EFTA01250081.pdf

From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 7:43 PM To: ((BANN'S) < ), Subject: Notes from Witness Prep with Leslie Fagin 4/28/21 Leslie Fagin Martin Druyer EL Witness Prep with Leslie Fagin Martin expressed concern about spending too much time waiting in the courtroom because LF isn't salaried, so needs the time to work. LF is willing to testify, though would rather this be stipulated. LF doesn't personally have a copy of the transcript, but if her name is on it, she was the reporter. After she signs it, she sends it off to production to get printed and sent to whoever has a copy. She assumes her agency (Magna) keeps an archived copy and they send the original to 85F, but she's not sure. The transcript has a certification at the end of every transcript that LF takes, in which she certifies the truth and accuracy. Not sure whether LF has access to her agency's files. LF can't identify a page of a transcript in isolation. She doesn't have a particular process normally to determine the truth and accuracy of the contents of a transcript later — isn't really asked. To figure out whether or not a transcript is doctored, LF could compare side by side the version Magna has and the exhibit. Though she's never been asked to do this in her 34 years. 3501.488-001 Page 1 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA 00096051 EFTA01250081 LF takes down testimony, comes home, edits it, sends it to Magna with her cert page at the end, and that's the end of the process. Her cert says that she certifies the transcript and it's true and accurate. Not sure she has her notes still. Maybe on the cloud somewhere. Note that LF's stenographic notes, if they exist, aren't themselves in the transcript, and so may diverge from the final transcript she wrote and sent to Magna because the notes were produced and edited into the final transcript. 2 3501.488-001 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00096052 EFTA01250082