📄 Extracted Text (1,082 words)
From: Richard Joslin
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 1:52 PM
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: Eileen Alexanderson; lawrence delson
Subject: Re:
I am not privy to comp numbers for anyone other than Ava and Aneta so = cannot be precise. EA can add color here.
401k specialist at=Ambose has census data and he was running ACP and ADP (non discrimination =ests) and running
matching scenarios for 2015.
IT costs currently $3,850 per month. Proposals are in range of $=,40O to 3,600 per month. There are to add on/
contingent costs on each pro=osal that I need to review to determine differences with our current provi=er, eg new
server install charge, or imaging a new user computer, file backup costs.
On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:35 AM, "jeffrey E." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote:
providing percentage numbers for IT tells me NOTHING=It; how much ?? same with 401 k. dollars only , th=s
is reallh silly
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Richard Joslin =span dir="ltr">
<mailto » wrote:
Additional specificity:
loser positions — AFP Imaging and Magnetek can be sold. Th=re may be virtually worthless security held
in LDB 2011 [Starter Corp.] that might be sold to claim tax loss this year
Dartmouth contribution— sending checks for Leon to sign today<=font>
From: Richard Joslin
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:25 AM
To: jeffrey E.; Eileen Alexanderson; lawrence delson
Subject: RE:
LRN shares (K 12 Inc). RD and I contacted transfer agent and now RD is w=rking with KUE outside
counsel to get shares quantities confirmed and re-i=sued if necessary. The transfer agent records do not match the
amount we s=ould have received (nor is the name on file the holder of record (LBF Holdings)) and transfer agent has n=t
EFTA_R1_01777755
EFTA02594065
received insruction to deliver to broker. Once we get quantity and=other transfer agent issues cleared up, we will mpve
to broker and sell.&n=sp; RD is contacting outside counsel again today for follow up
I rec'd the last of 3 IT outsource proposals yesterday. Second mee=ings with all concluded last week and
EA/ LD included in second meeting.&n=sp; I will summarize differences and take one firm out of running (cost 3x=. Plan
was to discuss internally today/ tomorrow for final selection. Cost 10% cheaper than current provid=r with same/
improved coverage.
Foundation has been funded with appreciated stocks and these positions h=ve been liquidated. There
are 1648 shares of United Rentals that are=restricted. RD is sending paperwork to LDB to sign today to clean these
sh=res up. Once the paperwork is provided to broker and they release the restriction (move the shares to type 2
acco=nt) then transfer to Foundation will begin. There are a couple of lo=s positions worth < $3K that need to be sold.
RD is to provide shares a=d ticker to EA today so that clearance/ compliance apporval can begin. I'd like to have the
accounting group=be invilved in this to gain familiarity with the Apollo compliance process= There is a worthless
position that JPM will purchase for $1 t= take off their books (Scienta is the name of the company - no longer on pink
sheets or OTC BB) RD has paperwork f=r this for LDB to sign today.
401k - call with specialist yesterday with EA/RJ. To not hav= Julie be part of 401k, the thought is to
begin plan Dec 1. Compensa=ion would be one month and any employer contribution would be minimal give= any
contribution would be for rank and file on one month comp. Given that highly compensated is defined by prior ye=r
compensation, Ftl and RD are not highly comped in 2013 and will help cure=any low participation by rank and file for
2014 plan year. (Plan yea= is calender year) Top heavy rules should not be applicable given that RI and EA are only key
employees and AC/RD ar= not, ie the key employee contributions will not exceed 60% of total plan =ontributions a/o
12/31/2014. For 2015, the 401k speciali=t is running numbers based on our census to see if we will have any issue
either on the discrimination rules or the top he=vy rules. Specialist indicated that matching can be made only for no=-
highly compensated and not fr highly compensation, For 2015, HG will not =e highly compensated apparently as her
stub comp is less than $115K. The more non-highly comped that partic=pate, the better. 401k specialist is running
some scenarios and cost= under different matiching scenarios and will revert tomorrow (Tuesday is =mbrose holiday)
Art list has been provided to LDB. Gating question is what is cost=benefit of retaining more than 2x
collateral - step up benefit of art reta=ned in estate vs lesser value of art partnership leaving an unpaid note in=hands of
APO1 (with a zero basis), ie capital gain by trust at death. This was the gist of the meeting wit= LDB /HG/Ill late Oct. HG
has confirmed we can expand colateral list =o 200+ names and go down the value scale to $200K per item. LDB =K with
this. This was discussed in FO team meeting two weeks ago.
From: Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 5:31 AM
To: Eileen Alexanderson; lawrence delson; Richard Joslin
2
EFTA_R1_01777756
EFTA02594066
Subject:
please tell me where we are , with=specificity. KU shares. 401 k, IT cont=act. foundation sales and
contributions of stock. , TIMBER ? list of=art to be contributed to partnership.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
3
EFTA_R1_01777757
EFTA02594067
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e21f2bf8d35d6265925d44c9849eb353014763fb226c1c3f8fe43f98730b60ad
Bates Number
EFTA02594065
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0