📄 Extracted Text (1,209 words)
To: Gmax
From: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent Wed 8/18/2010 12:26:18 PM
Subject: Re: I correct - please let me know today if you agree to me selling to david for 175.00 - it's
what I think is best
yes„ he is chinese, and appears only interested in making money for david, Your comments were
perfect. and well stated.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Gmax wrote:
Re I Correct. I think David does not have a prayer to monetize the co. Or make it do anything.
I don't think what I have seen can change the game field for people - only search engine
optimization linked to corrections could in this day of twitter facebook etc - the business plan
is a joke and I'd think it's better to cut out
See bellow c mail traffic and give me your views
Below from point a were my issues w/his shareholding agreement-
a) Page 1 - Edgarley LLC - my company is not incorporated under United
Kingdom laws but US Laws
b) Page 2 - my ownership is 8.61% and will be further diluted if the
1,000,000 you put in is not enough - should probably only be for Net contributions not gross -
OF THE MILLION HE WAS PUTTING IN 1/2 WAS GOING IN SALARY TO DAVID!
) Page 3 - Section 3.21 - since you have the right since you own more than
65% of shares to sell the company, issue more debt, mortgage assets,
dissolve company without your say..I think before you do any of those things you should alert us
and ask for our input - the language as is - you could sell the co. And we would even know
about it
d) Page 4 - Section 5.5 - You must have more that 20% of shares to
request an audit of company? I think if we want to look at the books we should be able to - there
can't be a reason to not allow that
e) Page 6 - Section 6.5 - Drag Along Rights - if 65% of shareholders
You only agree to sell then all shareholders must follow - not a big
deal just want to be kept in the loop and language is a bit off
g) Page 11 - Section 15.2.2 - It is intention to establish ESOP plan? Please explain further your
thoughts here?
h) want to understand our liability here is I Correct is sued for what ever reason what is our
exposure?
-IM NERVOUS ABOUT BEING IN A BUSUNESS I HAVE NOT CONTROL OR SAY IN
AND BEING SUED
I know that we are all friends but I still like to really understand all things I sign today and be
comfortable with it - it is a result of my history which has made me more anal than maybe
always necessary. I realise that all of this may be a hindrance to you so am willing to sell my
portion of the shares if you know someone who would be interested in partnering in this
venture with you to find someone easier maybe to deal with ..
Let me know you thoughts
Have fun at the Cortina's
EFTA_R1_00489841
EFTA01981332
Gx
Thank you for your comments. -
I believe that some of your points are reasonable, but some not so much.
Be that as it may, you indicated that you wouldn't mind selling out, and so I suggest that I buy
your stake.
As you know, the present capitalization of the company is SI.685 million (and you are
absolutely right that there will be further cash call which, if you did not follow pro rata, would
dilute your stake further).
So your existing 8.61% can be valued at $145,000. If you agree to this, I will be willing to take
your stake for this amount — and you might be the cleverest of us all, as you will have made a
reasonable profit!
Please let me know because if you are selling the stake, we obviously don't need to go through
your points.
You will be pleased to know that we are on the brink of launching 'Correct, believe it or not! It
is, therefore, important for me to summarize the equity position of the company.
Between November 06 and April 08, each of us contributed equally 145K. Between May 08
and February 09, I had put an extra 23K for miscellaneous expenses, which I will be happy to
treat as a shareholders loan. In November 09, I wrote to you both giving you an opportunity
to participate in a further equity investment of 250K, which both of you declined and which I
have now spent. In other words, our present equity is as follows:-
Maxwell: 145K (21.17%)
Weinberg: 145K (21.17%)
DT 395K (57.66%)
EFTA_R1_00469842
EFTA01981333
According to the latest business plan, which I will send you within a week, roughly US$1 million
will be required to launch the company in July. I am underwriting this amount, and want to
make it fair for you both to participate in this latest capital requirement.
The two extreme positions are as follows (please see attached tables):-
a. No participation from either ofyou would result in the following equity position:-
Maxwell: 145K (8.61%)
Weinberg: 145K (8.61%)
DT: 1,395K (82.79%)
b. On the assumption ofboth of you following the increased equity by each contributing
211.7K, and mine to be 971.6K, then the position would be:-
Maxwell: 356.7K (21.17%)
Weinberg: 356.7K (21.17%)
DT: 971.6K (57.66%)
Of course I will be happy for you to invest any amount in between 0 to 21 I.7K.
Essentially, !Correct will go live with passwords by June 3, when I will start to seek out the 100
founding correcters. Each of them will be a celebrated figure or a representative of a well-
known institution. Each of them will join free.
EFTA_R1_00469843
EFTA01981334
Please note, however, that our business model is predicated on charging other correcters $1,200
per year (i.e. $100 per month) for the use of the site.
Accordingly, we will probably be the first website that charges significantly for a service —
therefore, becoming the world's first "luxury" site. But I believe that people will pay this
amount for the service when Icorrect become a recognized word like Google or Twitter or
Facebook. But much more importantly, this is a business model that would bring in good cash-
flow — and our subscription price could even increase when our number of browsers goes up,
just like the advertising rate of a newspaper or magazine.
In time, I would need both of your help in getting more and more correctors because that is
going to make us more and more money!
Dictated by Sir David Tang
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to kin [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA R1_00489844
EFTA01981335
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
fa27d81acf650a3e999311a11d6322d00a95f74ae4a167bfa437ec538068a79f
Bates Number
EFTA01981332
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
4
Comments 0