📄 Extracted Text (870 words)
SOF III - 1081 Southern Financial LLC
Secondary Opportunities Fund III. LP
because purchasers of investments held directly or indirectly by the Fund typically require acquisition financing to fund a
portion of the purchase price, these conditions may adversely affect the availability of favourable exit opportunities for
such investments. This could have a serious adverse effect on the Fund's ability to implement its investment strategy
and generate returns. The continuation or worsening of the disruptions in the debt markets could have an adverse
impact on the availability of credit to businesses generally. Under the Dodd-Frank Act (defined below), and under other
international bank regulatory frameworks, such as Basel Ill, banking organisations and other financial institutions are
required to hold additional regulatory capital and to meet more stringent liquidity, leverage and other similar tests. The
timing, scope and cumulative effect of these regulatory developments is not fully known, but they may result in lenders
being less willing and able to extend credit to borrowers like the Fund and/or increased costs to lenders, which are
passed on to borrowers such as the Fund. In addition, as noted below, under the Volcker Rule (defined below), the Fund
may be prohibited from borrowing from Deutsche Bank and its affiliates.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Volcker Rule
Deutsche Bank is subject to a broad array of US and German banking laws and regulations. As a result of both
Deutsche Bank's investment in the Fund, if any, and the Manager being an affiliate of Deutsche Bank, the Fund and the
Manager also are likely to be subject to the banking laws and regulations that are applicable to Deutsche Bank. Such
laws and regulations may, among other things, impose restrictions on the types and amounts of investments that the
Fund may make, the types of activities in which the Fund may engage and the amount of influence and control the
Manager and the Fund may have over the operations of the Fund's portfolio companies. Thus, though Deutsche Bank
intends to commit capital to the Fund, its ability to do so will depend on the operation of such laws and regulations.
For example, in the United States, Deutsche Bank is treated as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the 'BHC Act'). Deutsche
Bank has elected to be treated as a financial holding company within the meaning of the BHC Act. To comply with the
BHC Act. and the rules applicable to financial holding companies and their affiliates, the Fund may be required to
dispose of investments within 10 years of their acquisition or to obtain US regulatory approval for an extension. If it were
to apply for an extension, there is no guarantee that an extension would be obtained. Furthermore, Deutsche Bank may
choose not to seek an extension if doing so would, in Deutsche Bank's view, lead to certain adverse consequences to
Deutsche Bank.
In addition, certain bank regulatory limits may apply to Deutsche Bank, its affiliates and the Fund on an aggregate basis.
As a result, investments made by Deutsche Bank in the ordinary course of business may limit the investments or the size
of the investments the Fund can make or the degree of influence and control the Manager and the Fund may have with
respect to an investment. As a result of such limitations, the Fund may be required to invest in a manner that would be
less advantageous than it if were not subject to such laws and regulations and some otherwise suitable investments may
not be available to the Fund. or may be unprofitably disposed of by, the Fund.
In addition to these limits and restrictions, new laws have been enacted in the United States and Europe that govern
banks and their affiliates. Changes in applicable banking laws or regulations or in the interpretation or application thereof
could require the Fund to dispose of some or all of its investments under unfavourable market conditions, thus causing
the Fund to recognise a loss that it might not otherwise have recognised, and could cause the Manager to discontinue
activities with respect to certain of the investment activities of the Fund. The discontinuance of such activities by the
Manager could have a material adverse effect on the Fund.
One significant new law was enacted in the United States on July 21, 2010, when President Obama signed into law the
US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the 'Dodd-Frank Act'), certain provisions of which
will apply new capital, prudential, credit and other new limits to bank holding companies and financial holding companies.
The full scope. nature and extent of these new limits — and any potential impact on the Fund — are to be determined by
regulations, some of which have only recently been finalised and are. therefore, subject to ongoing analysis following the
recent completion of certain aspects of the rulemaking process.
Volcker Rule
Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act established a new section 13 of the BHC Act, commonly referred to as the "Volcker
Conhdential Private Placement Memorandum 79
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0108308
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00254492
EFTA01451607
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
df07fb4f266518863fd1ee1728c1840cba9d0ea7adf063b9bba6b9a404148990
Bates Number
EFTA01451607
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0