EFTA02608540.pdf

From: Valeria Chomsky Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 4:21 PM To: Jeffrey E.; Noam Chomsky Subject: Vincent's reply I would like to write the following: </=iv> Vincent, There is no "seller's remorse=the day after", and I think you and Jason achieved a very good =esult. My point is about the information we=have available, it is not to question the amount of the settlement, but to=have the truth established about the assets of the trust on December 31, 2=14, since they provided a false information. There is no reason to accept =he false information when we have the documents proving it. And I don't see why the acknowledgements wouldn&=39;t be possible. Valeria </=iv> What do you think? Valeria Forwarded messa e From: Vincent Pisegna Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM Subject: RE: URGENT To: Valeria Chomsk Jason B. Curtin Cc: Noam Chomsky Good morning. </=pan> Yesterday, we discusse= at length the choice you faced. You could settle early on acceptabl= terms but to do so, it required foregoing further investigation into the =acts of the case. Or, alternatively, you could choose not to settle and embark on discovery and a further investiga=ion of the facts. You very clearly chose that further litigation was=not in Noam and your best interests because of the stress that would be in=olved in further litigation and that closure was of paramount importance. Also, the settlement is a very =ood deal for you. This is not an unusual judgment for a client to ma=e and it is also not unusual to have "seller's remorse =80 the day after a settlement. I do not think we can rescind the agreement and it doesn't sound like you want to rescind the agreem=nt. We successfully negotiated for a release of you so let's=see what we can put into the release. I do not think we will be able=to negotiate the acknowledgements you reference. EFTA_R1_01801269 EFTA02608540 </=pan> Feel free to call if y=u want to talk about this. </=pan> Vincent J. Pisegna Krokidas & Bluestein LLP 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02210 Tel: Fax www.kb-law.com <http://www.kb-law.comh </van> </=pan> </=pan> </van> From: Valeria Chomsky Sent: Thursday, Janua 10 2019 10:06 AM To: Vincent Pisegna ; Jason B. Curtin Cc: Noam Chomsky Subject: URGENT Vincent and Jason, First of all, thank you very much for solving this c=nstant and stressful situation in our life. I would like to make some comments that I think are =f paramount importance. 2 EFTA_R1_01801270 EFTA02608541 We keep finding outrageous false information from Ma= and Harry, such as that the funds in the Marital Trust was only $1,000,00= until the Lexington house was sold and incorporated to it. This is = flat lie -- as the documents I sent you prove it (Bainco statement from December 2014 and Harry's e-mail from =ay 2015, when the Lexington house was sold). Also outrageous to say that the Trust was providing = house to Noam, when the apartment in Cambridge was bought with half of a =ortgage with a commercial institution that we were paying monthly and with=half of the funds coming from a loan from the Marital Trust with the highest possible interest rate, when Noam =ould have bought it himself with the funds from his IRA, that was being di=tributed to them. The only reason for this loan from the Marital Tru=t was to have the apartment tied to the trust and not allow to have it as a jointly owned property with me, as=Noam requested many times. Requests very well documented in e-mails =xchanges. There are numberless other examples of them acting i= bad faith and since it has been a pattern from them, with their father be=ng competent and productive, I have to express my concerns for the future,=if Noam and/or I become somehow limited in our cognitive capacities and they try to manipulate again or if Noam di=s before me and they contest Noam's will. Although we preferred a settlement, if we would have=gone to court, much more would be discovered and we would have the documen=s that now we are missing to prove what had been done wrong. With th= settlement we won't have access to them anymore. It seems to me that the moment requires that in thei= releases they acknowledge explicitly that they recognized all the gifts t=ey have received from Noam in the form of trusts for them, trusts for the =randchildren, the Lexington house, the Wellfleet house, royalties for children and grandchildren, payment of =xpenses, distributions from Noam's IRA to them, justifying the settlem=nt, and now the Marital Trust where Noam is waiving most of his rights to =t, and most important also correct through the documents that I provided (Bainco statement and the email from=Harry) that the Marital Trust in December 31, 2014 had a market value of $=,502,581, and that the Lexington house was sold in May 2015, therefore it =as not the proceeds from the house that elevated the assets of the Marital Trust from $1,000,000 to the curre=t value -- as they falsely stated. It also should include that they recognize that the =oney that Noam was left with, it is for him to live his life with his wife= and that if some is left (hopefully Noam will live long enough to use it =11) they agree that Noam decided to leave in his will only to his wife, Valeria. Therefore with this settle=ent, they are not going to contest Noam's will or claim any additional=funds. I think we have to address this information, or we w=ll be signing that all the false information they gave us is correct and r=sk to have more problems in the future. We accept the agreement, but we don't have to ac=ept their false information. 3 EFTA_R1_01801271 EFTA02608542 I should add that the only reason I don't want t= go to Court is because I don't want to cause more stress to Noam. Oth=rwise, I would much prefer to go to Court and have all the issues clarifie=, as I see the non•clarification of them as potential future problems and accusations. Valeria Chomsky Forwarded messa e From: Valeria Chomsky Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:34 PM Subject: Fake news To: Vincent Pisegna Jason B. Curtin Cc: Noam Chomsky <=p> One of the main characteristics of so-called "p=stmodern" societies is to disregard the difference between objective =nd subjective, truth and lie, reality and fiction. This case is a striking example of the contempt of o=jective reality by a large number of people who have preferred to believe =he lie that coincides with their previous opinions. The famous "fake =ews" prevailed over reality, the belief about reason. The attachment shows the Carol Chomsky Exempt Marita= Trust, on December 31, 2014 with a market value of $2,502,581.<=u> And the email copied below shows that the Lexington =ouse was sold in May 2015. Something is not right in their allegations.<=> Valeria Chomsky 4 EFTA_R1_01801272 EFTA02608543