EFTA00211156
EFTA00211157 DataSet-9
EFTA00211160

EFTA00211157.pdf

DataSet-9 3 pages 449 words document
P17 V16 D5 D7 D6
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (449 words)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. THE PARTIES' JOINT STATUS REPORT AND MOTION FOR REVISED BRIEFING AND DISCOVERY SCHEDULE The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Joint Status Report and Motion for Revised Briefing and Discovery Schedule. In support thereof, the parties state: 1. Briefing and responses to discovery in this matter were stayed while the parties pursued settlement negotiations with the assistance of U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. After Judge Brannon declared an impasse, the parties continued to pursue settlement. While those efforts will continue, at this time the parties believe that the Court should re-institute a briefing schedule on the petitioners' pending summary judgment motion and re-set the deadline for the government to respond to the petitioners' amended discovery requests. 2. The parties have conferred and jointly request that the Court extend these deadlines as set below to allow the parties time to continue exploring resolution of the matter while also moving towards resolution if settlement cannot be reached. 3. Should the parties be unable to resolve the matter, the parties have agreed to ask that the Court enter an amended briefing and response schedule as follows: October 17, 2016 Government's Responses to Outstanding Discovery Requests Due EFTA00211157 October 17, 2016 Government's Response to Petitioners' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Due November 21, 2016 Petitioners' Reply to Government's Response and Response to Government's Cross-Motion Due December 12, 2016 Government's Reply to Petitioners' Response Due. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court impose the proposed briefing/discovery schedule. A proposed Amended Scheduling Order is attached. Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY slPaul G. Cassell By: Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Cit Utah 84112 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 22, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. According to the Court's website, counsel for all parties are able to receive notice via the CM/ECF system. 2 EFTA00211158 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Ave Ste 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake Cit Utah 84112 Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 EFTA00211159
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ea56519144cf2f175421dff63139fbd3a6bc42b50cf5e4258dbb2d87f70a26d1
Bates Number
EFTA00211157
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!