📄 Extracted Text (251 words)
From: Cecile de Jongh
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:41:33 +0000
I tried Richardson again this afternoon since I did not get a return call but no answer. I'm not entirely sure that
having Randy involved will help rather than hinder the cause at this point in the process. I would prefer that we
wait to get confirmation that there is absolutely nothing left to do with her file.
Randy is not exactly a light touch or diplomatic and I don't want the board members to feel that they are
threatened into approving MM. I will call everyday and I will call Donald as well. Please note that the board
members are not Gov't employees.
With that said, it's obviously your decision re calling Randy.
With warm regards,
Cecile
Sent from my iPhone and misspellings courtesy of iPhone.
On Sep 30, 2015, at 8:36 PM, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote:
should i call randy knight re ME?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00625900
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
decc28b5bf4438ca20858ca5bd889b95afa30ddd6d53e1d6194e1cc0b5abbc0b
Bates Number
EFTA00625900
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0