👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,139 words)
From: Seth Lloyd
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 2:44:13 PM
Subject: Re:
To: "jeffrey E." cjeevacation©gmaiicom>
Dear Jeffrey,
That is poetic!
Well, there is a clear evolutionary advantage to consciousness of others and to self-consciousness.
That ability to say, if she does this, I'll do that, but if she does that, P11 do something else, is key
to dealing with others, and directly leads to agreements, deception, etc. That is, having even a
simple model of others' behavior, and of one's own future actions, conveys a strong advantage.
Of course, such models arc necessarily incomplete. When one models oneself, one always
leaves out the vast majority of things that are going on, as you say. In my paper, 'A Turing test
for free will: I show that the incompleteness of one's own model of oneself is responsible
for one's inability to predict one's future decisions, a key component of free will.
Similarly, one'e models of others are also incomplete, so that other people constantly
behave in surprising and unpredictable ways. Because of the necessary incompleteness
of our conceptions of ourself and others, error correction is key, as you say. We must
operate in a way that allows us to function even in the face of constant unknowns. Evolution
drives us towards this error correcting ability.
Although I am phrasing this in a way that is less poetic than you!
Time for me to tilt the table more to the horizontal for a bit and watch those
balls lazily roll around.
Seth
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote:
I already enjoyed it . i will just catch up to it. why does living things pose such an
undecipherable system. ? I suggest an error correction system. is an expensive add on.
the vast majority of things going on in your body is unknown and like dynamic guard rails.
. think of it like flippers on a pin ball machine. emotions tilt the machine, overwhelming
the rate of balls and making the flippers useless. . meditation tilts the table more towards the
horizontal. . . when you reach out your hand to pick up a glass the concious makes error
corrections , it does not really decide to pick it up. it would be nice if the hard problem was
easy :)
9
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Seth Lloyd <• wrote:
Sure: let's talk tomorrow. Any time in the afternoon. (Or, we could talk yesterday!)
Seth
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:33 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
EFTA_R1_00028011
EFTA01739441
tomorw? lets assume that like a weak signal you can go back but only for I second before
the signal fades. ? an error correction.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Seth Lloyd wrote:
Dear Jeffrey,
My apologies for not responding sooner: I was off email for the last few days.
Of course thoughts are constructed from neural signals that move much slower than light but
let's
just take the suggestion that they move faster than light seriously. A couple of things would
happen.
First of all, since going faster than light translates into the ability to send signals backwards in
time,
this has implications for game theory. If you know your opponents moves in advance -- and
they
know yours -- this restricts the set of strategies to non-cheating, non-deceptive strategies. I
believe
that in such games one should be able to show that Nash equilibria are all optimal: unlike in
prisoner's
dilemma, there is no incentive for cheating. This is sort of the opposite of what you are
suggesting.
There is a sense in which thought processes are taking place in an extended setting
simultaneously
throughout the brain, so that faster than/slower than light is not so meaningful. In this setting,
as
you and Martin suggest, there is probably some pretty strong evolutionary advantage for
consciousness
or sense of self reference. Indeed, just to ask the sort of question, If he does this, I'll do that,
but if
he does this other thing, I'll do something else, requires a sense of self reference: one is modeling
what one oneself will do in the future. This does indeed allow for extended cycles of deception
and intent, which I think we agree are very important at least for human behavior.
I'd enjoy talking further so give a call any time you like.
Yours,
Seth
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote:
if you have a moment i have a quick question. - assume for the moment that living
EFTA_R1_00028012
EFTA01739442
things unlike physical things. have a component that travels faster than light. .
thoughts? or call it x . it would explain the inability of detection by conventional
means. martin and i are working on game theory of self awareness. the evolutionary
benefit of what some call consiousness. the conjecture is that is no more than a dynamic
error correction system. slow. easily overwhelmed and able to do simple tasks. if the
mathematics of biology and physics were symmetrical. physics woudl live in the slower
than light , and biology in the faster. . deception and intent in bi000gy , none of it in
physics. .
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. if you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacationOgmail.com and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
EFTA_R1_00028013
EFTA01739443
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return c-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00028014
EFTA01739444
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e32db73ef63a5bb27e1ff3549216364377c749938f9633830aa3d9a120f059b4
Bates Number
EFTA01739441
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0