📄 Extracted Text (390 words)
From: Jeevacation [email protected]>
To: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:00 +0000
I thought he received a gj sub from Marie in Jan 07
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2009, at 8:46 AM, "Martin Weinberg" < > wrote:
one possibility is that she is/was part of the Rothstein FBI investigation i.e. that Edwards' cooperation
in late October (as a CW) regarding AR was just part of a larger effort to exclude himself from the
growing storm
a second possibility is that they did not want Kirkendahllyour FBI investigators involved (except as a
confirming witness) so that the FBI would not look as if they were circumventing the NPA if they sent
evidence to other districts
a more innocuous alternative is that the case is by information, he is pleading, and that there was no
need to have the paperwork signed by a more exp agent
interestingly, I am not sure there even is a crime - obstructing a state investigation is not obstructing
an "official proceeding" - if the FBI 1-07 interview did not seek does and did not ask if he had does
then it would be hard for them to prove an intent to "corruptly" intend to impair the availability of the
doc for use in the federal gj - and I am not at all sure that not bringing a doc to a civil deposition could
be converted into "the official proceeding before a judge, court". Ordinarily would require a federal
GJ subpoena and a resulting concealment.
Original Message --
From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Martin Weinberg • Roy Black
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 6:05AM
should we read anything into the fact that marie used a fbi agent with only three months experience ,. not
conected with anythingr but street gangs in miami?
* ***** *****************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00743856
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
de03949b2babad2eaee10413941ec38c0032cece17401a76b5e5c6e785605975
Bates Number
EFTA00743856
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0