📄 Extracted Text (1,415 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Valeria Chomsky
Subject: Re:
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 17:12:28 +0000
weird , lets see if noam can get harry to agree to replace max with richard or your new attny as a fall back ,
we can deal with the past afterwards
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Valeria Chomsky < > wrote:
As you know, I have been very unsatisfied with Deborah's performance. She assumed the role of a judge and
decided to make decisions according to her judgement about me (biased by her father's experience and by her
own prejudices).
I am absolutely aware that I have been judged and condemned by them in the inner circle and "circus" they
established.
She has been agreeing with Max all the time and I wouldn't be surprised even if she was advising all of them,
through Max, that Noam (because of his new wife) should NOT have access to his own money. And
guaranteed them that she was not going to take any actions about it. (She actually told me once in her office,
that Noam did not have rights to the assets of the marital trusts, since Noam's children were the beneficiaries.)
Therefore, she doesn't want to expose herself to Max and to the children, as providing Noam with material that
proves that Noam is entitled to. She wants to make look like, on the contrary, despite her efforts to follow
Max's agenda, that Noam is demanding some actions and as his legal representative, she has to follow his
requests. This will free her in Max's and the children's eyes. And also in Noam's eyes. All very simple.
Forwarded message
From: Noam Chomsky
Date: Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Valeria Chomsky
-------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Jeffrey E [email protected]>
Date: Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 4:03 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Noam Chomsky
like the military, can be good for an individual . but needs a group. I think "understanding" might be
similar as a group function as the visual system is for the individual. . it needs collective input and then with
a recursive interations focuses on a concept
you should have the call with your children asap. feel free to send them debras memo so they see what you
see. her privlege argument makes no sense. you WANT the other side to see your justifications for your
position. she is just trying to stay out of the mix. as she has done virtually nothing to get you what you
clearly are entitiled to. shameful
EFTA00933615
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Noam Chomsky > wrote:
If done properly, like offering free and creative opportunities for kids, I think it can be good for the
individual.
And with your immense help, for which I can't express enough gratitude, we're working our way through it I
think
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:09 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
no question in my mind that it is a huge benefit for the group. but my conjecture is that it is not
necessarily good for the individual. . like being a hero ( throwing yourself on a grenade ) . good for
the group not so good for the hero. . as writing forces a linear slow pace. I wonder if in a large
population , handwriting wiill be correlated with G . anyway , I need to get my mind off the way you
have been getting screwed. drives me crazy.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Noam Chomsky < wrote:
Good to have a fun note.
I suspect that forcing children to do anything is probably harmful. But it's possible to introduce writing
and (secondarily) reading in a way that seems to enhance thinking. That's the idea behind "invented
spelling" (here's a link to some of the work: https://pages.wustl.eduffiles/pages/imce/treiman/Read%
20%26%20Treiman_Childrens_Invented_Spelling final.pdf). Back in the early '50s, a philosopher
friend of mine (Israel Schemer) brought me some pages on which his two-year old son had written
things that he thought were gibberish, wondering if I could make something of it. It was immediately
obvious that the kind had learned the names of the letters and was spontaneously stringing them together
to express himself in writing. And making interesting generalizations. Thus the letter "A", pronounced
/eyl, he used for the words "came," "pet", "pat"; the letter "i", pronounced /ay/, he used for "pie", "pot,"
"but/" . And so on. It all made sense. Our kids did the same thing. Carol wrote some papers about it,
Charles Read and others carried it forward. Turns out to be a great way to teach reading too. Kids
spontaneously express themselves, often in creative way, and the transition to official orthography is not
that difficult now that they have the general idea.
There's a debate about it in educational circles, and though I haven't followed it, my impression is that
old-fashioned forcing into a mold probably wins out, undermining the joy of self-expression and
possibly reading.
As you may know, Galileo regarded invention of the alphabet as among the greatest of all human
inventions. Can do no better than quote his own words. He regarded the invention of the alphabet
as "surpassing all stupendous inventions," asking "what sublimity of mind was his who
dreamed of finding means to communicate his deepest thoughts to any other person, though
distant by mighty intervals of place and time! Of talking with those who are in India; of
speaking to those who are not yet born and will not be born for a thousand or ten thousand
years; and with what facility, by the different arrangements of twenty characters upon a pager
Shortly after, the same observation was made about the more fundamental matter of sounds (Port Royal
Grammar, 1660). I discovered all of this about 50 years ago and wrote about it. Unknown then, still
unknown, in my view some of the most profound insights in the human sciences.
Smart guys, the founders of modern science.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
on a more fun note. is is possible that learning how to write and read, in fact slows down your
thinking process. forcing children to write and organize their thoughts in a medium that does not
EFTA00933616
lend itself to speed. is not natural?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00933617
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00933618
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
de7dafd32c71970560f0affde6ce914d8e841758b63865573dbace0cce79e697
Bates Number
EFTA00933615
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
4
Comments 0