EFTA02663122.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (464 words)
From: Deepak Chopra <
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Jeffrey E.
Subject: Re:
I will only write if there a chance of his accepting
I am totally familiar with edge.org and can cater to their style. I wii =e sure to not mention anything spiritual. I have a
weekly column in t=e San Francisco Chronicle where I can write whatever comes to my mind as l=have built up my
audience over several years . Here is today's article
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/ar=icle/What-Came-Before-the-Big-Bang-A-Surprise-Answer-10844439.php
<http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/What-Came-Before=the-Big-Bang-A-Surprise-Answer-10844439.php>
I realize publishing something written =y be might be risky as its bound to draw criticism from his usual very mai=stream
writers and readers . So I fully understand if he is reticent about=it
Love
<http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/chopra/article/What-Came-Before=the-Big-Bang-A-Surprise-Answer-10844439.php>
What =ame Before the Big Bang? A Surprise Answer <http://www.sf=ate.com/opinion/chopra/article/What-Came-
Before-the-Big-Bang-A-Surprise-An=wer-10844439.php>
www.sfgate.com
Ironically, science has stuck to these possible scenarios with the universe= even though what science is supposedly
famous for is its defeat of religi=n, or to be more specific, its defeat of metaphysics and the whole notion =f a higher
plane. I...] the big bang and expansion of the universe was first proposed by Georges Lemaitr=, a Belgian Roman Catholic
priest, who was an astronomer and professor of =hysics at the Catholic University of Leuven. L.] many have pointed out
t= the agreement of the big bang view with Biblical accounts in the book of Genesis. Unwittingly, the general pu=lic that
accepts a casual idea about the universe being born and dying is =ctually adopting a metaphysical position about human
birth and death, not =imple, unvarnished, provable facts. In our book, You Are the Universe, we cover this topic in great
detail, bu= here's a thumbnail sketch of our argument. There is no evidence of any ki=d that time existed before the big
bang. [...I what we typically think of =s time--the tick toc
EFTA_R1_01912375
EFTA02663122
Chopra Foundat=on <http://www.choprafoundation.org> <http://www.choprafoundation.org> </=iv>
Jiyo <http://www.jiyo.com> <http://=iyo.com> <=a> <http://jiyo.com>
Chopra Center for Wellbe=ng <http://www.chopra.com> <http://chopra.com> <http:=/chopra.com>
<http://www.jiyo.com>
<=span>
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 8:44:27 AM
To: Deepak Chopra
Subject:
you around. ? i havent heard back from b=ockman yet. i think if you phrase the reality as a question instead =f an
answer you will have a better chance.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
2
EFTA_R1_01912376
EFTA02663123
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
fb2f7104d0dd4f20ad7d6c80082fdf688efeef0bb58a2c2d17832564962919c3
Bates Number
EFTA02663122
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0