📄 Extracted Text (2,279 words)
FILED Sy DD D.C.
May 27, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STOCJI IL !ANYONE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CtIlls MST. CT.
S.o. Of VIA. MIAMI
11-60124Sfl- LOCH/ROSENBAUM
18 U.S.C. §371
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHEN CAPUTI,
Defendant.
INFORMATION
The United States Attorney charges that, at all times relevant to this Information:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, E. (hereinafter referred to as "RRA") was a law
firm with offices located at 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida and elsewhere.
The law firm employed approximately seventy attorneys and engaged in the practice of law involving
a wide range of specialties, including labor and employment law.
2. Scott W. Rothstein (hereinafter referred to as - Rothstein") was an attorney and the
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chairman of RRA.
3. TD Bank..., (hereinafter referred to as - TD Bank") was a large commercial bank
with branch offices in 13 states. including offices in Weston, Florida and Deerfield Beach, Florida.
The executive offices of TD Bank were located in Portland, Maine and Cherry Hill. New Jersey.
EFTA00912234
4. Rothstein and RRA maintained approximately 38 bank accounts at TD Bank during
the dates set forth below..
COUNT 1
(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. §371)
1. The General Allegations of this Information, numbered 1 through 4, are real leged and
expressly incorporated herein as if set forth in full.
2. From in or about 2007 through in or about October 2009, in Broward County in the
Southern District of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant,
STEPHEN CAPUTI,
did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with Rothstein and with other
persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney to commit an offense against the United
States of America, that is, to devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud and for
obtaining money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations,
and promises, and, for the purpose of executing, and attempting to execute, such scheme and artifice
to defraud and for obtaining money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent
pretenses, representations, and promises, to knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted by means
of wire communication in interstate and foreign commerce, certain signs, signals, and sounds, in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (Wire Fraud).
The Purpose and Object of the Conspiracy
3. The purpose and object of the conspiracy was to enrich the members of the conspiracy
by various means, including obtaining investors' money for their own use and benefit and the benefit
of others through the operation of a fraudulent investment scheme.
2
EFTA00912235
The Manner and Means of the Conspiracy
THE FRAUDULENT INVESTMENT SCHEME
4. It was part of the conspiracy that, beginning in or about 2007, Rothstein and other co-
conspirators began operating a fraudulent investment scheme.
5. It was further part of the conspiracy that the potential investors in the fraudulent
investment scheme were informed that either RRA or firms affiliated with RRA represented alleged
potential plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as "plaintiffs") in sexual harassment, discrimination and/or
whistle-blower suits and that settlements of these claims had been negotiated prior to the filing of
law suits.
6. It was further part of the conspiracy that potential investors were informed that,
pursuant to the aforesaid settlement agreements, the terms thereof were to remain confidential.
7. It was further part of the conspiracy that potential investors were informed that the
plaintiffs would accept discounted lump-sum payments, that the investors would fund the lump-sum
the
payments to the alleged plaintiffs, and that, in exchange, potential investors would receive
installment payments due and owing to the plaintiffs under the terms of the negotiated settlement
agreements.
8. It was further part of the conspiracy that the potential investors were informed by
Rothstein and other co-conspirators that pools of confidential settlement agreements were available
for purchase in amounts ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars.
9. It was further part of the conspiracy that potential investors were told that the amounts
and RRA,
due the alleged plaintiffs were paid into trust accounts at TD Bank controlled by Rothstein
and that said funds would only be utilized to pay the potential investors.
3
EFTA00912236
10. It was further part of the conspiracy that investors funds, consisting of wire transfers
in interstate and foreign commerce, were sent into and out of accounts maintained at TD Bank.
11. It was further part of the conspiracy that, in fact, there were no such plaintiffs who
had entered into the above-described confidential settlement agreements. Instead, Rothstein would
utilize the funds obtained from investors to further the fraudulent scheme by (a) paying prior
investors in the scheme; (b) supplementing and supporting the operation and activities of RRA; (c)
distributing lavish gifts, including exotic automobiles, jewelry, boats, loans, cash and bonuses, to
individuals and members of RRA in order to engender goodwill and loyalty and to create the
appearance of a successful law firm; (d) making political contributions to local, state and federal
political candidates; (e) making large monetary contributions to public and private charitable
institutions, including hospitals and other legitimate charitable and nonprofit organizations, in order
to deflect any negative scrutiny by the public and/or law enforcement agencies and to create the
public impression of altruism and commitment to the community; and (1) creating the appearance
of affluence and wealth, by purchasing expensive real and personal property, in order to convince
potential investors of the legitimacy of RRA and of the purported investment opportunities.
THE COCONSPIRATORS
12. It was further part of the scheme that, at different times, Rothstein would utilize co-
conspirators to assist him in carrying out various aspects of the fraudulent investment scheme,
including the following: attorneys, who would falsely claim to represent the alleged plaintiffs in the
sexual harassment, discrimination, and/or whistle-blower suits; bank officials, who would provide
false documents and other misleading information to investors in order to make it appear that the
funds purportedly being held in the trust accounts for the plaintiffs had not been dissipated;
4
EFTA00912237
"independent verifiers," who would purport to verify that the persons and entities entering into the
confidential settlement agreements were genuine and that there were sufficient funds in the trust
accounts at TD Bank to pay the investors; accountants and/or bookkeepers, who would transfer funds
between the various trust accounts and other bank accounts in order to perpetuate the fraudulent
investment scheme; computer experts, who would create false bank statements and web sites in order
to make it appear to investors that the funds purportedly being held in the trust accounts for the
plaintiffs had not been dissipated; office workers at RRA, who would create false documents in
connection with the purported confidential settlement agreements; persons who would pose as the
purported plaintiffs claiming to be entitled to a settlement from the litigation; and financial advisors,
who would induce investors through fraudulent misrepresentations to send hundreds of millions of
dollars to Rothstein to purchase the fictitious confidential settlement agreements.
A PERSON POSING AS A BANKER
13. It was further part of the conspiracy that investors and their representatives, both
before and after having invested in the fraudulent scheme, would perform due diligence in an attempt
to verify that funds were being held in trust accounts at TD Bank in accordance with the terms of
their investments.
14. It was further part of the conspiracy that Rothstein would arrange for investors arid
bank
their representatives to be taken to branches of TD Bank for the purpose of confirming with
of
officials that funds were being held in trust accounts at TD Bank in accordance with the terms
their investments.
15. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant CAPUTI agreed to pose as a TD
Bank official during meetings with investors.
5
EFTA00912238
16. It was further part of the conspiracy that Rothstein would contact TD Bank officials,
generally at the Weston, Florida branch, and request the use of a conference room at the bank.
17. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant CAPUTI would obtain from a co-
conspirator fraudulent bank statements which falsely reflected the balances of trust accounts at TD
Bank.
18. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant CAPUTI would travel to the TD
Bank branch and wait in the conference room for the investors or their representatives.
19. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant CAPUTI would meet investors
or their representatives at the TD Bank branch and falsely introduced himself as a customer service
representative of TD Bank.
20. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant CAPUTI would hand the investors
or their representatives the fraudulent bank statements, which the investors would compare to
fraudulent bank statements previously provided by Rothstein, thus inducing the investors or their
representatives into believing that balances existed in the accounts sufficient to fund their
investments when, in fact, they did not.
A PERSON POSING AS A PLAINTIFF
21. It was further part of the conspiracy that certain investors requested to meet with
plaintiffs who ostensibly were entering into the confidential settlement agreements.
22. It was further part of the conspiracy that Rothstein solicited defendant CAPUTI to
pose as such a plaintiff.
6
EFTA00912239
23. It was further part of the conspiracy that, in the presence of various potential
investors, defendant CAPUTI executed settlement documents which falsely purported that defendant
CAPUTI was entitled to settlement proceeds totaling $10,000,000.
24. It was further part of the conspiracy that, shortly after meeting with defendant
CAPUTI, various investors agreed to invest $5,000,000 in the fraudulent investment scheme.
OVERT ACT
In furtherance of the conspiracy and to achieve the purpose and object thereof, the defendant
and his coconspirators committed and caused to be committed in the Southern District of Florida and
elsewhere, at least the following act, among others:
1. On or about September 25, 2009, defendant CAPUTI met with two potential investors
in the fraudulent investment scheme and posed as a plaintiff who purportedly had entered into a
$10,000.000 settlement.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
J
ASSIST TES ATTORNEY
PA
A ATES ATTORNEY
LAW,KENCE D. VECCHIO
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
7
EFTA00912240
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO.
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY*
STEPHEN CAPUTI,
Defendant.
Superseding Case Information:
Court Division: (select one) New Defendant(s) Yes No
Number of New Defendants
Miami Key West Total number of counts
_X_ FTL WPB FTP
I do hereby certify that:
1. I have carefully considered the allegations of the indictment, the number of defendants, the number of
probable witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Information attached hereto.
I am aware that the information supplied on this statement will be relied upon by the Judges of this
2.
Court in settin_g their calendars and scheduling criminal trials under the mandate of the Speedy Trial Act,
Title 28 U.S.C. Section 3161.
3. Interpreter: (Yes or No) Mn
__
List language and/or dialect
4. This case will take _0__ days for the parties to try.
5. Please check appropriate category and type of offense listed below:
(ChOCk only MC (Chock arty ono)
I 0 to 5 days _X__ Petty
II 6 to 10 days Minor
III 11 to 20 days Misdem.
IV 21 to 60 days Felony
V 61 days and over
Mn
__
6. Has this case been previously filed in this District Court? (Yes or No)
If yes:
Judge: Case No.
(Attach copy of dispositive order)
Has a complaint been filed in this matter? (Yes or No) Mn
__
If yes:
Magistrate Case No.
Related Miscellaneous numbers:
Defendant(s) in federal custody as of
Defendant(s) in state custody as of
Rule 20 from the District of
Is this a potential death penalty case? (Yes or No) Jyn
7. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to
April 1. 2003? Yes _If_ No
8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to
April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No
If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No
prior
9. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office
to October 14, 2003? Yes X- No
to
10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior
May 18, 2003? Yes __X_ No
prior
11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office
to September 1, 2007? Yes S No
LA ENCE D. V CCHIO
AS ISTANT U ITED STATES ATTORNEY
Florida Bar No. 0305405
REV 9/11107
*Penalty Sheet(s) attached
EFTA00912241
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENALTY SHEET
Defendant's Name: STEPHEN CAPUTI
Case No:
Count #: 1
Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
Title 18, United States Code, Section 371
• Max. Penalty: 5 Years' Imprisonment; $250,000.00 Fine
•
EFTA00912242
AO 455 tµe' ug) er of an Ir4 ctinenl
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District of Florida
United States of America
v. Case No.
STEPHEN CAPUTI
Defendant
WAIVER OF AN INDICTMENT
one
I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than
year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me.
After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by
information.
Date:
Defendant's signature
Signature ofdefendant's attorney
Printedname ofdefendant's attorney
Judge's signature
Judge's printed name and title
EFTA00912243
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
da985e128ec18d24191eb29de253df98998aca1744e0f4663d71e85e7ba77c83
Bates Number
EFTA00912234
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
10
Comments 0