Search / DataSet-10 / EFTA00616147.pdf

EFTA00616147.pdf

Dataset DataSet-10
File Type Unknown
Pages 29
Words 8,384
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 1 of 29



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.:

M.J.,

Plaintiff,

vs.


JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
SARAH KELLEN,

Defendants.


COMPLAINT


Plaintiff, M.J., by and through her undersigned counsel, sues the Defendants, Jeffrey

Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and alleges:

I. This is an action in an amount in excess of $15,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs and

is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court.

2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of the

Plaintiff because this Complaint makes allegations of sensitive nature of offenses against a then

minor child.

3. At all times material to this cause of action, the Plaintiff, M.J. (hereinafter referred to as

"Plaintiff"), was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida.

4. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a residence

located at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.

5. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the United States Virgin Islands.




EFTA00616147
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 2 of 29



6. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult

male born in 1953.

7. Defendant, Sarah Kellen, is currently a citizen ofNew York, where she currently resides.

8. At all times material, the Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen both owed a duty

unto Plaintiff to treat her in a non-negligent manner and to not commit or conspire to commit

intentional or tortious illegal acts against her.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

9. At all times material, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, over 50 years old.

Defendant Epstein is known as a billionaire, yet even those closest to him, including family

members, long time employees and those that he considers his closest friends have no idea what

he does or did to earn money to support his lifestyle.

10. Defendant Epstein owns, directly or through nominee individuals used to conceal his

interests, a fleet of airplanes, motor vehicles, boats and a helicopter. He owns numerous

properties and homes, including a 51,000-square-foot mansion in Manhattan, a $30 Million

7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico, a 70-acre private island formerly known as Little St. James in

St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (he is alleged to have renamed this island Little St. Jeff's after

himself), a mansion in London, England, a home in Paris, France, and a mansion in Palm Beach

County, FL. The allegations herein primarily concern the defendant's conduct while at his

mansion in Palm Beach County, FL.

II. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor females,

specifically targeting female children age 12 to 17, and Defendant Epstein acts on that obsession

by luring underage minor females to him where he attempts to sexually molest and batter these




2




EFTA00616148
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 3 of 29



underage minor females on an everyday basis, oftentimes 2 or 3 different underage minor

females on one day.

12. Sometime prior to 1998, Defendant Epstein devised a complex plan, scheme and criminal

enterprise to gain access to countless underage minor females, some as young as 12 years old, for

the purpose of coercing the minor females into various acts of sexual misconduct that he

committed upon them. His enterprise operated with a definite hierarchal structure with his

various employees/assistants and associates, including Defendant Sarah Kellen, Jean Luc Brunel,

Ghislaine Maxwell, Leslie Groff. Adriana Ross. Nadia Marcinkova, various housekeepers,

butlers and pilots, performing their respective roles to ensure the goals of the enterprise: operate

an organized and efficient system to maximize the number of underage minor females for

Defendant Epstein (and others) to sexually abuse and exploit while avoiding law enforcement

detection.

13. Defendant Epstein, with help from his assistants and associates, recruited and procured

underage minor females, lured them to one of his mansions, had the underage minor female

taken to a room to be alone with him, then he would appear naked or wearing only a towel and

sexually batter or otherwise sexually exploit the underage minor female. He would then pay the

underage minor female for the sex acts he committed against her (typically between $200 and

$300 per molestation session, or as his criminal enterprise commonly refers to it — per

"massage"). Prior to leaving, Defendant Epstein's assistant would get the phone number of the

underage minor female and input it into his computer system or otherwise keep it on file. He

would then offer the underage minor female to return to his house to make money in exchange

for him committing sexual acts against her, and he also typically informed her of another option -

make more money recruiting and procuring other underage minor females for him to sexually



3




EFTA00616149
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 4 of 29



abuse. He would tell the underage minor female that he will pay her for each underage minor

female that she brings to him (again, typically between $200 and $300), and he encouraged, and

oftentimes forcefully demanded, her to bring him as many underage minor females as she was

able. Through this general pitch, Defendant Epstein created a vast pyramid of underage minor

females recruiting and procuring other underage minor females for his purpose of coercing these

underage females into sexual acts for money.

14. Defendants Epstein and Kellen and the criminal enterprise specifically targeted

underprivileged and economically disadvantaged children to sexually exploit and molest and

otherwise prey upon the vulnerabilities of these young girls.

15. It is unknown exactly how long Defendant Epstein's aforementioned criminal enterprise

operated, although information and belief indicates that it was continuously and actively in

operation from at least 1998 through Defendant Epstein's criminal arrest in 2006.

16. The complete list of underage minor females that were sexually abused by Defendant

Epstein over the years is believed to have been kept on a computer system controlled by

Defendant Epstein and accessible by several of his employees, including Defendant Sarah

Kellen. It is also known that much of the data regarding the names, addresses and whereabouts

of each underage minor female was input by one of his assistants, including Defendant Kellen.

17. Defendant Sarah Kellen was listed in the Federal Non-prosecution Agreement related to

Defendant Epstein's criminal plea on sex charges against minors as a criminal co-conspirator for

her role in the criminal activity that was committed by Defendant Epstein against many underage

minor females. She was employed by Defendant Epstein to maintain his schedule, arrange for

underage minor females to be with Defendant Epstein, maintain contact with the underage minor

females, schedule the underage minor females' transportation to and from Defendant Epstein's



4




EFTA00616150
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 5 of 29



mansion, and greet the underage minor female at the house before taking her upstairs to be alone

with Mr. Epstein. Upon information and belief, Defendant Kellen remains employed by

Defendant Epstein and continues to work for Defendant Epstein in furtherance of the goals of the

criminal enterprise.

18. Defendant Epstein used his vast wealth and power to lure underprivileged minor females

to him, and to coerce them into prostitution once he was alone with the underage minor female.

He sexually battered, molested, committed lewd and lascivious acts upon and otherwise

exploited numerous underage minor females and then gave them money. So long as the

underage minor female followed his demands and advances, he assumed the role of a friend or

mentor or father figure to the minor female in an attempt to groom the minor female; however, if

any minor female resisted his sexual advances, Defendant Epstein became frustrated, angry and

threatening towards the underage minor. His intent was to groom each minor female into

engaging in sexual acts with him as well as to "work" for him, i.c. bring him other underage

minor females to sexually molest, batter and exploit. He was masterful in his exploitation and

grooming of these minor females with an additional intent of gaining trust and cooperation from

these minors to prevent any one of them from reporting his criminal acts to law enforcement.

Certain of his many co-conspirator associates, including Ghislane Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel,

helped in this recruiting process by creating the impression that legitimate modeling

opportunities were available for the minor females.

19. Through information and belief, Defendant Epstein has been successful in luring

hundreds of underage minor girls to him for the purpose of him (and sometimes others) sexually

abusing them. He intentionally preys upon underage minor females that are middle school or

high school children who are not working prostitutes, and he takes pleasure in using his power



5




EFTA00616151
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 6 of 29



and influence to coerce these minor females into acts of prostitution with him personally and

sometimes with his friends and associates as well, including but not limited to Ghislaine

Maxwell and Nadia Marcinkova.

20. Over time, Defendant Epstein fine-tuned his operation to further his goals of gaining

access to a greater number and variety of underage girls while avoiding detection by law

enforcement. He also provided the roadmap for his enterprise should the illegal sexual

exploitation of the enterprise be detected — he or the criminal enterprise would (and did) retain

legal representation for each criminal enterprise member who would instruct each member to

invoke his/her S'h amendment rights, they would hide behind the 5th amendment to avoid turning

over incriminating materials (i.e. computer system that logged information about the underage

sexual molestation victims, scheduling books, message pads, and tangible items such as vibrators

and dildos), they would destroy evidence and refuse all cooperation with law enforcement.

21. The plan and scheme was developed by Defendant Epstein, and he and his assistants and

associates carried it out with each underage minor female in a well-planned and ritualistic

manner; Epstein ran this criminal enterprise as an experienced Mob boss would run any

organized crime family — in a well-planned, organized, arrogant and ruthless manner, with

complete cooperation from his co-conspirator associates and underlings and an absolute

dedication to carrying out the illegal operations of the criminal enterprise.

22. Defendant Epstein frequently traveled between his various mansions and either he or an

authorized agent would call to inform a recruiter, assistant, or scheduler at his next destination as

to his arrival time. His scheduler, usually Defendant Sarah Kellen, would then contact an

underage minor female and schedule her to be at Defendant Epstein's mansion or to bring

another underage minor female to his mansion at a particular time. Once the minor female was



6




EFTA00616152
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 7 of 29



brought to Defendant Epstein's residence, she was greeted at the door of the mansion and lead

inside by one of Defendant Epstein's employees, oftentimes Defendant Sarah Kellen.

23. Defendant Sarah Kellen would lead the underage minor female up to Defendant Epstein's

room and leave the underage minor alone in the room. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, himself would

then appear naked or wearing only a towel. He would then demand a massage and during the

massage he would attempt, usually successfully, to perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and

sexual acts, including, but not limited to, masturbation, touching of the underage minor female's

sexual organs, coercing or forcing the underage minor female to perform sex acts with him,

using vibrators or sexual toys on the underage minor female, coercing the underage minor female

into sexual intercourse with himself or others, and digitally penetrating the underage minor

female. He would then give the Plaintiff money for engaging in this sexual activity.

24. Consistent with Defendants Epstein and Kellen's foregoing scheme or plan, in or around

the summer of 2002, Plaintiff, an economically poor and vulnerable child, was told by another

one of Epstein's underage minor sex abuse victims, that she could make $300 cash by giving an

old man a massage on Palm Beach.

25. Plaintiff's then minor acquaintance (also a sexual abuse victim of Epstein) telephoned

Defendant Epstein and scheduled for Plaintiff to go to Defendant Epstein's house to give him a

massage. During that call, Defendant Epstein himself got on the phone and spoke with Plaintiff

MJ and asked her personally to come to his mansion in Palm Beach.

26. Plaintiff then took a taxicab to Defendant Epstein's mansion and was greeted by

Epstein's top assistant, Defendant Sarah Kellen.

27. Defendant Kellen, in furtherance of the scheme to exploit Plaintiff, escorted Plaintiff

upstairs to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's large bathroom, where Defendant Kellen set up the


7




EFTA00616153
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 8 of 29



massage table and showed Plaintiff different massage lotions to use. Defendant Kellen then left

Plaintiff alone in the room. Plaintiff was alone in Defendant Epstein's bathroom until Defendant

Jeffrey Epstein emerged wearing only a towel.

28. Defendant Epstein then walked to the massage table that was already open in the room.

He lied face down on the table and told Plaintiff to start massaging him, at which time he

engaged in a conversation with Plaintiff. During the conversation, Defendant Epstein asked

Plaintiff her age and she told him she had recently turned 16.

29. Consistent with all of Defendant Epstein's known underage minor female victims,

Plaintiff had no massage experience whatsoever and she informed him of that, and Defendant

Epstein began instructing Plaintiff on how he liked his massage.

30. After approximately 15 minutes, Defendant Epstein turned over onto his back, and he

commanded Plaintiff to massage his chest.

31. Defendant Epstein then suddenly removed his towel and his penis was already erect. He

then commanded Plaintiff to remove her shin and bra and to begin "pinching his nipples" as he

began masturbating with his right hand.

32. As he was masturbating, Defendant Epstein began fondling Plaintiffs breasts.

33. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, while masturbating with his right hand, reached out his left

hand and grabbed Plaintiff's vagina and butt over her clothes. Plaintiff pushed Defendant's hand

away and told him repeatedly not to touch her like that. Epstein was persistent in his attempt to

grab Plaintiff's vagina and continued to grab her vagina and butt on multiple occasions after she

told him not to.

34. Defendant Epstein continued to masturbate his exposed penis until he ejaculated in front

of the then minor Plaintiff.



8




EFTA00616154
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 9 of 29



35. Plaintiff was shocked and embarrassed by the events and Defendant Epstein talked to her

to persuade her that everything he was doing with he was normal.

36. Epstein paid Plaintiff $300 for allowing him to grope her and masturbate in her presence.

37. Plaintiff returned to Epstein's home on approximately 20 occasions. On each occasion

Epstein grabbed Plaintiff's bare breasts, exposed his penis, masturbated and ejaculated in

Plaintiff's presence, and paid her $300 each time.

38. Defendant Epstein coerced Plaintiff into acts of prostitution, preying on her low

economic status and troubled upbringing, complimenting Plaintiff for being "special" to him and

having a "very pretty body" and making promises to Plaintiff such as — he told Plaintiff that if

she graduated high school, then he would buy her a computer, something that she wanted yet

could not afford.

39. On multiple occasions Defendant Epstein pressured Plaintiff to bring him other underage

minor females to abuse; he told Plaintiff that he would pay her $300 for each girl she brought

him, but Plaintiff refused to bring other girls.

40. Defendant Epstein told Plaintiff that he would pay her more money if she would give him

oral sex and that he would pay her $600 for actual sexual intercourse. Plaintiff refused.

41. Defendant Epstein personally called Plaintiff at least five times to tell her when she

should be at his house to "work" or give him a "massage" (Epstein's criminal enterprise's

learned code words for paying minors for Epstein and others to interact with them sexually).

42. Every other time (approximately 15) Defendant Kellen called to inform Plaintiff of the

date and time when she needed and was expected to be at Epstein's mansion to "work".

43. The acts referenced above, committed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, against the then

minor Plaintiff were committed in violation of numerous State and Federal criminal statutes


9




EFTA00616155
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 10 of 29



condemning battery, assault and the exploitation of minor children, contributing to the

delinquency of a minor and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those criminal

offenses outlined in Chapters 796, 800, and 827 of the Florida Statutes, as well as those

designated in Florida Statutes §796.03, §796.07, §796.045, §796.04, §796.09, §39.01, §450.151,

and §827.04.

44. The above-described acts took place in Palm Beach County, Florida at the residence of

the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Any assertions by Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen,

that they were unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by their actions and

rendered irrelevant by the provisions of applicable Florida Statutes concerning the sexual

exploitation and abuse of a minor child. The Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, at all

times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of the Plaintiffs minority as

Plaintiff specifically told Epstein her age and Defendant Epstein and criminal organization has a

history of seeking out underage minor children to sexually abuse. In fact, one primary goal of

the organization is to sexually abuse females who are under the age of 18, and oftentimes

Defendant Epstein has turned away females (i.e. refused to engage in sexual acts with them) for

being "too old" once she reaches 18 years of age, and he has reprimanded girls for bringing him

other girls who are over the age of majority.

45. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Defendant

Epstein entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida State crimes related to his exploitation of

minors for sex.

46. As a condition of that plea and in exchange for the Federal Government entering into a

Non-Prosecution Agreement with Defendant Epstein, wherein the Federal Government agreed to

effectively stay any prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen and other criminal co-



10




EFTA00616156
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17;2010 Page 11 of 29



conspirators Nadia Marcinkova and Leslie Groff, Defendant Epstein agreed to admit that

approximately 40 underage minor females, whose names were provided to Defendant Epstein,

were his victims. Plaintiff was not included in that list as she moved away from the West Palm

Beach area in part to escape from Epstein, and she has lived in fear of Epstein and his

organization and has not yet been contacted by law enforcement.

47. Beginning in or about June 2008 and continuing to the present time, defendant Epstein

has been aware he faces significant financial liability for his sexual offenses, both to MJ and to

many other similarly-situated girls whom he abused. MJ and these other girls are creditors of

Epstein, in that have filed and can file tort actions against him under both Florida and Federal

laws. Accordingly, Epstein has conveyed substantial assets and property into the names of other

persons and into overseas bank accounts and other financial institutions. These assets and

properties could have been attachable and used to pay the debts owed to MJ and to the other girls

that Epstein has abused.

48. As an example of the fraudulent conveyances that Epstein has attempted, in

approximately October 2009, Epstein placed his personal 727 aircraft up for sale, with the intent

that the proceeds of that sale would be hidden so that MJ and other creditors of Epstein would

not be able to secure payment from that substantial asset.

49. While Epstein is clearly distinct from the criminal enterprise that he oversees that asset,

as well as his other airplanes and helicopters and other assets, have been used continuously and

repeatedly to further the interest and endeavors of Epstein and his criminal enterprise.

50. As another example of the fraudulent transfers that Epstein has made, Epstein has titled a

Ford F-I50 Truck in the name of Larry Visoki (Epstein's personal pilot). Visoski was unaware

that the truck was titled in his name when he was questioned under oath in a deposition.


II




EFTA00616157
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09:1712010 Page 12 of 29



51. In approximately 2009, Defendant Epstein purchased a $68,000 Land Rover and

registered it in Visoski's name with the intent to hide this asset from MJ and other creditors.

52. In approximately 2009, Defendant Epstein purchased a Mercedes-Benz 2005 by wiring

funds to Visoski and then placing the car in Visoski's name.

53. In approximately 2009, Defendant Epstein bought a Jaguar X-Type 2005 so that he

(Epstein) would have another car around Palm Beach available for his friends to use and then

placed the car in Visoski's name.

54. In approximately September 2009, Visoski attempted to sell a Ferrari owned by Epstein

for $159,000. Epstein intended for the sale to hide the value of this Ferrari and prevent MJ and

other creditors from recovering from him.

55. Epstein is concealing substantial assets through a new corporation, Shmitka Air, Inc.,

whose representative is Larry Visoski. In September 2010, Epstein attempted to sell a 1999 Bell

Helicopter for approximately $1,900,000. This sale was an attempt to prevent MJ and other

creditors from recovering from him.

56. Epstein is also concealing substantial assets through an entity known at JEGE, Inc. He is

currently attempting to sell an aircraft for $10,000,000 through that entity in an attempt to

prevent MJ and other creditors from recovering from him.

57. Through information and belief, Epstein and/or his criminal enterprise provides the

financial support for his various employees, co-conspirators, other criminal enterprise members

and associates.

58. In addition to Epstein's various houses, he owns or controls other condominiums,

including approximately 8 to 10 units at 301 East 66 Street, in New York City, where certain of

his or his Criminal Enterprise associates live or reside, including Jean Luc Brunel, Nadia


12




EFTA00616158
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 13 of 29



Marcinkova, Sarah Kellen, and at times various underage minor girls are stashed at this location

as well.

59. Defendant Epstein has numerous overseas contacts and accounts and sophistication in

international business transactions. He previously served as a trader at Bcar Steams and founded

his own financial management firm, J. Epstein and Col. (later called Financial Trust Co.) located

on his private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands where, until his recent incarceration, according to

him he allegedly managed the assets of billionaire clients.

60. After extensive investigation into Epstein's employment history, including questioning of

Epstein's family, those whom Epstein considers friends and longtime employees of Epstein, the

only known client of Epstein was Limited, Inc. Founder Leslie Wexner, although it is believed

that even that relationship has been severed. No other legitimate means of income have been

reported.

COUNT I

BATTERY AGAINST DEFENDANT EPSTEIN

61. Plaintiff M.J. adopts and =lieges paragraphs I through 60 above.

62. In the summer of 2002, just after Plaintiff turned 16 years old, Defendant Epstein

committed battery against Plaintiff when he intentionally touched intimate areas of her body and

person in an offensive manner while she was a minor child.

63. Defendant Epstein intentionally touched Plaintiff MJ's private areas multiple times

against the will of MJ.

64. Defendant Epstein's tortious commission of battery upon Plaintiff was done willfully.

65. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses committed by Defendant Epstein against

the then minor Plaintiff, MJ, she has in the past suffered and will in the future suffer injury, pain



13




EFTA00616159
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09 17 2010 Page 14 of 29



and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental anguish,

humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of enjoyment of

life, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulation and

leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. Plaintiff will incur medical and

psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn

income in the future, and loss of proper and complete education. These injuries are permanent in

nature and Plaintiff MJ will continue to suffer these losses in the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff MJ demands judgment against Defendant Epstein for

compensatory damages, punitive damages and such other relief as this Court deems proper and

hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.

COUNT II
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
AGAINST DEFENDANT EPSTEIN

66. The Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 60 above.

67. Defendant Epstein's extreme and outrageous conduct towards the then minor Plaintiff

was intentional and reckless.

68. Defendant Epstein acted with the intent to cause severe emotional distress or with

reckless disregard for the high probability of causing severe emotional distress.

69. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses committed by Defendant Epstein against

the then minor Plaintiff, MJ, she has in the past suffered and will in the future suffer injury, pain

and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental anguish,

humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of enjoyment of

life, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulation and

leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. Plaintiff will incur medical and



14




EFTA00616160
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 15 of 29



psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn

income in the future, loss of proper and complete education. These injuries are permanent in

nature and Plaintiff MJ will continue to suffer these losses in the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff M.J. demands judgment against Defendant Epstein for

compensatory damages, punitive damages and such other relief as this Court deems proper and

hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.

COUNT III
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TORTIOUS ASSAULT OR BATTERY AGAINST
DEFENDANT SARAH KELLEN

70. The Plaintiff adopts and realleges paragraphs I through 60 above.

71. Defendant Kellen is one of Defendant Epstein's top assistants, as referenced previously

in this Complaint. Defendant Epstein, Defendant Kellen and others reached an agreement

amongst and between them and otherwise conspired for the purpose of allowing Defendant

Epstein and others to commit the tortious and illegal acts described above against Plaintiff MJ.

72. Defendant Kellen aided, abetted and assisted Defendant Epstein in his organized scheme

and plan to sexually exploit Plaintiff and commit battery against her and/or commit or attempt to

commit numerous other crimes against her, including coercing her into prostitution.

73. Defendant Kellen conspired with Defendant Epstein to commit tortious and illegal

conduct against Plaintiff, and in furtherance of the conspiracy Kellen specifically engaged in

overt acts such as contacting Plaintiff MJ on many occasions, scheduling the then minor

Plaintiffs appointment for a "massage" knowing that Defendant Epstein was going to commit

battery against Plaintiff, attempt sexual battery against Plaintiff, and force her into prostitution

and otherwise did everything in her ability to conceal the illegal operation and refuse cooperation

with law enforcement.



15




EFTA00616161
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 16 of 29



74. Additionally, Defendant Kellen greeted Plaintiff on the occasions when Plaintiff arrived

at Epstein's home and personally lead Plaintiff to Defendant Epstein's bathroom where Epstein

appeared for the purposes of committing crimes against Plaintiff.

75. Defendant Epstein's battery against Plaintiff was facilitated by Defendant Kellen and the

conspiracy resulted in the various aforementioned crimes being committed against Plaintiff MJ

as well as many other underage minor females.

76. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant, Sarah Kellen's, participation in the

aforementioned conspiracy, Plaintiff, MJ, she has in the past suffered and will in the future suffer

injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental

anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of

enjoyment of life, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant's

manipulation and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. Plaintiff will incur

medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the

capacity to earn income in the future, loss of proper and complete education. These injuries are

permanent in nature and Plaintiff MJ will continue to suffer these losses in the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff MJ demands judgment against Defendant Sarah Kellen for

compensatory damages, punitive damages and such other relief as this Court deems proper and

hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.

COUNTS IV THROUGH XXIII
CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS EPSTEIN AND KELLEN PURSUANT
TO IS USC 42255 IN VIOLATION OF VARIOUS ENUMERATED OFFENSES
CONTAINED WITHIN THAT FEDERAL STATUTE

77. Plaintiff, MJ, adopts and realleges paragraphs I through 60 above.

78. The allegations contained herein in Counts IV through XXIII are separate and distinct

legal remedies.

16




EFTA00616162
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 17 of 29



79. As a condition of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's criminal plea, and in exchange for the

Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the

Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal

Government; that agreement governed not only Defendant Epstein's conduct but also the

conduct of his "co-conspirators" including Defendant Kellen as she played an essential and

criminal role in the commission of these offenses.

80. The Plaintiff, MJ, was in fact a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18,

United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant,

Jeffrey Epstein, and against Defendant Kellen pursuant to this Section of the United States Code

and the agreement between the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and the United States Government.

81. Specifically, Defendants Epstein and Kellen:

(a) knowingly conspired with others known and unknown to use a facility or

means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, or entice minor females,

including Plaintiff MJ, to engage in prostitution, in violation of title IS, United States

Code, Section 2422(b).

(b) knowingly and willfully conspired with others known and unknown to travel

in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with minors,

including Plaintiff MJ, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, in violation

of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b); all in violation of Title 18, United

States Code, Section 2423(e);

(c) used a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly

persuade, induce, or entice minor females, including Plaintiff MJ, to engage in

prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b);



17




EFTA00616163
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09!1712010 Page 18 of 29



(d) traveled in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual

conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, including Plaintiff MJ; in

violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b).

82. As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned criminal offenses enumerated in

Title IS, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff,

Plaintiff, MJ, she has in the past suffered and will in the future suffer injury, pain and suffering,

emotional distress, psychological and psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation,

confusion, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, loss of enjoyment of life, invasion

of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulation and leading her into

a perverse and unhealthy way of life. Plaintiff will incur medical and psychological expenses.

These injuries are permanent in nature and Plaintiff MJ will continue to suffer these losses in the

future. Plaintiff, M.J., has also incurred attorneys' fees.

83. With regard to each of the following counts, Plaintiff suffered personal injury, as outlined

above from the acts above, as a result of the violations of federal criminal law by Defendant

Epstein enumerated in paragraph 33, on approximately 20 occasions, and while the dates are not

all precisely documented or diaried by Plaintiff, Defendants Epstein and Kellen committed these

crimes and inflicted said injuries on or about the following dates:

COUNT IV August 2002

COUNT V September 2002

COUNT VI October 2002

COUNT VII November 2002

COUNT VIII December 2002

COUNT IX January 2003



18




EFTA00616164
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 19 of 29



COUNT X February 2003

COUNT XI March 2003

COUNT XII April 2003

COUNT XIII May 2003

COUNT XIV June 2003

COUNT XV July 2003

COUNT XVI August 2003

COUNT XVII September 2003

COUNT XVIII October 2003

COUNT XIX November 2003

COUNT XX December 2003

COUNT XXI January 2004

COUNT XXII February 2004

COUNT XXIII March 2004

WHEREFORE, with regard to each and every one of these counts, Plaintiff, MJ,

demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for compensatory damages, loss of

income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, attorney's fees, and such other and

further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues

triable as of right by a jury.

COUNT XXIV
Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices

84. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs I through 60 above and for the purposes of this count

incorporates and alleges the RICO Statement that has been filed contemporaneously herewith as

Exhibit "A."

19




EFTA00616165
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17;2010 Page 20 of 29



85. The allegations contained herein in Count XXIV are a separate and distinct legal remedy

brought pursuant to Florida Statute 772.104(1) and (2).

86. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was associated with an enterprise, a group of individuals

associated in fact although not a legal entity, which was comprised of at least Defendant Jeffrey

Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, Jean Luc Brunel, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Nadia Marcinkova

(and likely many other yet unknown persons); Defendant Epstein participated in this enterprise,

or conspired or endeavored to so participate, through a pattern of criminal activity in violation of

Florida Statutes §772.103(3)-(4), as further outlined in detail in the RICO statement filed with

this court.

87. This enterprise was separate and distinct from Epstein himself and had a definite

hierarchical structure. Epstein served informally but effectively as the leader, C.E.O. or "boss"

of this organization similar to the way an experienced mob boss runs his organized crime family,

directing his underlings how to recruit and procure underage girls for his sexual activities and the

sexual activities of others, developing the use of slang or code words to be used to discuss the

illegal activities of the organization, designing a plan or scheme to gain the cooperation of

underage minor females, developing methods and techniques to otherwise avoid detection from

law enforcement including making large charitable donations to law enforcement agencies,

powerful politicians, businessmen and world leaders, associating with powerful social people

and highly influential politicians and attorneys, gathering information to blackmail or extort

powerful people, devising a plan to attack the credibility and character of anyone that dare unveil

the illegal operations of the enterprise and to take an oath to remain silent and/or lie when

confronted by law enforcement about the illegal operations and activities of the criminal

organization. Epstein's key "lieutenant" in the local Palm Beach branch of the National



20




EFTA00616166
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/1712010 Page 21 of 29



organization was Kellen, who served as both his scheduler and a recruiter/procurer of the girls.

Marcinkova also served as a recruiter and helped Epstein satisfy his criminal sexual desires by,

on occasion, directly participating in sexual abuse and prostitution of the minor girls. Epstein

also used otherwise-legitimate business activities to help further the purpose of the criminal

enterprise. These apparently legitimate activities provided "cover" for Epstein and his associates

to commit the crimes. Epstein and his associates maintained the appearance of running an

upstanding investment business, as well as other legitimate businesses with connections to

modeling agencies and other powerful business and political people, to discourage the minor

girls from reporting the abuse to law enforcement. Ghislane Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel

helped to provide "cover" by creating the impression that legitimate modeling opportunities were

available for the girls. There are many other known and unknown associates of the criminal

organization, that worked throughout the country and possibly internationally, who performed

functions to perpetuate the criminal activities of the organization.

88. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein participated in this enterprise through a pattern of criminal

activity in that he engaged in at least two incidents of criminal activity, as defined and required

in Florida Statute 772.102 and as described below, that have the same or similar intents, results,

accomplices, victims, or methods of commission and are not isolated incidents.

89. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein engaged in criminal activity by committing, attempting to

commit, conspiring to commit or soliciting, coercing or intimidating another person to commit

one or more of the following predicate acts as outlined and defined in Florida Statute 772.102:

(a) Procuring for prostitution, or causing to be prostituted, any person who is

under the age of 18 years in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.03;

(b) Acts of battery in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 784;



21




EFTA00616167
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2010 Page 22 of 29



(c) Forcing, compelling or coercing another to become a prostitute in

violation ofFlorida Statutes Chapter 796.04;

(d) knowingly recruiting, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing or

otherwise obtaining by any means a person, knowing that coercion would be used to

cause that person to engage in prostitution in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter

796.045;

(e) tampering with a witness in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 914.22;

(f) altering, destroying, removing, or concealing records or documents or

other evidence with the purpose to impair its verity or availability in violation of Florida

Statutes Chapter 918.13;

(g) maintaining a place (or more accurately "places") for the purpose of

lewdness or prostitution; offering or securing another for the purpose of prostitution or

for some other lewd or indecent act; receiving persons into his Palm Beach mansion for

the purpose of prostitution or lewdness; directing, taking or transporting or agreeing to

direct take or transport persons to his Palm Beach mansion with knowledge or reasonable

belief that the purpose of such directing, taking or transporting was prostitution or

lewdness; all in violation of Florida Statutes Chapter 796.07.

90. The criminal acts of Defendant Epstein occurred repeatedly over a substantial period of

time and were not isolated events.

91. Under Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's plan, scheme, and enterprise, Defendant, Jeffrey

Epstein, paid employees and underlings, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, to bring him

minor girls to his Palm Beach mansion in order for the Defendant to solicit, induce, coerce,

entice, compel or force such girls to engage in acts of prostitution and sexual misconduct with



22




EFTA00616168
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09 17 2010 Page 23 of 29



Defendant Epstein and sometimes Nadia Marcinkova, and to otherwise commit acts of sexual

battery thereon, and further Defendant Epstein worked in concert as part of the enterprise with

those who were free to act independently and advance their own interests, including Ghislaine

Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel, to obtain minor girls for sexual purposes.

92. Plaintiff, MJ, was the victim of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's plan, scheme, and enterprise

and was so injured by reason of his violations of the provisions of s. 772.104. Plaintiff, MJ, was

called