podesta_email_01993.txt

podesta-emails 5,830 words email

D4 D6 P19 D3 D1

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Wednesday December 3, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> "will forever be known for taking opportunities to expand the roles of women," expanding opportunity http://www.journalinquirer.com/opinion/other_commentary/hillary-is-paving-the-way-for-others-to-follow/article_18061a4a-7af4-11e4-b45f-4fa875b50899.html … <http://t.co/EeNrZXuA0p> [12/3/14, 12:41 p.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/540199087992107008>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: As Secretary of State, @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> launched global action to fight climate change. http://correctrecord.org/stemming-the-tide-of-climate-change/ … <http://t.co/5229XfhTZn> [12/2/14, 3:06 p.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/539873184485371904>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: "You saw her tonight...leaning in to this issue to make it clear how much she cares about it." @LCVoters <https://twitter.com/LCVoters>' Karpinski http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-goes-green … <http://t.co/ChvF5yMpsM> [12/2/14, 1:22 p.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/539846988670312450>] *Headlines:* ​​*Journal Inquirer opinion: East Hartford Mayor Marcia Leclerc: “Hillary is paving the way for others to follow” <http://www.journalinquirer.com/opinion/other_commentary/hillary-is-paving-the-way-for-others-to-follow/article_18061a4a-7af4-11e4-b45f-4fa875b50899.html>* “This fall, Hillary Clinton crisscrossed the country campaigning on behalf of Democrats and speaking out for women’s rights and opportunity. I cannot think of anyone better to speak on our behalf than the one who paved the way for the rest to follow.” *The Hill blog: “Clinton: Women should have larger role in national security” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/225853-clinton-women-are-agents-of-change>* “Hillary Clinton called for women to have a larger role in national security issues in a speech at Georgetown University on Wednesday, saying women ‘are agents of peace and agents of change.’” *MSNBC: “Hillary Clinton plays it safe with ‘smart power’ speech” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-plays-it-safe-smart-power-speech>* “It was the right topic at the right venue for Hillary Clinton Wednesday morning at Georgetown University, but the timing was off. Poor weather and impending finals kept students from filling up the ornate Gaston Hall, and her wonky foreign policy remarks left many disappointed who are hungry for something more from the likely presidential candidate.” *NBC News: “Hillary Clinton Lauds Female Leaders As ‘Agents of Change’” <http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/hillary-clinton-lauds-female-leaders-agents-change-n260796>* “Hillary Clinton appeared at Georgetown University Wednesday to laud the contributions of female leaders globally, saying that women are important catalysts for change throughout the world.” *Washington Post blog: Post Everything: Sally Kohn: “The Republicans hating on Hillary Clinton’s speaking fees are hypocrites” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/03/the-republicans-hating-on-hillary-clintons-speaking-fees-are-hypocrites/>* “Let that sink in for a moment. The Republican Party, which wants to keep women and minimum wage workers (the majority of whom, incidentally, are also women) severely underpaid while trust fund families and Wall Street execs pocket more — this crowd is attacking Hillary Clinton for being paid well.” *Mediaite: “Politico Demands Hillary Put It out of Its Own Misery” <http://www.mediaite.com/online/politico-demands-hillary-put-it-out-of-its-own-misery/>* “It should be pointed out that nobody forced the Beltway media to cover a campaign that didn’t exist.” *The New Republic: “Poll: Obama's Immigration Plan Could Help Hillary Clinton Win Latino Voters” <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120467/hillary-clintons-support-obamas-executive-action-good-politics>* “A new poll from Latino Decisions asked 405 Latino voters if they were more or less likely to support Hillary Clinton for president if she said she would extend the executive action. The results were clear: 85 percent of respondents were likely to support Clinton in such a situation, with just 11 percent saying they were unlikely to support her.” *Washington Post blog: Post Partisan: Stephen Stromberg: “Hillary Clinton’s insulting silence on Keystone XL” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/03/hillary-clintons-insulting-silence-on-keystone-xl/>* “Did Hillary Clinton learn enough from 2008? She still seems to be self-defeatingly guarded.” *People: “Mia Love, the First Black Republican Congresswoman-Elect, Says Hillary Clinton Should Stand Down” <http://www.people.com/article/mia-love-first-black-republican-congresswoman-on-hillary-clinton>* “But asked if she would like to see Hillary Clinton run in 2016, Love responded, in her first at-home interview since her election, ‘Nope.’ Asked to elaborate, the normally outspoken conservative had nothing more to say.” *The Hill: “Benghazi panel to meet in lame duck” <http://thehill.com/policy/defense/225865-benghazi-panel-to-meet-in-lame-duck>* “The hearing on Dec. 10 will feature two State Department officials and serve as a follow-up to the panel’s inaugural September meeting on security measures surrounding American diplomats overseas.” *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “Ready for Hillary holding events in O’Malley’s home state” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/225861-ready-for-hillary-to-hold-event-in-omalleys-backyard>* “Ready for Hillary is holding events this week in the home state of Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), a potential presidential rival to Hillary Clinton.” *The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Elizabeth Warren gets a new slogan” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/225860-elizabeth-warren-gets-a-new-slogan>* “The merchandise could stir fresh speculation that Warren is considering a run for the White House in 2016 despite her repeated denials.” *Articles:* ​​*Journal Inquirer opinion: East Hartford Mayor Marcia Leclerc: “Hillary is paving the way for others to follow” <http://www.journalinquirer.com/opinion/other_commentary/hillary-is-paving-the-way-for-others-to-follow/article_18061a4a-7af4-11e4-b45f-4fa875b50899.html>* By Marcia Leclerc, mayor of East Hartford December 3, 2014 11:00 a.m. EDT This fall, Hillary Clinton crisscrossed the country campaigning on behalf of Democrats and speaking out for women’s rights and opportunity. I cannot think of anyone better to speak on our behalf than the one who paved the way for the rest to follow. Clinton will forever be known for taking opportunities to expand the roles of women and for not resting until everyone is given the opportunity to succeed. As secretary of state, Clinton showed her ability to lead as a woman on the global stage. In an increasingly challenging and changing world, Clinton’s leadership helped make the planet a safer place and created opportunities for millions in underdeveloped countries. Throughout her career, Clinton has successfully paved a path in a traditionally male-dominated world. Here are just a few examples of her many accomplishments that have left her poised, qualified, and ready to potentially become the first female president of the United States. First lady of Arkansas: During her time in Arkansas, Clinton became a lifelong advocate for families and creating opportunity for all. Even before her time as first lady, Clinton worked to expand early childhood education to low-income families. As first lady, Hillary Clinton brought the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters program to Arkansas to expand early childhood education. And as chairwoman of the Arkansas Education Standards Committee, Clinton helped develop new education reform standards that were eventually adopted statewide. Clinton understands the value of education. Here in East Hartford, we too know the value of education and we celebrate our excellent schools. Education is the greatest tool for creating opportunity, economic security, and building greater family and community engagement. First lady of the United States: As First Lady of the U.S., Clinton continued to change the role of women in politics. Clinton demonstrated that, in a role once only thought of as “the wife to the president,” she could become an effective powerhouse, forever changing the direction of our country. The moment I knew that Clinton would forever change the role of women was when she famously declared in China, circa 1995, that “human rights are women’s rights, and women’s rights are human rights.” Clinton continued to be a trailblazer, working to improve the lives of children and families throughout the country. Clinton was instrumental in the creation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which increased health coverage to millions of children in low-income and working families, continuing to provide a vital lifeline to millions of families today. U.S. senator: As a senator, Clinton fought for those who put their lives on the line every day to protect our country — our service members. Clinton helped expand access to health care for our National Guard and reservists, and secured funding to help first responders recover from the 9/11 attacks. Clinton also fought for hardworking Americans by consistently advocating for equal pay for equal work, expanding access to early childhood education and health care, and working to raise the minimum wage. Secretary of state: By the time Clinton was appointed secretary of state, she had already forever changed the role of women, serving as an example to millions. But she didn’t stop there. Clinton became one of our most successful secretaries of state, improving our country’s leadership and standing in the world, while working to empower women and girls across the globe. “The highest, hardest glass ceiling”: We do not yet know what is in store for Clinton’s future, but we do know that the futures of millions of girls will forever be brighter and more promising, thanks to her leadership and dedication to creating opportunities for others. I know I would not be where I am today if it were not for Hillary Clinton. *The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Clinton: Women should have larger role in national security” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/225853-clinton-women-are-agents-of-change>* By Peter Sullivan December 3, 2014, 12:16 p.m. EST Hillary Clinton called for women to have a larger role in national security issues in a speech at Georgetown University on Wednesday, saying women "are agents of peace and agents of change." While Clinton was not giving a speech especially themed on U.S. politics, her expected presidential campaign means politics are never far away. Even as she spoke, Republicans pointed to the empty seats in the hall as evidence of a lack of enthusiasm for Clinton. "Women are not victims of conflict," Clinton said. "They are agents of peace and agents of change." Clinton made women's rights on the domestic front a centerpiece of her midterm campaigning for Democrats, touting issues like equal pay and paid leave. As first lady in 1995, she famously said in Beijing that "women's rights are human rights." She touted women defense ministers on Wednesday, saying they prove that they can they can "defend their countries as well as any man." Asked about Ukraine, in a session after the speech, Clinton called on the Ukrainian military to "make it at least possible for women to be in positions of military and civilian authority in defending their country." As Ukraine deals with a conflict with separatists in the east and Russia's annexation of Crimea, Clinton called for the United States to support Ukraine's military building back up. "I hope other European countries, the United States will be there as they undertake this defense buildup," she said. Some Republicans have called on the U.S. to provide arms to the Ukrainian military, but Clinton did not weigh in on this debate. On Syria, an issue where Clinton sparked controversy in August by referring to President Obama's "failure" to arm the rebels, Clinton steered clear of larger U.S. policy and said the situation was dire enough that as far as women and security, a "protective, humanitairan approach" is what is needed. She said "we should do what we can" to support Kurdish women who are fighting ISIS militants. While Clinton was speaking, another issue was generating buzz: the empty seats in front of her. The balcony and some of the seats lower down were empty in Georgetown's Gaston Hall, which the University says is an "over 700-seat hall." America Rising, a conservative PAC, linked to photos of the empty seats with the title "Guess who's #ReadyforHillary! Empty chairs!!!" A lack of enthusiasm for Clinton among students would speak to fears that some Democrats are not excited about a Clinton candidacy. Avery Jaffe, who works for Ready for Hillary, the pro-Clinton group, posted on Twitter, "In fairness to Georgetown students, it is finals prep week." *MSNBC: “Hillary Clinton plays it safe with ‘smart power’ speech” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-plays-it-safe-smart-power-speech>* By Alex Seitz-Wald December 3, 2014, 1:22 p.m. EST It was the right topic at the right venue for Hillary Clinton Wednesday morning at Georgetown University, but the timing was off. Poor weather and impending finals kept students from filling up the ornate Gaston Hall, and her wonky foreign policy remarks left many disappointed who are hungry for something more from the likely presidential candidate. It was just over a month ago when Clinton last visited Georgetown’s Institute for Women, Peace and Security, which was founded by a close friend and former aide of Clinton’s, and where Clinton herself serves as honorary chair. “When I told my husband this morning that I was going to Georgetown, he said, you’ve been to Georgetown more in the past two years than I have,” the former secretary of state joked as she took the stage. Bill Clinton is a Georgetown alum. On October 30, when she last appeared at Gaston Hall, decorated with elaborate wood-carved beams and religious frescos, it was to talk about women’s role in the economy. It was also in this room that she, in her first year as secretary of state, launched the the country’s first “action plan on women, peace, and security.” Melanne Verveer, who now runs the Georgetown institute and who moderated the discussion Wednesday, served as Clinton’s Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues. This time, when Clinton came to Georgetown to partake in a conference on “smart power,” the topic was as close to her heart as any. It was her guiding philosophy at State. Clinton defined the term Wednesday as “using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security,” while “showing respect” for other countries and actors on the world stage – “even for one’s enemies.” She also spoke about women, noting they often “bear the humanitarian load” of conflicts more than men. But she added, “Women are not just victims of conflict, they are agents of peace and agents of change.” She referenced the Northern Ireland Peace process, where women took a lead. After Clinton concluded her remarks, Norway’s 38-year-old female Defense Minister, Ine Eriksen Soreide took the stage. She told a story about how the then-secretary of state inspired Soreide to have the confidence to take on the chairmanship of the foreign policy committee in her Parliament. Soreide also said Russia “violated fundamental … international law” in Ukraine. Clinton nodded in agreement. Later, the former secretary of state called the comments “very strong.” The themes are all well-known to those familiar with Clinton’s work, but felt somewhat vintage for a former secretary of state who has been increasingly moving away from her foreign policy safe zone into economic and other domestic issues, like immigration. And there was little room for spontaneity or commenting on news of the day. Questions from students were submitted ahead of time and reviewed by a committee of faculty and students before being read by Verveer. At the start of the program, an announcer declared that interruptions to the program “will not be permitted.” The questions Clinton was asked focused on women’s roles in the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, something Clinton spoke about another time she visited Georgetown. Meanwhile, as she speaking, an entirely different theme was being pushed by Republicans operatives, who filled reporters’ inboxes and Twitter feeds with pictures showing empty rows of seats in the hall. The university said the hall seats over 700 people, but that only 400 turned out. The entire balcony was empty, save reporters, while there were several empty seats downstairs. Clinton regularly gives speeches where she’s paid up to $300,000 by groups to hear her remarks. Tickets were offered free to every student. The university and students sympathetic to Clinton pointed out that many students were busy studying for upcoming finals. The rainy weather also may have kept some students indoors, and made Clinton run about 30 minutes late for her speech, which Verveer blamed on “weather delays.” *NBC News: “Hillary Clinton Lauds Female Leaders As ‘Agents of Change’” <http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/hillary-clinton-lauds-female-leaders-agents-change-n260796>* By Carrie Dann December 3, 2014, 11:55 a.m. EST Hillary Clinton appeared at Georgetown University Wednesday to laud the contributions of female leaders globally, saying that women are important catalysts for change throughout the world. "Women leaders, it has been found, are good at building coalitions across ethnic and sectarian lines and speaking up for other marginalized groups," the former secretary of state told attendees at a Georgetown University conference entitled "Smart Power: Security Through Inclusive Leadership." "It's important to underscore this overriding fact: women are not just victims of conflict," added Clinton, who is widely viewed as a potential first female president if she chooses to run in 2016. "They are agents of peace and agents of change." During her remarks at the conference, some Republicans took to Twitter to gleefully point out empty seats at the event. *Washington Post blog: Post Everything: Sally Kohn: “The Republicans hating on Hillary Clinton’s speaking fees are hypocrites” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/03/the-republicans-hating-on-hillary-clintons-speaking-fees-are-hypocrites/>* By Sally Kohn December 3, 2014, 8:50 a.m. EST Hillary Clinton makes a lot of money when she speaks. This is, somehow, offensive to the Republican Party. Let that sink in for a moment. The Republican Party, which wants to keep women and minimum wage workers (the majority of whom, incidentally, are also women) severely underpaid while trust fund families and Wall Street execs pocket more — this crowd is attacking Hillary Clinton for being paid well. In a hum-drum effort to vet the hum-drum presumptive 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, news outlets have been reporting on Clinton’s speaking fees and contract requirements. Most recently, the Washington Post revealed Clinton’s terms for a speech at the University of California Los Angeles. For the speech, Clinton’s team made such ludicrous requests as a “pitcher of room temperature water, water glass, and lemon wed­ges.” Why can’t she settle for cold water? Plus she wanted, nay demanded, that backstage there be “diet ginger ale, crudité, hummus and sliced fruit.” How dare Hillary Clinton demand healthy snacks? For this, she was paid $300,000 — a sum, like all her speaking fees, which Clinton donated to the Clinton Global Foundation. The Washington Post story comes on the heels of June reporting about a speech to the University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation, for which Clinton was paid $225,000. Anti-Hillary conservatives have taken this reporting and run with it: *America Rising PAC* @AmericaRising: Hummus: $5 Crudité: $19 Speaking fee: $300,000 Making students pay for it: Priceless http://gph.to/1vPxHa6 <http://t.co/uPNWeKZgDA> cc @ClintonCosts <https://twitter.com/ClintonCosts> @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> [11/26/14, 8:29 p.m. EST <https://twitter.com/AmericaRising/status/537780301096054784>] First, the facts. Neither the UCLA speech or UNLV speech were paid for with student tuition dollars. The UCLV Foundation is a private non-profit separate from the university; the UCLA speech was paid for as part of a separately endowed lecture series. More pertinently, though, both speeches raised money for the universities and their students. For instance, the UNLV event raised more than $350,000. But shame on Hillary, speaking at events that raise money for public universities! It’s ironic that, after a 2012 election spent complaining about how Mitt Romney was attacked for being successful, Republicans now find themselves trying to attack success. And that’s just the tip of the irony iceberg. On the occasion of Clinton’s UNLV speech, the Republican National Committee put out a statement saying, “Hillary Clinton’s speaking fee at UNLV is more than 4 times what the average Nevadan makes in a year.” Raising the minimum wage would sure help those Nevada families way more than cutting Hillary Clinton’s speaking fee. But Republicans are the ones blocking a minimum wage hike nationwide. Conservatives also complained that Clinton accepted six figures to speak at a public university about, among other things, the challenges of mounting student debt. They pounced on calls by some students for Clinton to donate her speaking fees back to defray scholarships and rising tuition costs. But if conservatives are so outraged about the rising cost of college and run-away student debt, why have they blocked legislation to refinance student loans and proposed massive cuts to Pell grants? Certainly, Clinton has stumbled in finding a populist way to talk about her finances, as when she said she was “dead broke” when she and Bill left the White House (they had two houses). The New York Post wrote that Clinton’s “diva routine could hurt her chances of campaigning as a champion for the middle class.” Sure, but you know what else hurts a party’s reputation as a middle class champion? Repeatedly opposing policies like paid sick leave and investments to fix roads and schools that help the middle class—which Republicans routinely do. Selective outrage sure works for fanning the flames of Twitter trolls, but when Election Day rolls around, Republicans won’t be able to paint Hillary Clinton as an out-of-touch elitist if their party is a still a worse example of that which they seek to condemn. There is plenty in Hillary Clinton’s speaking schedule actually worth scrutinizing. Since leaving the State Department, Clinton has given paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, Fidelity, the Carlyle Group, the National Association of Realtors and other business interests. “This is a great way for a company to get access to her, to hear what she’s thinking, to be remembered if and when she does run for office,” Campaign Legal Center policy director Meredith McGehee told Mother Jones. This might also seem like the perfect thing to attack given the problems with Clinton’s coziness with Wall Street in a post-Occupy political era increasingly focused on the crisis of inequality. Curiously, conservatives aren’t even mentioning these speeches—just the ones Clinton has given at fundraisers for public universities. Of course, why would Republicans ever critique big business, even if big business is courting the potential Democratic frontrunner for 2016? While conservatives might rhetorically feign a defense of public colleges and the middle class, they would never, ever hint at attacking big business. Which reveals the deepest irony of all — Republicans regularly say that government should get out of the way and let “market forces” handle everything from pay inequity to healthcare. But market forces are precisely what have made Hillary Clinton the second best paid political speaker in America (after her husband, Bill) — she’s simply more popular, by leaps and bounds, than any potential Republican challenger. By drawing attention to how much Hillary Clinton is being paid to speak, Republicans are merely pointing out how in-demand Clinton is—presumably not just on the stage but in the voting booth in 2016. *Mediaite: “Politico Demands Hillary Put It out of Its Own Misery” <http://www.mediaite.com/online/politico-demands-hillary-put-it-out-of-its-own-misery/>* By Evan McMurry December 3, 2014, 8:34 a.m. EST For the twenty-one months, Hillary Clinton has daily disappointed the political press corps by not actually being a presidential candidate. In not holding any office nor actively campaigning for one, Clinton left political publications and cable news shows to endlessly pick over the non-ness of her non-campaign. It’s as if every science publication were forced by invisible decree to incessantly debate whether the cat is still alive. On Wednesday Politico’s Roger Simon had enough. Chiding her non-campaign for “insufficiently” arguing her qualifications for the office for which she’s not yet running, Simon all but demanded that Clinton put everybody out of their misery. “Not since Hamlet first strode upon the stage circa 1599 and dithered over ‘To be, or not to be’ have so many held their collective breath for an answer,” he wrote. Not for nothing, the subhead suggests who this “so many” is: [SCREENGRAB OF HEADLINE: “HILLARY SHOULD STOP DITHERING”] Simon even cites “his own publication’s” coverage — just in the past week — as proof that Clinton’s non-campaign is failing. He could go back further: a search of Politico’s archives reveals 1,064 mentions of “Hillary Clinton 2016″ since February 2013, when Clinton left the State Department. Even allowing for peripheral mentions, that’s more than article a day. No wonder Politico’s exhausted, though it should be pointed out that nobody forced the Beltway media to cover a campaign that didn’t exist. *The New Republic: “Poll: Obama's Immigration Plan Could Help Hillary Clinton Win Latino Voters” <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120467/hillary-clintons-support-obamas-executive-action-good-politics>* By Danny Vinik December 3, 2014 President Barack Obama’s executive action protecting more than four million undocumented immigrants from deportation isn’t just good policy. It’s also good politics for the Democratic Party. A new poll from Latino Decisions asked 405 Latino voters if they were more or less likely to support Hillary Clinton for president if she said she would extend the executive action. The results were clear: 85 percent of respondents were likely to support Clinton in such a situation, with just 11 percent saying they were unlikely to support her. Clinton announced her support for the executive action soon after Obama announced it, so it’s hard to imagine her discontinuing it as president. Of course, a backlash among non-Hispanic voters could hurt Clinton. But given party polarization today, there are few voters left in the middle who could be disheartened with her over her support for Obama's plan. In other words, this move allows Clinton to consolidate her support among Hispanic voters while her risk of losing many non-Hispanics is low. That’s a good position to be in. *Washington Post blog: Post Partisan: Stephen Stromberg: “Hillary Clinton’s insulting silence on Keystone XL” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/12/03/hillary-clintons-insulting-silence-on-keystone-xl/>* By Stephen Stromberg December 3, 2014, 11:51 a.m. EST Did Hillary Clinton learn enough from 2008? She still seems to be self-defeatingly guarded. Several recent articles have called Clinton out for refusing to say where she stands on the Keystone XL pipeline. In fact, reporters should be asking her whether she has changed her mind on the issue now that environmentalists have made it into a purity test — because she had sensible things to say about Keystone XL four years ago, before she adopted her strategic silence. Here is Clinton in 2010, then secretary of state, speaking at San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club: We haven’t finish[ed] all of the analysis. So as I say, we’ve not yet signed off on it. But we are inclined to do so and we are for several reasons — going back to one of your original questions — we’re either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada. And until we can get our act together as a country and figure out that clean, renewable energy is in both our economic interests and the interests of our planet — (applause) — I mean, I don’t think it will come as a surprise to anyone how deeply disappointed the president and I are about our inability to get the kind of legislation through the Senate that the United States was seeking. Now, that hasn’t stopped what we’re doing. We have moved a lot on the regulatory front through the EPA here at home and we have been working with a number of countries on adaptation and mitigation measures. But obviously, it was one of the highest priorities of the administration for us to enshrine in legislation President Obama’s commitment to reducing our emissions. So we do have a lot that still must be done. And it is a hard balancing act. It’s a very hard balancing act. Clinton was responding to a question about the Alberta Clipper, a pipeline that began transporting tar sands oil to Wisconsin in 2010. But the State Department subsequently clarified that she was speaking about Keystone XL. Her remarks were on the right track: The Keystone XL decision will not determine the future of oil use here or abroad, and there are much more important factors that will. Policymakers should focus on those instead of trying to micromanage decisions on energy supply infrastructure, angering our allies in the process. Does Clinton still hold to those principles? If so, why won’t she admit it? If not, what changed her mind? Clinton is not officially running yet, so she is not under the high obligation to square with the public that candidacy brings. But she isn’t free of obligation; she led the State Department when it considered the issue. Continuing evasion only communicates one thing: insulting caution. As was often the case in her 2008 run, she gives the impression that she is unwilling to tell you what she really believes, at least not until Mark Penn or some other purveyor of political pablum has sliced it up and served it to the public in its maximally inoffensive — and least interesting — form. That’s infuriating for those who would agree with her — particularly for those who want pro-environment leaders to guide people toward issues that really matter — because she knows better and won’t stick up for their side. It’s patronizing to environmentalists because she is trying to pander to them by refusing to engage them like adults. Clinton’s political calculation is good sign that she’s running for president — but not an indication that she will do a better job than she did in 2008. *People: “Mia Love, the First Black Republican Congresswoman-Elect, Says Hillary Clinton Should Stand Down” <http://www.people.com/article/mia-love-first-black-republican-congresswoman-on-hillary-clinton>* By Sandra Sobieraj Westfall December 3, 2014, 7:45 a.m. EST It seems there is little in the way of sorority when it comes to glass-ceiling shatterers. Last month Utah's Congresswoman-elect Mia Love sent shards flying when she became the first black woman Republican – not to mention, first Haitian-American – to be elected to the House of Representatives. Her victory was noted as a milestone even by political opponents, such as Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, who said, "Black women no longer have to fit in a bracket." But asked if she would like to see Hillary Clinton run in 2016, Love responded, in her first at-home interview since her election, "Nope." Asked to elaborate, the normally outspoken conservative had nothing more to say. PEOPLE sat down with Love and her family – husband Jason, daughters Alessa, 14, and Abi, 12, 7-year-old son Peyton and even the rambunctious family dog Xander – at their Saratoga Springs home to get better acquainted with the woman arguably poised to be the most high-profile member of the new Congress being sworn in Jan. 6. Once a fine arts major who dreamed of a musical theater career, Love, 39, gave up that path when her 1998 wedding date conflicted with a Broadway audition. After that she became a flight attendant, a call-center manager, and a fitness instructor before finding her calling in politics when an insect infestation in her community motivated her to organize – successfully – against a home developer. After six years on her city council, and one term as mayor of her small Utah town, Love finds herself headed to Washington, and into the history books for changing the face of the Republican party. But making history, she says, "wasn't important to me – it's certainly not why I ran. I wasn't elected because I'm female or because I'm a certain color. We wanted to make sure we were focusing on issues." *The Hill: “Benghazi panel to meet in lame duck” <http://thehill.com/policy/defense/225865-benghazi-panel-to-meet-in-lame-duck>* By Martin Matishak December 3, 2014, 1:01 p.m. EST The House Select Committee investigating the 2012 Benghazi attack announced Wednesday that it will meet again before the year is out. The hearing on Dec. 10 will feature two State Department officials and serve as a follow-up to the panel’s inaugural September meeting on security measures surrounding American diplomats overseas. The lame-duck session meeting's tone could be less restrained than the House panel’s first hearing, when Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) stressed the neutral, fact-finding nature of the committee's mission. Committee Republicans could look to use the hearing to chastise Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of State at the time of the deadly strike in Libya. Republicans have repeatedly attacked Clinton’s handling of the episode, with several suggesting it should bar her from seeking the presidency in 2016. The hearing also comes after the House Intelligence Committee released a report last month that cleared the Obama administration of GOP charges that it covered up the circumstances of the attack and intentionally misled Congress. Many Republicans, including Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.), Ted Cruz (Texas) and Marco Rubio (Fla.), all of whom could run for the White House in two years, have lambasted the report, charging the panel with whitewashing its conclusions to protect the intelligence community. They, along with other Senate Republicans, want the upper chamber to join the investigation. Appearing next Wednesday will be Greg Starr, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security, who testified in September, along with Steve Linick, the State Department’s inspector general. *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “Ready for Hillary holding events in O’Malley’s home state” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/225861-ready-for-hillary-to-hold-event-in-omalleys-backyard>* By Peter Sullivan December 3, 2014, 12:49 p.m. EST Ready for Hillary is holding events this week in the home state of Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), a potential presidential rival to Hillary Clinton. The group, which is not formally affiliated with Clinton but has gained welcome among her advisers, will hold a fundraiser at a Potomac, Md. home on Thursday. That follows an event held at Goucher College in Baltimore on Monday. The events are featuring a number of top Democratic figures in Maryland who support Clinton, ahead of a possible 2016 presidential run. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) told the Monday gathering that the state would provide a "groundswell of grassroots" support for Clinton, according to the Baltimore Sun. Seth Bringman, a spokesman for Ready for Hillary, said about 100 people attended the event, mostly young professionals giving $20.16 each. The Thursday event's host committee includes Attorney General Doug Gansler, state Treasurer Nancy Kopp, state Senate President Mike Miller, and other members of the legislature. O'Malley says he is weighing a bid and has been laying the groundwork for a run with visits to early states like Iowa and New Hampshire. He has also gone to Clinton's left on some issues, warning President Obama not to send unaccompanied children back across the border this summer, and urging the rejection of the Keystone pipeline. O'Malley faced a possible setback to a presidential run on Election Day, when his lieutenant governor, Anthony Brown, lost the governor's race to a Republican, Larry Hogan. Asked by the Washington Blade last month whether the loss would hurt his chances, O'Malley said "Don't know, don't care." *The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Elizabeth Warren gets a new slogan” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/225860-elizabeth-warren-gets-a-new-slogan>* By Kevin Cirilli December 3, 2014, 12:46 p.m. EST Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has a new slogan: "The best senator money can't buy." Those are the words plastered across a new T-shirt that is now for sale on the senator’s campaign website. The merchandise could stir fresh speculation that Warren is considering a run for the White House in 2016 despite her repeated denials. Warren is not up for reelection in the Senate until 2018. The T-shirt plays up the senator's independent streak, something liberals have seized on while declaring themselves members of the “Warren wing of the Democratic Party.” Groups on the left have praised Warren for her populist, anti-Wall Street rhetoric, with some pleading for her to mount a challenge to Hillary Clinton in 2016. The grassroots of the Democratic Party has long been suspicious of Clinton, recently criticizing her for making paid speeches to Wall Street banks. Earlier this week, The Winnipeg Free Press reported that Clinton will speak at the Winnipeg Convention Center in January at an event sponsored by the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Republicans, meanwhile, have sought to portray Clinton as out of touch with Americans as she collects hefty paychecks, some of which have been reported to be upwards of $300,000 per speech.