👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (431 words)
From:
To:
Subject: FW: The Spectator - Prince Andrew story
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:18:04 +0000
Inline-Images: -WRD000.jpg; image00 I.jpg
From: Matt McDonald <M E>
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:12 AM
To:
Subject: The Spectator - Prince Andrew story
Dear
Our writer Dominic Green has written about Prince Andrew's correspondence with the Southern District of New
York, and how it is being characterized by Geoffrey Berman.
I was wondering whether you would be prepared to comment on the following excerpts from Mr Green's story.
He attempted to contact the press office earlier today but was not able to get through to anyone:
'Berman has actively misled the global media and the global audience,'my source alleges. 'The Duke's legal
team has dozens ofemail exchanges with the Southern District, proving that there has beenfull cooperation.'
On January 27, Berman denounced the Dukefirm the steps ofEpstein's Manhattan townhouse. Berman
claimed to befacing a 'wall ofsilence' and 'zero co-operation'from Andrew. But this, my source tells me,
wasn't true: 'Berman must have known we had an email trail.'
***
...the DOJmade no effort to contact Prince Andrew during Jeffrey Epstein's lifitime. Only after Epstein's death
in August 2019 and the BBC's broadcast of Virginia Roberts Giuffre's accusations in November 2019, did the
DOJ approach the Prince — not as a suspect, but as a witness.
'The lawyers responded immediately,'I'm told. In early January, the Prince's new legal team suggested that
they draft a proposalfor how Andrew would deliver his witness statement. The DOJ, my source reports,
accepted this approach.
Although the DOJ wanted to talk with Andrew as a witness, Berman seemed to imply that Andrew had aided
Epstein's crimes: Epstein couldn't have done what he did without the assistance ofothers. ' This, I'm told, was
an 'overt breach ofthe DOJ:s own rules on how to engage with witnesses, and the need to maintain privacy
and confidentiality'.
After Berman's attack in January, there was a everyflank exchange ofviews' between Andrew's lawyers and the
Southern District But Andrew's team played by the rules and didn't release emails that wouldprove they were
negotiating with the Southern District in goodfaith.
EFTA00087604
We plan to publish the story at 3pm ET, but can update the story to include any response. If this request for
comment should be directed towards your press office, I'd appreciate it if you could pass it onto them - there is
no way of contacting them on the SDNY site as their mailbox is full and no one is in the office.
Yours sincerely,
Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Managing Editor The Spectator US
EFTA00087605
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e239fb4efdf630e909d922a3abfe3c4764915d11db657fc18ec58d893d0dce5a
Bates Number
EFTA00087604
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0