📄 Extracted Text (718 words)
From
To: "Jay Lefkowitz"
Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:25:56 +0000
Importance: Normal
She has an amazing voice -- I saw her in Sweeney Todd. There are so many great shows playing right now. I
hope that the economy doesn't destroy Broadway.
Have a good time.
If you are going to file anything in the Doe v. United States case, just give me a heads up.
Thanks.
From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto
Sent: Thursda October 16 2008 5:17 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States
Have heard it's fantastic. We're actually taking all the kids tonight to see Gypsy with Patti Lupone.
From:
Sent: 10/16/2008 05:13 PM AST
To: Jay Lefkowitz
Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States
And probably something much stronger than coffee.
I was in New York last weekend and saw "In the Heights." Have you seen it? It was absolutely fantastic. It may
be slightly too racy for your daughter, but it was amazing.
EFTA00216098
From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto
Sent:
m Th is da ctol
To:
Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States
Ok. But we'll need a whole meal.
From:
Sent: 10/16/2008 05:08 PM AST
To: Jay Lefkowitz
Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States
When (if) this is ever all over, I will buy you a cup of coffee and we can swap stories.
From:Jay Lefkowitz [mailto
Sent: Thursda October 16 2008 5:01 PM
To. Ro Black
Cc
Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does v. United States
Thanks welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :)
From:
Sent: 10/16/2008 04:23 PM AST
To: J
Cc: '
Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States
Dear Roy and Jay:
I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his
pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his
Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no
interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal.
As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed
by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues,
instead, in his lawsuit against the United States.
«DE30_081016_RepIy re Mom Unseal.pdf>> <<DE30-2_081016_Ex 1.pdf>> <<DE30-3_081016_Ex 2.pdf>>
EFTA00216099
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00216100
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
f844fa3b608acf69f6eb60fee9847651bf5028d18e35f9873fa1b95d64c2f00d
Bates Number
EFTA00216098
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3