podesta_email_20822.txt

podesta-emails 7,527 words email

V15 P21 D6 V11 P19

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Wednesday September 17, 2014 Morning Roundup:* *Headlines:* *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “On Fox, Latest ‘Benghazi Bombshell’ Progresses From Baseless Speculation To Absurd Allegations” <http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/16/on-fox-latest-benghazi-bombshell-progresses-fro/200772>* “Fox News' coverage of an evidence-free ‘bombshell’ from Benghazi hoaxster Sharyl Attkisson took just hours to morph from a reiteration of her claim that a disgruntled former State Department employee ‘couldn't help but wonder’ if Hillary Clinton's staff had turned over "scrubbed" Benghazi documents to investigators into full-blown allegations that documents had been "destroyed" -- allegations that remain baseless.” *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “Even Some At Fox News Are Skeptical Of Attkisson's Latest Benghazi Conspiracy Theory” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/16/even-some-at-fox-news-are-skeptical-of-attkisso/200779>* “Fox News' Bill O'Reilly questioned whether the latest report from discredited investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, which baselessly suggested a Benghazi cover-up by State Department officials, actually constituted a ‘scandal.’” *Raw Story: “Jon Stewart mocks Joe Scarborough’s hypocritical rant about Hillary Clinton” <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/jon-stewart-mocks-joe-scarboroughs-hypocritical-rant-about-hillary-clinton/>* “Amid all of the speculation surrounding a possible presidential run by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Daily Show host Jon Stewart singled out MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough for hypocritically criticizing Clinton’s silence on the issue.” *The Daily Beast: “Hillary Clinton Basks in Labor’s Love: ‘This Is Like a Homecoming!’” <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/16/hillary-clinton-basks-in-labor-s-love-this-is-like-a-homecoming.html>* “Hillary Clinton returned home to Lower Manhattan on Tuesday night, basking in the love of organized labor at a union hall that helped launch her political career a decade and a half ago.” *Newsday: “Hillary Clinton recalls 'hell' of 9/11; vows to press for Zadroga extension” <http://www.newsday.com/news/new-york/hillary-clinton-recalls-hell-of-9-11-vows-to-press-for-zadroga-extension-1.9331121>* “Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Tuesday night called on Congress to extend legislation that aids rescuers and others affected by Ground Zero toxins, as she reflected on the ‘hell’ she witnessed one day after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.” *Business Insider: “Immigration Activists Just Crashed Hillary Clinton's Speech In New York” <http://www.businessinsider.com/immigration-activists-crash-hillary-clinton-speech-2014-9>* “Immigration activists disrupted a speech by Hillary Clinton on Tuesday evening at an event in New York City to benefit groups advocating on behalf of programs and legislation to support first responders and workers affected by the September 11th attacks.” *Wall Street Journal opinion: Jason L. Riley: “Why Hillary Was in Iowa” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-why-hillary-was-in-iowa-1410902756>* “The Clintons are the party's biggest fundraisers after President Obama, which explains more than anything else why they were in Iowa on Sunday.” *Washington Post blog: Post Politics: “Anti-Hillary Clinton PAC launches ad campaign to coincide with Benghazi hearing” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/09/17/anti-hillary-clinton-pac-launches-ad-campaign-to-coincide-with-benghazi-hearing/>* “Stop Hillary PAC, a organization that says it was formed to prevent Hillary Rodham Clinton from becoming president, launched an ad campaign Wednesday criticizing the former secretary of state as a special House committee prepares to hold its first hearing on the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya.” *Washington Post column: Ruth Marcus: “Hillary Clinton’s steak fry populism” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-hillary-clintons-steak-fry-populism/2014/09/16/ea1e444e-3dc3-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html>* “Hillary 2016 would inevitably be a far different campaign than Hillary 2008.” *USA Today opinion: Ari Rabin-Havt, co-author of The Benghazi Hoax: “Benghazi Select Committee hearing on right path” <http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/09/16/benghazi-select-committee-public-hearing-circus-column/15734395/>* [Subtitle:] “It will be a welcome miracle if Republicans look for constructive solutions instead of trying to score partisan points.” *CBS: “Will politics doom the Benghazi committee's investigation?” <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-politics-doom-the-benghazi-committees-investigation/>* “Already, though, the focus has turned away from the ARB's recommendations.” *Politico: “Bill Clinton to stump for New Hampshire pols” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/bill-clinton-new-hampshire-campaigning-111024.html>* “Former President Bill Clinton is expected to campaign for Democratic candidates next month in New Hampshire.” *BuzzFeed: “Jon Huntsman, Independent For President?” <http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/jon-huntsman-independent-for-president#2wk3999>* “Former presidential candidate Jon Huntsman has engaged in discussions with supporters in recent months about pursuing another White House bid — this time as an independent, according to three sources close to Huntsman.” *Articles:* *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters for America: “On Fox, Latest ‘Benghazi Bombshell’ Progresses From Baseless Speculation To Absurd Allegations” <http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/09/16/on-fox-latest-benghazi-bombshell-progresses-fro/200772>* By Olivia Kittel September 16, 2014 *Fox News' coverage of an evidence-free "bombshell" from Benghazi hoaxster Sharyl Attkisson took just hours to morph from a reiteration of her claim that a disgruntled former State Department employee "couldn't help but wonder" if Hillary Clinton's staff had turned over "scrubbed" Benghazi documents to investigators into full-blown allegations that documents had been "destroyed" -- allegations that remain baseless.* *Attkisson Hypes Baseless Claim That State Department Covered Up Damaging Benghazi Documents* *Attkisson Highlights Speculation That State Department Staff Removed Damaging Benghazi Documents.* On September 15, Attkisson forwarded disgruntled former State Department employee Raymond Maxwell's unsupported allegation that "Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to 'separate' damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board (ARB) investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya." According to Attkisson's report, Maxwell claimed to have observed an "after-hours" document sorting session at which a State Department office director "close to Clinton's top advisers" told staff to separate out Benghazi documents "that might put anybody in the Near Eastern Affairs front office or the seventh floor in a bad light." [The Daily Signal, *9/15/14* <http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/> ] *Maxwell Did Not Claim Claim Documents Were Withheld, Just That He "Couldn't Help But Wonder" If They Were. *Attkisson's report noted that Maxwell didn't stay to observe the full document sorting process, but simply reviewed a separated stack of documents that "included pre-attack telegrams and cables between the U.S. embassy in Tripoli and State Department headquarters" and later "couldn't help but wonder" if the ARB investigation had been skewed. From Attkisson's report: In May 2013, when critics questioned the ARB's investigation as not thorough enough, co-chairmen Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Adm. Mike Mullen responded that "we had unfettered access to everyone and everything including all the documentation we needed." Maxwell says when he heard that statement, he couldn't help but wonder if the ARB -- perhaps unknowingly -- had received from his bureau a scrubbed set of documents with the most damaging material missing. [The Daily Signal, *9/15/14* <http://dailysignal.com/2014/09/15/benghazi-bombshell-clinton-state-department-official-reveals-alleged-details-document-review/> ] *Rep. Cummings: Maxwell Didn't Raise Allegation During Interview With House Oversight Committee.* Slate's Dave Weigel reported that Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which has extensively investigated the attacks in Benghazi, pointed out that Maxwell did not mention the allegation during an interview with the committee: "Maxwell was interviewed by our committee, the Oversight and Government Reform Committee," said Cummings. He was called by Chairman Issa as a witness. And he never talked about this. He had plenty of opportunities to do it. But keep in mind, we have allegations seeming to come out every week. Mr. Schiff just talked about the three contractors, who also have been interviewed, and suddenly they come out with these 'stand down' allegations. But again, Mr. Maxwell did not bring those allegations to our attention when we interviewed him extensively. Extensively." [Slate, *9/16/14* <http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/09/16/democrats_baffled_by_new_benghazi_whistleblower_s_accusations.html> ] *Successive Fox News Reports Exaggerate Attkisson's Allegations* *Fox News' America's Newsroom: "Some Wonder If This Could Be A Smoking Gun Of A Potential Cover-Up." *The September 15 edition of Fox News' *America's Newsroom* quickly highlighted Attkisson's claims, calling them a "bombshell development, they say." Fox News correspondent Doug McKelway called the report "powerful," but was careful to characterize the details as "accusations." He said members of the Benghazi Select Committee "are going to want to probe this information deeply" ahead of the first committee hearing. Host Eric Shawn concluded the segment by noting that "some wonder if this could be a smoking gun of a potential cover-up." Meanwhile, an on-air graphic reiterated Attkisson's basic claim: [Fox News, *America's Newsroom*, *9/15/14* <http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2014/09/15/36769/fnc-an-20140915-smokinggun> ] *Fox News' On The Record: "Clinton Allies Removed Politically Damaging Docs." *Attkisson appeared on the September 15 edition of Fox News' *On The Record* to discuss what host Greta Van Susteren called "stunning new allegations in the Benghazi investigation." Van Susteren asked Attkisson whether Maxwell knows "what was removed, what Congress didn't see, any documents that were taken out?" Though Attkisson acknowledged that Maxwell does not know of any documents withheld from the investigation, an on-air graphic claimed more definitively that "Clinton Allies Removed Politically Damaging Docs": [Fox News, *On The Record*, *9/15/14* <http://mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/09/16/36774/fnc-otr-20140915-benghazibombshell1> ] *Fox News' Fox & Friends: "They're Scrubbing The Documents. Anything That Makes Hillary Clinton Look Bad, They're Taking Out." *The September 16 edition of *Fox & Friends* took Attkisson's claims further, describing her "explosive new revelations" as "a scandal down in D.C. that threatens to derail Hillary Rodham Clinton." Co-host Steve Doocy summarized the story: "State Department was told, 'put all the documents together, we're going to send them to the review board.' He, Mr. Maxwell walks in on a weekend, odd hours, and there, one of the people that works for him -- they're scrubbing the documents. Anything that makes Hillary Clinton look bad, they're taking out." Appearing as a guest on the show, Attkisson noted that references to the State Department's "seventh floor" in her report refered to Hillary Clinton and her top advisers -- which Doocy reinterpreted in order to claim that orders to separate damaging documents "apparently came from the seventh floor." During the segment, an on-air graphic said simply, "Documents Destroyed": [Fox News, *Fox & Friends*, *9/16/14* <http://mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/09/16/36775/fnc-ff-20140916-benghazibombshell2> ] *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “Even Some At Fox News Are Skeptical Of Attkisson's Latest Benghazi Conspiracy Theory” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/16/even-some-at-fox-news-are-skeptical-of-attkisso/200779>* By Sophia Tesfaye September 16, 2014, 10:41 p.m. EDT Fox News' Bill O'Reilly questioned whether the latest report from discredited investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, which baselessly suggested a Benghazi cover-up by State Department officials, actually constituted a "scandal." On the September 16 edition of his Fox News show, host Bill O'Reilly invited Attkisson to discuss her "troubling accusations against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton" from "a disgruntled former State Department official." After Attkisson confirmed that her source had not witnessed such actions himself, O'Reilly dismissed the conspiracy explaining that "If no documents were removed, scrubbed, if they weren't taken out or destroyed, then I don't know if there is any scandal": [VIDEO] Later during the segment, Fox correspondent James Rosen reported that Attkisson's source had previously failed to disclose this accusation of a cover-up and that his account "bears a lot of further investigation before it can be deemed credible": ROSEN: One point about this matter, Democrats on the House Oversight committee, which has previously investigated Benghazi, have noted that Mr. Maxwell was formally interviewed by that panel last year with a transcript prepared and despite many opportunities to do so, Mr. Maxwell never disclosed this shocking scene of obstruction of justice by high level state department officials that he now claims to have witnessed. That omission on his part at that time, along with other issues, will ensure that if and when Mr. Maxwell testifies before the House Benghazi committee, he will face some rough sledding in cross examination. O'REILLY: Yeah. Why didn't you say it when you had the first opportunity? Yeah, I got it. ROSEN: Yes now, all of this is not to say that what Mr. Maxwell claims to have witnessed never happen, just that it bears a lot of further investigation before it can be deemed credible. *Raw Story: “Jon Stewart mocks Joe Scarborough’s hypocritical rant about Hillary Clinton” <http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/jon-stewart-mocks-joe-scarboroughs-hypocritical-rant-about-hillary-clinton/>* By Arturo Garcia September 16, 2014 Amid all of the speculation surrounding a possible presidential run by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Daily Show host Jon Stewart singled out MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough for hypocritically criticizing Clinton’s silence on the issue. Scarborough complained on Monday that Clinton, who recently visited Iowa for Sen. Tom Harkin’s (D-IA) “Steak Fry” event, has been “on a glorified book tour” looking for people to ask her if she’s running so she can say she doesn’t know, describing it as “why Americans hate politics.” “I don’t want to see you eating steak,” Scarborough said angrily. “If you’re gonna run, just say you’re gonna run and stop playing games.” But Stewart showed footage of Scarborough doing much the same thing, with his own book promotion event in New Hampshire this past March getting the benefit of a “presidential campaign patina,” right down to the Morning Joe host dodging a question about his own political ambitions and saying he hadn’t ruled out running in 2016. “If you’re gonna run, just say you’re gonna run and stop playing games,” Stewart exclaimed, turning Scarborough’s words against him. For his part, Stewart admitted he was interested in one potential candidate: the squirrel who made an appearance during an ABC News interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) aired over the weekend. “It’s just really f*cking hard to focus,” Stewart said after showing the squirrel running behind Sanders. “Given the choice between Bernie Sanders and squirrel! you gotta go with squirrel!” Watch Stewart’s commentary, as posted online on Tuesday, below. [VIDEO] *The Daily Beast: “Hillary Clinton Basks in Labor’s Love: ‘This Is Like a Homecoming!’” <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/16/hillary-clinton-basks-in-labor-s-love-this-is-like-a-homecoming.html>* By David Freedlander September 16, 2014 [Subtitle:] The 9/11 first responders’ law Clinton championed expires in 2016, and on Tuesday night, she headlined a fundraiser at a union hall to expand it, calling labor ‘my principal ally.’ Hillary Clinton returned home to Lower Manhattan on Tuesday night, basking in the love of organized labor at a union hall that helped launch her political career a decade and a half ago. “This is like a homecoming!” Clinton exclaimed at the headquarters of the United Federation of Teachers. The event that brought the former of secretary of state back to the city was a fundraiser for a group pushing to expand a law that provided health benefits for aid workers who assisted in the cleanup of the World Trade Center after 9/11. Those attacks occurred in Clinton’s first year as a United States senator from New York, just as she was emerging as a political figure in her own right. She spent the next six years working to pass a bill that would eventually become the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which provided $4.2 billion in for first responders to the attacks suffering from the effects of toxic dust. The law is set to expire in 2016, just as Clinton is likely to be in the heat of a presidential campaign—a date advocates for the bill pushed for, hoping that it would mean more attention to their cause. Her appearance at UFT headquarters, according to John Feal, a demolition supervisor at ground zero who had his foot amputated when a piece of steel fell on him during the cleanup and who led the effort to get federal benefits to the workers there, is a sign that Clinton, “owns this now.” “I am going to hold her to what she says here tonight,” he said. Mostly, though, Clinton praised the forces of organized labor that pushed for the bill—and which would likely motor any potential presidential campaign she may mount. “It is absolutely imperative to recognize the key role that organized labor played in the very beginning. It was your members, you lost janitors and security guards and workers,” she said. “It was organized labor that came to the forefront.” “Organized labor was my principal ally,” Clinton added. And labor, or New York labor at least, signaled that it would be ready for Clinton, too, should she decide to mount another presidential campaign. “In Mrs. Clinton, we have someone who will stand with us and will fight with us,” said Mario Cilento, president of the New York chapter of the AFL-CIO. Clinton recognized several of her former constituents among the couple of hundred people in the audience and said that as a globe-trotting secretary of state she longed to return to New York. On the nearly million miles worth of plane rides she took in those four years, she said she would occasionally shut her eyes “and dream about being home.” Clinton’s speech was marred at its conclusion by a handful of protesters who disrupted the proceedings to call attention to President Obama’s policy on deportations of illegal immigrants. Shouting, “Unafraid! Undocumented” they were quickly shuffled out. Out in the lobby, one of the protesters explained that they staged the demonstration to ask the secretary, “Is she going to continue the policy of Obama and continue to deport our families? Our communities cannot wait any longer.” Clinton, meanwhile, spent several minutes greeting audience members along the rope line and posing for cellphone selfies. (“This is going to be on Instagram in 30 seconds,” said one young woman after securing her cheek-to-cheek shot alongside the possible next president of the United States.) Several of the well-wishers were recognized with a “Great to see you again!” from the former senator, and they responded meekly with a “Great to see you, as well.” Clinton was asked about the protesters, who at least waited until she was finished speaking to make their case. The former secretary of state ignored the question. *Newsday: “Hillary Clinton recalls 'hell' of 9/11; vows to press for Zadroga extension” <http://www.newsday.com/news/new-york/hillary-clinton-recalls-hell-of-9-11-vows-to-press-for-zadroga-extension-1.9331121>* By Emily Ngo September 16, 2014, 10:09 p.m. EDT Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Tuesday night called on Congress to extend legislation that aids rescuers and others affected by Ground Zero toxins, as she reflected on the "hell" she witnessed one day after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. "It was just a scene out of Dante's Inferno," said Clinton, a U.S. senator when she visited the site 13 years ago. "It was as close to hell as I can imagine any of us experiencing." She described breathing toxic air and seeing billowing smoke. "All you had to do is be there, and you knew that there were going to be consequences to the people who had survived," she said. Clinton spoke at a lower Manhattan fundraising benefiting 9/11 Health Watch, which monitors aid for those who fell ill after the 2001 attacks. She said she was among the first to demand legislative action on behalf of 9/11 first-responders and others whose health was threatened. The event was hosted at the United Federation of Teachers headquarters, and Clinton was introduced by AFL-CIO state president Mario Cilento. "Organized labor was my principal ally," Clinton said. Pension funds were the only initial means of helping those who worked on "the pile," she said. Thousands have benefited from the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, signed into law in 2011 to monitor and treat 9/11-related health conditions, but thousands more still need attention, Clinton said. She urged Congress to renew the law before it expires in two years. "The price of passage was a so-called sunset clause, and it will come due," she said. She thanked New York Democratic allies in Congress, including Sen. Charles Schumer, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-Manhattan) and Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan), but also Seaford Republican Rep. Peter King for recognizing that Zadroga isn't a "partisan issue," but rather an "American issue." "Last week, with the anniversary, we mourned," Clinton said. "This week, we mobilize." As Clinton's speech ended, six immigration activists with a group called "United We Dream" chanted "undocumented, unafraid" and were escorted out by security officials. One protester, Mateo Tabares, 19, of Queens, whose family is from Colombia, told reporters Clinton opposes action by President Barack Obama to prevent deportations. Clinton's spokesman Tuesday night did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the protest. *Business Insider: “Immigration Activists Just Crashed Hillary Clinton's Speech In New York” <http://www.businessinsider.com/immigration-activists-crash-hillary-clinton-speech-2014-9>* By Hunter Walker September 16, 2014, 7:46 p.m. EDT Immigration activists disrupted a speech by Hillary Clinton on Tuesday evening at an event in New York City to benefit groups advocating on behalf of programs and legislation to support first responders and workers affected by the September 11th attacks. After Clinton's speech, the group of at least six young activists began chanting, "Undocumented! Unafraid!" Several of them wore t-shirts that said: "Will You Deport My Family." The group was escorted from the room by security. One of the activists, who said his name was Mateo Tabares, claimed he was pushed by a guard as they were removed from the room. "No need to push me sir!" Tabares shouted. "I want to tell you to leave," the guard said. "What you just did is disrespectful." The event was held in a room at the headquarters of the United Federation of Teachers union in Manhattan. Outside the room, Tabares told reporters the group of activists was there to ask Clinton why she would deport their families. Tabares said Clinton opposed action by President Barack Obama that would prevent some deportations. "No more deportations!" Tabares said. Tabares said he was 19-years-old and his family was from Colombia. He also said the activists were affiliated with the immigration reform advocacy group United We Dream. Tabares would not tell Business Insider exactly how the activists gained entrance to the benefit. "We were invited earlier today ... by a close friend of mine that I'm not going to disclose their information," he said. After the activists were removed, Clinton greeted admirers and took photos with people who attended the event. She did not respond to multiple questions from Business Insider about her reaction to the activists. In her speech, Clinton called for an extension of the James Zadroga Act, which was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2011 and provides support programs and treatment for survivors and first responders affected by the September 11th terrorist attacks. As a senator representing New York, Clinton pushed for programs to support those affected by September 11th. She said the legislation was due to expire in two years due to a "sunset clause" that she described as the "price of passage for the act." According to a press release announcing the event, it benefitted two organizations: Citizens for the Extension of the James Zadroga Act and 9/11 Health Watch, Inc. *Wall Street Journal opinion: Jason L. Riley: “Why Hillary Was in Iowa” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/political-diary-why-hillary-was-in-iowa-1410902756>* By Jason L. Riley September 16, 2014, 5:25 p.m. EDT Hillary Clinton's weekend visit to Iowa understandably stirred more 2016 speculation, but the first order of business for the former first lady is 2014. And Mrs. Clinton and her husband were in the Hawkeye State because the Democratic Senate candidate, Bruce Braley, is in trouble. Mr. Braley and his Republican opponent, Jodi Ernst, are running for the seat being vacated by retiring Democrat Tom Harkin. And according to a CNN poll taken last week, Mr. Braley leads among likely voters by one point, 49 to 48. A congressman from Waterloo, Mr. Braley was the Democrats' first choice to run for the seat. Republicans had trouble even fielding a candidate, yet Ms. Ernst, a state senator with relatively low name I.D., has run a stellar campaign and made the race competitive. And so Democrats find themselves worried about another Senate seat that they expected to hold this year without too much trouble. The Clintons are the party's biggest fundraisers after President Obama, which explains more than anything else why they were in Iowa on Sunday. Democrats will outraise Republicans this cycle, as they usually do. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee raised $7.7 million in August and had $25 million on hand. The corresponding figures for the GOP were $6.1 million last month and $19.9 million on hand. Democrats are counting on this funding advantage to save them in a year when the president's popularity is down and Republican voter enthusiasm is up. Monetizing Mrs. Clinton's star power is part of this strategy. The fact that she was needed in Iowa, a state that Mr. Obama won comfortably in 2008 and 2012, is not a good sign for Democrats headed into November. *Washington Post blog: Post Politics: “Anti-Hillary Clinton PAC launches ad campaign to coincide with Benghazi hearing” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/09/17/anti-hillary-clinton-pac-launches-ad-campaign-to-coincide-with-benghazi-hearing/>* By Sean Sullivan September 17, 2014, 5:00 a.m. EDT Stop Hillary PAC, a organization that says it was formed to prevent Hillary Rodham Clinton from becoming president, launched an ad campaign Wednesday criticizing the former secretary of state as a special House committee prepares to hold its first hearing on the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya. The six-figure online and television ad campaign includes a 30-second commercial that will run in the early nominating states of New Hampshire, South Carolina and Iowa, the group told The Washington Post. The ad accuses Clinton of not being forthcoming about the deadly 2012 attacks on a diplomatic compound n Benghazi that claimed the lives of four Americans. It encourages viewers to sign a "citizens subpoena" demanding Clinton testify before the committee. The "citizens subpoena" Web site asks people to provide their name, address and e-mail address. PACs often ask for such information to help build their e-mail lists for fundraising purposes and other communication. The ad campaign marks Stop Hillary PAC's first TV commercial since its formation in May 2013. It comes as the bipartisan House Benghazi Select Committee, a panel headed up by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and created by House Republican leaders, will hold its first open hearing Wednesday. The panel will focus the hearing on a review board the State Department created after the attack to examine government security abroad. Clinton testified before House and Senate committees about Benghazi shortly before she stepped down as the nation's chief diplomat in early 2012. But some conservatives have continued to criticize her and raise questions about what she knew. Colorado state Sen. Ted Harvey, Stop Hillary PAC's honorary chairman, said in an interview that his group intends to raise questions about various aspects of Clinton's record moving forward. "My number one goal is to make sure that Hillary Clinton is not the next president of the United States," Harvey said. *Washington Post column: Ruth Marcus: “Hillary Clinton’s steak fry populism” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ruth-marcus-hillary-clintons-steak-fry-populism/2014/09/16/ea1e444e-3dc3-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html>* By Ruth Marcus September 16, 2014, 7:51 p.m. EDT The headline out of Hillary Clinton’s visit to Iowa was her flagrant flirtation with the prospect of another presidential campaign. The more interesting part was the shortest of sneak previews of the race she seems increasingly certain to run. “I’m ba-ack,” Clinton said at the start of her speech at Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin’s 37th, and final, steak fry, a fundraiser that has helped launch many a Democratic presidential candidate. And that was just the start of the pre-campaign tease. She wasn’t sure, Clinton confided, whether to accept Harkin’s invitation. “I’ve got a few things on my mind these days,” she said, to knowing laughter. The “constant grandchild watch,” for one. “And then, of course, there’s that other thing.” The crowd erupted. Clinton smiled. “Well, it is true I am thinking about it,” she allowed. It showed. A steak fry peroration is far from a campaign platform. Yet there were echoes in Clinton’s remarks not only of campaign themes past; there were also glimmerings of the arguments to come. Hillary 2016 would inevitably be a far different campaign than Hillary 2008. Running in the aftermath of a two-term incumbent of the opposing party is an easier task than running in the shadow of a two-term president in whose administration you served. The first situation calls for attack and differentiation; the second is a subtler enterprise, demanding both support and distancing. Back then, Clinton could run against what she called “seven years of incompetence, cronyism and corruption.” Now, even as she presents the midterm elections as a choice between “the guardians of gridlock and the champions of shared opportunity and shared prosperity,” she faces the challenge of explaining, politely, how she would do better than President Obama at managing congressional obstructionism. “Change is just a word if you do not have the strength and experience to make it happen,” Clinton noted pointedly at the Iowa Democratic Party’s Jefferson-Jackson Day dinner in November 2007 — where she was outshone, nonetheless, by Obama. That’s a dicier argument to make today. To look back at Clinton’s speeches seven long years ago is to be reminded of the ways in which the world has changed — and has not. “How do we bring the war in Iraq to the right end?” Clinton asked then. “How can we make sure every American has access to adequate health care? How will we ensure our children inherit a clean environment and energy independence? How can we reduce the deficits that threaten Social Security and Medicare?” Good questions, even now. The first, about Iraq, has taken on poignant new relevance, and new urgency, with the emergence of the Islamic State. The second has begun to be answered by the Affordable Care Act, but key tests of its implementation and effectiveness await. The third, at least when it comes to climate change, remains dangerously unresolved. And the fourth, on deficits and entitlement spending, now goes unasked by a Democratic Party that has concluded that deficits don’t matter and entitlement reform is unnecessary. Clinton 2014, at least the Clinton 2014 of the steak fry, sounded a decidedly populist note: “We Democrats are for raising the minimum wage, for equal pay for equal work, for making college and technical training affordable, for growing the economy to benefit everyone — and our opponents are not.” There is an understandable tendency to interpret those remarks as a nod to Democrats’ post-financial-crisis populist leanings. Maybe — certainly Clinton wasn’t talking deficit reduction. But it is also clear, rereading her 2007 speeches, that these are matters of long-standing concern. Listen to Clinton in Knoxville, Iowa, in November 2007, worrying that “our labor market is just not working for middle-class families,” that corporate profits are soaring while workers’ wagers remain stagnant, that “the gap between the rich and everybody else has only gotten broader.” She wasn’t worrying about Elizabeth Warren back then. One striking difference between then and now is the degree to which Clinton at the steak fry invoked issues specific to women — equal pay, access to contraception, the implications of raising the minimum wage for female workers. No doubt, that argument reflects Democrats’ imperative to persuade women to turn out in November. But I suspect it also represents a coming attraction. Seven years ago, Clinton was skittish about gender until the end, when she proclaimed 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling. If she takes another run at the ceiling, it is likely to be more head-on. *USA Today opinion: Ari Rabin-Havt, co-author of The Benghazi Hoax: “Benghazi Select Committee hearing on right path” <http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/09/16/benghazi-select-committee-public-hearing-circus-column/15734395/>* By Ari Rabin-Havt September 16, 2014, 6:50 p.m. EDT [Subtitle:] It will be a welcome miracle if Republicans look for constructive solutions instead of trying to score partisan points. On Wednesday, the Benghazi Select Committee, led by Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC) will hold its first public hearings since forming last spring. The topic they will focus on, "Implementation of the Accountability Review Board [ARB] recommendations" is exactly the type of oversight Congress should be engaged in. From the outset it was not illogical to believe the formation of the Benghazi Select Committee would result in nothing more than a political circus designed to rile up the Republican base while digging deeper down into a conspiracy rabbit hole that has distorted public conversation about the attack two years ago on our diplomatic facility in Libya. Wednesday's hearing though avoids the blame games, political posturing, and conspiracies that have been a hallmark of both Republican led investigations into Benghazi and even Trey Gowdy's previous statements. If anything, not enough attention has been focused on the steps taken since September 11, 2012 to secure our diplomatic facilities. The ARB, chaired by Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullen, two highly regarded public servants who worked for both Democratic and Republican administrations, was extreme critical of the State Department's handling of the attack and laid blame on "systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department" stating that security at the facility was "grossly inadequate." The ARB did not attack the president or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton leaving many on the right, in both Congress and the media, deeply disappointed. So far ignored in much of the public debate have been the 29 recommendations made by the ARB to improve security at diplomatic facilities around the world. Trey Gowdy's first hearing is asking exactly the right question – are these recommendations being implemented with due haste. In fact in a rare show of bipartisanship, the hearing was held at the recommendation of one of the committee's Democrats, Adam Schiff (D-CA). The question for the future is will Gowdy be able to continue down this path, focusing on areas absent from oversight? Or will he cave to his party's worst desires to relitigate long debunked conspiracy theories -- for example the suggestion that Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton issued a stand down order on the night of the attack. As Representative Schiff correctly noted "I guess time will tell whether the committee is constructive and whether our participation on it helps it be productive, or whether it degenerates into a circus." *CBS: “Will politics doom the Benghazi committee's investigation?” <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-politics-doom-the-benghazi-committees-investigation/>* By Stephanie Condon September 17, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EDT The Republicans in the House who spearheaded the formation of a special Select Committee on Benghazi have insisted that their investigations into the Sept. 11, 2012 attack won't be politically motivated. Democrats joined the committee with the aim of keeping politics out of the effort. Still, ahead of the committee's first public hearing, neither Democrats nor Republicans have seemed capable of defusing one of the most politically-charged issues in Washington. In a show of bipartisanship, Wednesday's hearing is slated to take a more forward-looking approach. Rather than focusing on who's to blame for the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya that left four Americans dead, the committee will examine the implementation of recommendations for improved diplomatic security that were offered up by the Accountability Review Board (ARB), the independent body that investigated the attack. Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-South Carolina, the chairman of the committee, "is leading a fair, fact-based and impartial investigation," Benghazi committee spokesman Jamal Ware said in a statement. "Chairman Gowdy sincerely hopes that all sides will not prejudge the outcome of the investigation--before even the Committee's first hearing, which is on a topic suggested by the Democrats--and instead allow a constructive and thorough investigatory process that produces a final report on Benghazi that is beyond any doubt," Ware said. When asked Tuesday whether he is concerned the committee is inherently political, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, the committee's top Democrat, declined to answer directly. "Mr. Gowdy has told me politics will not be involved in this, but of course we have our concerns," he said. He cited a few issues that concern Democrats, such as the rules concerning the committee's transparency. Still, Cummings said, "We want to make sure we zero in on several things -- the things we'll be talking about tomorrow, that is making sure our men and women in diplomatic posts around the world are safe." Already, though, the focus has turned away from the ARB's recommendations. Anticipating a politicized hearing, the House Democrats on the committee on Tuesday rolled out a web page called "Benghazi on the Record" that aims to convince people that virtually every question about the Benghazi attack has been answered. It includes an "asked and answered" database with questions that have already been addressed, as well as a 133-page collection of public documents that answer the questions in greater detail. "Many Americans do not realize how much work has already been done investigating the Benghazi attacks," Cummings said, noting that the ARB and seven different congressional committees have already issued nine different Benghazi reports. Ware said that Gowdy is "willing to risk answering the same question twice rather than risk it not be answered at all." Ware pointed out that Congress has yet to receive every document it has requested related to the attack, "it is fair to say that not all questions have been asked and answered." Lawmakers may have a whole new line of questioning from a report published this week by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson on the Daily Signal, a blog funded by the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation. Attkisson interviewed former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, who was one of four State Department officials disciplined in the wake of the Benghazi attack. Maxwell returned to the State Department after being placed on administrative leave, though he retired last year. Maxwell told Attkisson that a group of Clinton allies in the State Department sifted through Benghazi-related documents before handing them over to the ARB. He suggested they were attempting to sift out any documents that could have been damaging to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "The ARB inquiry was, at best, a shoddily executed attempt at damage control, both in Foggy Bottom and on Capitol Hill," Maxwell said. Marie Harf, deputy spokeswoman for the State Department, defended the ARB on Tuesday, insisting it had "full and unfettered access and direct access to State Department employees and documents." The ARB co-chairs, former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, had "complete authority to reach out independently and directly to people," Harf continued. "Employees had complete authority to reach out directly to the ARB. And they've said themselves they had unfettered access." She added, "I have no idea what prompted this somewhat interesting accounting of what someone thinks they may have seen or is now saying they saw. But the ARB has been clear. The ARB's co-chairs have been clear that they had unfettered access." Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, a member of the House Oversight Committee, suggested on Fox News on Monday that Maxwell told him the same story a year ago, when congressional investigators interviewed the former State Department employee. However, the Benghazi report that the House Oversight Committee produced last year doesn't mention anything about Maxwell's allegations. Cummings, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said Tuesday, "Mr. Maxwell did not bring that to our attention when we interviewed him extensively." Should Wednesday's hearing become too heated, a pair of Democrat-aligned firms are readying the website BenghaziCommittee.com, described as a rapid response project to fact-check and respond to the Select Committee on Benghazi hearings. If lawmakers are interested in keeping Wednesday's discussion nonpartisan, there's still plenty to discuss. Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told CBS News that Congress could avoid the typical "Benghazi foodfights" by focusing on the overall dilemma of the United States' policy in Libya. "The president himself recently acknowledged that he's been very disappointed in where the country has gone over three years," O'Hanlon said. "So there's no partisanship in observing that the broad policy has failed, and that we need improvements in everything from embassy security to rapid response forces to how we try to help the Libyans build a new state." Libya this year has been plagued by some of the worst violence it's seen since dictator Muammar Qaddafi was ousted in 2011. American personnel evacuated the country in July, and a group allied with Islamist militias recently stood guard over the deserted U.S. embassy in Tripoli. The committee on Wednesday will hear from Greg Starr, assistant secretary for diplomatic security for the State Department; Mark Sullivan, chairman of the Independent Panel on Best Practices and former U.S. Secret Service director; and Todd Keil a member of the Independent Panel on Best Practices and a former Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary. *Politico: “Bill Clinton to stump for New Hampshire pols” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/bill-clinton-new-hampshire-campaigning-111024.html>* By Katie Glueck September 16, 2014, 5:58 p.m. EDT Former President Bill Clinton is expected to campaign for Democratic candidates next month in New Hampshire. WMUR.com reported on Tuesday that Clinton will be in the Granite State, home to the first presidential primary, on Oct. 16for a Jefferson Jackson dinner. A spokesman for the former president subsequently confirmed the report. Clinton’s wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would be the likely Democratic front-runner if she decides to make a second run for president in 2016. Bill Clinton is expected to stump for Democrats on the ballot, a list that includes Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, Reps. Carol Shea-Porter and Ann McLane Kuster, and Gov. Maggie Hassan, the report noted. *BuzzFeed: “Jon Huntsman, Independent For President?” <http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/jon-huntsman-independent-for-president#2wk3999>* By Ruby Cramer and McKay Coppins September 16, 2014, 9:05 p.m. EDT [Subtitle:] The former Utah governor has engaged with supporters and donors in a discussion about another White House bid in 2016. Former presidential candidate Jon Huntsman has engaged in discussions with supporters in recent months about pursuing another White House bid — this time as an independent, according to three sources close to Huntsman. The former Utah governor declined to comment for the record. His daughter, MSNBC co-host Abby Huntsman Livingston, who was a surrogate for Huntsman’s campaign in 2012, said in an email that her father is “primarily focused on family and private-sector endeavors.” She added: “He has no plans to run, but in politics never say never. I know there is a lot of pull out there for him to do something as an independent.” The sources said Huntsman has talked with supporters and donors about an independent candidacy, and that he appeared open to the idea. Other friends and former aides, however, suggested that the 2016 conversations were primarily a function of Huntsman’s willingness to hear out his supporters — not his interest in the race. Fundraising would be a massive obstacle, one his campaign struggled with mightily in 2012. And securing a place on a nationwide ballot is difficult — and expensive — for any independent candidate. “People are way out over their skis,” said Steven Bogden, the policy director for Huntsman’s political action committee, Red Rock PAC, which was founded last May to help test the waters for a national run but has since gone dormant. “Just because Huntsman loves Captain Beefheart doesn’t mean he’s taking psychedelics,” Bogden said. Huntsman told the Deseret News earlier this month that he was a “strong no” on a 2016 presidential bid. Huntsman dropped out of the Republican primary in January 2012, after a third-place finish in New Hampshire, where he based his headquarters. About a month later, appearing on MSNBC, he called for the rise of a “third-party movement.” “Someone’s going to step up at some point and say we’ve had enough of this,” he said. Before he quit the race, Huntsman considered going independent twice, once in the summer and again in the fall of 2011, according to a senior member of his campaign staff. Huntsman considered taking advantage of the infrastructure set up by Americans Elect, a nonprofit group that hoped to elect a third-party candidate, but his campaign ultimately dismissed the idea as unrealistic. Those deliberations were detailed in part in the book, Double Down: Game Change 2012, which outlines a call from Huntsman to his campaign manager after a September debate in Tampa, Fla. “I want to go independent,” Huntsman reportedly said. “I think we should do it sooner rather than later.” Since the election, Huntsman has co-chaired a coalition of Democrats, Republicans, and independents called “No Labels.” He also serves as chairman of the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank. The 54-year-old former governor was most recently the U.S. ambassador to China during President Obama’s first term. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · September 18 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton participates in a CAP roundtable (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-center-for-american-progress-110874.html> ) · September 19 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the DNC with Pres. Obama (CNN <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/27/politics/obama-clinton-dnc/index.html>) · September 21 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton attends CGI kickoff (The Hollywood Reporter <http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clintons-honor-leonardo-dicaprios-environmental-731964> ) · September 22 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton at CGI (CGI <http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/public/2014/pdf/agenda.pdf>) · September 23 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton at CGI (CGI <http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/public/2014/pdf/agenda.pdf>) · September 23 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women CGI Dinner (Twitter <https://twitter.com/danmericaCNN/status/510157741957316609>) · September 29 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines fundraiser for DCCC for NY and NJ candidates (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-new-york-fundraiser-110902.html?hp=r4> ) · September 29 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines another fundraiser for DCCC (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-headline-dccc-fundraiser-110764.html?hp=l8_b1> ) · October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network <http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>) · October 6 – Ottawa, Canada: Sec. Clinton speaks at Canada 2020 event (Ottawa Citizen <http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-speaking-in-ottawa-oct-6> ) · October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation Annual Dinner (UNLV <http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>) · October 14 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes salesforce.com Dreamforce conference (salesforce.com <http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/highlights.jsp#tuesday>) · October 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for House Democratic women candidates with Nancy Pelosi (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-nancy-pelosi-110387.html?hp=r7> ) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)