EFTA00993540.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (616 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Richard Joslin -4
Subject: Re: exchange
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:51:42 +0000
I could understand the vertial slice in the context of a partnership but why grantor trust , if so. couldn't we
distribute thefull slice and then sell the shares only
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Richard Joslin < wrote:
Also note that the mechanics of the exchange is that the underlying management company and carry GP entity
vehicle interests are distributed up through AP Professionals to BRH Holdings to the member of BRH
Holdings who then transfers these partnership interests to APO/AMH in exchange for PTP units. The
exchange of property for PTP interest is taxable as a sale/exchange. The subsequent sale of PTP units gives
rise to cash flow but not the large tax bite. So going into a 10b5- 1 plan to sell has modest tax effect and does
not serve to delay gain recognition The APO Trading blackout recommences on Dec 5 2014 but there is not
blackout for 10b5-1 plan
From: Richard Joslin
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:20 AM
To: 'Jeffrey E.'
Subject: exchange
RJ, LD, EA, AC, RD met with PW exchange attorneys and AH yesterday. We discussed the various options.
Given that there may be more than one founder exchanging and given that each founder can choose different
options to sell PTP interest, eg underwritten offering, secondary market, private sale and each founder can opt
out at different times if price moves lower greater than 10% from Sept 4 closing price, there may be decisions
one founder makes that has a effect on another founder. If there is an underwriting, and the underwriter prices
with a significant discount, one founder can opt out (assume > 10% price decline) and wait for better price.
Alternatively, the underwriter may decide to offer fewer shares in the offering and the scale back would be pro
rata. However, if a founder opts out of underwriting then the other founder might not be scaled back despite
the underwriter scale back. The underwritten offer has the greatest discount and Josh opted to sell on open
market. There are a raft of questions the PW attorneys will be looking into relating to the interaction of
founders under the exchange agreement and the principals agreement. If we detect that the exchange
agreement does not cover a particular wrinkle or needs to clarifify interplay of multiple founders exchanging
concurrently, the agreement should be amended by Sept 4. Aug 29 is latest date to notify other founders of
intention to exchange. Note that exchange agreement has been amended twice previously and that founders
had noodled (disclosed) with other founders far in advance of the deadline for notice.
With regard to pre-exchange transfers to LDB or a new grantor trust, AH (PW) has a vertical slice concern and
will review. There are anti-churning issues that need to be reviewed but likely the principal's agreement has
been written to cover this sufficiently that there may be little if any flexibility. PW will review and revert
EFTA00993540
Richard Joslin
CFO
Elysium Management LLC
445 Park Ave
Ste. 1401
New York, NY 10022
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00993541
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e030511396d744d1844ffe8b14051d7b1394f62b2cdabef8f841f934c4c0c93b
Bates Number
EFTA00993540
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0