EFTA00094028.pdf

From: " To: ' Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:02:06 +0000 Yes indeed From: USANYS) < Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 11:03 To: >; Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Perfect, thank you! Also, if convicted on all counts (I know you hate this), she faces a total of 35 years? From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:32 AM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? also correct (none of this conduct would have fit that statute in any event, because — unlike what we charged Epstein with — there was no commercial sex here, no monetary payments, but whatMays about the timing of that statute is exactly right) From: Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:30 To: (USANYS) < 1 .=> Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? As an FYI, and the team should correct me if I'm wrong, the sex trafficking statute with which Epstein was charged (18 USC 1591) was enacted in 2000—after the conduct alleged here. From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:28 AM To: USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? correct From USANYS) < > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:27 To: Cc: la Subject: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? EFTA00094028 United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office [Southern District of New York EFTA00094029