EFTA00820953.pdf

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: David Sauvage Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:44:02 +0000 I like you, I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if you make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you. how about being blindfolded and guessing their name. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are shy , sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalists that do much better than that. they could take a strength finder test, and then you could take it with empathy for them, there are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 percent right. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage < > wrote: Jeffrey, Just an additional thought. A vision, actually-- What if I did readings blindfolded? So I held someone's hand and felt into them. With such limited visual/tactile information, it would be a real test of my empathic abilities. It would almost validate "the sixth sense." Then maybe we could compare my ability to read people with an average person's ability to read people? Just brainstorming here... Very best, David On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage < > wrote: I would love to do that. Definitely has higher probability of success. Sent from my mobile device On Aug 15, 2016, at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I greatly appreciatei the honesty, I dont think will work with pictures. but might work face to face. if it will work at all. if so I would try 10 women, and ten names. . you willl need to touch each one. . On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage > wrote: Hi Jeffrey and Gino, Earlier today, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 names and tried to match them. It turned out to be quite a struggle -- primarily because people were very similar. For instance, I'd have descriptions like this: Shy but relatively happy on the outside Filled with frustration and anxiety Burning with rage deep down But out of the 15 people, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching ending up looking like a convoluted chart. EFTA00820953 What I concluded was that I need a bit more help designing this experiment. Ideally, rather than matching 15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of binary decisions (A or B). One would expect me to get 50% right. IF the people are emotionally different enough (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize I will do considerably better than chance. Does that make sense? I have started to go down this road with my friend at NYU. Happy to discuss with Gino as well. And of course, happy to submit to MRI machines and the like to figure what's happening on that end. Open to any and all thoughts. Science, clearly, is not my gift. Very best, David On The, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage < wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Sorry it took a beat to respond. This weekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a friend to lay out some pictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report back what I learn. I've been thinking about this for a while -- and I do feel we ultimately need a more rigorous experiment. But I like your idea, at least to start, ofjust giving it a good and seeing. Great meeting you. David Sent from my mobile device On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, Jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: david, if you can do the name to photo test. in a 25 picture test. it could be an interesting begining, I suggst you take twenty women all availbel on google or facebook and try. , please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00820954  please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00820955