📄 Extracted Text (367 words)
PT/BC/
13 March 2011
Telegraph Media Group Ltd.,
111 Buckingham Palace Road,
London SWIW ODT.
FAO: The Editor. The Daily Telegraph
cc Arthur Wynn Davies. Legal Manager —
A rthu r.wvnn-davies telegranh.co.uk
Dear Sirs,
We have been consulted by Jeffrey Epstein in relation to your grossly inaccurate and persistent
references to him being a "paedophile", in particular in your editions of Th and 10th March under the
headlines "Duchess of York admits Duke arranged for convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein to
pay off her debts" and "The Duke, his paedophile guest, and the most unusual use of an RAF
base" respectively, and on your website.
Our client is not, as your headline article alleges, a convicted paedophile. Although he has been
convicted of soliciting prostitutes, and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, he has served his
time for that offence. As a matter of record, but without seeking to justify the offence, the girls in
question were not pre-pubescent. ...
Furthermore, the false and distorted terminology used by you to describe our client in your vitriolic
attack on his character is simply not true on any interpretation of the word "paedophile". He has not
been convicted nor been accused of being a paedophile (a pejorative that has a very specific medical
definition), apart from by certain elements of the tabloid press in their recent reports on his friendship
with Prince Andrew. Our client however should be entitled to expect more accurate and credible
reporting from a respected broadsheet such as the Daily Telegraph, which is supposed to have
significantly higher standards than the sensationalised and exaggerated reporting of the tabloids. .
Our client is entitled, at the very least, to the publication of a categoric clarification and apology, in
terms to be first agreed with us, as a matter of some urgency. We would therefore be grateful to
receive your proposals in this regard, while our client continues to reserve all his rights in relation to,
in particular, what would be a totally justified Complaint to the PCC, together with appropriate redress
in relation to your defamatory allegations and malicious falsehoods.
We look forward to hearing from you by return.
Yours faithfully,
EFTA_R1_00009770
EFTA01733837
JOHNSONS
EFTA_R1_00009771
EFTA01733838
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
df7cf80c6e3a124977cd8f1dc5d8766153a1d64bed8a448c4d54edba04d0c509
Bates Number
EFTA01733837
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0