👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,899 words)
JAWBONE — Overview of Company Model
April 10, 2013
EFTA01136528
Jawbone — Company Revenue Model
2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E CAGR
Units (000s)
UP Band 111 3,510 8,775 17,549 30,712 46,067 59,888 185%
Jambox 1,583 1,853 3,057 4,586 6,053 7,142 8,000 31%
Headset 651 694 777 820 850 865 866 5%
Net Revenue / Unit
UP Band 78.63 69.37 61.74 55.56 52.23 49.62 47.14 -8%
Jambox 123.95 120.43 114.40 102.96 96.79 90.98 85.52 -6%
Headset 53.80 52.99 50.31 47.85 45.53 43.37 41.38 -4%
Revenue (SOON)
UP Band 8,719 243,479 541,741 975,133 1,604,094 2,285,834 2,823,005 162%
Jambox 196,278 223,120 349,740 472,149 585,843 649,817 684,127 23%
Headset 35,005 36,762 39,117 39,231 38,681 37,517 35,839 0%
Software/Services 18,820 47,050 94,100 178,790 268,185 NA
Total 240,003 503,361 949,418 1,533,564 2,322,717 3,151,958 3,811,155 59%
2
EFTA01136529
Dramatic shift in product offering
Sales Mix by Revenue
UP Band Data Headset
4% 0% 1%
Data
Headset
7% Jambox
14%
18%
Jambox UP Band
82% 74%
2012 2018
Company model contemplates a dramatic conversion from speakers to wearable
technology.
3
EFTA01136530
Company model assumes `iPod-like adoption of UP
Cummulative Unit Sales (millions)
400
iPod
350
300 -
iPhone
250
Blackberry
200 UP Band:
167
Company Model
150
iPad UP Band:
100 - .•'+ GV Model
98
50 71
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Years from 1st Launch
Jawbone's financial model assumes an UP adoption curve that closely matches the
historical results for the iPod. Not only is this an aggressive benchmark, but we are
concerned that such a close match may indicate the plan is not based on a rigorous
bottoms-up analysis.
4
EFTA01136531
Company assumes significant gross margin expansion
Gross Margin (%)
• a• Jambox UP Band
45%
41%
4O% 39% ... °
....
37%
36% ...... • • °'
35% 34% _
.***. ...... •• •
29%,•°* ....... . .......... 33% 33%
30% _.°.
•.•" 30% 31%
2696..•*
•
25% .°
Se
•*. 24%
••
20%
19%
15%
10%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Jawbone assumes gross margin will expand 15% over the next six years. The Company
expects these margin gains will come from 'value-engineering' developed by its contract
manufacturers.
5
EFTA01136532
Projected margins are well above industry averages
Hardware Gross Margins
60%
53%
50% 47%
42% 41%
40% -
34%
31%
2
29% 30% 28%
30% - 27% 26%
r 23%
21% 21% 20%
20% -
10% -
0%
`Z`
I'
bA „\se,
ccs̀ -4° \<.•4' log<
• $.).\
`-f
s
L 1I
pcsA E, sc
,isv•
,91)0 '
4f)
6(s o('
cb
Jawbone's blended hardware gross margin is projected to be 13 percentage points above
the hardware industry median. Again, Jawbone projections are 'Apple-like'.
6
EFTA01136533
Projected operating expenses are below industry averages
Operating Expenses / Sales
50%
44%
39%
40%
35%
33%
32% 31% 31%
30%
22% 22% 21% 22%
20%
20%
16% 16% 16%
15%
10%
7%
0% ;
\e, ,SZ, ,4 <So .\>;2 A (.1 • c,
cc• ‹p x's cp C\ tCs „
ccs \e' (IP
se.
31° As4Q
Jawbone forecasts operating expenses to be 6 percentage points of revenue below the
hardware industry median.
7
EFTA01136534
Hardware companies trade well below Jawbone multiple
EV/ OPIDU
Comps EV
Sales Sales
Audio
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL $2,717 M 0.6x 26.9% 19.8% 7.1%
VOXX INTERNATIONAL CORP $411M 0.4x 28.6% 22.0% 6.6%
SKULLCANDY INC $130M 0.7x 47.3% 33.4% 13.9%
Median O.6x 28.6% 22.0% 7.1%
Mobile
APPLE INC $272,026 M 2.1x 41.9% 6.6% 35.3%
MOTOROLA MOBIUTY* $9,813 M 0.8x n.a. n.a. n.a.
NOKIA OKI $9,358 M 0.3x 27.8% 35.4% -7.6%
HTC CORP $5,501M 0.8x 20.6% 15.2% 5.5%
RESEARCH IN MOTION $5,046 M 0.4x 31.0% 39.1% -8.1%
Median O.Bx 29.4% 25.3% 4.1%
*Motorola Mobility was acquired by Google in '12 at the above multiples
Other Hardware
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS $186,325 M 1.3x 29.6% 16.5% 13.1%
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO 559,424M 0.4x 23.2% 15.5% 7.7%
SONY CORP $22,883 M 0.2x 20.6% 21.7% -1.0°A
LG ELECTRONICS INC 516,350M 0.6x 21.4% 21.2% 0.2%
NINTENDO CO LTD $5,435 M am 26.2% 32.0% -5.8%
GARMIN LTD $3,856 M 1.9x 53.0% 30.7% 22.2%
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL $894 M 0.5x 34.4% 31.3% 3.1%
Median O.6x 26.2% 21.7% 3.1%
Jawbone '18
Company Model 58,812 M 2.3x 41.2% 15.7% 25.6%
GV Model 52,989 M 1.5x 28.0% 22.0% 6.0%
Jawbone assumes an exit multiple of 2.3x revenue, whereas comparable hardware
companies trade below 1.0x revenue on average.
8
EFTA01136535
Expected returns using Company model
2O12A 2013E 2014E 2015E 1016E 2017E 2018E CAGR
Revenue Jawbone management has
UP Band 8,719 243,479 541,741 975,133 1,600,094 2,285,834 2,823,005 162%
Jambox 196,278 223,120 349,740 472,149 585,843 609,817 684,1.27 23%
modeled the Company's
Headset
Software/Services
35,035 36,762 39,117
18220
39,231
47,050
38,681
94,100
37,517
178,790
35,839
268,185
0%
NA
prospects to near perfection:
Total 240,003 503,361 949,418 1,533,564 2,322,717 3,151,958 3,811,155 59%
1. iPod-like adoption for the UP
Gross Margin
UP Band 2,247 71,538 184,192 351,048 593,515 891,475 1,157,432 183%
band
Jambox
Headset
37,293
9,556
53,103
12,095
104,922
11,777
146,366
11,824
187,470
11,675
214,440
11,348
225,762
10,872
35%
2%
2. Apple-type gross margins
Software/Services 12,986 32,465 63,988 119,789 177,032 NA
Total 49,0% 136,735 313,877 541,703 856,648 1,237,052 1,571,068 78%
3. Exit multiple in excess of all
% Gross Margin 205% 27.2% 33.1% 3S3% 369% 392% 41.2%
current comparable
(-1R&D
(-) S&M
(41,028)
(48,387)
(69,397)
(76,325)
(93,686)
(125,936)
(115,234)
(182,608)
(139,433)
(242268)
(161,742)
(293,870)
(182,769)
(346,767)
28%
39%
company trading multiples
(-1 G&A (16,959) (18,603) (26,044) (35,160) (45,708) (58,506) (67,282) 26%
Operating Profit (57,278) (27,590) 68,210 208,702 428,639 722,934 974251 NA
% Operating Margin -219% -5.5% 7.2% 116% 183% 22.9% 25.6%
(-1Taxes - - (12,522) (175,742) (296,403) (399,443) NA
(.) D&A 4,531 9,756 17,820 26,270 34,672 39,445 37,473 42%
(-1Capes (4,366) (31,470) (21,470) (30,195) (39,399) (43,828) (41,637) 46%
(.1-1A in Work. Cap. (31,495) (38,436) (12,269) (27,873) (37,823) (45,734) (45,734) 6%
Free Cash Flow (88,608) (87,740) 52,292 164,382 210,396 376,414 524910 NA
Dividends to GV $416 $1,306 $1,672 $2,991 $4172
Revenue Multiple 5.th 2.3x -12%
Equity Valuation 1,193,228 8,812,257 40%
Shares 233.058 246,064 1%
Value per Share $5.12 $3521 38%
GV Shares 1.956 1,956 0%
Value of GV Stake $10,000 I $70,033 38%
GV MOI 8.1x
IRR 44%
9
EFTA01136536
What are expected returns using more realistic assumptions?
The next slide shows the expected returns for an investment in Jawbone using what we think are a
more realistic set of assumptions:
1. Adoption rates for the UP that are roughly halfway between the iPod and the Blackberry. We
would still consider this an impressive target.
2. Zero revenues from 'data' over the next 6 years. We aren't yet convinced that the current or
proposed generations of the UP will really provide valuable data for health care providers and
insurance companies. For two main reasons:
a) It is generally the healthier person that opts to purchase and wear the UP band or one of its
competitors (Fitbit, etc.)
b) UP band sensors (current and planned) don't provide data that insurance companies can
use to better predict major diseases: heart disease/hypertension, diabetes, stroke, or
cancer*
3. Margins in-line with hardware industry averages: —28% gross margin, and —6% operating profit
margin.
4. Exit multiples more in-line with current trading multiples for hardware companies, adjusted for
higher expected growth: - 1.5x revenue
*Conversation with Rob Korpman MD - CEO of CentriHealth Inc, a leader in health informatics.
10
EFTA01136537
More realistic assumptions yield only a modest expected return
2012A 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E CAGR
Revenue 25 percentage point shortfall in unit sales
UP Eland 8,719 i 241,544 483,722 761,848 1 074 232 1,275 663 1,272 452 growth rate each period
lambox 196,278 223,149 349,735 472,141 585,945 649,955 684,249 2
Headset 35,005 36.772 I 38 703 37 567 35 0%
Software/Services - - A
Total 240,003 501,46.5 1,698,880 1.963,185 1,992,633
No revenue attributed to data
Gross Margin
UP Band 2,247 67,632 135,442 213,317 300,785 357,186 356,287 133%
lambox 37,293 53,110 97,926 132,214 164,065 181,983 191,590 31%
Headset 9,556 10,296 10,950 10,986 10,837 10,519 10,051 1%
Software/Services NA
Margins expand to meet industry
Total 09 096 131.038 244.318 356.517 475.686 549.692 557,937
96 Gross Margin 20.5% 26.1% 28.0% 2&O% 28.0% 28.0% 28014
averages
(-) R&D (41,028) (84002) (135,967) (178,447) (211,461) (213,582) (185 29%
(-) S&M (48,387) (94,588) (149.541) (196.262) (232,572) (234,905) (204,07 22%
(-)G&A (16,959) (23.054) (36,448) (47,836) (54686) (57,254) (49,739
Operating expenses fall linearly as a
Operating Profit (57.278) (72,607) (776 39) (66,027) (25,032) 43,950 118,580 NA
96 Operating Margin -23.9% -14.5% -&9% -8296 -1.5% 2.2% 6.0% percentage of revenue until they meet
industry averages
(-) Taxes (2,637) (48,618) NA
(+) D&A 4,531 &966 14,795 19,213 21,593 20,622 21,655 30%
(-)Capex (4,366) (28,923) (17.825) (22,080) (24,537) (22,913) (20,061) 33%
(+1-) Ain Work. Cap. (31,495) (35,325) (10,186) (20,385) (23,556) (23,909) (27,498) -2% Sales multiple more in line with public
Free Cash Flow (n.608) (127,888) (94255) 189,224 (51,532) 1-5,113 00,058 NA
comps, adjusted for higher expected
Dividends to GV $99 $262
growth
$0 $0 $0
Revenue Multiple 5.0x 1.5x
Additional dilution as negative cash flows
Equity Valuation 1,193,228 2,988,949
persist longer, requiring new equity raises
Shares 233,058 299.155 4%
Value per Share $5.12 $9.99 12%
Still impressive adoption + industry
GV Shares 1,956 956 0%
average margins + market multiple 1
Value of GV Stake $30,000
(adjusted for growth) a modest return
GV MOI 2.0x
IRR 12%
I 11
EFTA01136538
Conclusion
Using a (still) robust assumption for UP adoption, coupled with industry averages for margins and
exit multiples, an investment in Jawbone at the proposed $1.188 Bn valuation would yield only
modest returns.
The entry multiple of 5x revenue is high relative to current trading multiples for comparable
hardware companies, even adjusted for growth. Expected multiple contraction during the
investment period will make it difficult to realize a meaningful return.
Despite the valuation coming at a discount to the last round (and the proposed near-term round),
we are concerned that over a medium-term hold period this investment will not produce venture
capital type returns.
EFTA01136539
Appendix
13
EFTA01136540
Return sensitivity for GV model
MOI Sensitivity (Exit Multiple = 2.0x Revenue) MOI Sensitivity (Exit Multiple = 1.5x Revenue)
Operating UP Adoption (% haircut to company model) Operating UP Adoption (% haircut to company model)
Margin 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% Margin 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25%
26% 6.3x 5.6x 5.0x 4.5x 4.th 3.6x 26% 4.9x 4.4x 3.9x 3.5x 3.2x 2.8x
21% 6.0x 5.3x 4.8x 4.3x 3.8x 3.4x 21% 4.6x 4.1x 3.7x 3.3x 3.0x 2.7x
16% 5.6x 5.th 4.5x 4.0x 3.6x 3.2x 16% 4.3x 3.8x 3.4x 3.1x 2.7x 2.5x
11% 5.1x 4.6x 4.1x 3.7x 3.3x 19x 11% 3.9x 3.Sx 3.1x 2.8x 2.5x 2.2x
6% 4.5x 4.1x 3.7x 3.3x 2.9x 2.6x 6% 3.4x 3.1x 2.8x 2.5x 2.2x I 2.0x
GV expected
return
MOI Sensitivity (Exit Multiple = 1.0x Revenue) MOI Sensitivity (Exit Multiple = 0.5x Revenue)
Operating UP Adoption (% haircut to company model) Operating UP Adoption (% haircut to company model)
Margin 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% Margin 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25%
26% 3.Sx 3.2x 2.8x 2.5x 2.3x 2.1x 26% 2.1x 1.9x 1.7x 1.6x 1.4x 1.3x
21% 3.3x 2.9x 2.6x 2.3x 2.1x 1.9x 21% 1.9x 1.7x 1.5x 1.4x 1.3x 1.1x
16% 3.0x 2.7x 2.4x 2.1x 1.9x 1.7x 16% 1.7x 1.5x 1.3x 1.2x Lbc 1.0x
11% 2.7x 2.4x 2.1x 1.9x 1.7x 1.5x 11% 1.4x 1.3x 1.1x 1.0x 0.9x 0.8x
6% 2.3x 2.1x 1.9x 1.7x 1.5x 1.3x 6% 1.2x 1.1x 1.0x 0.9x 0.8x 0.7x
1 14
EFTA01136541
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
fadebbed03d134ef14f293e8eb21e51aded954aa5f19fd6cb28525f94606b255
Bates Number
EFTA01136528
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
14
💬 Comments 0