👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (546 words)
From: "Frank McKinney" ctl
To: "'Jeffrey Epstein"' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: anonymity and a model
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:42:31 +0000
Good Morning Jeffrey,
No house on the 520,' just landscaping/park?
f satth ill Kinneat
From: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:21 AM
To: Frank McKinney
Subject: Re: anonymity and a model
no the park would be the entire 520„ i appreciate your creativity„ my sense is that if you can refinance for the
250k that you mentioned that seems like the best short term solution. If I can find the time, I will come visit
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Frank McKinney > wrote:
Good Morning Jeffrey,
Had a thought regarding confidentiality as it relates property rights transfer.
I share the following with the assumption that you maintain a level of interest in Acqua Liana and the 5.57
acres/520' of direct oceanfront land at 700 S. Ocean. Tell me to cease any time:
As you know, my debt matures on 12.31.09. If all or some of my properties do not sell before this date I will
finalize a one year extension with Bank of America.
Rather than extend my facilities with B of A, enter into an agreement with a distant company that you control to
refinance my debt, plus a sum equal to what I would in effect "sell" the properties for. In essence your entity
becomes the "bank." This extension would be for 6 months to a year. At maturity, the debt would simply convert
to equity, or the properties would be conveyed to the "bank" in some other manner. If you wanted the 150' to the
south of Acqua Liana that I no longer own, the refinance would include an adequate sum to allow me to purchase
that property from Harold Pontius, thus giving the new "bank" control of all 820,' if that is what you desired.
The media and snooping parties are looking for high-dollar traditional real estate transactions to create headlines
from. They could care less about a refinance, and if they did care, the focus would be on the debtor, not the
lender. At maturity, a conversion feature, a deed in lieu, or other conveyance, would draw little attention. What it
did draw would again rest on the conveyor, not the receiver. The story would pass in days, becoming a non-story.
EFTA00771361
By the time the ultimate transfer of property between your "bank" or entity and you took place (if ever), your
world would have calmed to the point of rendering such a transfer irrelevant to the prying public.
During the 6 months to a year while the new bank held the note, I would agree to maintain the properties, and
even continue my effort to sell the portion(s) that you did not have an interest in. Business as usual.
As far as the model reference, why don't you come down to Acqua Liana. I would be the only one there. I would
have the scale model of The Manalapan Residence set up around the pool.
I never got to answer your question regarding the creation of a "park" on the 150' south of Acqua Liana that I do
not own. I could share my idea at that time.
flank irk <419447
EFTA00771362
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d6e5265e8716af585d947add25676fbd2f49beb17bcebf1c0d2cbab66f2d4919
Bates Number
EFTA00771361
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0