📄 Extracted Text (542 words)
4 September 2015
US Fixed Income Weekly
"dirty" relent, which is to keep October and December FOMC dates in play. In
this case 2s55 could steepen slightly but such a move would be short lived and
limited in magnitude, if not for a hyped expectation of an October liftoff it
would be because China's FX intervention flows continue to exert a flattening
pressure on the curve, which we discussed earlier in this note.
fernI y-2y2y as a leveraged proxy for 2s5s spot Flattening carry is 31% better in Urn I y-2y2y than in 2s5s
200 1 125
—Ctody-2y2y (IeIt axis) r•••••• 24.54 wet 08( 1144,1)
Beta-
180 r 115
Level Dv01 3M carry adjusted Improve
r 106 (%) Ratio (bp) Beta carry (bp) meM
160 ••
.9S 2Y spot 0.83 1.983 (8.3)
140 51 spot 1.54 4.838 5.3
SS
2y-5y spot 0.71 2.44x (2.9) 1.03 (2.9)
120
IS
100 6mly 0.82 0.992 (15.1)
Correlation = 98 4% 65
Beta = 1 74 4 2Y 1.87 1.927 11.6
80 6m1y-2y2y 1.05 1.94x (3.5) 1.74 (2.0) 31%
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Sant Onsets Sep Swot Dna.,Bent
Risk/reward shifting towards paying front end spreads
Front end spread tightening has been considerable given concerns about
possible intervention-related selling, and has reached levels we think offer
value. At the time of writing the most recent Chinese reserves data have not
been released, and markets will naturally be looking for concrete evidence that
intervention-related sales have indeed been material. While this may introduce
event risk into paid positions in spreads. we think risk reward should be biased
toward spread re-widening from current levels.
There are three primary supporting arguments. The first is that China will be
increasingly defensive of its reserves, and is more likely to devalue in a larger
increment to discourage new speculation against the RMB and trap
speculative capital. A large enough increment should significantly reduce
further speculation on the margin and hence reduce the need to liquidate
Treasury positions to sell dollars and buy domestic currency.
The second is that there remains some possibility that if the Fed does indeed
raise rates (which we think would increase the probability of further
devaluation in a lumpy increment) that IOER will have to be set higher than the
top of the desired band for overnight effective funds in order to create
adequate incentive for banks to do the "arb" whereby they absorb cash
balances in the overnight market and then deposit them at the Fed. Third,
both a devaluation and the likely risk-off market environment that would
accompany it should bias spreads wider.
If, as remains our central expectation, the Fed does not raise rates. then we
would expect speculative pressure against the RMB to decrease somewhat,
slowing reserve loss and Treasury liquidation. So even though diminished
financial stress might work against spreads in this scenario, intervention-
related selling could well decline.
Financing is obviously critical with front end spreads, and this trade is
complicated somewhat by high term repo rates relative to LIBOR. The
September 2y note, given current levels, is likely to a reopening of the
Page 16 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0051317
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00197501
EFTA01362020
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d8453f93781d53a8e62d3ed9b17599a2c31c005802e29f6bdab729ecbc8344af
Bates Number
EFTA01362020
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0