📄 Extracted Text (202 words)
From: Jeevacation <jeevacation®gmail.com>
To: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:04:12 +0000
Let's talk tomorrow , thanks for yesterday I think we should reference the speecaik mAter that we have proposed
reflects sloman letter to davis
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2010, at 5:17 PM, "Martin Weinberg" <=lain wrote:
Before sending the letter I want to re-address the decision not to make an add'I offer of
settlement/payment. I am uncomfortable with the growing gap between what has been paid and
what is Rowed" and whether your best position vis-a-vis the USAO (and if necessary a court) is to
have such a substantial gap between what BJ says is owed under the NPA and what has been paid
to date. Lets discuss alternatives.
Martin G. Weinberg
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, PC
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
****************************************************************************
This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg,
and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are
not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents
of this message is prohibited.
*** ***** ******************************************** ***** *******************
EFTA00733411
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d82e68f740af12be05308cabb0e59e3ebd003a142e9c747dabf1ed01cb4e7265
Bates Number
EFTA00733411
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0