EFTA00215252
EFTA00215254 DataSet-9
EFTA00215256

EFTA00215254.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 379 words document
D2 V11 V16 P17
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (379 words)
From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:52:04 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated_with_l_Information.doc.rtf Here is a version with only one information but the same time, which may be more conventional. To "Jay Lefkowite cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? 09/18/2007 09:14 Ml Hi Jay — I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly oppose the suggestion). From: Jay Lefkowitz [maitto Sent: Tuesda Se tember 18 2007 8:59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation in the state on the state charges with the first 6 months being community control. To *Jay Lefkovnte 09!18:2007 08:44 MI cc Subject Draft Agreements? EFTA00215254 Hi Jay — I was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but I will try to remain patient. I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (I) a plea agreement to a federal charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him). A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy. A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute without compulsory process. On the obstruction charges, many of the fa in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations o We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we could consider that. Hope that helps. EFTA00215255
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e195ba98e02b9a918110e8dac7f563b8c35171a14e788e4182587137a00e35c0
Bates Number
EFTA00215254
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!