EFTA01074686.pdf

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. NOTICE OF HEARING- UMC PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned has set down for hearing before the Honorable David F. Crow, one of the Judges of the above-styled Court, in the Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., the following: PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER- PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES I hereby certify that I have made a good faith attempt to resolve this matter prior to my noticing this motion for hearing. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. In accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, persons needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding should contact Barry Blacey, ADA Coordinator for the Courts of Palm Beach Couni,S. Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Telephone Number M, no later than seven days prior to the proceeding. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SDUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • EFTA01074686  CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via U.S. Mail this VCayof April, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Gary Farmer, Esquire, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, 42, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. a -Alvw ^bL Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Christopher E. Knight Fla. Bar. No. 607363 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: WN3074ANOTIIRG30-Epttein's MPO co Extra-Judicial Slatneals-CEK.doot -2 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • EFTA01074687  IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DF,FENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO TILE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states: I. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is facing a new criminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA01074688  CASE NO, 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMI1 AC; a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." b. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United States for sex." c. "We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr. Epstein while Mr. Epstein has been in the company of under-aged children." [Exhibit I]. 3. That same day, the Palm Beach Daily News published an article entitled "Jeffrey Epstein address book 'Holy Grail' of famous manes." [Exhibit 2]. This article refers to the fact that "[t]he British press has been having a field day digging up new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." [Exhibit 2]. 4. Two days later, another British publication, "The Observer," reported: "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not have seen while attending parties with Epstein." [Exhibit 3]. 5. Any published comments by Mr. Scarola aro clearly generating other articles about EPSTEIN. All statements and comments by Mr. Scarola to the press and media must therefore stop immediately. 6. This Court has the undeniable discretion to control and prohibit such extra- judicial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See Slide cx. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v -2- EFTA01074689  CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between lawyers and/or litigants and the media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See $tate ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the power of the trial judge when it said: Limitation placed on lawyers, litigants and officials directly affected by court proceedings may be made at the court's discretion.... Muzzling lawyers who may wish to make public statements ... has long been recognized as within the court's inherent power to control professional conduct. State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated: "Prohibition on continent is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary. 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (order prohibiting public comment on evidence and charges against two defendants by members of state attorney's office and sheriff's was proper preventive measure where prejudicial publicity threatened to impair the right to a fair trial). 8. Any communications by Mr. Jack Scarola and Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, as attorneys and officers of the court, with the media and press are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6, entitled "Trial Publicity," states: (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be -3- EFTA01074690  CASE NO 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AO disseminated by means of public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding due to its creation of an imminent and substantial detrimental effect on that proceeding. (b) Statements of Third Parties, A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to make such a statement. Counsel shall exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, employees, or other persons assisting in or associated with a ease from making extrajudicial statements that are prohibited under this rule." 9. Rule 4-3.6 incorporates the "substantial likelihood of material prejudice" standard that the United States Supreme Court found to be a "constitutionally permissible balance between the First Amendment rights of attorneys in pending eases and the state's interest in fair trials." Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030, 1075, Ill S. Ct. 2720, 2745, 115 L. Ed. 2d 888 (1991). 10. In a letter of March 18, 2011, in an effort to conserve this Court's time and resources, undersigned counsel requested Mr. Scarola to enter into a written agreement guaranteeing that Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and their respective agents and employees will not engage in any extra-judicial commentary concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females. 11. The undersigned's efforts have unfortunately, been successfbl. An e-mail response to the above March 18, 2011 letter was received on March 21, 2011 rejecting the request. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3.6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, - 4- EFTA01074691  CASE NO. SO 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB ACi Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, and their respective agents and employees, from participating, encouraging, assisting, or abetting in the dissemination of any out-of-court publicity or extra-judicial statements and commentary to the media and press concerning MR. EPSTEIN's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females. Additionally, the requested Protective Order should direct all parties and their counsel, and their respective agents and employees, not to participate, encourage, assist, or abet in the dissemination of any out-of-court publicity, statement and commentary in this matter which is injurious to Mr. Bradley Edwards' reputation. Respectfully submitted, /4 By: - • Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 235954 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach Fl 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff and Christopher E. Knight Fla. Bar. No. 607363 FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th Floor 1395 Stickel' Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff -5- EFTA01074692  rein NO 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXmlit AO CERTIFICATE OF SERVICk I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this 2 i day of March, 2011 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One B. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 By: I e Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 607363 W:110143WITHPRO29-Its vends opsompos toners a onsilitlel tlelameMfIIRO.doa -6- EFTA01074693 Natalie A. Trompet From: Lisa B. Toney Sent: Frida , A ril 01, 2011 10:27 AM To: L. Ackerman, Jr. Cc: Michelle S. Ganetis; CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT; Lisa B. Toney; Lilly Ann Sanchez Jacqueline M. Borrero; Michelle S. Ganetis; Aprill; Vicki Passy Subject: Epstein v. Rothstein - Signing and filing of NOH Attachments: Epstein M/P/O Good morning Joe and Natalie, Please see in directory 80743, our Notice of Hearing on Epstein's M/P/O from Making Extra-Judicial Statements, which I would ask that Joe please sign and Natalie please file with the Clerk and mail to counsel. I have attached to this e-mail our signed M/P/O from Making Extra-Judicial Statements, etc. so it may be attached to the Notice of Hearing. I will place on all calendars. Thank you. Fowler White Burnett ATTORNEYS AT LAW )Lisa B. Toney LEGAL ASSISTANT TO CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT main Espirito Santo Plaza 0 1395 Bricked Avenue fax 14th Floor ttoney fowler-white.com Miami, Florida 33131 www.fowler-white.com 1 EFTA01074694