EFTA00215606.pdf

Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 FRIT1113w1 O_to D.C. ELECTRONIC JULY 7, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. GIST. CT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI 08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. enc y VICTIM'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.0 . SECTION 3771 COMES NOW the Petitioner, JANE DOE (hereinafter "Petitioner"), by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and files this Petition for Enforcement in the above styled action as follows: 1. Petitioner, an adult, as a minor child was a victim of federal crimes committed by JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "Defendant"). These crimes included sex trafficking of children by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, use of a means of interstate commerce to entice a minor to commit prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as well as wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant committed these crimes within the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Florida in Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is the subject of a federal criminal investigation conducted by the United States of America in the Southern District of Florida. The Defendant has recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution. 3. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is engaged in plea negotiations with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida concerning federal 1o110 EFTA00215606  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 2 of 10 crimes which he is alleged to have committed against minor children, including the Petitioner. Such negotiations may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days. 4. Under the CVRA, before any charges are filed against the Defendant, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to notice of her rights under the CVRA, to confer with the prosecutors, and to be treated with fairness. As soon as charges are filed, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to timely notice of court proceedings, the right not to be excluded from such proceedings, the right to be heard at such public proceedings regarding conditions of release, any plea, and any sentence, the right to confer with the attorney for the government. the right lo restitution, and the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for her dignity and privacy. 5. The Petitioner has been denied her rights in that she has received no consultation with the attorney for the government regarding the possible disposition of the charges, no notice of any public court proceedings, no information regarding her right to restitution, and no notice of rights under the CVRA, as required under law. 6. The Petitioner is in jeopardy of losing her rights, as described above, if the government is able to negotiate a plea or agreement with the Defendant without her participation :md knowledge. WHEREFORE, for the reasons outlined above, the Petitioner respectfully requests this Court to grant her Petition, and to order the United States Attorney to comply with the provisions of the CVRA prior to and including any plea or other agreement with the Defendant and any attendant proceedings. 2 20110 EFTA00215607  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 3 of 10 MEMORANDUM I. THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT MAKES CRIME VICTIMS INDEPENDENT PARTICIPANTS THROUGHOUT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. In October 2004, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Crime Victims' Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2251 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3771). Because this appears to be the first case involving the Act to come before this Court, a bit of background may be in order. A. The CVRA Gives Crime Victims Rights to Participate in the Criminal Justice Process. Congress passed the CVRA "to give crime victims enforceable rights to participate in federal criminal proceedings." Opinion at 14. Congress was concerned that in the federal system crime victims were "treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them." 150 CONG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple right to know what is going on, to participate in the process where the information that victims and their families can provide may be material and relevant ... ." Id. The CVRA gives victims of federal crimes a series of rights, including the right to notice of court proceedings, to be heard at plea and sentencing hearings, and to reasonably "confer with the attorney for the Government in the case." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). Victims also have a "right of access to the terms of a plea agreement ... ." In re Interested Party I, 530 F.Supp. 2d 136, 2008 WL 134233 at *7 (D.D.C. 2008). The CVRA also assures victims broadly that they will "be treated with fairness." 18 U.S.C. §3771(a)(8). 3 30110 EFTA00215608  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 4 of 10 Nair Of course, these rights would be of little use to most crime victims unless they were told about them. To ensure that victims are notified of their rights, the CVRA directs employees of the Justice Department "and other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime" to use their "best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of... the rights described [in the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added).1 B. The CVRA Gives Victims Rights During the Investigation of a Crime. The CVRA gives victims rights during the investigation of a crime. The Fifth Circuit recently reached this conclusion, holding: The district court acknowledged that "[t]here are clearly rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution is underway." BP Prods., 2008 WL 501321 at •11, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893, at *36. Logically, this includes the CVRA's establishment of victims' "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government." 18 U.S.C. & 3771(a)(5). At least in the posture of this case (and we do not speculate on the applicability to other situations), the government should have fashioned a reasonable way to inform the victims of the likelihood of criminal charges and to ascertain the victims' views on the possible details of a plea bargain. la re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 394 (516 Cir. 2008). The position that CVRA rights apply before charges have been filed is consistent with the Justice Department regulations under the CVRA, which explain that government officials "must advise a victim [about their rights under the CVRA] ... at the earliest opportunity at which it may be done without interfering with an investigation." A.G. GUIDELINES FOR VICTIM AND WITNESS I Further supporting this requirement is another statute, 42 U.S.C. § I 0607(cX3). which directs government officials tc provide victims with "the earliest possible notice of," among other things. "the filing of charges against a suspected offender." 4 4 of 10 EFTA00215609  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 5 of 10 Nat ASSISTANCE 23 (May 2005). And the plain language of the CVRA undergirds this conclusion, as it applies not simply to prosecutors but to government agencies "engaged in the detection [and) investigation ... of crime ... ." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). Indeed, if there were any doubt, the plain language of the CVRA extends victims' right to situations "in which no prosecution is underway." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). H. PETITIONER IS A "VICTIM PROTECTED BY THE CVRA. Under the CVRA the crime victim is defined as "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense ... ." 18 U.S.C. Section 3771(e). In particular, Defendant called Petitioner when she was a minor over a telephone (a means of interstate communication) requesting that she perform a massage in exchange for payment. As Defendant well knew, that request was fraudulent, as he not only intended to receive a massage, but also intended to have her perform sexual acts in exchange for a cash payment to Petitioner. Only when Petitioner arrived at a Defendant's mansion as directed by Defendant, did Defendant reveal his true purpose of obtaining sexual favors in exchange for payment. This conduct violated 18 U.S.C. § 2422, which forbids using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly "induce" or "entice" a minor "to engage in prostitution." In addition, this conduct was both a use of "fraud" to obtain a commercial sex act, in violation of 18 U.S.0 § 1591, and use of wire communications to perpetrate a "scheme and artifice to defraud," in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. It appears obvious that Petitioner was "directly and proximately" harmed by these crimes, thereby making her a victim under the CVRA. It should be emphasized that the CVRA "was designed to be a `broad and encompassing' statutory victims' bill of rights." United States v. 5 SOI10 EFTA00215610  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 10 wisie ye' Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quot ing 150 Cong. Rec. S4261 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein)). Congress intend ed the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of const ruing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victim s independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Courtfor C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilit ate and accomplish its purposes and intent"). The CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) ). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted libera lly, but its definition of "crime victim" requires a generous construction. After reciting the direct-and-proximate-harm language at issue here, one of the Act's two co-sponsors -- Senat or Kyl -- explained that "(t)his is an intentionally broad definition because all victims of crime deserve to have their rights protected ." 150 Cong. Rec. S10912 (Oct. 9, 2004) (emphasis added). The description of the victim definition as "intentionally broad" was in the course of floor colloquy with the other primary sponsor of the CVRA and therefore deserves significant weigh t. See Kenna, 435 F.3d at 1015-16 (discussing significance of CVRA sponsors= floor statements). 6 6 Of 10 EFTA00215611  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 7 of 10 vow The definition of "crime victims" must thus be construed broadly in favor of Petitioner. She obviously qualifies as a "victim" under the CVRA. III. PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF HER RIGHTS, AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONFER WITH THE PROSECUTORS AND TO BE TREATED WITH FAIRNESS. Because Petitioner is a "victim" under the CVRA, she has certain protected rights under the Act. Most important, the Act promises that she will have an opportunity to "confer with the attorney for the Government in the case." To date, Petitioner has not been given that right. This raises that very real possibility that the Government may negotiate and conclude a plea agreement with the Defendant without giving Petitioner her protected rights.2 Petitioner is entitled to have this conference with prosecutors before any final plea agreement is reached. The Fifth Circuit reached exactly this conclusion in a very recent case. In In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), the Government negotiated a plea agreement with the well-heeled corporate defendant without conferring with the victims. When the Government's fitilure was challenged in the Fifth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Government had indeed violated the CVRA. The Fifth Circuit observed: "In passing the [CVRA), Congress made the policy decision-which we are bound to enforce-that the victims have a right to inform the plea negotiation process by conferring with prosecutors before a plea agreement is reached." Id. at 394. This Court is obligated to protect the rights of Petitioner. The CVRA directs that "[i]n any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the 2 On information and belief, roughly the same crimes were committed against several other young females. These victims, too, are in danger of losing their right to confer under the CVRA. 7 Tot 10 EFTA00215612  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 8 of 10 crime victim is afforded the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(bX1). The CVRA also confers on crime victims the right to "assert the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(1). Therefore, this Court has its own independent obligation to intercede and ensure that the Government respects the rights of Petitioner under the CVRA. CONCLUSION The Petitioner requests the intervention of this Court to ensure that her rights are respected and accorded, as promised in the Crime Victim s' Rights Act. DATED this 7th day of July, 2008. Respectfully Submitted, THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Brad Edwards, Esquire Attorney fnr Petitinnpr Hollywood, Florida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: 8 Sot 10 EFTA00215613  Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 9 of 10 Now CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by United States mail and via facsim ile to: USA, United States Attorney's Office- est Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 7th day of July, 2008. Brad Edwards, Esquire Attorney for Pell. Florida Bar No. 9 9 of ID EFTA00215614 ° 8-892AccialW i ticatIPP I+ ntered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Fepeyi 06th 0 D.c. eel% 44 11:e . 1 en CIVIL COVER SHEET "heJS 44 civ I cover sheet and the information contained burin neither replace nor supplement the filing and service ofpkadings or other papers a by local rules of cowl. This form. approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for the use of the Clerk JULY 7, 2008 Ise civil enacts Meet. ISLE INSTR V( TIONS ON III/ Res( RSI of 1111 fUR M 1 NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-flied I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS STEVEN M. LARII&ORE 22; 34i/e. Poe Avred 5-6/-es- CLERK Il.S. DIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI (b) Count) of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff ech , County of Residence of First Listed Defendant 1E X(' EPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES, ON L.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) ICI ADO:Net% ,Fenn name. Addien. and Tekpbone Mambo, NOTE: IN LAND ( ONDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT 7ac # .0,55'06 -tr.5 LAND INVOLVED. K.5 CtnyS LOP ice 53 IIICheck County Where Action Arose MIAMI-DADS 3 MONROE 3 EIROW MID /PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 3 OKEECHOBEE 1110111 SN1DS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION derma -a- Leon Ben usio III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PA RTIESernee an - re.. One Ras for Plawro If or Moray Cann OM": and One Nos foe Oelendaitil S (yeomen,. 3 3 seders, Ones**, ITT DEE yrs DEE Ploite0 IVES. Doserninent Soo • Pany) Cowen of The. Sale 3 I 3 I Incorporated or Principal Place 1 4 14 of Busmen In This S me , S. Lo.etneent 3 4 Diversely Como of A noshes State 3 Incorpotoed and Pntopal Plats of 0.1660. In Another Stale 1 5 1 5 Cele, day (Indicate ('uitostop of Pones in hem III) mon or Same e of a 1 3 1 1 Foreign Naomi 6 1 r OScv 5 013 c' mAfraik oftmso,v Foreign Connell CONTRACT TORTS FORFEIT,. RE,PENALTY BANKREPTC1' OTHER ST rac TES ' II* los ram e PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 3 610 Allicuhult 1 422 Appeal 2li UST 153 3 400 Sin 4 ReaPPoliiel'aral : 120 Mater 3 310 A robin 3 )62 hood Imury • 3 020 Other food a Deg 1 423 WohOtassl 3 410 Ammo., : IN, Miller Aci 3115 A oho Peodoct Mad mogreetto 3 625 Dog Related Suture 20 ESC 157 3 430 Bo I' ad Dant ins 2 140 Negotiable Inatoteent Lability 3 365 Personal lorry • of Popov 21 VS(' sal 3 450 Comment 3 120 Amaish. Libel & Prodmi LiabiWy 3 630 LaRue, Lana PROPF RTY RIGHTS 3 460 Donation ' ISO It 06 net 01 0‘irPar•en. & Le foscooto ofludgmem Standee 3 360 Abloom. Personal 3 640 R.R. a Tent 1 X20 Copyrights 3 470 RN \OW Influenced and ' 151 Monroe rest 3 3)0 Federal Employe.. 'story Product .3 650 Angle Rep. 3 100 Paint Comp, Orgameations ' 152 Romeo of Defeo BO bathe' Imbibe, 3 660 Occoaliosal 1 OlITtademark 3 IMO Consumer Code, Sondem 1 nos 3 140 Manor PERSONAL PROPERTY SafoeNobh 3 490 Cable Sat TV tEtt . Votive., 3 345 Mom Product 3 370 Omer Fraud 3 690 Who 3 III0 SOlone Sersice : I II PI es nem co fili tom snot Labile,' 3 171 Tenth en Lending LABOR SOCIALSECURITY 3 *50 Sec fides COM00/010t. of Vorties Resells 3 350 Most Vehicle 1 WOOther Posonal 3 710 Fair Labor Standard* 3 X6I NIA II 395(11 Emtne 2, 160 StoslebeMets' Sues 3 355 Moor Venecle 110060), Damage Ao 3 1162 Blob Lung 02/1 3 g75 Cmlama Challenge tl 190 00e re C mermt retalCILialohly 1 135 Property Damage 3 720 EsboeMgmi. Rebhan 3 X63 DINT DOVW (405($3) IT ESC 3410 D 195 Costa Vadat I..adit) 1 )60 0 bet Personal Pada' labday 3 730 LaboeMputeperting 1 X615510 Tole XVI 3 $90 Other' pity AMOR, to I% km chef INIF, a Diolosure MI 3 ,165 RSI 005i011 3 $91 Agoculitteat Aces REM, PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHT' PRISONER PETITIONS 3 740 aaaaay Labor Act FEDERAL TAX SUITS 3 S92 tee ROOK Stalk:6000 AO C 210 Leal d' ink newel, 3 441 Voliog -I , I 0 %I onon• to Vacate 3 790 Oihtr Labor Liimation 3x 7 0 TARO ICS Planar 3 093 Entwonmental Mauna • ]ate Tofecloure 3 412 Employment Sentence 3 791 Engl. Ito. Inc. Sono, or Defender° 3 MO Emig, alloeman Act 1 :30 Rot Leese a f tet MOM 3 44 3 Moon Hahn C t .co 3 XII IRS Odd Pan) 3 095 Frodom olInfonnatoo" et 240 Tors to Lan! Accominodoons 1 )30 Goma, In ES( 7609 • 245 Tor Priiduii Liabittiv 3 444 WM.. 1 313 Death Penally r I 3 000 001014 of fee Dviermioalion 115 Amer. ti. DISailitry, - 3 5, 0 mandamusa Omer .., 462 Noterthreoon Under I pal A (ten 10 Jana 7, 290 All la. r Rol POW) 3 Employment ' Apploation 3 116 Amer. o Disabelehm • 3 ypp Riots 463 lieben Corpres.Alien Cud 1 Delano OM" 465 Other honeymoon m 950 Cossietuannably of State )(44O Other tea Rights 3 555 Prison Condition 3 Amon' SIAM in V. ORIGIN enlace a - X" en One Rea man Appeal to District Transferred from , Judge from Original 2 Removed Porn 3 3 Re-ftled- 0 4 Reinstated or 0 5 another &strict 16 Multidindel O ' Magistrate Proem tog State Court see VI below) Reopened IsPecifY) Litigation Judgment a) Re-filed Case 0 YES ONO b) Related Cases 1 YES 1 NO VI. RELATED/RE-FILED ,See woodman (:ASE(S). mond POO JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite Jurisdic I on al st atutes unless dhersIty): Cer tgale k/ A 9 'S 4c* it age. 5 7) VII. CAUSE OF ACTION fe-frtlon on behalf al v1414'4,4 o$ Sex OatrinSeS to LC auto. -pled eviret - veldt.'" 7 tLt CvdrQlf LENGTH OF TRIAL via 1 days estimated (for both sides to try entire easel REQUESTED IN 0 CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS AcnoN DEMANDS CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: COMPLAINT: UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 JURY DEMAND: 3 Yes 3 No ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO S1GNATUR NET OF RECORD DATE 1 HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE FOR OFFICE CSE ONLY AMOUNT 3 5D RECEIPT r inWc/03 IPP 10 e410 EFTA00215615