​Correct The Record Saturday January 17, 2015 Roundup

podesta-emails 6,203 words email

P17 P22 D6 V11 V16

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Saturday January 17, 2015 Roundup:* *Headlines:* *MSNBC: “Is this Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda?” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/how-hillary-clinton-will-tackle-inequaly>* “A new report from a leading Democratic think tank offers clues about how Hillary Clinton might tackle economic inequality, which has become a key motivating issue of the progressive base, if she decides to run for president in 2016.” *The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Clinton: Focus more on wages, less on regs” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/229795-clinton-focus-more-on-wages-less-on-regs>* “Hillary Clinton on Friday criticized the new Republican-controlled Congress for trying to boost economic growth by loosening regulations, which progressives say would weaken financial watchdogs.” *MSNBC: “Clinton slams GOP attempts to roll back Wall Street reform” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-slams-gop-attempts-roll-back-wall-street-reform>* “Hillary Clinton has been very careful about which issues she weighs in on as she considers a second run for the presidency in 2016, but she took to Twitter Friday to condemn Republican attempts to gut the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law.” *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “RNC chairman: 'We're ready for Hillary'” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/229797-rnc-chairman-were-ready-for-hillary>* “Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a speech Friday that ‘we're ready for Hillary’ and previewed a line of attack linking the former secretary of State to the Obama administration.” *Politico: “Mitt Romney's 2016 pitch: I'm a foreign policy prophet” <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/was-romney-really-right-114347.html>* "But, as Democrats point out, any losing candidate can cherry-pick a few issues that later broke his way. And Romney’s batting average was hardly perfect. Nor do bragging rights on a few specific issues necessarily translate to a popular foreign policy vision overall." *New York Times: Sec. Clinton supports pro-democracy Saudi blogger <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/17/world/caning-of-saudi-blogger-is-delayed-amid-protests.html>* “Ms. Badawi also sued the government in 2011 for not allowing women to vote in local elections, a move cited by the State Department when it gave her an International Woman of Courage Award in 2012. ‘You are making a difference,’ Hillary Rodham Clinton, then secretary of state, told her at the award ceremony, which was also attended by Michelle Obama.” *The Weekly Standard: “Hillary Clinton's Charlie Hebdo Problem” <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-clintons-charlie-hebdo-problem_823878.html>* “What seems most likely is that Clinton has remained silent in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre in order to avoid scrutiny of her own failure to defend free speech in the face of Islamist violence.” *The Hill blog: “Five reasons the left doesn’t believe Elizabeth Warren” <http://thehill.com/policy/finance/229840-five-reasons-the-left-doesnt-believe-elizabeth-warren>* "Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has said time and time that against she’s not running for president in 2016." *Articles:* *MSNBC: “Is this Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda?” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/how-hillary-clinton-will-tackle-inequaly>* By Alex Seitz-Wald and Suzy Khimm January 16, 2015, 6:27 p.m. EST A new report from a leading Democratic think tank offers clues about how Hillary Clinton might tackle economic inequality, which has become a key motivating issue of the progressive base, if she decides to run for president in 2016. The report, assembled by an international panel of prominent economists and policy experts, tries to tackle one of the biggest and most difficult questions of contemporary economics – how to boost wages for the middle class and share prosperity more broadly. As Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren and many others have noted, while much of economy has recovered from the 2008 financial crisis, middle class wages remain stagnant. But while Warren pins the blame on Wall Street, the Center for American Progress report, released Thursday, takes a broader and less confrontational approach, highlights a wide basket of policy solutions employed successfully by other countries. Its authors have embraced a more positive, hopeful message of economic empowerment, putting aside the messier and more contentious questions of whether and how such sweeping initiatives would be paid for. Clinton will have to “walk a tightrope” between speaking to the middle class and Wall Street, as longtime Clinton donor Alan Patricof put it on Bloomberg TV Friday. “I think that she’s very sensitive to this kind of Elizabeth Warren trying to paint her as being identified with Wall Street,” he added. It’s hard not see the report as the potential seed of an economic agenda that helps Clinton walk that tightrope. It tackles the issues Americans consistently list as their top priority in polls – jobs and the economy – but in a way that’s less likely to alienate the business community and financial sector, or appear inauthentic to her own identity. The report’s international focus also plays to the former secretary of state’s strengths, and it would allow her to promote lessons she’s learned from her many travels abroad. “In our time, advocates and apologists for anti-democratic regimes argue that the democracies are no longer capable of managing their problems or creating a sense of social dynamism. Democracies are cast as sclerotic, inefficient, and ungovernable,” the report says. “But countering this persistent attack on democracy requires that free economic and political systems restore their vitality and reclaim their ability to deliver on the promise of prosperity for all.” Democrats made inequality a centerpiece of their 2014 campaign, but the party’s steep losses in November suggest that their message and policy prescriptions weren’t strong enough to break through. Now that the pace of the recovery has picked up, they’re also struggling to take credit for the recovery while acknowledging the work that still needs to be done to make sure those gains reach ordinary Americans. The CAP report suggests one potential way forward, providing a broad framework and positive message of empowerment that encompasses many of the economic policies that Clinton has highlighted in recent years, from paid family leave to a higher minimum wage to more affordable college education. If the report seems tailor made for a Clinton campaign, that might not be an accident. CAP, after all, was founded by key Clinton allies to be an ideas factory for establishment Democrats. Its current president, Neera Tanden, was Clinton’s policy director and one of her closest aides during the 2008 presidential campaign. Tanden keeps in touch with Clinton and her aides today, and will likely advise Clinton’s 2016 campaign from the outside, though Tanden has said she’s not interested in a day-to-day job on the campaign. In addition to Tanden, the task force behind the report included former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a board member of the pro-Clinton Priorities USA super PAC, and economist Larry Summers, who served as treasury secretary under Bill Clinton. And the man who founded CAP, John Podesta, served as Bill Clinton’s last chief of staff and is expected to become the chairman of Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign should she decide to run. Though Clinton has yet to lay out a detailed policy agenda, she has stressed the urgent need to deal with inequality since at least the spring. “The dream of upward mobility that made this country a model for the world feels further and further out of reach and many Americans understandably feel frustrated, even angry,” Clinton said during a high-profile speech in May at the New America Foundation. And on Friday, Clinton tweeted that Congress should focus on helping the middle class, instead of rolling back financial reform, as Republicans are trying to do. *The Hill blog: Briefing Room: “Clinton: Focus more on wages, less on regs” <http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/229795-clinton-focus-more-on-wages-less-on-regs>* By Kevin Cirilli January 16, 2015, 2:37 p.m. EST Hillary Clinton on Friday criticized the new Republican-controlled Congress for trying to boost economic growth by loosening regulations, which progressives say would weaken financial watchdogs. "Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong. Better for Congress to focus on jobs and wages for middle class families," Clinton tweeted on Friday. The former secretary of State and presumed Democratic presidential frontrunner has received criticism from progressives in her party who are concerned about her ties to Wall Street. But the tweet is a clear signal that Clinton is looking to adjust her tone as she continues to mull her expected presidential campaign. Clinton's tweet comes as progressives continue their efforts to try and draft Warren to challenge Clinton from the left in 2016. On Saturday, MoveOn.org will launch its efforts in New Hampshire with a kick-off campaign for its "Run Warren Run" effort, which the liberal group funded with a $1 million donation last month. Earlier this week, the House passed legislation on a 271-154 vote that would delay for two-years the implementation of a portion of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law. *MSNBC: “Clinton slams GOP attempts to roll back Wall Street reform” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-slams-gop-attempts-roll-back-wall-street-reform>* By Alex Seitz-Wald January 16, 2015, 3:50 p.m. EST Hillary Clinton has been very careful about which issues she weighs in on as she considers a second run for the presidency in 2016, but she took to Twitter Friday to condemn Republican attempts to gut the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law. “Attacking financial reform is risky and wrong. Better for Congress to focus on jobs and wages for middle class families,” Clinton tweeted to her 2.66 million followers. Many will read the move as channeling Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat who has risen to prominence as the Senate’s top Wall Street foe. Now that Republicans control both chambers of Congress, they’re preparing for a showdown over the 2010 financial reform law, which they say is too burdensome on business. Late last year, President Barack Obama signed a government funding bill that included a provision to remove a part of the law that dealt with financial instruments known as swaps, despite vociferous objections from Warren and other progressive Democrats. And this week, the House approved a measure on a largely party-line vote to reign in regulators, with more attacks on regulations promised for the future. The White House has threatened to veto attempts to gut progressive regulations, but Republicans may find ways to slip the measures into larger must-pass legislation, as they did with the funding bill in December. Clinton, who faces criticism from some progressives over her financial support from Wall Street, has been trying to find ways to shore up her left flank ahead of a presidential run. She stumbled during a joint appearance with Warren last year when she said business don’t create jobs. Clinton tweets rarely, and the vast majority are about her work at the Clinton family’s charitable foundation. The presumed Democratic front-runner typically waits until her next planned public appearance before weighing in on the issue of the day, whether it’s Syria or protests in Ferguson. Clinton has been laying low for about a month, but has two speeches scheduled for next week in Canada, sponsored by a Canadian bank. *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “RNC chairman: 'We're ready for Hillary'” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/229797-rnc-chairman-were-ready-for-hillary>* By Peter Sullivan January 16, 2015, 2:51 p.m. EST Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a speech Friday that "we're ready for Hillary" and previewed a line of attack linking the former secretary of State to the Obama administration. "At the RNC, we’re not waiting until Hillary’s the nominee; we’re not waiting until she announces to go after her record," Priebus told the RNC's Winter Meeting in San Diego. "We’ve been preparing for a long, long time, and we’re Ready for Hillary." Priebus previewed what could be a line of attack against Hillary Clinton, arguing that she represents a continuation of President Obama's policies. The extent to which Clinton differentiates herself from Obama is a major question. Likely Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta said this month that Clinton "will have some different views from the president," but "for the most part" agrees with his policies. "We’re ready to show America that this country can do better than Hillary Clinton and Obama’s third term," Priebus said. "Because the next generation deserves better." The RNC has already been attacking Clinton's paid speeches and travel requirements, dubbing her "high-flying Hillary." Priebus continued this line of criticism in the speech, referencing her gaffe last year that she was "dead broke" after leaving the White House. "And let’s be clear: she is campaigning," Priebus said. "She’s just found a way to get paid really, really well for it. For example, bilking cash-strapped public universities for a quarter million dollars to fly in on a private jet and give a speech about nothing. But, she still wants you to know she’s just your average 'dead-broke' American." Priebus has also recently said that the RNC has opposition researchers in Arkansas looking for dirt, and that Bill Clinton's personal life is "fair game." While Clinton is widely seen as by far the Democratic frontrunner, the Republican side has a wide field of viable candidates. But Priebus played up that contrast. "The good news is we have great potential candidates for president," Priebus said. "Our voters are going to have a real choice. Leaders with diverse backgrounds and diverse experiences. We should be excited because this means real debates and real conversations." "I’d much rather have that than what the Democrats have," he added. *Politico: “Mitt Romney's 2016 pitch: I'm a foreign policy prophet” <http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/was-romney-really-right-114347.html>* By Michael Crowley January 17, 2015, 8:19 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] But is he right about that? He saw Vladimir Putin as a threat to peace. He insisted that radical Islam was spreading. He warned that Iraq was at risk without American troops to stabilize it. And he was right. As Mitt Romney’s supporters push the idea that the 2012 Republican nominee might run for president again, one of their core talking points is that Romney was a foreign policy prophet in the last campaign. His vindication on several scores, they argue, gives him a rationale to run again — and a leg up on his potential Republican rivals. “The results of the Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama foreign policy have been devastating,” Romney declared at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting in San Diego on Friday. “The world is not safer.” But, as Democrats point out, any losing candidate can cherry-pick a few issues that later broke his way. And Romney’s batting average was hardly perfect. Nor do bragging rights on a few specific issues necessarily translate to a popular foreign policy vision overall. “Romney was right about the world getting more complicated,” said Mieke Eoyang, director of the National Security Project at the moderate Democratic think tank Third Way. “But a complicated world doesn’t mean a more simplistic response, which is what Romney was offering.” Back in 2012, President Barack Obama was less charitable. “You haven’t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy,” Obama told Romney in an October debate. “But every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong.” More than two years later, however, hindsight suggests that’s not true. Romney offered warnings on several major issues that now appear prescient. On Iraq, for instance, Romney told an audience in November 2011 that America’s withdrawal from the country the prior year was “an enormous mistake,” one that “puts at risk many of the victories that were hard-won by the men and women who have served there.” Obama later scoffed at his rival’s claim that the U.S. should have maintained a long-term troop presence in Iraq. Two years later, Obama has ordered thousands of troops back there to prevent the country’s collapse. Putin’s annexation of Crimea and his intervention in eastern Ukraine dominated much of last year for Obama. But as early as December 2011 Romney called Putin ”a real threat to the stability and peace of the world,” noting that the Russian president’s rhetoric had been growing sharper. After Romney later called Russia America’s top “geopolitical foe,” blocking U.S. interests at the United Nations and elsewhere, Obama openly ridiculed him: “The 1980s are calling to ask for their foreign policy back,” the president told Romney in an October 2012 debate. “You know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.” Romney also cast repeated doubt on Obama’s claim that, after Osama bin Laden’s killing, al Qaeda was “on the run.” He warned about the spread of radical Islam in the Middle East and North Africa. “This is a group that is now involved in 10 or 12 countries, and it presents an enormous threat … and we must have a comprehensive strategy to help reject this kind of extremism,” Romney said. That characterization of the Islamist threat seems more apt as extremist violence surges around the world. Beyond the emotional satisfaction of saying “I told you so,” people close to Romney argue that the 2012 record positions the former Massachusetts governor well for his third straight White House bid. “Romney was right about a lot of this stuff. But I don’t see it as vindication,” said a former senior Romney advisor. “I think it’s a demonstration that he has a view of the world that’s rooted in reality.” Credibility on foreign policy could matter more in 2016 than in the last presidential contest. Amid terror threats and the beheadings of Americans in the Middle East, voter concern about national security has spiked sharply. Romney may also find it harder to repeat his warnings that the U.S. economy is headed for a crisis. Romney set a target of unemployment under 6 percent by the end of his first time. The jobless rate currently stands at 5.6 percent. Meanwhile, Democrats say Romney is more vulnerable than he appears. “I think he should run again. It would be great for the Democratic Party,” said Tommy Vietor, a former Obama White House national security spokesman. Vietor insisted that claims of Romney’s vindication overlook Obama’s repeated caveats that Islamic terrorism was still a threat even after the death of bin Laden. And he argued that Obama’s response to Putin had helped to cripple Russia’s economy. “Putin turned out to be his own greatest enemy,” Vietor said. Romney’s hard-line approach to Iran, said Eoyang, would have precluded the nuclear talks Obama began in late 2013, which have paused the progress of Iran’s nuclear program. “He was totally wrong on Iran,” Eoyang said, saying that putting greater pressure on Iran would “potentially force us into another military confrontation.” And Democrats scoffed at the contention of an unnamed Romney advisor quoted in the Boston Globe last week, who said that “there wouldn’t be an ISIS at all,” if Romney were president. One former advisor declined to repeat that assertion, saying “you can’t run the counterfactual in history,” while adding that Romney would have taken stronger action to arm and train moderate Syrian rebels — perhaps blunting the rise of radical Islamists in that country. Romney can’t perfectly recreate his campaign against Obama, of course. But one Romney advisor, foreshadowing a likely Republican line of attack for 2016, said that’s not a problem. “Will you be running against Obama? Nope. You’ll be running against the architect of his foreign policy” — namely, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Democrats claim to be unfazed by such cocky talk. “Things aren’t perfect,” said Vietor, who has worked on behalf of Clinton since leaving the White House. “But by no means do I think Mitt was borne out to be the next Henry Kissinger.” *New York Times: Sec. Clinton supports pro-democracy Saudi blogger <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/17/world/caning-of-saudi-blogger-is-delayed-amid-protests.html>* By Ben Hubbard January 16, 2015 BEIRUT, Lebanon — A lawyer in Saudi Arabia who founded a human rights group was sentenced to 15 years in prison. His wife, a women’s advocate who won a courage award from the State Department, says she is barred from leaving the country. Her brother, a writer who ran a liberal online forum, is also in jail and was sentenced to be caned regularly in a public square over the next few months. International condemnation of the writer’s sentence, which also included a prison term and a heavy fine, has mounted since a video of him receiving his first round of blows appeared on YouTube, and the State Department and the United Nations have called for the caning to stop. The Saudi authorities did not administer the second round of blows as scheduled on Friday. But the case of the writer, Raif Badawi, has nonetheless drawn new attention to the Saudi government’s harsh treatment of dissidents for acts that are considered anything but criminal in the West. Adding to the scrutiny of Saudi Arabia’s legal system are the rise of the Islamic State extremist group, which, like Saudi Arabia, claims to rule according to Shariah, and the attack on the French newspaper Charlie Hebdo for its satirical portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, an act considered criminal in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi government, which has joined the United States-led air campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, condemned the violence in Paris as a “cowardly terrorist attack which is incompatible with Islam.” But at home, Saudi rulers strike hard at those who question how they apply Islam to governance, rights groups say. “There is just no tolerance for any kind of domestic dissent or activism,” said Adam Coogle, a researcher for Human Rights Watch. “They have made it a red line and a zero-sum game, where anyone who crosses that line will be dealt with.” The caning of Mr. Badawi is the latest step by the Saudi government to punish a small group of activists in the western port city of Jidda who have challenged the kingdom’s fundamentalist, patriarchal system, to the fury of the state and conservative elements of Saudi society, including their own families. Speaking through Skype from Jidda, Samar Badawi said her problems began after she fled her father’s house and moved into a shelter for battered women. Her father, angry that she had left, filed a lawsuit against her in 2009 for “parental disobedience.” For her defense, she took on a young lawyer named Waleed Abulkhair, who had started a group to track human rights in Saudi Arabia, and the two found common ground in their activism. “He was a rights activist, and his path was full of dangers, so would he be able to find a woman who would put up with the thorny road he was on?” Ms. Badawi said. For her part, she liked how he valued women’s rights. The couple decided to marry, but Ms. Badawi’s father withheld his consent. So she sued him under a Saudi law that makes it illegal to prevent a woman from marrying. At the first court hearing in that lawsuit, she was arrested on the disobedience charge and spent six months in jail, according to Human Rights Watch. After she was released, she prevailed in both cases — hers against her father and her father’s against her — and she and Mr. Abulkhair finally married. The couple worked together on rights campaigns, calling for women to have the right to drive in the kingdom and criticizing Saudi Arabia’s guardianship system, which generally bars women from working, marrying or traveling abroad without the permission of a male guardian. Ms. Badawi also sued the government in 2011 for not allowing women to vote in local elections, a move cited by the State Department when it gave her an International Woman of Courage Award in 2012. “You are making a difference,” Hillary Rodham Clinton, then secretary of state, told her at the award ceremony, which was also attended by Michelle Obama. But the Saudi government was pursuing her husband, barring him from traveling abroad, detaining him for holding “unauthorized gatherings” and charging him with various crimes, including seeking to overthrow the head of state, tarnishing the reputation of the judiciary and forming an unlicensed organization, according to a State Department report. Mr. Abulkhair was convicted last year and is now serving a 15-year prison sentence. The United States government says he was punished for “exercising his rights to freedom of expression and association.” Ms. Badawi has continued her activism. But she said that when she tried to fly to Geneva a few months ago, she was told that she, too, was barred from traveling. Meanwhile, Ms. Badawi’s brother, Raif, started a website called “Free Saudi Liberal Network” that featured writings by him and others who had often criticized Saudi Arabia’s religious establishment. “He wanted to create an environment where there was an open forum to talk about ideas,” said his wife, Ensaf Haidar, who spoke by telephone from Canada, where she has political asylum with the couple’s three children. On the website, which has since been taken down, Mr. Badawi criticized what he considered religious hypocrisy, lauded Western legal systems and said that atheists should have the right to state their views without punishment, according to Saudi court documents. Prominent clerics responded with accusations that he was seeking to spread atheism, and he received personal threats, his wife said. Mr. Badawi’s father, Mohammed Badawi, denounced him and his sister repeatedly on television; in one program, the father said his children’s minds had been “formatted” like hard disks and filled with ideas that were foreign to Saudi society. “I hope he will go down to the square of retribution, he and my daughter, to receive their retribution in front of me,” the elder Mr. Badawi said. “The reason: infidelity to God.” Mr. Badawi’s wife said he was arrested at a supermarket in 2012. A Saudi court convicted him of running a website that promoted “heresy” and of not removing comments that were considered insulting to God, Islam and prominent Saudi clerics, according to court documents. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1,000 blows, to be given in installments of 50 with at least a week in between; he was also fined more than $250,000. In the video showing the first installment on Jan. 9, a uniformed security officer swiftly strikes Mr. Badawi up and down his back with a wooden cane as a crowd looks on. Mr. Badawi squirms a bit, and the crowd applauds and yells “God is great!” as he is led away. Mustafa Alani, an analyst with the Gulf Research Center who often works in Saudi Arabia, said that while the cases of the three dissidents had raised alarm in the West, few people in the conservative kingdom were bothered by them. “These people have no support from the great majority of Saudi society,” Mr. Alani said. “They think that those people are weird, and influenced by the West, and trying to damage the interests of Saudi Arabia.” He said the Saudi government faced competing pressures in dealing with human rights issues, with the West calling for more openness and tolerance of dissent while powerful conservatives at home want strict enforcement and punishment. He said that international pressure might have prompted the delay in the second round of caning for Mr. Badawi, and that the Saudi authorities might decide that one round was enough. “You need to send a message,” he said, “and the message has already been sent.” *The Weekly Standard: “Hillary Clinton's Charlie Hebdo Problem” <http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-clintons-charlie-hebdo-problem_823878.html>* By John McCormack January 16, 2015, 3:52 p.m. EST In the days since the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the response from American politicians has ranged from pathetic to parodic. Through his press secretary, President Obama expressed regret on Monday that neither he nor any other high-ranking American official joined 44 world leaders who marched alongside millions in Paris last weekend. Then on Friday, in an effort to make amends, Secretary of State John Kerry brought James Taylor to Paris to sing "You've Got a Friend." The response from Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state and likely 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, hasn't been any better. Clinton has remained silent about the Charle Hebdo massacre since it occurred on January 7. Clinton's spokesman Nick Merrill confirmed in an email to THE WEEKLY STANDARD that the former secretary of state has not publicly commented on the attack, but Merrill declined to give any particular reason for Clinton's silence. (She did manage to find the time Friday afternoon, however, to condemn Republicans in Congress for "[a]ttacking financial reform.") What seems most likely is that Clinton has remained silent in response to the Charlie Hebdo massacre in order to avoid scrutiny of her own failure to defend free speech in the face of Islamist violence. Three days after the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack killed four Americans, including Ambassodor Chris Stevens, in Benghazi, Libya, Clinton attended a ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base welcoming home the remains of the slain Americans. While flanked by four four flag-draped caskets, Clinton blamed an "awful internet video that we had nothing to do with" for the "rage and violence directed at American embassies." Clinton did not, in the course of her speech, defend the right to free speech. What's worse, Clinton privately told the father of one of the CIA officers killed in Benghazi: "We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted." By the end of the month, an American citizen known as Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man who made the anti-Islam YouTube video, was indeed arrested for violating the terms of his probation. He was later sentenced to a year in jail for using a name other than his given legal name. A number of questions remain for Hillary Clinton: Does she dispute the claim that she said she would "make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted"? How did she know on September 14 that the American who made the film was going to be arrested? And does Clinton see any difference between the blasphemous Charlie Hebdocartoons and the blasphemous anti-Islam YouTube video? "I’d refer you to what she wrote in her book," Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill told me in an email. When I replied that the book does not address the questions I was asking, Merrill wrote: "She addresses the attack fully and comprehensively in Hard Choices, I don’t have anything to add to that." Despite her spokesman's stonewalling, we do know that Clinton did not dispute in her book the claim that she vowed the American filmmaker would be arrested and prosecuted, and her spokesman is not disputing it now. We also know, of course, that the terrorist attack on Benghazi was not the result of a spontaneous protest in response to the offensive video, but the filmmaker became a convenient scapegoat for an administration arguing that al Qaeda was on the run. "A violation of probation, though, usually produces a court summons and doesn’t typically lead to more jail time unless it involves an offense that would be worth prosecuting in its own right under federal standards. Not for Nakoula," National Review's Rich Lowry wrote in a column in May of 2013. "This wasn’t a case of nailing Al Capone on tax evasion. As Nina Shea of the Hudson Institute points out, Al Capone’s underlying offense was racketeering and gangland killings. Nakoula Basseley Nakoula’s underlying offense wasn’t an underlying offense. He exercised his First Amendment rights." *The Hill blog: “Five reasons the left doesn’t believe Elizabeth Warren” <http://thehill.com/policy/finance/229840-five-reasons-the-left-doesnt-believe-elizabeth-warren>* By Kevin Cirilli January 17, 2015, 8:50 a.m. EST Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has said time and time that against she’s not running for president in 2016. But don’t tell that to her fans in the Democratic Party. Supporters on the left are moving full-steam ahead with efforts to draft her into the 2016 race, believing it’s only a matter of time before the Massachusetts senator changes her mind — and becomes the populist challenger to Hillary Clinton that they think the party desperately needs. Here are five reasons the left hears “yes” when Warren says “no.” 1.) She hasn't definitively ruled out a presidential run. Warren has yet to definitely say she won’t run for president in 2016, choosing instead to phrase her denials by saying she isn’t running now. "Every candidate says they're not running before deciding to run," said Erica Sagrans, campaign director at Ready For Warren. Sagrans pointed to 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who up until this week insisted he wasn't running for president. Now there are reports he's mulling a third presidential bid. "Things change fast in politics, and Warren hasn't ruled anything out," Sagrans said. Political watchers say Warren is smart to keep Washington guessing about her political ambitions. "Warren is wisely hedging her bets. She is underselling herself politically by saying, 'No,' which is intriguing to the base but she is leaving room to potentially over-deliver publicly should the circumstances merit her jumping into the 2016 fray," said Ford O'Connell, a GOP strategist. 2.) She's distancing herself from President Obama. Warren flexed her political muscle during the budget negotiations late last year and spearheaded a successful revolt against an Obama nominee to the Treasury Department with ties to Wall Street. Her attention-grabbing moves come at a time when Democrats are fiercely debating whether to move to the middle on economic issues or shift to the left. "She's shown that she can rally, hold and lead progressives groups these past few weeks, especially," said Neil Sroka, communications director at the liberal Democracy For America, which is pushing to draft Warren into the presidential race. Warren also has worked to get the White House to issue a veto threat on a financial regulatory bill she says would weaken Wall Street regulations. "She's battling the White House on a lot of these issues," Sroka said. 3.) She hasn't ordered the grass roots groups to shut it down. Groups like Ready For Warren and MoveOn.org's $1 million-funded "Run Warren Run" campaign are maneuvering in early caucus and primary states Iowa and New Hampshire. On Saturday, hundreds of supporters are expected to attend MoveOn's draft Warren kick-off event in New Hampshire. In August, Warren's attorney filed a letter with the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) saying she wasn't endorsing "Ready For Warren," but has yet to personally comment on the groups’ efforts. "We're not running this campaign because of some sort of parsing of her speech," said Nick Berning, MoveOn.org communications director. "We take her at her word. We're running the campaign because we think our country will be better off if she enters the race." "Elizabeth Warren has always been a reluctant politician, but she has always listened to her supporters," Sagrans said. Sagrans noted that in Warren's book, the senator wrote that she was persuaded to challenge then-Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) during the 2012 Senate race after one of her supporters urged her to get in. "We've got an entire nation asking the same question now, and we think it's in Warren's nature to give the same answer she gave last time: 'Yes, I'll fight,'" Sagrans said. 4.) Her promotional tour didn’t end after the midterms. Warren campaigned heavily during the 2014 midterm election campaign, hitting the trail in states like Iowa, Kentucky and West Virginia. While she campaigned for these candidates, it also seems to have fueled national interest in her own political career. Veteran pollster Peter D. Hart, chairman of Hart Associates, last week released the results of a special interest group with 12 voters in Aurora, Colo. that found widespread intrigue with Warren. "There's a connection that she's made in terms of talking about the economy," Hart said. "The most established candidates, such as Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton and Chris Christie — they did less well." Still, Hart noted that, "someone who is appealing before they’re in [the race] may not find the same type of appeal once they've announced." "That doesn't diminish Elizabeth Warren," he said. "But she's connected as a person who is talking about economic issues in the way the public is responding positively." 5.) She's remained tight-lipped about Hillary Clinton. It seems that virtually every prominent Democratic politician is being asked about Clinton ahead of 2016. While Warren did join each of the female Democratic senators in the last Congress in signing a letter urging Clinton to run, she has not openly endorsed her probably candidacy. In an interview with The Washington Post in June, Warren declined an opportunity to defend Clinton after she said in an ABC News interview that she and former President Bill Clinton were "dead broke" after leaving the White House. The Post reported that Warren paused for "a full 19 seconds" because answering: "Uh, I was surprised." "There is no question about Warren is mulling a run and she has the dynastic Team Hillary unnerved," said O'Connell, the GOP strategist. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · January 21 – Saskatchewan, Canada: Sec. Clinton keynotes the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce’s “Global Perspectives” series (MarketWired <http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/former-us-secretary-state-hillary-rodham-clinton-deliver-keynote-address-saskatoon-1972651.htm> ) · January 21 – Winnipeg, Canada: Sec. Clinton keynotes the Global Perspectives series (Winnipeg Free Press <http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Clinton-coming-to-Winnipeg--284282491.html> ) · February 24 – Santa Clara, CA: Sec. Clinton to Keynote Address at Inaugural Watermark Conference for Women (PR Newswire <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillary-rodham-clinton-to-deliver-keynote-address-at-inaugural-watermark-conference-for-women-283200361.html> ) · March 4 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton to fundraise for the Clinton Foundation (WSJ <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/01/15/carole-king-hillary-clinton-live-top-tickets-100000/> ) · March 19 – Atlantic City, NJ: Sec. Clinton keynotes American Camp Association conference (PR Newswire <http://www.sys-con.com/node/3254649>)