👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (767 words)
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Richard Kahn
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:37:58 +0000
He plead guilty to solicitation of s prostitue
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 3:28 PM Richard Kahn < wrote:
please advise on DKI proposed responses below for Interactive Brokers application
thank you
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Begin forwarded message:
From: Darren Indyke <
Subject: Privileged and Confidential
Date: August 10, 2017 at 7:20:39 PM EDT
To: Richard Kahn
The Interactive Brokers account opening questionnaire that you gave me in connection with opening
accounts for STC includes two questions that we have been considering:
I. Has the organization [STC] or any of its officers or authorized traders ever been the subject of, or
initiated, litigation, arbitration or any other type of dispute or settlement proceeding with another broker or
dealer?
DKI comments: The Wilbraham case was several years ago and I am not sure that it is relevant anymore. It
was with Citibank as an investment advisor and fund manager and not a broker or a dealer to my recollection,
but it was so long ago, I doubt that it matters in any event.
We had two Bear Steams related proceedings approximately 6 years ago. One was a FINRA arbitration by
FTC and COUQ against The Bear Steams Companies, Bear Steams & Co, Bear Steams Asset Management
and Warren Spector. The other was in the US District Court in the VI by FTC against The Bear Steams
Companies.. Neither was by STC or Jeffrey. FTC was merged into SF which is a subsidiary of STC, but it is
not STC. Moreover the arbitration related to claims in respect of two hedge funds. The underlying claims in
the arbitration were really in the nature of claims against Bear Steams serving as investment advisor and fund
manager rather than as Broker or Dealer. Even the action in the US DC in the Virgin Islands that related to
EFTA01037772
FTC's losses with respect to shares of Bear Steams stock was not against Bear Steams in its capacity as a
broker or dealer, but in its capacity as issuer.
For the reasons set forth above, i would argue in favor of responding "no" to this question. But I would run it
past JE for his approval.
2. Have any of the principals, officers or authorized traders of the Organization ever been arrested for, or
convicted of, a crime?
DIG comments: Although it is not specifically stated in the question, i wonder whether this question is
intended to relate to securities related crimes or crimes of dishonesty, etc. On the other hand, there is not
such a limitation in the body of the question and technically the response to this question would be yes. JE, a
principal and officer of STC, was arrested for and convicted of a crime. In the box that requests details to be
provided, I would simply say:
Mr. Epstein, a principal and officer of STC was arrested for and convicted of soliciting prostitution. If more
details are subsequently required, they can ask us and we can decide how to respond. I would also run this
past JE as well before responding to the question.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Thanks.
DARREN K. INDYKE
DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC
575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor
**** Please note that my mobile telephone number has changed to the new number provided above. ***
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client
privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication
or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this
communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - O 2017 Darren K.
Indyke, PLLC — All rights reserved.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
EFTA01037773
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01037774
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e235c882f09b4f9fe1f0b724ee9680a48d9c2e358afe1f16b9cba0c07bc4f9d1
Bates Number
EFTA01037772
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3
💬 Comments 0