👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (633 words)
GLDUS143 Henry Nicholas
Section 2: Investment Performance Glendower Capital Secondary Opportunities Fund TV, LP
In Exhibit 2 each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage peer group reported in the
Cambridge Associates Secondaries Benchmark statistics (September 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively
strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year.
Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37
Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked partners
sea OS+
• :new (mann Icor "dal*, • 1.6.61.1e
SOF 0
SOF 1N1::l•
2* PM • I SC. DP1.3 I. SO; I
:TI: I 1.• 904 6
'S. SOF •I DPI • lab CO e II iVAr I3.
SOF 0 OF' • 0 I..
2" IN.
a t l 10
BC. Sous
ltsto Sea I
20%
•
20% II I 16F
s t t t
•
" 05a
• ;
56,
OS
I.
64 1 a 00 0ir 14 • ! II 04 t•S /6 or at •09 '10 11 IS 13 11
epee on nos inn t: SOF era CPI SCF IA& RYPI
In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout
funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF
Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year.
Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke returns with a secondary risk profiles
cep
•.. SO. I FM 1 • EOF D tt
OZ0
Ss]
an.1
• at= ,dal y,
• COIF Its
it s. La.
•1
or .1
AX4 AN Alt to no n, r X
Wee to • 1..s ih•Tor
Some: Cambridge Associates Secondaries Benchmaik statistics as of September 30 2017 SOF Funds are shown benchmarked against their
War yew peer group SOF and SOF 0 performance is nee included in the data se teed to calculate the benchmark data Note that the performance
tomes in reaped ci SCF and SOF D have not been audited and should be read and rewewed n omen:ben huh Appendix 5 impOrtanIParlonnanCe
fraismatton Past padamance of SOF Finds 6 not a predecton ci hews performance.
Irfamation presented n Exhibt 21s based at the unaulted results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017
", Past performance is rat a 11111001:41 of the Mute performance of SCF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demcnwrwe the track record of the
Glick:Wow SOF Team There can be no aewarce that SOF ft/ will achieve competed° MEd% or that any target resultswill be acheved
DPI = CeArbutions to Paid-In Capital. RVOI = Rewind Value to Pawl-In Capital. TVPI = Total Value to Paid-in Capital
'4 Source' Cambridge Associates GIOOSI Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. The information reflects a companson of SOF. SOF D. SOF II
Sir III performance against one benchmark only Past performance is net a prediction ol the !awe performance or SOF. SOF D, SCF II. SCF III or
any other Glendower rinds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any Impel results will be achieved. biA
is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Team Internam presented in this chart IS based on the unaudted issues of SOF.
SOF D. 9CF 11 and Syne, of September 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in conpnctoon and *hand be read and reviewed in conjunction
with Appendix 5 Irripatant Pet matte Intrination which sets forth amongst other throe important information regarding the pedcanance
deathbed above
Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 9
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0038839
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00185023
EFTA01354245
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e3b2fe187993ebf191faef48365fc295bed0bcfaa2a7c731d1bca1010d225508
Bates Number
EFTA01354245
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0