EFTA00216033
EFTA00216034 DataSet-9
EFTA00216035

EFTA00216034.pdf

DataSet-9 1 page 165 words document
V16 P17 P23 D6
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (165 words)
From: "KATHERINE W. EZELL" To: Cc: "Amy Ederi" <Ma> Subject: Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:44:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear M, This is a message I tried to send on the 20th. I got a notification back that it did not go through, so I'm trying this different address. In your notification letter about JE's work release that you wrote to the victims you mentioned the possibility of their notifying you if they wanted any of their addresses made off limits on his mechanical device that restricts him. First, if he is only going to and from that office address, why does he need to be mechanically otherwise restricted? Second, should one of the victims want to designate an address where she lives or works to be programmed as off limits, is it possible for him to then have access to the name of the victim and the specific location from which he is being restricted? Wishing you a peaceful and happy holiday! Kathy EFTA00216034
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
f116a1a8cee4d668da1bf9daf29374281d023af949c68005125c759a5ed7721c
Bates Number
EFTA00216034
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!