👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (876 words)
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Melanie Spinella
Subject: Fwd: For our call on Monday
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:52:40 +0000
Forwarded message
From: Heather Gray <I
Date: Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:05 AM
Subject: For our call on Monday
To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation mail.com>
Cc: Alan S Halperin , Ada Cla •, Eileen Alexanderson
, lawrence delson • , Richard Joslin
, Heather Gray
Jeffrey,
As you know, Rich J. and I met with Leon last week to discuss which works of art Leon would put in the "new"
Narrows. Leon raised two points at the meeting which may alter the focus of the art planning.
First, Leon said he wants to keep the flexibility to withdraw works of art from Narrows without the consent of
the Class B Managers. His said that if his non-art assets increase in value so that the kids are well provided for
without the art, he may want to create a Black Family Museum with works in Narrows and he doesn't want to
have to obtain consent of the Class B Managers regarding which pieces he could withdraw from the LLC for
the museum. The draft LLC agreement for the new Narrows provides that a member can only withdraw with
the unanimous consent of the Class B Managing Members and they alone decide what property gets distributed
to the withdrawing member.
Second, Leon questioned whether he should be completely paying off his Note to the APO1 Trust. He thinks
making the annual interest payments on the Note is a great way for him to make tax-free gifts to the kids and he
did not seem concerned about the income tax that the trust would have to pay at his death if the note was still
outstanding (which would be close to 34%). The tax consequences of not paying off the note are only on the
income tax side - either income tax will be due at Leon's death (if he hasn't paid off the note prior to that time)
or no income tax will be due (if he has paid it off). The estate tax side is a wash because either he pays off the
note during his lifetime, in which case the note and the assets used to pay it off are out of his estate, or he
doesn't pay it off prior to his death so the assets are in his estate but so is the debt obligation.
Based on this discussion, there are perhaps 3 ways we could go with the current planning:
EFTA00999953
1. Keep the plan as is. Leon has to rely on the Class B Managers to allow him to withdraw and to distribute
to him art he would want to put in the Black Family Museum. Valuation discounts are obtained for the
Narrows membership interests and Leon uses these interests to repay most or all of the Note to APOI. This
addresses neither of the above concerns.
2. Give Leon Control-Decide Later whether or when to Pay Down the Note. Revise the draft LLC agreement
so that Leon is the sole manager and, to reduce 2036 inclusion, permit all members to withdraw their capital
from the LLC at any time without the consent of the manager (as we do with BFP). This addresses Leon's
stated wish for control but results in much smaller valuation discounts being applied to the Membership
interests. This means that Leon would use fewer Membership interests to repay the Note to APOI-if in fact
he decides to pay down the Note. This approach also allows Leon some period of time (before the note pay-off
and his death) to decide to create the art museum. If Leon ultimately decides not to pay down the note, the new
Narrows will still obtain some (smaller) valuation discounts on the art in Leon's estate and will have provided a
vehicle through which Leon can undertake art investing for the trusts. This addresses both of Leon's above
concerns.
3. Do not Revise Narrows and Do not Pay Down the Note. If we are certain that Leon does not want to use
Narrows membership interests to repay the Note, we may decide to forgo creating the LLC which comingles
trust art and Leon's art because the benefits noted in 2 above are outweighed by the administrative complexities
and restrictions that arise as a result of the comingling. For example, restrictions arising from revisions to the
loan documents with BAC as well as the need for Leon to pay a guaranty fee to the LLC (to avoid a potential
gift) if it guaranties his personal liability after the trusts become members. There are simpler ways to achieve
the benefits noted in 2.
Thanks,
Heather
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
EFTA00999954
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00999955
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
f97d3cd1d124d8d48319a4f67e41cc62448e930d08b2aa9e299a88378b7ac44c
Bates Number
EFTA00999953
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3
💬 Comments 0