📄 Extracted Text (258 words)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1133 Filed 10/21/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE
Plaintiff,
15 Civ. 7433 (LAP)
-against-
ORDER
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:
In light of the Court’s order dated October 2, 2020,
declining to construe an email to the Court from Does 1 and 2 as
a formal objection to unsealing and giving Does 1 and 2 14 days
after service of requested excerpts to file a formal objection to
unsealing (dkt. no. 1125), the transcript of Doe 1’s deposition
and materials quoting that transcript or disclosing information
from that transcript shall not be unsealed tomorrow. The Court
received word from the parties that Does 1 and 2 would be served
with the relevant excerpts today, after which Does 1 and 2 will
have 14 days to lodge a formal objection to unsealing. Should
Does 1 and 2 fail to file an objection to unsealing in that
timeframe, the transcript of Doe 1’s deposition and related
materials shall be unsealed as soon as practicable after the 14-
day clock has run.
Notwithstanding the above, the transcript of Ms. Maxwell’s
April 2016 deposition and materials quoting that transcript or
1
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1133 Filed 10/21/20 Page 2 of 2
disclosing information from that transcript shall be posted on the
public docket no later than tomorrow, October 22, at 9:00 a.m.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York
October 21, 2020
__________________________________
LORETTA A. PRESKA
Senior United States District Judge
2
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ec0c5ab135a3700a36bb56bb58b8c7e1b650d1d7fe9fb412fd06b3acc121cb05
Bates Number
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1133.0_2
Dataset
giuffre-maxwell
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0