EFTA00867012.pdf
PDF not loading? Open directly | View extracted text
📄 Extracted Text (105 words)
From: "Martin G. Weinberg" •MINIM>
To: [email protected]>,
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:45:01 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: Witness_-_5th_-_harassment_to_question_witness_after_taking_the_5th.rtf
A case where a federal court imposed sanctions for continued questioning at a deposition after the witness asserted the
5th Amendment Researching Fla law if any on this issue. May be federal pleading opposing joinder filed today or no later
than next week. If it is strong enough may, in combination with other matters, including those you've identified, provide
some reasons why Cassell may be persuaded that a the lawsuit is not in anyone's interest which could open door to a
cease fire.
EFTA00867012
To: [email protected]>,
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:45:01 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: Witness_-_5th_-_harassment_to_question_witness_after_taking_the_5th.rtf
A case where a federal court imposed sanctions for continued questioning at a deposition after the witness asserted the
5th Amendment Researching Fla law if any on this issue. May be federal pleading opposing joinder filed today or no later
than next week. If it is strong enough may, in combination with other matters, including those you've identified, provide
some reasons why Cassell may be persuaded that a the lawsuit is not in anyone's interest which could open door to a
cease fire.
EFTA00867012