EFTA00210105.pdf

Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 03:07:46 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI. The story was also on HLN. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Gershman, Jacob" <Jacob.Gershman wsj com> Link to post: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/ u • Itt: WSJ ralow-up question Hi, Jacob, Thank you for your inquiry. We will decline the opportunity to comment as the matter is ongoing. Best regards, From: Gershman, Jacob [mailto:Jacob.Gershmanwsj.corn] Sent: Monday, January 05 2015 4:54 PM Hi Marlene, I'm writing a follow-up post for WSJ's Law Blog looking at the "Jane Doe" lawsuit itself and the arguments put forward by the government and the plaintiffs. I just wanted to check to see if you wanted to include any additional EFTA00210105 comment on the merits of the lawsuit. At the moment, I'm just quoting from government briefs outlining its position. Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman Reporter The Wall Skeet Journal 1211Avenue of the Americas New York. NY 10036 0 G:646-675-4797 Twitter: @jecobgershmen Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 2:12 PM Subject: RE: WSJ deadline question Hi, Jacob, Thank you for your inquiry. We do not comment on pending matters. Best regards and happy new year. Marlene From: Gershman, Jacob [mailto:Jacob.Gershmanewsj.corn] Sent: Frida Janua 02 2015 12:28 PM ea ineque on Hi Marlene, I'm a reporter at WSJ. I wanted to know if the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami has any comment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #21 UNITED STATES (9:08-cv-80736), a lawsuit concerning the government's non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. As widely reported, the motion, which asks the court to allow two other women to join the action, includes new allegations against Prince Andrew and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. I can be reached by email or by phone at Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman EFTA00210106