EFTA00692304.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 423 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (423 words)
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey" <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:14:32 +0000 I am not at all sure that SORNA includes travel notification. So far its prohibitions have only been extended to registration and updating. Needs to be checked. Feds enacted reg to incentivize states to follow. Real issue is whether states will and if so whether there is discretion built in. (If states do not adopt they cannot violate you). If there is no such discretion I like the argument it is penalty (and your penalties cannot expand after you are sentenced). I will look into all this over weekend. MGW ---- - Original Message From: Jeffrey. To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:01 AM Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Yes but a prenotification ??? What other govt reg has prenotification and penalty for violating , of a right ( travel , speech ) I understand post . I can be violated for traveling without having given proper per notice??? Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:33 PM, "Martin Weinberg" < wrote: have they been added to the state laws in any/all of the states in which you are registered? if its a penalty its ex post facto and cannot enhance your sentence. if its part of tracking a registrant it would not be a penalty. the first practical issue is whether the state implementation of this added guideline includes discretion such as was being considered in VI -- Original Message — From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Alan M. Dershowitz ; Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:16 AM as the sex registrationguidlines now want 21 days notive before traveling out of the country. and they have maintaned that registration is not a penalty on an adminsitravtive reuglation to register. how does it operate if one wants to leave tomoorrow. and cannot meet the 21 day requiemmet.. it can't act as a restriction on travel. and still claim not to be a righs violation or at minimum a penalty?? The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by EFTA00692304 oytmail e- om r by m mailotnoajnedevaalclatiopn® iesggail.com, and destroy thereof, EFTA00692305
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e08ada1916070e647a526b78effea8de42f74b02c7fa9d90d53e0dc46e550ab4
Bates Number
EFTA00692304
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!