podesta-emails
[big campaign] Media Monitoring Report - Morning 06/18/08
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
*Main Topics: *Offshore Drilling, Terrorism and Guantanamo Back and Forth
*Summary of Shift:* Gas prices continue to rise and McCain's new stance on
offshore drilling is attracting attention. While receiving the
support of Bush and the recently converted Crist McCain is being attacked
from the Democratic side for being environmentally irresponsible. Terrorism
has also become a major battleground with the McCain camping calling Obama
"naïve" and "delusional." The Obama camp shot back accusing McCain of trying
to "frighten" Americans.
Rememberances of Russert continued today with coverage of his
funeral. Much of Iowa remains underwater after the breach of the levees
yesterday.
Highlights:
1. Offshore Drilling
a. Sens. Boxer and McCaskill call McCain's position a flip-flop
b. Dana Bash examines McCain's flip-flop on offshore drilling
c. McCain's plan won't have an appreciable effect on gas prices
d. McCain's drilling position is a "side headache" that will hurt him in
coastal states
e. ABC-WJLA-DC links McCain to Bush in their offshore drilling coverage
2. The Supreme Court, Guantanamo and Obama vs. McCain on terror
a. Former Bush terror czar, Clarke, accuses McCain of trying to frighten
Americans
b. John McCain's changing position on detainees
3. Giuliani makes the rounds
a. Giuliani talks counterterrorism, pushes offense
b. MSNBC: Calling Obama naïve is just quoting Hillary
c. Giuliani talks oil drilling and fighting terrorism
4. Independent voters split between the candidates but like McCain
because he's perceived as different than Bush
5. Fox covers Recipegate
6. Fox News: Gingrich leading drive for domestic oil drilling [no clip]
7. Fox News: Oil drilling could hurt tourism [no clip]
8. Fox News examines "What House Star Signs" in VP Stakes [no clip]
9. Conan and Letterman make fun of McCain's age [no clip]
10. CBS WUSA DC outlines McCain's and Obama's positions on energy [no clip]
Local Highlights:
11. Local Affiliates in Texas do straight reporting on McCain's visit [no
clip]
Clips:
Highlight #1
*Boxer and McCaskill Call McCain out on Oil Flip-Flop *(MSNBC 06/18/08
8:37am)
BARBARA BOXER: We can't keep on doing the same old same old. For example,
they're no saying, drill, give them more leases . . . the oil companies
already have 68 million acres already under lease they're not using. So why
just give them more acres . . .?
CLAIRE MCCASKILL: In fact, I'm surprised Joe, you didn't mention as a
Floridian, they wear a lot of flip-flops in Florida, we've got a giant
flip-flop here on drilling offshore in Florida. The people of Florida do not
want the incredible tourist industry spoiled by more offshore drilling . . .
but what happens? John McCain flip-flops on this and your governor
flip-flops on this. And you know what it is? It's the influence of big oil.
[. . .]
SCARBOROUGH: . . . when I was in congress, I was very, very conservative on
economic issues, almost a libertarian but there is something about being
surrounded by water that turns you into an environmentalist on these type
issues. Also, the thing is talking about the environment, George Miller and
I would always fight against royalty relief when we've actually got the
federal government, basically subsidizing oil companies to drill in areas
where Americans don't want them to drill.
BOXER: Right. And I want to put some dollar figures to it. You know, the
unspoiled coastlines all over America, that's a $60 billion recreation and
tourism industry and millions of jobs. So it's very shortsighted. Now we
have the two oil men in the White House who've just been waiting to do this.
And it was President Bush who said we're addicted to oil, remember that? . .
. and what's the answer? More oil sometime in the future?
*Dana Bash Examines McCain's Flip-Flop Reversal Over Off-Shore Oil
Drilling*(CNN 06/18/08 7:26am)
JOHN ROBERTS: The President's request for off-shore drilling comes less than
24 hours after Senator John McCain changed his stance on the issue. […]
Dana, a lot of people changing their minds, John McCain, Gov. Charlie Crist
out of Florida, what's this all about?
DANA BUSH: Well, what they're all saying *[…] from the White House, John
McCain is basically saying the same thing, which is interesting because he's
trying to distance himself from the President on climate change.* But on
this issue of off-shore drilling, he says he's looking for some way to ease
voters pain at paying at the pump and that's not the only area his position
on energy policy is evolving. In the heart of Texas oil company, John McCain
went after Barack Obama for supporting a windfall profits tax on oil
companies. […] Critical now, but just last month McCain said he was open to
the idea. […] *The change, proof of just how tricky gas price politics is
for McCain. *On the one hand, he's pushing green energy alternatives, like
wind, solar, and bio-diesel. Pushing away from George Bush with this new ad.
[…] But in the face of voter outrage over high gas prices McCain is changing
his position on an issue that helped define him as an environmentally
conscious republican. He used to oppose lifting a federal moratorium on
off-shore drilling. Now he wants to lift the ban. […] *It's a risky reversal
by a candidate trying to use the issue to appeal to independents. *Especially
in the battleground of Florida where many republicans, like Gov. Charlie
Crist and Senator Martinez have long opposed off-shore drilling. *But as
McCain changes his position, so are they.* […] Barack Obama accused John
McCain of taking the politically expedient way out. Obama echoed what some
environmental groups are saying about off-shore drilling, that it would
really take 5 to 10 years to really get the oil exploration up and running
and that's no short term fix.
*McCain's Plan Won't Have an Appreciable Effect on Gas Prices *(MSNBC
06/18/08 6:47am)
ALI VELSHI: John McCain was talking about energy and I wanted to chime in
about that because what we've been waiting for is the third leg of the stool
from the major presidential candidates in terms of an energy policy . . .
both the candidates say they want to reduce the candidates dependence on
foreign oil . . . except that the United States uses about 20 million
barrels of oil a day, we produce about 5 million . . . we've been using a
disproportionate amount of oil for very long. John McCain is talking about
drilling for more oil . . . the concept here is the problematic one . . .
the problem is that no amount of oil that we drill for is going to offset
the worldwide demand for oil so it doesn't necessarily bring the price down.
The concentration should probably be in reducing our reliance on oil.
*McCain's Oil Position will Hurt Him in Costal States *(MSNBC 06/18/08
9:06am)
TAMRON HALL: Yesterday . . . John McCain said that drilling was a step in
the right direction but Barack Obama calls it a bad idea and a sign that
McCain can't stick to his positions.
[. . .]
JAMES WARREN: . . . to suggest that this is just a matter of McCain
inconsistency, I think is quite unfair . . . the situation in this country
is getting more and more dire . . . the question is for McCain, politically,
is does this hurt him or not? . . . in coastal states will gas prices go so
high that folks who are naturally reluctant to support offshore drilling,
will they have second thoughts?
TAMRON HALL: . . . we just showed that Quinnapiac poll where Sen. Obama
leads Sen. McCain and this was before the plan . . . to lift the ban on
offshore drilling. So when you look at the matchup without that conversation
thrown in we know how Floridians feel about this. Now with the Gov. coming
in on McCain's side, how does this affect the race in Florida?
LYNN SWEET: I think it will make it harder for McCain because what this
really is is McCain tossing it to the states and President Bush tossing it
to the states which will immediately trigger a big state campaign by the
local environmental groups and forces who will probably line up to fight
this . . . it will also create problems for Sen. McCain because one of the
issues he was going to use to attract crossover Democrats was that he was
different than President Bush; he does have an environmental record, he has
recognized global warming. So what this decision does it triggers
organizations organizing in critical states in the presidential campaign
that might be against him on this issue. It just creates, I think, kind of a
side headache. And nothing will happen this summer so fast anyway that will
bring gas prices down before the election.
*WJLA Links Bush To McCain On Piece Covering Their New Oil Drilling Policies
* (ABC-DC-WJLA, 06/18/08, 6:23am)
ALLISON STARLING: *Well President Bush is on the same page as republican
presidential candidate, John McCain, when it comes to energy relief.* Today,
Mr. Bush will call on Congress to lift the ban on off-shore oil drilling.
This as energy policy moves to the top of the agenda for the presidential
campaign. Viviana Ratato has the details.
VIVIANO RATATO: American's are paying more than $4.00 a gallon for gas,
that's why President Bush will make a move today to support off-shore oil
drilling. He's expected to call on Congress to lift the federal ban which
currently prevents it. The current presidential candidates also weighed in.
*The likely republican nominee agrees with the President.*
[McCain Off-Shore Oil Drilling Speech Shown]
*But this represents a political U-Turn for John McCain, who in the past has
opposed lifting the ban on drilling off the U.S. coast for oil.* Barack
Obama, who is against lifting the ban, calls his rival's position
flip-flopping.
BARACK OBAMA: This is yet another reversal by John McCain in terms of his
earlier positions. I think we could set up an interesting debate between
John McCain 2000 and John McCain 2008.
RATATO: As rising oil prices continue to worry American families, a new ABC
News poll shows more Americans trust Obama with America's energy future*.
Specifically, just over half of respondents trust Obama to do a better job
than McCain handling energy policy. *The President's announcement is
intended to pressure Congress into lifting the ban on off-shore drilling.
But with only a few months left before a new administration enters the White
House, it's unclear how effective the President will be.
Highlight #2
*Richard Clarke Accuses McCain Campaign of Fear-mongering on Terror *(MSNBC
06/18/08 6:17am)
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Richard Clarke came out swinging for Obama, didn't he?
WILLIE GEIST: Richard Clarke, former terrorism czar under President Bush and
a great critic of the Bush administration, responded to the McCain response
to Obama . . .
RICHARD CLARKE: I'm frankly a little disgusted b y the attempts of some of
my friends on the McCain campaign to use the same old tired tactics that
have been used in the last several campaigns of trying to paint one party as
weak on terrorism and, completely and utterly distorting the record of that
party to frankly frighten Americans.
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: And Joe, doesn't he have a point, looking back at the Bush
presidency and what tactics were used or what sentiment of the voters might
have been preyed upon a bit to get people to vote for President Bush and are
we going to fall for it again?
*John McCain's Changing Position on Guantanamo Detainees *(MSNBC 06/18/08
7:24am)
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Rudy Giuliani and a lot of Americans are asking the
question, why should we give terror suspects . . . constitutional rights
that no enemy combatant on foreign soil has ever had before last week?
SUSAN RICE: You should ask John McCain that, because back in 2003 *The New
York Times* reported that John McCain wanted everybody in Guantanamo charged
with a crime or released. That's what the administration wanted to do.
[. . .]
RICE: . . . that goes way, way beyond what the Supreme Court just said. The
Supreme Court said *habeas* hearings. John McCain in 2003 said charge them
or release them. Now he's flip-flopped for political purposes. This
campaign, the McCain campaign is doing what George Bush tried to do in 2004,
which is to stoke fear and blow smoke and confuse the American people.
SCARBOROUGH: It worked though, didn't it?
RICE: The American people are smart . . . they get that this has been a
failed war on terrorism . . .
Highlight #3
*Giuliani Talks Counterterrorism, Pushes Offense* (FNC 06/18/08 7:50am)
GRETCHEN CARLSON: We have been discussing all morning the rift now that has
suddenly appeared yesterday between John McCain and Barack Obama about
terrorism and how we should handle it. Now, here is what Barack Obama has
said. […] do you have a problem with that statement?
RUDY GIULIANI: Well sure. What it says is something I've been saying along
time. The democrats want to go back to a pre-September 11th view of
terrorism. What I call being on defense. They want to treat it mostly as a
criminal justice matter use grand juries, investigations. They seem to think
that 1993 was a good example of how to do it. It turns out in retrospect
1993 was a mistake. It's was a mistake not to recognize it was more than a
criminal act it was an act of terrorism. It was followed by attacks in
Nairobi, in Darisalam, in Cobalt Towers, in U.S.S. Cole, a whole series of
attacks and then ultimately the attacks of September 11th. The reality is we
can't deal with this as solely a criminal justice matter. The things that I
said and other republicans have said are no different than what Hillary
Clinton said about Barack Obama's approach to dealing with terrorism. I
think she described it as irresponsible or naive or some language like that.
I'm not sure I would characterize it. I would describe it and say this is
not a realistic approach. Time has proven that being on offense is better
than being on defense.
BRIAN KILMEADE: Rudy, were things exposed in that trial of Yousef and others
detrimental to the war on terror?
GIULIANI: In several of the trials, there have been things of interest that
were passed on to bin laden. This disclosure of classified information,
which sometimes comes out in these things. These are all dangerous things. I
think the Supreme Court, quite respectfully I would say this, but I think
the supreme court made a big mistake in extending rights to terrorists. Big
mistake is to give terrorists rights they didn't have in the past. I don't
understand for the life of me, why would you want to create new rights for
terrorists at a time we are dealing with terrorism?
STEVE DOOCY: During the Clinton years, wasn't that law enforcement only?
GIULIANI: It was to a large extent there were responses to several of the
bombings but they were for a day or two and they were not sustained. The
whole difference that has happened since September 11th that I believe was
at the core of keeping us safe is we now have a full response to terrorism.
We're on offense. We're trying to anticipate it. in the criminal justice
system you react to what happened.
*Giuliani: Calling Obama Naïve is Just Quoting Hillary *(MSNBC 06/18/08
7:24am)
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Yesterday in a conference call members of McCain's campaign
called Barack Obama naïve, they called him delusional. . .are the
Republicans trying to tell Americans once again that electing a Democrat
will make them and their families less safe?
RUDY GIULIANI: I think those Democrats are just repeating what Hillary
Clinton said. Those are almost exactly the same words . . .
SCARBOROUGH: Do you think that Barack Obama is naïve? Do you think that he
is delusional? Do you think that he's dangerous?
GIULIANI: It's an attitude that demonstrates his inexperience. . .
*Giuliani Talks Oil Drilling and Fighting Terrorism* (CNN 06/18/08 7:26am)
JOHN ROBERTS: Hey look, during the campaign you were for lifting the federal
ban on off-shore drilling, but a lot of people saying this is nothing more
than pandering to the oil and gas interests, this is going to do nothing to
lower the price per barrel of oil in this country. Listen to what Barack
Obama said about that yesterday.
[Barack Obama "Had it right the first time" Clip Shown]
As we mentioned Mr. Mayor, this is an about-face for Senator McCain, also an
about change for Governor Crist who has about-faced on his position on
off-shore drilling. Why all the change of heart here?
RUDY GIULIANI: Well, as you said, i believe it should be left to the states.
That's the position I've always taken. I think the reality is it's just not
correct to say it wouldn't affect the price of oil. anything you do to
increase supply, actually, given the futures market, anything you do to
suggest that you're going to increase supply in the future is going to
reduce somewhat the price of oil. The reality is, Barack Obama opposes
almost everything that could realistically reduce the price of oil.
Expanding refineries. Expanding nuclear power, which is something that he
doesn't embrace. so the reality is you can't look at this in isolation. if
all you were doing is this, it would have a small impact on the price of
oil. but if you're talking about thinking some of the things that have hurt
us over the last 20 to 30 years, then that is truly taking us on a path
toward energy independence. It includes liquid natural gas. It includes wind
and solar. It includes hybrid vehicles. You have to do all these things.
These all have to be opened up for discussion. Because we've been basically
on hold for about 30 years now. We haven't built a new refinery in 30 years.
we haven't licensed a nuclear power plant in 25 or 30 years. We're not
exploiting responsibly our oil reserves. All these things have to now be
opened up. We're in a crisis with regard to this. And the reality is
the American
people deserve some really tough political decisions about things that we've
held back on in the past.
ROBERTS: Mr. mayor, in the past 24 hours you've really been lashing out at
senator Obama over this idea of fighting the war on terrorism. it falls out
of comments he made in an interview with abc in which he said regarding the
supreme court decision on Guantanamo detainees, quote, we can crackdown on
the threats to the united states but we can do so within the constraints of
the constitution. For example, the first attack against the World Trade
Center, we were able to arrest those responsible, put them on trial. They
are currently in U.S. prisons, incapacitated. He says he wants to deal with
terrorism within the frame work of the constitution. What's wrong with that?
GIULIANI: The reality is, no one is lashing out at him. The words that we
use by some of the commentators are no different than hillary clinton said.
she described the way he deals with terrorism, the way he proposed dealing
with it. talking to people in some of these countries without preconditions.
she described it as irresponsible. i'm not sure she used the word naive,
it's the same word some of the republicans used. i haven't said that but
what i do suggest is he doesn't have the experience to handle terrorism. it
was a terrible mistake to deal with it in the '90s just as a criminal
justice matter.
ROBERTS: Would you have dealt with the 1993 world trade center bombing in a
different fashion?
GIULIANI: We should have. We should have recognized it was a terrorist
attack.
ROBERTS: What should you have done?
GIULIANI: America should have gone on offense. America should have gone on
offense against terrorism. We didn't. We had a muted response to the terrorist
attacks that occurred right after that. Including the ones that occurred on
the u.s.s. coal where we had no response. we saw it as the way senator
Obama sees it. I call it a pre September 11th mentality that he wants to
return to. The reality is the criminal justice system has limited
application in this area of terrorism. when it can be used, it should be
used. but you should not think of it as a criminal justice matter, as a
grand jury is going to solve terrorism. and i guess the real objection that
we have is trying to take the constitution and apply it all over the world.
We never did that before. The constitutional decision last week by the supreme
court is a creation of new rights for terrorists that did not exist before.
ROBERTS: Senator Obama says that the Guantanamo detentions haven't resulted
in a lot of people being prosecuted for terrorist crimes and all its done is
ruin America's credibility in the world. True or untrue?
GIULIANI: It may have also protected America. at least 30 of the people that
were released from Guantanamo have engaged in battlefield activities or
terrorist activities again. That'll give you some idea of what can happen if
you decide to release those people from Guantanamo. So the reality is the
people that are being held there may have something to do with safety. We
haven't had a terrorist attack in the United States since September 11. I
thank god for that. You keep thinking it could happen again and we've got to
be prepared for that. The reality is, we've been safe. I don't know why we
want to change the constitutional guarantees and give terrorists more
constitutional guarantees than they have had over the last 200 years. Or at
least enemy competence they've had over the last 200 years
Highlight #4
*Independent Voters Down, Split Between Candidates, But Like McCain Because
He Is Different Than Bush* (CNN 06/18/08 9:45am)
BILL SCHNEIDER: Independents hold the key to victory. Both contenders know
it. […] *Who's got the edge with independents? Two new polls have the same
answer. Neither candidate.* The Washington Post/ABC News poll finds
independents split, so does the CNN poll by the Opinion Research
Corporation, 45 percent for Barack Obama, 45 percent for John McCain.
Independents remember have no brand-name loyalties. Bizarre as it may sound,
they actually look at the candidates on the issues and then make up their
minds. So what do they think of the candidates? Do they hate them both?
Actually they like them both. McCain somewhat more than Obama. On the
issues, however, independents are not happy at all. 78 percent think the
economy is lousy. 72 percent oppose the war in Iraq. Which explains why
independents are so down on the republican party. Only 33 percent have a
favorable opinion on republicans. 53 percent like the democrats. Big
difference. Obama's trying to sell change, which independents clearly want.
[…] *If independents are so down on republicans, why do so many of them
support McCain? Because most independents think McCain will be different
than Bush. Otherwise McCain wouldn't have a chance.* Independents don't like
the republican brand, but they do like McCain. For independents the brand
comes second, for partisans the brand comes first.
Highlight #5
*Fox News on Recipe Gate *(FNC 06/18/08 8:59am)
GINA MOSE: John McCain's wife Cindy is getting battered over a cookie
contest. […] "Serial Recipe thief" "Re-Heat Offender" "Cindy Bakes Another
Waffer" screams the Huffington Post. Both Cindy McCain and Bill Clinton are
feeling the heat, accused of recipe plagiarism. Every year FamilyCircle
magazine holds a presidential cookie bake-off. Candidate spouses submit
their favorite recipes and may the best cookie win. Readers are supposed to
try the recipes then vote. […] Cindy McCain turned in a receipe she says she
got from a good friend, but the Huffington Post says they found the exact
same recipe on Hersheys.com. The recipe's are pretty identical. […] They're
even in the same order! No comment from Mrs. McCain. This is the second time
she's taken lumps for supposedly passing off recipes, the last time for
recipes for passion fruit mousse, where described as family recipes on the
McCain website then discovered elsewhere. That time Mrs. McCain blamed a
campaign intern for posting the recipes. […] That's the way the cookie
crumbles, they smell good, they smell like plagiarism.
--
Evan Whitbeck
Progressive Media USA
202.609.7677 (office)
360.480.0786 (cell)
[email protected]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group.
To post to this group, send to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns
This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e1a494feb05c3298e2171b1b1514bf01db960bbb2bf1b078d523f4f91e05fb65
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email
Comments 0