gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.909.2
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.91.0 giuffre-maxwell
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.911.0

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.91.0.pdf

giuffre-maxwell 3 pages 373 words document
P17 V16 D5 V9 P19
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (373 words)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 91 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ...... ......................................... VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X Motion To Exceed Page Limits For Reply In Support Of Defendant’s Motion To Compel Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, hereby requests that the Court permit the filing of a reply memorandum in excess of the 10 pages permitted pursuant to this Court’s Practice Standard 2D. As grounds, she further avers as follows: Defendant was forced to bring her Motion to Compel as to each and every one of Plaintiff’s interrogatory responses and each and every one of her responses to the Request for Production. The issues raised in the Motion to Compel are at once novel (Plaintiff asserts, for example, a “public interest privilege” which is unavailable to individual, non-governmental litigants) and mundane (Plaintiff completely refused to answer interrogatories, even though they comply with the Federal and Local Rules). Because of the breadth of the issues raised, Defendant’s obligations in fully and fairly responding to Plaintiff’s intransigence and creative litigation tactics could not be amply be set forth in 10 pages. 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 91 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 3 Further, Plaintiff “incorporated by reference” her response to Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order for purposes of attempting to explain her refusal to respond to proper interrogatories, thus causing her “response” to well-exceed 25 pages. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests the Court’s indulgence in permitting an 18 page reply memoranda which is necessary to fully and fairly set forth rebuttal to Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Compel. Dated: April 11, 2016 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Laura A. Menninger Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303.831.7364 Fax: 303.832.2628 [email protected] Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 91 Filed 04/11/16 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on April 11, 2016, I electronically served this DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] /s/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 3
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
e5f9c61b980c32cc1451adc8a1ca59df6c1f2ec75bdb9b59e12a5cc14b455188
Bates Number
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.91.0
Dataset
giuffre-maxwell
Document Type
document
Pages
3

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!