📄 Extracted Text (437 words)
4 September 2015
US Fixed Income Weekly
Even without considering the empirical relationships, it is also clear that FX
intervention is very much a short term affair. As the chart below shows the
recent jump in dealer positions in less than three years is consistent with the
Treasury data for 2014 that shows the preponderance of foreign official
Treasury holdings is held in the sub 3 year sector. Very little is held in longer
dated maturities so any FX intervention is anyway more likely to flatten the
yield curve than steepen it.
About 56% foreign official holdings of Treasuries are Dealer positions in Treasuries maturing in 3 years or less
under three years in maturity
60% Distribution of Maturities in Treasuries Held
—Dealer Net Outright Poston:
by Foreign Investors 30,000 Govt Coupon Secunhes,Oue 3-
50% Yr or Less(EOP.M4)
■0fficial institutions a Private Investors
20,000
40%
30% g 10.030
ea
20%
10% .10,000
-20,000
3.5v S :Cy too Jam14 Jul•14 Jan-15
Sarce ireDeuttlie flank Soar leiteeelltramar as
The relationship between central bank liquidity and the byproduct of FX
reserve accumulation is clearly central to risk asset performance and
therefore interest rates. The simplistic error is to assume that all assets are
treated equally. They are not - or at least have not been especially since the
crisis. If liquidity weakens and risk assets trade badly, rates are most likely to
rally not sell off. It doesn't matter how many Treasury bills are redeemed or
USD cash is liquidated from foreign central bank assets, US rates are more
likely to fall than rise especially further out the curve. In some ways this
really shouldn't be that hard to appreciate. After all central bank liquidity
drives broader measures of liquidity that also drives, with a lag, economic
activity. The indicators of excess liquidity (see below) are but derivatives of
central bank liquidity and the bank or "inside" money multipliers. If liquidity
is tightening relatively to nominal growth, real growth will tend to slowdown
later. Right now the message is not good for the OECD, excess liquidity
indicators point to real growth losing momentum. The IMF seems to get the
picture. China is probably getting the picture but faces the conundrum of
how to manage the carry trade unwind with minimal disruption. The grass is
definitely though greener if the currency is weaker and they hang onto most
of their reserves. Ironically the excess liquidity indicator has recently
improved for China although this is as much to do with decelerating nominal
growth.
Page 14 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0051315
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00197499
EFTA01362018
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
fb0a74061771c12bfda93f2170907f98b0f5affe0a78ec066dc79c096eaac8a5
Bates Number
EFTA01362018
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0