📄 Extracted Text (606 words)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHRN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2,
Petitioners,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Unopposed Motion to
Amend Scheduling Order, and states:
I. On December 23, 2015, the Court entered its Scheduling Order, setting forth dates on
which the parties are to file their respective motions for summary judgment; responses thereto;
and replies. D.E. 346. This Order was based upon the parties Joint Scheduling Report, filed on
December 17, 2015. D.E. 345.
2. When the Joint Scheduling Report was filed, respondent expected it would be able to
respond to petitioners' Third Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions
Relevant to "Victim" Status under the Crime Victim Rights Act, and petitioners' Supplemental
Request for Production to The Government Regarding "Victim" Status, by January 19, 2016.
This would have allowed petitioners to have the responses prior to January 22, 2016, the date
they were to file their motion for summary judgment. D.E. 346,1 1.
3. Due to the absence of one of respondent's co-counsel during the period January 14 —
24, 2016, respondent's counsel were unable to prepare the responses to the two discovery
EFTA01137783
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 2 of 3
requests by January 19, 2016. Respondent asked petitioner's counsel for an extension until
February 1, 2016, to which they graciously consented. Since petitioners will not have the
responses prior to the filing of their motion for summary judgment, the parties have agreed to
seek leave of the Court to amend the briefing schedule to the following:
February 10, 2016 Petitioners shall file their motion for summary judgment
(presently due on January 22, 2016)
March 24, 2016 Government shall file its response to petitioners' motion for summary
judgment, and its own cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on February 22, 2016)
April 12, 2016 Petitioners shall file their reply to the Government's response to
petitioners' motion for summary judgment, and their response to the
Government's cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on March 11, 2016)
April 26, 2016 Government shall file its reply to petitioners' response to the
Government's cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on March 25, 2016)
4. Respondent respectfully requests the Scheduling Order be amended to reflect the
adjusted dates in the preceding paragraph. A proposed Order is attached.
DATED: January 20, 2016 Respectfully submitted,
WIFREDO A. FERRER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By: s/ Dexter A. Lee
DEXTER A. LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Fla. Bar No. 0936693
99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300
Miami, Florida 33132
(305) 961-9320
Fax: (305) 530-7139
E-mail: dexter.leeeusdojav
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
2
EFTA01137784
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 20, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.
s/ Dexter A. Lee
DEXTER A. LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
SERVICE LIST
Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States,
Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.,
Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
(954) 524-2820
Fax: (954) 524-2822
E-mail: [email protected]
Paul G. Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah
332 S. 1400 E.
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
(801) 585-5202
Fax: (801) 585-6833
E-mail: [email protected]
Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2
3
EFTA01137785
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
f6b3117d8503a42b9ab2f7aaef3948ac77abd85e17b4b7c90ed98d95bc2619ce
Bates Number
EFTA01137783
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0