a material effect if in fact we were going to see drilling there, on the wildlife and on the community. PALIN: Well, ANWR, that point, it's about 2,000 acres that is being asked to be looked at and then to be explored and then to be produced. 2,000 acres out of 20,000,000 acres. That footprint, it's about the size of LAX, or one of the larger airports across the nation. That should allow some perspective there also. No one, I think, but Alaskans, care more about our wildlife, about our clean water, our clean air, the pristine environment that we are blessed to live in and get to breath in every single day. No one but Alaskans will care more to make sure that we are preserving that pristine environment that is ANWR, the coastal plane, Prudo Bay, Alaska as a whole. And when you ask Alaskan's, are you ready to allow drilling to take place to a greater degree up on the north slopes, specifically here we're talking about ANWR, do you want to see that happen? And with Alaskan's love and care for our environment and our lands and our wildlife, Alaskan's are saying, yes, because we believe that it can be done safely. It can be done prudently. And it had better be done ethically, also. Yes, we'd want to see that drilling. So hopefully the rest of American can understand that also. You go door to door and you ask Alaskans if we are ready, willing, and able to produce more and contribute more to the U.S., and they're going to tell you, yes. BARTIROMO: President Bush tried this a number of times under his watch. Why is it that we have been unable to actually get this done? PALIN: I think there's a lot of misperceptions and misconceptions about what ANWR is all about and what, up in the north slope, what the environment actually is up there. You see pictures, you see visuals from the nay-sayers, the critics of the idea of opening up ANWR and the pictures that they're showing are mountains, and polar bears, lots of different wildlife. They'll show moose in a stream with mountains in the background, that's not ANWR. And as your people go up there also and actually get to see for themselves, and we've had a lot of Congressman and Congresswomen come up here this summer even to see for themselves, what actually is ANWR. What would be touched here in terms of lands and wildlife. Then they see that those visuals that have been shown to America for all these years are inaccurate. Those are not the pictures of ANWR, there aren't mountains up there for instance. So I think that there's a lot of misperception out there for what the plane actually looks like. And the visuals are very important to Americans, I do think though that Americans are recognizing more and more, it's evidence in the pressure that they're putting on Congress at this point, the constituents putting on Congress, more and more Americans are recognizing it is time to ramp up America's supply of energy. Especially, we're a nation at war, a lot of the issues that are so adversely effecting America are based on energy supplies as we're relying on foreign sources of energy to feed our hungry market. More and more Americans are recognizing, our sister state, up in the Alaska, has these supplies. We have trillions of cubic feet of clean, natural gas. We have billions of barrels of oil still sitting underground, in a sense, being warehoused. It's time to unlock these reserves and allow competitors to come in and compete for the right to tap those resources and start flowing that energy into the domestic markets that so hungry, so that we can become less reliant on foreign sources of energy. As more Americans recognize that, more Americans, I believe, are choosing to educate themselves on what ANWR is really all about. BARTIROMO: For Sure. And this year there was a price. And once there was a price actually reached, it was, people got it. PALIN: I believe so too. BARTIROMO: Let me get your thoughts, on really the consequences. What then are the major consequences of drilling in ANWR? I was reading a piece earlier that said, look, it will impact the breeding of caribou, the breeding of polar bears. Give me your sense, what are the consequences? PALIN: Well, let's look at lessons learned over the last 30 years from the Trans-Atlantic Oil Pipeline was finally allowed to be built. And there were the threats then and the fears that the caribou herds would diminish and die off. No, the caribou herds are actually thriving, they're flourishing. There has not been the adverse impact on the caribou herds. So we anticipate the same thing as we tap more energy supplies up on the North Slope in ANWR, and as we build a Natural Gas Pipeline also that's underway at this point. When you consider the naysayers, kind of the fear mongerers, 30 years ago before the Trans America Pipeline was built, and remember, that pipeline has supplied 50 billion barrels of oil into our domestic supplies here in America. By the way, Joe Biden was one who voted against that Trans Atlantic Pipeline 30 years ago. He was fearful of allowing ramped up domestic supplies of energy, even then. So of course, I fear, if he's of the same mind today we're in a world of hurt there. But no, the environment will continue to be protected. Our wildlife will continue to thrive and prosper up there. And we're going to make sure that we have the stringent and safe oversight that is necessary and will allow the population of this wildlife and the pristineness of the area to continue. BARTIROMO: Ok, let's talk about jobs and sort of the impact of drilling and of operations there. How significant? PALIN: Here in Alaska, oil production is so significant. 85 to 90 percent of our entire state budget is based on that barrel of oil and the price that it drives. And our state revenue, is again, so reliant on the price of a barrel of oil. For such a great part also Alaskan jobs are contingent on very aggressive production of oil and natural gas up here in Alaska. BARTIROMO: On probably of all the 48 states, it's a ripple effect PALIN: Absolutely, and also the ripple effect, is our belief too that as more domestic supplies of energy from Alaska flow into the hungry markets, naturally, we believe the price of energy will diminish also. It will decrease and that will be good for the economy as a whole. But very, very important to the US economy, specifically here in Alaska. My goodness, it is what drives our economy. BARTIROMO: So how important are the oil and gas industries, businesses to Alaskans? PALIN: Very, very important. Conical Phillips, Exxon, BP, you know we bump heads quite a bit when it comes to the sovereignty of our state. Alaska is set up unlike any other state in the nation, where our statehood compact act, and our state constitution lays out for us who owns the resources. And unlike other states, it's Alaskans who live here who own the resources underground. So as they're tapped, as they're produced Alaskans share in the wealth that's derived from the production of these resources. So the oil industries there are our partners here, they have the leases, the rights to develop the resources. But Alaskans own the resources. So that obviously creates some tension with who owns what and who can control what. But our position of strength in my administration, we know is our state consititution that again lays out for us who actually owns the resources. That's the Alaskan residents and I will do all I can to protect the Alaskan residents as we develop, but at the same time we recognize that the big oil industry that is here they do have the rights and have had the rights for many years now to develop these resources for us and with us. BARTIROMO: How will you do that? How will you protect Alaskans homes, there environment? PALIN: We need to drill, drill, drill though. Otherwise I can not believe that a domestic solution is any part of a national energy policy. If they're not going to let Alaskans drill on our own lands, and on Federal lands within our own state. And a domestic solution isn't part of a national energy plan, then our nation is in a world of hurt. We're going to continue to be reliant on foreign, dangerous regimes, to feed our hungry markets. I find it ironic, and I find it non-sensical that here, we send Secretary Bodman we even send our own President overseas to negotiate with the Saudi's to ask the Saudi's ramp up oil production. For us in America, where again, absolute nonsense because Alaska has those resources already. And we should be tapping these American supplies before we go over to the Saudi's and ask them to do so. So very significant where what is going on and I think our nation is at a cross roads also. We better be making decisions to allow this American supply of energy to be tapped, or we are going to become more and more beholden to these foreign regimes. And again, our nation is going to be in a word of hurt. When you talk about national security, when you talk about ever reaching potential towards energy independence. If we can not implement a domestic solution for this national energy policy, and we have lacked a national energy policy also. We have not had a plan. Alaska should be a leader in this plan because we have the conventional, the non-renewable supplies, the petroleum. We have them up here. […] We also have the renewables also. We have the largest tides on the continent. We have the geothermal. We have the winds. We have all these alternative renewable resources that also can be tapped into as we work collectively and comprehensively on an energy plan. BARTIROMO: So as a nation we need to be doing everything? PALIN: We need to be doing everything, and people need to be realistic, also. This is what scares me about Biden and Obama also is it seems to be almost a naïve notion of their that we can just automatically jump right into a renewable supply of energy to feed hungry markets across our nation, when these renewables are not yet proven to be economic or reliable. We're going to be in a transition period for quite some time where we're going to have to continue to be reliant on conventional sources of energy as we're working on the renewables. And we certainly have to head in that direction also, but it's got to be doin' everything, everything that we can to allow the domestic supplies; renewable and unrenewable, to be tapped; solutions plugged in both those ends, and not just skip the oil and gas developments that- and the coal development also that we have to have as part of a comprehensive plan. It's naïve to think we can go right to renewables, and think that's ever going to work for our nation, today. At this time. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group. To post to this group, send to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d5121fea77b69c0e7aaa7cde5f32fd7f1676061a025974ba3ad33290f1e785ab
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!