podesta_email_19697.txt

podesta-emails 5,793 words email

D6 P17 P22 V11 P20

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Sunday January 18, 2015 Roundup:* *Headlines:* *Associated Press: “Clinton's Democratic allies offer her an economic road map” <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/0f0c4f7a6dee47559a9344be107bf0c5/clintons-democratic-allies-offer-her-economic-road-map>* “A group of Clinton advisers offered a detailed economic agenda last week that aims to help raise wages for millions of workers and close the gap between rich and poor. The policy road map was produced at the Center for American Progress, a Washington-based think tank stocked with veterans of the Bill Clinton and Obama administrations.” *Washington Post: “Elizabeth Warren keeps pressure on Hillary Clinton and Democrats ahead of 2016” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-keeps-pressure-on-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-ahead-of-2016/2015/01/17/cc844300-9b49-11e4-a7ee-526210d665b4_story.html?postshare=5561421530653740>* “And though she is the darling of the liberals — with the organizations MoveOn.org and Democracy for America counting 244,000 signatures in their online petition drive to draft her to run for president — many of Warren’s stances do not easily lend themselves to partisan and ideological labels.” *New York Times: “Republicans Like Their 2016 Options, Assuming They Avoid Chaos” <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/us/politics/republicans-like-their-2016-options-assuming-they-avoid-chaos.html>* “So the leaders happily extolled the Noah’s Ark quality of their presidential options, comparing their sprawling field favorably with the Democrats’ flavor of one, Hillary Rodham Clinton.” *ABC News: Polls: “Huckabee vs. Clinton: Reconsider the Day Job?” <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2015/01/huckabee-vs-clinton-reconsider-the-day-job/>* “Tested in a head-to-head matchup among registered voters, Huckabee gets 39 percent support in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, vs. 56 percent for Clinton, a wide 17-point gap in presidential preference. It’s their first test in an ABC/Post poll in this cycle, and much better for Clinton than a hypothetical matchup in late 2007, when she and Huckabee ran essentially evenly among registered voters, 48-45 percent.” *Atlanta Journal-Constitution: “Clinton honored by the King Center during MLK celebration” <http://www.ajc.com/news/news/clinton-to-be-honored-by-the-king-center-during-ml/njqnT/>* "Accepting an award from The King Center on Saturday, former President Bill Clinton spoke of a modern “beloved community” — King’s vision for a world achieved through peaceful nonviolence — to inspire youth and curb global acts of terror." *Washington Free Beacon: “Mark Halperin: Clinton Insiders Worried About Hillary ‘Laying Low’ Without a Message” <http://freebeacon.com/politics/mark-halperin-clinton-insiders-worried-about-hillary-laying-low-without-a-message/>* “Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin said people close to the Hillary Clinton have told him of their concern that she still doesn’t have a message to run on.” *Articles:* *Associated Press: “Clinton's Democratic allies offer her an economic road map” <http://bigstory.ap.org/article/0f0c4f7a6dee47559a9344be107bf0c5/clintons-democratic-allies-offer-her-economic-road-map>* By Ken Thomas January 18, 2015, 9:09 a.m. EST WASHINGTON (AP) — Inside the Democratic Party, economic policy is often seen as a contest between President Barack Obama's track record and the anti-Wall Street approach advocated by Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. As Hillary Rodham Clinton heads for an expected 2016 run for president, her allies are pointing her toward something in-between. A group of Clinton advisers offered a detailed economic agenda last week that aims to help raise wages for millions of workers and close the gap between rich and poor. The policy road map was produced at the Center for American Progress, a Washington-based think tank stocked with veterans of the Bill Clinton and Obama administrations. It appeared to target those who are disenchanted with Obama and skeptical that Clinton effectively would police Wall Street and champion middle-class workers. "While there are large forces, globalization, technology and more, that are creating large challenges for many workers, there is no excuse or intellectual basis for fatalism," said Larry Summers, one of its authors and a former treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton who later worked for Obama. The subject is clearly on Hillary Clinton's mind. In her first tweet in more than a month, she posted this Friday: "Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong. Better for Congress to focus on jobs and wages for middle-class families." Campaigning for Democrats last fall, she often spoke of the need to return to an economic system of broadly shared prosperity. That goal has eluded Obama, even though he is able to point to a rebounding economy, falling unemployment rates and lower gas prices. Obama, in Tuesday's State of the Union, plans to propose raising the capital gains rate on the wealthy and eliminating a tax break on inheritances. The plan is a nonstarter with Republicans, but Obama will make the case for using the additional revenue for new tax credits and other benefits for the middle class. Warren, in a speech this month to the AFL-CIO, said that despite stronger economic growth and a soaring stock market, "America's middle class is in deep trouble." Liberals say the problem of stagnant wages require urgent action. "We need to be extremely aggressive to deal with income and wealth inequality," said Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who may seek the Democratic presidential nomination. Republicans such as Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney are beginning to articulate their own agenda for addressing income inequality, reflecting an expected argument that Obama's policies have not helped millions of workers. "Their liberal policies are good every four years for a campaign, but they don't get the job done," Romney said in a speech last week to the Republican National Committee. Clinton's template has been the 1990s, during her husband's two terms, and Summers noted that many of the ideas in the report built upon the "Putting People First" agenda from Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign. It also cited some of the chief parts of Obama's economic program, such as efforts to raise the federal minimum wage, spend more on roads, bridges and public works, offer paid leave for workers and help students pay for college. But the report also offered other ideas with broad appeal in the party: tax credits for middle-class families, incentives for employees to partake in profit-sharing, attention to collective bargaining rights and tying the repayment of student loans to a graduate's income earned over two decades or more. Those responsible for the report have strong Clinton connections. Along with Summers, the commission included the center's president and CEO, Neera Tanden, a former Hillary Clinton policy adviser; former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a leader of a political action committee set to back a Clinton candidacy; and Steven Rattner, who was chief adviser to Obama's auto bailout task force and is a longtime Clinton donor. Clinton, who returns to the speaking circuit in Canada this coming week, has said she would offer a "very specific agenda" if she runs for president. Some progressives said that while the new report offered good ideas, it had deficiencies. Most notably, it does not advocate for the breakup of Wall Street banks, which Warren has sought, and does not push for a higher minimum wage beyond the $10.10 pushed by Obama. Anna Galland, executive director of MoveOn.org, noted the role of lobbyists only had a passing reference in the findings. "In some areas, the report represents a largely Washington establishment perspective, and isn't as bold as folks outside the Beltway are probably ready for," Galland said. Jared Bernstein, a former economic adviser to Vice President Joe Biden, said much of the report offered ideas that could unite broad parts of the Democratic coalition. He said it built upon a growing understanding in the party, in the aftermath of the November elections, that simple economic growth is not enough to lift the fortunes of middle-class workers. "I don't think the 2014 midterms were some sort of fluke. If you don't give people a reason to get up and go vote for you, I'd expect them to sit down and stay home or vote for somebody else," he said. "So you can't assume based on demographics or race or income class that the electorate is going to support you. ... You have to do precisely the kind of policy work that this group is offering us." *Washington Post: “Elizabeth Warren keeps pressure on Hillary Clinton and Democrats ahead of 2016” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-keeps-pressure-on-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-ahead-of-2016/2015/01/17/cc844300-9b49-11e4-a7ee-526210d665b4_story.html?postshare=5561421530653740>* By Karen Tumulty January 17, 2015, 4:07 p.m. EST Sen. Elizabeth Warren has an explanation for the singular nature of her power. “I’ll always be an outsider. That’s how I understand the world,” the Massachusetts Democrat said in an interview. “There’s a real benefit to being clear about this. I know why I’m here. I think about this every morning before I open my eyes, and I’m still thinking about it every night when I go to sleep.” Being the target of that kind of focus can be an excruciating experience — the freshest case in point being investment banker Antonio Weiss, whom President Obama put forward last year as his nominee for Treasury undersecretary for domestic finance. Initially seen as a highly credentialed and noncontroversial pick for a low-profile post, Weiss found himself up against a storm of opposition, led by Warren, who said he was yet another example of Wall Street cronyism within the Obama administration. On Monday, Weiss wrote a letter to the president asking that his name be taken out of consideration. The tussle sent yet another signal, maybe the clearest yet, of how Warren intends to wield her growing clout. It showed that she and her brand of populism are forces to be reckoned with — not only by Obama and his team, but also by the Democrats’ likely 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton. “It’s not about Antonio Weiss personally,” said Simon Johnson, an outspoken Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor and former International Monetary Fund chief economist who admires Warren and shares her views. “What it’s really about is the presidential election.” No small amount of speculation has centered on whether Warren herself will run for the White House in 2016. She insists that she will not. But her advisers and longtime allies say that she intends to keep the pressure on Clinton, to make sure the former secretary of state pays more than lip service to the issues that matter to Warren. She is training her heat vision not on the Oval Office, but two doors down the hall on the Cabinet Room. Warren wants to make sure that Wall Street-aligned figures who have shaped the Clinton and Obama brand of economic policy for the past quarter-century, going back to former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, are not the only ones at the oval mahogany table. “The worst case for us is that [Clinton] gives a feisty speech now and then, but surrounds herself with the same old” economic gurus, said one longtime Warren ally, insisting upon anonymity to speak frankly. A powerhouse fundraiser who taps the passions of the liberal base, Warren also believes she can loosen the political grip of the financial industry, which pours more money into elections than any other industry, most of it in recent years to Democrats. “She’s a disruptive force, because she stands outside the basic transactional proposition that has dominated Washington for a generation,” said AFL-CIO policy chief Damon Silvers, who was Warren’s deputy on the congressional oversight panel that monitored the government’s $700-­billion Wall Street bailout known as the Troubled Assets Relief Program. In other words, there is an argument to be made that Warren could get more of what she wants by holding herself outside the 2016 fray than by jumping in. In a speech this month before the union federation, Warren took several not-so-subtle jabs at both Hillary Clinton and former president Bill Clinton, whose economic record of growth and balanced budgets are expected to be one of his wife’s major selling points. The Massachusetts senator suggested that the policies, many of which began in the 1980s, are nothing to brag or be nostalgic about. “Pretty much the whole Republican Party — and, if we’re going to be honest, too many Democrats — talked about the evils of ‘big government’ and called for deregulation,” Warren said. “It sounded good, but what it was really about was tying the hands of regulators and turning loose big banks and giant international corporations to do whatever they wanted to do.’’ Warren also singled out a company on whose board Hillary Clinton sat for six years when she was first lady of Arkansas: “If you work at Wal-Mart, and you are paid so little that you still need food stamps to put groceries on the table, what does more money in stockholders’ pockets and an uptick in GDP do for you?” A Clinton spokesman did not respond to requests for comment. Warren’s appeal lies in her ability to frame complex financial issues, strip them of their jargon and connect them to the workaday struggles of average Americans who are not feeling the benefits of an improving economy. “She represents a focus on economics that is not unique. She does have a unique ability to explain things extraordinarily well,” said Democratic pollster Mark Mellman. Warren also brings an expertise honed over decades as a well-regarded academic who did groundbreaking research into bankruptcy and other factors that have made the middle class more fragile. It is hard to think of a precedent for the role she has carved out in the Senate. “I think she’s brought some extraordinary credentials to this job in the public policy area. The only analogy I can think of is a former first lady,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (Ill.), the Senate’s second-ranking Democrat. Durbin paused a moment, and added: “That’s an interesting analogy, on a lot of levels.” Warren’s critics, however, say she often steps over the line between simplifying things and being simplistic. Former treasury secretary Timothy F. Geithner tangled with Warren in her pre-Senate days, when she was a Harvard Law School professor heading the TARP oversight board. The hearings that Warren conducted “often felt more like made-for-YouTube inquisitions than serious inquiries,” Geithner wrote in “Stress Test,” his 2014 memoir. “She was worried about the right things, but she was better at impugning our choices — as well as our integrity and our competence — than identifying any feasible alternatives.” Weiss’s defenders saw the same traits at work in her opposition to his nomination. It was not a total victory for Warren, given that Weiss will instead be given the title of “counselor” to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, a position that does not require Senate confirmation. The Washington Post editorial page called Warren and her allies’ case against Weiss “a grab-bag of symbolism and epithets, not a ration­ale.” New York Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin called her outrage “misdirected,” “misinformed,” and “just another campaign talking point.” Warren turned Obama’s pick into “a pawn in a struggle for the heart of the Democratic Party,” former investment banker Steven Rattner, who was lead adviser in the Obama administration’s automobile industry rescue, said in an interview shortly before Weiss’s withdrawal. But more than a few Democrats believe Warren is lighting the path forward for their party. At Sen. Harry M. Reid’s (D-Nev.) first senior staff meeting after the 2014 midterm elections that cost their party control of the Senate, the soon-to-be-minority leader passed around copies of an op-ed by Warren that had run a few days earlier in The Post. “For all the talk of change in Washington and in states where one party is taking over from another, one thing has not changed: The stock market and gross domestic product keep going up, while families are getting squeezed hard by an economy that isn’t working for them,” Warren wrote. Two days after that meeting, Reid appointed Warren to a spot in the Senate leadership he created just for her. But if that created any impression that she had somehow been brought into the tent, Warren dispelled it during the lame-duck congressional session. She waged a full-throated campaign that nearly killed a spending bill, negotiated by Reid, that included a provision that would weaken restrictions on risky trades by big banks. Warren raises money on a level that few people who are not named Clinton or Obama can match. More than 350,000 donors gave a stunning $42 million to her 2012 Senate race, half of them in amounts of $25 or less. She was one of the most sought-after Democrats in last year’s election season, raising more than $6 million for the party and its candidates, and campaigning in 16 states that included such bastions of conservatism as West Virginia and Kentucky. And Warren has already weighed in for California Attorney General Kamala Harris to replace retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer in 2016. Warren can maintain her intensity in part because her scope is relatively narrow — focusing on financial regulation and issues such as Social Security and student loans that have a direct effect on middle-class family budgets. While she hews to her party’s line on most questions, she leaves it to others to take the lead on fights over abortion or foreign policy or climate change. And though she is the darling of the liberals — with the organizations MoveOn.org and Democracy for America counting 244,000 signatures in their online petition drive to draft her to run for president — many of Warren’s stances do not easily lend themselves to partisan and ideological labels. In her December battle against the loosening of restrictions on derivatives trading, for instance, she found herself on the same side as Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) and David Stockman, who was Ronald Reagan’s budget director. “I just hate this typecasting of her as this sort of far-left Massachusetts liberal. She was basically making a conservative, market-oriented argument,” former Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation chairwoman Sheila Bair said. Bair, a Republican, added that Warren is “the only Democrat I ever supported or campaigned for in a general election.” Sen. Joe Manchin III (W.Va.), widely regarded as the Senate’s most conservative Democrat, sat next to Warren for two years on the Senate Banking Committee and said: “There’s a lot of things we have in common about the fairness and equity of the system.” He, too, opposed the rollback of the derivatives trading restriction and Weiss’s nomination. Warren’s main legislative cause these days is holding the line against efforts to weaken the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which established a new federal agency, the Consumer Protection Financial Bureau, that she proposed and championed. With Democrats now in the minority in Congress, there is not much she can do to stop what former representative Barney Frank (D-Mass.), an author of the law, described as the “somewhat unexpected ferocity of the Republican attack on the reform bill.” But Warren can make it far more difficult for members of her own party to go along. “You ask me what I learned since I’ve been here?” she said. “One of the biggest things I’ve learned is that to be effective, you have to attack a problem from every angle. That can be through introducing legislation, bringing up an issue at a hearing, writing letters, every possible way to push on the issues that you care about. To draw people’s attention to them. To say, ‘This matters.’ “There are many different ways to get things done in Washington,” she added. Warren sounded like someone who is not running for president — but who is determined to leave her mark on anyone who is. *New York Times: “Republicans Like Their 2016 Options, Assuming They Avoid Chaos” <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/us/politics/republicans-like-their-2016-options-assuming-they-avoid-chaos.html>* By Jonathan Martin January 17, 2015 CORONADO, Calif. — At the end of the last Democratic presidential administration, Republicans hungry to recapture the White House rallied behind an all-but-anointed candidate to take on Bill Clinton’s heir apparent of that era. “We settled on George Bush way before the campaign,” said Rob Gleason, the longtime Pennsylvania Republican chairman. With a word more pungent than “slop,” Mr. Gleason recalled, “Everybody was happy: He flew us all down to Austin, and we were like pigs in slop.” The bulwark provided by such establishment backing enabled Mr. Bush to withstand the insurgent campaign of Senator John McCain, and win the nomination. That era of Republican coronations appears to be over. If it was not apparent by the sheer number of prospective Republican candidates — currently enough to field a football team, on both sides of the ball — it was underlined by Mitt Romney’s sudden declaration of interest in another campaign and the subsequent reaction: Get in line. As the Republican National Committee gathered in this seaside enclave for its winter meeting, party officials attempted to strike a balance between accommodating their vocal conservative wing, which is in no mood for a coronation, and pragmatic Republicans consumed chiefly with finding the most viable candidate for a general election. So the leaders happily extolled the Noah’s Ark quality of their presidential options, comparing their sprawling field favorably with the Democrats’ flavor of one, Hillary Rodham Clinton. At the same time, they agreed to limit the number of primary debates to nine sanctioned forums and moved forward with calendar rules aimed at terminating the contest by the end of March — steps designed to ensure a short, orderly process. “On one hand it’s exciting, and on the other hand it brings great risk,” Reince Priebus, the Republican National Committee chairman, said of the approaching campaign’s uncertain nature. “It means that there’s even a greater responsibility on the national party to contain a process that could get out of control.” The meeting featured four potential candidates as well as aides to twice as many prospects visiting with the state committee heads and members. But many of the activists were in no rush to make commitments, and even some of the operatives who, by their nature, want to find a winning pick seemed inclined to stay on the sidelines. Mr. Romney’s signal that he may run has roiled the race, but the waters were hardly placid before he stepped forward. Unlike many Republican nominating contests, this campaign is beginning with no dominant front-runner. Former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida appeals to some establishment-aligned Republicans, particularly donors, but party hard-liners are resistant. Center-right Republicans are skeptical that another Bush can be elected president, and want to see how rank-and-file primary voters receive him. And with Mr. Romney now considering a third bid, some of the movement toward Mr. Bush will taper off, at least momentarily. “Romney putting his foot in the door slows down that process,” said Ryan Call, the Colorado Republican chairman. “It creates an opening and opportunity for other candidates to get some oxygen.” One of those hopefuls is Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, who used a speech here to call for Republicans to embrace “a new, fresh approach.” The remarks were explicitly aimed at Mrs. Clinton, but there was little doubt that Mr. Walker also was trying to set himself apart from Mr. Bush and Mr. Romney. Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey has also begun making the case privately to Republican leaders that nominating Mr. Bush or Mr. Romney would rob the party of a chance to portray Mrs. Clinton as a relic, according to one party official who recently met with Mr. Christie. In addition to the establishment-oriented Republicans, even more hopefuls are vying for the support of ideologically driven activists. As with the center-right group, there are both familiar and fresher faces. Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas all have experience running for president and are lining up again. Then there are such newer prospects as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and the neurosurgeon Ben Carson. “There is an ongoing discussion about whether we look forward or whether we look back as a party,” Mr. Call said. “Do you look to the past, candidates who have run before that are battle tested, that have a strong infrastructure? Or do we as a party try to find a new standard-bearer that can embody the future?” Whichever direction the party takes, choosing a nominee may be messier than the Republican National Committee would like. The committee has encouraged a front-loading of the primary calendar by allowing states beyond the traditional four that kick off the contest — Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada — to begin holding winner-take-all primaries on March 15. With the early states staggered throughout February, The idea is to “have about a 60-day primary,” as Mr. Priebus put it. But conversations here raised the possibility that the new calendar could actually prolong the contest. That is because some Southern states, including delegate-rich Texas, are weighing holding their primaries on March 1. If there is no clear establishment leader after the initial four contests in February, then a Super Tuesday at the beginning of March in Southern states could scatter delegates among a number of conservative candidates. “This may be the first time there really is a chance since ’76 where you don’t know the outcome before you go into the convention,” said Steve Munisteri, the Texas party chairman, referring to the clash between Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan. Mr. Priebus dismisses that possibility. For now, he and his fellow Republicans are trying to put the best face on what he called “drama, intrigue and excitement,” but what could look more like chaos. “We’re not going to shut down people,” said Mr. Gleason, the Pennsylvania chairman, adding, “We might have 20 people at the first debate.” Envisioning such a prospect, Mr. Gleason recalibrated. “We don’t want 20,” he said. “We’d have to stretch it out to four hours or something.” *ABC News: Polls: “Huckabee vs. Clinton: Reconsider the Day Job?” <http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2015/01/huckabee-vs-clinton-reconsider-the-day-job/>* By Gary Langer January 18, 2015, 8:58 a.m. EST It’s almost enough to reconsider quitting the day job: Mike Huckabee’s got a steep hill to climb should he face off against Hillary Clinton for the presidency in 2016. Tested in a head-to-head matchup among registered voters, Huckabee gets 39 percent support in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, vs. 56 percent for Clinton, a wide 17-point gap in presidential preference. It’s their first test in an ABC/Post poll in this cycle, and much better for Clinton than a hypothetical matchup in late 2007, when she and Huckabee ran essentially evenly among registered voters, 48-45 percent. Huckabee, a guest today on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, resigned his Fox News job earlier this month and said he’s exploring another run for the Republican presidential nomination. He’s on a book tour the next few weeks, including three stops in Iowa, where the voting starts in a year. Additional candidate matchups and attitudes about the 2016 contest will be covered later this week in a subsequent analysis of the latest ABC/Post poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates. In one striking difference in their support profiles, Clinton’s backed by 92 percent of Democrats who are registered to vote (6 percent cross over to Huckabee), while Huckabee’s backed by fewer Republicans (79 percent, with 14 percent going to Clinton and 7 percent simply taking a pass.) Further, Clinton leads Huckabee among independents, potentially a swing voting group, by 52-41 percent. Huckabee, an ordained Southern Baptist minister, holds a broad 68-27 percent lead over Clinton among evangelical white Protestants, a core Republican group and one in which he did especially well in his 2008 campaign for the GOP nomination. However, that flips to a 55-39 percent race, Clinton-Huckabee, among non-evangelical white Protestants. And, typical for a Democrat, Clinton has a vast lead among nonwhites, 81-15 percent – an ongoing challenge for the GOP as nonwhites grow as a proportion of the electorate. Clinton leads Huckabee among women by 24 points, and does particularly well among younger adults, with a 65-32 percent advantage among registered voters who are under 40. Unusually for a Democrat, Clinton is competitive with Huckabee even in rural areas, customarily a GOP stronghold, as well as the suburbs, while she’s trouncing him in urban areas, 66-29 percent. Ideology is another strong differentiator. Huckabee leads Clinton by 73-22 percent among Americans who identify themselves as “very” conservative, and by a much closer 16 points among somewhat conservatives. Clinton, though, comes back with a 62-33 percent result among moderates and 81-15 percent among liberals, who together account for 60 percent of all registered voters. Clinton’s lead today, of course, is no assurance of what may happen in 2016. There are hats to drop, campaigns to pursue, nominations to win – and many months ahead for voters to come to their final judgments. METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Jan. 12-15, 2015, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,003 adults, including 843 registered voters, including landline and cell-phone-only respondents. Results have margins of sampling error of 3.5 and 4 points for the general population and registered voters, respectively, including design effect. Partisan divisions are 30-24-37 percent, Democrats-Republicans-independents, among the general population, and 33-26-33 percent among registered voters. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt-SRBI of New York, N.Y. *Atlanta Journal-Constitution: “Clinton honored by the King Center during MLK celebration” <http://www.ajc.com/news/news/clinton-to-be-honored-by-the-king-center-during-ml/njqnT/>* By Katie Leslie January 17, 2015, 9:38 p.m. EST Accepting an award from The King Center on Saturday, former President Bill Clinton spoke of a modern “beloved community” — King’s vision for a world achieved through peaceful nonviolence — to inspire youth and curb global acts of terror. Referencing recent attacks, Clinton spoke of the dangers in a “shame-based” cultures, saying “they are a curse on the young.” “The young need to believe, and they need to believe somebody’s got their back and wants them to live up to their God-given capacity,” he said. “We must stop raising them in shame and raise them in pride.” The King Center is honoring Clinton during its Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. observance this weekend. On Saturday he received the center’s highest honor, the Salute to Greatness Award, for his work with The Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. Hillary Clinton, widely seen as the likely Democratic nominee for the 2016 presidential election, did not attend the awards dinner at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Atlanta. The Salute to Greatness Awards dinner is one of several key events during a 10-day celebration of King’s life. On Monday, the King Center will host its commemorative service at Ebenezer Baptist Church to celebrate his legacy, and that of his late wife, Coretta Scott King. Speaking to a sold-out crowd, Clinton referenced sequencing the human genome as a key achievement of his second term at the White House, noting to the diverse audience that barring age-related differences, humans are genetically “99.5 percent the same.” “It’s a fool’s error not to spend more of our lives times focusing on those things we have in common,” he said. “That is the only way to create a beloved community and turn our differences into advantage, and that is what this is about.” Kaiser Permanente, led by CEO Bernard Tyson, was also recognized by The King Center for its work promoting diversity in the workplace and philanthropic efforts. King’s sister, Dr. Christine King Farris, received a “legacy of service” award for her work in helping establish The King Center. The awards program also honored hotelier Harris Rosen for his educational community service initiative, Tangelo Park Program, in Orlando; and local teen Aidan Hornaday, who raises money for charity through music. Introducing Reed to the packed house, Moore joked: “Don’t mess with him on Twitter.” Blitzer later added: “Those of us who follow you…are fully aware of your excellent capabilities on social media.” Reed, who took the jokes in stride, told the crowd that King’s legacy has been vital in building Atlanta as the “economic and cultural hub of the Southeast.” The mayor said King’s legacy is felt worldwide, adding that during his November trip to Rome to celebrate the Summit of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, he was “struck by how many Nobel laureates cited Martin Luther King Jr. as the reason for their work.” *Washington Free Beacon: “Mark Halperin: Clinton Insiders Worried About Hillary ‘Laying Low’ Without a Message” <http://freebeacon.com/politics/mark-halperin-clinton-insiders-worried-about-hillary-laying-low-without-a-message/>* [No Writer Mentioned] January 18, 2015, 12:05 p.m. EST Clinton insiders are concerned about Hillary Clinton “laying low” with a lack of message as prospective Republican candidates make aggressive moves. Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin said people close to the Hillary Clinton have told him of their concern that she still doesn’t have a message to run on. There is also a growing concern among those within the party that the Republican field is generating more intrigue than their own field or lack thereof. While numerous major contenders signal they are going to enter the race on the right, almost no serious candidate has stepped up to challenge Hillary Clinton for the Democrat nomination. Elizabeth Warren’s name has been tossed around as a champion of the far left who could generate more energy and enthusiasm out of the liberal base. Warren, however, has said repeatedly that she is not running. Her ruling out of a run has Democrats searching fervently for an alternative to the 67 year old former Secretary of State. “The Democrats have to hope serious people jump in the race and run against Hillary Clinton because right now there is so much energy on the Republican side, people feel great about the field and it was told to me there is drama and intrigue that is good that gets people to pay attention to us,” CBS’s Nancy Cordes added. “When John McCain sealed up the nomination, early in 2008, that was bad for him and he kind of sat around and wasn’t the story for months while Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama duked it out and that really hurt him.” With their likely nominee still struggling to find a reason to run for office, Democrats find themselves without a message heading into the 2016 cycle. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · January 21 – Saskatchewan, Canada: Sec. Clinton keynotes the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce’s “Global Perspectives” series (MarketWired <http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/former-us-secretary-state-hillary-rodham-clinton-deliver-keynote-address-saskatoon-1972651.htm> ) · January 21 – Winnipeg, Canada: Sec. Clinton keynotes the Global Perspectives series (Winnipeg Free Press <http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Clinton-coming-to-Winnipeg--284282491.html> ) · February 24 – Santa Clara, CA: Sec. Clinton to Keynote Address at Inaugural Watermark Conference for Women (PR Newswire <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillary-rodham-clinton-to-deliver-keynote-address-at-inaugural-watermark-conference-for-women-283200361.html> ) · March 4 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton to fundraise for the Clinton Foundation (WSJ <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/01/15/carole-king-hillary-clinton-live-top-tickets-100000/> ) · March 19 – Atlantic City, NJ: Sec. Clinton keynotes American Camp Association conference (PR Newswire <http://www.sys-con.com/node/3254649>)