EFTA00211919.pdf

From To Cr Subject: RE: State I Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:21:58 +0000 Importance: Normal I have reviewed the Agreement. We have no obligation to seek its continued sealing. Per my conversation with she is going to notify that he has yet to file the remainder of the Agreement and that the unsealing issue is between him/Epstein and the SAO's office. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM To: (USAFS2_ Cc: LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? went the e-mail below to this morning. How would you like to handle this issue? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Se tember 17, 2008 10:48 AM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State Jeffrey Epstein From: [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesda September 17, 2008 10:46 AM T USAFLS) Subject: FW: State Jeffrey Epstein Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Sent: Tuesda September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein How to proceed? EFTA00211919 From: Sent: Tuesda Se tember 16, 2008 3:52 PM To Cc Subject: State Jeffrey Epstein We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, EFTA00211920