Untitled Document

[00:00:00] shocking news this week when the [00:00:01] Department of Justice released this memo [00:00:04] about Jeffrey Epstein. I will be [00:00:06] explaining what information was released [00:00:08] and why it is making everyone angry [00:00:12] [Music] [00:00:18] [Music] [00:00:28] on July 6th. This two-page memo was [00:00:30] reported on by Axios. This is a joint [00:00:33] statement by the Department of Justice [00:00:35] and the FBI. In the memo, they explain [00:00:38] they performed an exhaustive review of [00:00:40] Jeffrey Epstein. No further information [00:00:42] will be released. There is no client [00:00:44] list. There's no evidence of blackmail. [00:00:47] No third parties were involved. And [00:00:49] Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. This is [00:00:52] shocking coming from an administration [00:00:54] that campaigned on releasing information [00:00:56] about Jeffrey Epstein. They're making [00:00:59] these statements that seem to contradict [00:01:01] the facts that we know about Epstein. [00:01:04] And also, there are a lot of strange [00:01:06] things about this memo. To start with, [00:01:10] this memo is not signed by anyone. It [00:01:14] only has a generic heading for the US [00:01:16] Department of Justice and the Federal [00:01:17] Bureau of Investigation. [00:01:20] Who wrote this memo? Who signed off on [00:01:23] this? We do not know. And later, anyone [00:01:27] can always claim, well, I didn't write [00:01:30] that, so I don't know how it happened. [00:01:33] This memo looks like no one is taking [00:01:35] accountability. It's very suspicious [00:01:38] that they would do this with such a [00:01:40] high-profile case. Second, the overall [00:01:43] concept does not make any sense. [00:01:47] They are telling us there is no [00:01:49] evidence, no crimes, and no case against [00:01:52] Jeffrey Epstein. [00:01:54] Then why did he kill himself? [00:01:57] Galain Maxwell went to prison on five [00:01:59] charges of sex trafficking and [00:02:01] conspiracy. [00:02:03] Why did Galileain Maxwell go to prison [00:02:05] if no one else was involved? The [00:02:08] argument in the memo is that Galain [00:02:10] Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were the [00:02:12] only people involved in these crimes and [00:02:14] no one else. This directly contradicts [00:02:17] the testimony of the victims. Here is [00:02:21] the diary of Virginia Guay who [00:02:23] unexpectedly died in April. I used to be [00:02:26] watched by Epstein's hidden cameras [00:02:28] which I have seen myself. The FBI have [00:02:31] the archive footage showing me being [00:02:34] abused by other men used as blackmail. [00:02:37] The Department of Justice explains that [00:02:39] they cannot release any more information [00:02:41] because they need to protect the [00:02:42] victims. But the victims are [00:02:45] contradicting what they are claiming. [00:02:48] The victims want the information to be [00:02:50] released so they can get justice by [00:02:53] allegedly covering up this information. [00:02:55] The government is protecting the [00:02:58] criminals. [00:03:00] Additionally, they admit in the memo the [00:03:03] Jeffrey Epstein files include 300 [00:03:05] gigabytes of data and physical evidence, [00:03:08] 10,000 downloaded videos and images of [00:03:12] illegal child sex abuse material and [00:03:14] other pornography and over 1,000 [00:03:17] victims. [00:03:19] That is a lot of information. [00:03:21] You are telling me that out of all that [00:03:24] information, there is not one piece of [00:03:26] evidence suggesting that anyone else was [00:03:29] involved. [00:03:30] I find that unbelievable. [00:03:33] Apparently, not one of those over 1,000 [00:03:37] victims could describe anyone they were [00:03:39] trafficked to. Again, this contradicts [00:03:42] what the victims themselves are saying. [00:03:46] I have uh spent the last 17 years in my [00:03:49] own prison [00:03:51] for what she [00:03:54] and all the co-conspirators did to me. I [00:03:56] was raped repeatedly. I was raped three [00:03:58] times a day sometimes. And I was not the [00:04:01] only girl on that island. There was a [00:04:03] constant stream of girls being raped [00:04:06] over and over and over again. And yes, [00:04:10] Skilain must die in prison because I've [00:04:13] been in hell and back for the last 17 [00:04:17] years. [00:04:19] That was Sarah Ransom explaining what [00:04:21] Jeffrey and all the co-conspirators did [00:04:24] to me. The victims are saying that third [00:04:27] parties were involved. The next problem [00:04:30] with the memo is the strange wording. [00:04:33] They say this systematic review revealed [00:04:36] no incriminating client list. Do you see [00:04:39] how this is sneaky language? They didn't [00:04:42] claim there was no client list. They [00:04:44] said there was no incriminating client [00:04:46] list. We know the FBI have the names of [00:04:49] the people who visited the island and [00:04:51] all the people who associated with [00:04:53] Jeffrey Epstein. [00:04:55] Why don't they release that? If it is [00:04:58] not incriminating, why not release the [00:05:00] list? The memo goes on to say, "There [00:05:03] was also no credible evidence found that [00:05:05] Epstein blackmailed prominent [00:05:07] individuals." [00:05:09] Again, do you see how this is sneaky [00:05:12] language? They didn't say there was no [00:05:14] evidence. They said there was no [00:05:17] credible evidence. [00:05:19] That's a judgment they are making. Why [00:05:22] do they not release the evidence and let [00:05:24] us decide if it is credible? The memo [00:05:27] goes on to say the files did not expose [00:05:30] any additional third parties to [00:05:32] allegations of illegal wrongdoing. [00:05:34] That is more sneaky language. They're [00:05:38] not saying there were no third parties, [00:05:41] just no third parties that were doing [00:05:43] something illegal in their opinion. The [00:05:46] big problem here is they're telling [00:05:47] everyone to just trust them. [00:05:51] If you want to protect the victims, [00:05:53] fine. Blur out their bodies. That's [00:05:56] really easy to do. But if there are [00:05:58] other people in those videos committing [00:06:00] crimes, why can't you just tell us who [00:06:03] they are or release all the other [00:06:05] evidence in the case that does not [00:06:08] relate to the victims? [00:06:10] What about all the financial [00:06:12] transactions Jeffrey Epstein was [00:06:13] receiving from other people? Why can't [00:06:16] we know who those came from? [00:06:20] They're not going to release any of the [00:06:21] evidence, but they want everyone to take [00:06:24] their word that there's nothing [00:06:25] important in the files. [00:06:28] It's very hard to trust their word when [00:06:30] they will not even sign their own memo. [00:06:33] It is also hard to trust their word when [00:06:36] this memo contradicts their own [00:06:38] statements. Here is Pam Bondi a few [00:06:41] months ago. [00:06:42] >> DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey [00:06:45] Epstein's clients. Will that really [00:06:47] happen? It's sitting on my desk right [00:06:49] now to review. Um that's been a [00:06:51] directive um by President Trump. I'm [00:06:53] reviewing that. I'm reviewing JFK files, [00:06:56] MLK files. That's all in the process of [00:06:59] being reviewed because that was done at [00:07:00] the directive of the president from all [00:07:02] of these agencies. [00:07:03] >> She said the client list was sitting on [00:07:06] her desk for review. [00:07:08] How could there have been a client list [00:07:10] a few months ago and now suddenly there [00:07:13] is no client list? That's strange. [00:07:17] Here's White House press secretary [00:07:19] Caroline Levit when she was asked about [00:07:21] this contradiction. [00:07:23] >> Yes, she was saying the entirety of all [00:07:25] of the paperwork, all of the paper in [00:07:28] relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. [00:07:30] That's what the attorney general was [00:07:31] referring to, and I'll let her speak for [00:07:33] that. [00:07:34] >> It sounds to me like she's trying to [00:07:36] cover it up. [00:07:38] I noticed something very interesting [00:07:40] about this statement. [00:07:42] If you know anything about Caroline [00:07:44] Levit, she's almost always seen wearing [00:07:46] a cross necklace around her neck. Here's [00:07:50] a cross. Here's a cross. People will [00:07:54] make fun of Caroline Levit's religion, [00:07:56] but she refuses to stop wearing her [00:07:59] cross. [00:08:00] But did you notice that on this day when [00:08:02] she's asked about Jeffrey Epstein, she [00:08:05] decides to not wear a cross? [00:08:09] Why is that? Could it be that she cannot [00:08:12] stand to lie while wearing the cross? [00:08:16] I think this is very suspicious. Here's [00:08:20] Alina Hava, who's now the acting US [00:08:22] attorney for the District of New Jersey, [00:08:24] who said this in February. [00:08:26] >> But in this case, in Epstein's case, it [00:08:28] is incredibly disturbing. We have uh [00:08:31] flight logs, we have information, names [00:08:33] uh that will come out. [00:08:35] >> Is it going to be shocking? [00:08:39] I don't see how it's not shocking that [00:08:42] there were so many individuals that were [00:08:45] hidden [00:08:47] um and kept secret and not been held [00:08:51] accountable. Let's talk about the [00:08:52] reverse. I believe in accountability. [00:08:54] So, you have to now go through your [00:08:56] process. Now, I won't say they're guilty [00:08:58] until they go through their time in [00:09:00] court. Um but again, now it's time for [00:09:03] accountability. We have seen for so many [00:09:05] years Pierce in this country many [00:09:06] investigations, subpoenas, testimonies [00:09:09] in Congress, etc., etc. But there's a [00:09:11] general frustration with accountability. [00:09:13] We take it halfway. We don't take it [00:09:15] home. And I really believe that now with [00:09:17] Cash and Pam, there will be [00:09:18] accountability. [00:09:19] >> She says, "We have flight logs, [00:09:22] information, names that will come out." [00:09:25] That sounds like a client list to me. [00:09:28] Why can't they release that? And then [00:09:30] there was this statement during Cash [00:09:32] Patel's confirmation hearing to become [00:09:34] the FBI director. [00:09:35] >> I want to talk to you about the Epstein [00:09:38] case. I have worked on this for years [00:09:40] trying to get those records of who flew [00:09:43] on Epstein's plane and who helped him [00:09:46] build this international human [00:09:49] trafficking sex trafficking ring. Now, [00:09:52] earlier I urged then Chairman Durban uh [00:09:56] to subpoena those records and I ended up [00:10:00] being blocked by uh Senator Durban and [00:10:04] Christopher Ray. They stonewalled on [00:10:07] this and I know that breaking up these [00:10:09] trafficking rings is important to [00:10:11] President Trump. [00:10:13] >> So, according to Marshia Blackburn, [00:10:15] Senator Dick Durban blocked the client [00:10:18] list from being released. [00:10:20] If there was no client list, what [00:10:23] exactly was Dick Durban blocking from [00:10:25] being released? [00:10:27] Listen to how Caspel responds to those [00:10:30] remarks. [00:10:31] >> So, will you work with me on this issue [00:10:34] so we know who worked with Jeffrey [00:10:37] Epstein in building these sex [00:10:40] trafficking rings? [00:10:41] >> Absolutely, Senator. Child sex [00:10:43] trafficking has no place in the United [00:10:46] States of America. And I will do [00:10:47] everything if confirmed as FBI director [00:10:49] to make sure the American public knows [00:10:51] the full weight of what happened in the [00:10:53] past and how we are going to counter man [00:10:56] missing children and exploited children [00:10:57] going fewer. He says, "I will do [00:11:00] everything if confirmed as FBI director [00:11:03] to make sure the American public knows [00:11:04] the full weight of what happened in the [00:11:06] past." [00:11:08] It certainly does not sound like he's [00:11:10] fulfilling his promise. With all these [00:11:13] contradicting statements, how are we now [00:11:15] supposed to just take their word for it? [00:11:18] The one piece of new evidence they did [00:11:20] release is footage from the jail. This [00:11:23] video file is stored on the justice.gov [00:11:25] website and you can go view it yourself. [00:11:28] This is the video that Caspel talked [00:11:30] about in his previous interview with Joe [00:11:32] Rogan. But the problem is there's been [00:11:35] like 15 years of people coming in and [00:11:38] creating fictions about this that [00:11:40] doesn't exist. Where's the videotape of [00:11:43] an epipene island of X, Y, and Z [00:11:45] committing these frauds? Why haven't you [00:11:47] given it to us? Do you really think I [00:11:48] wouldn't give that to you if it existed? [00:11:51] I'm working my off along with the [00:11:54] leadership at the bureau and DOJ to get [00:11:55] you what we're allowed to give you. And [00:11:57] you're going to get the video of the [00:11:59] cell and you're going to see for [00:12:01] yourself. and we will never be able to [00:12:03] convince everyone. [00:12:05] >> It is funny that he describes it as [00:12:07] video of the cell because what they [00:12:10] released was not video of Jeffrey [00:12:11] Epstein's cell but of the common area. [00:12:15] Here is the camera. The video shows cell [00:12:18] 46, but Jeffrey Epstein was in cell 220. [00:12:23] I'm going to show you cell diagrams, and [00:12:25] these are from the official DOJ report [00:12:27] on Jeffrey Epstein's death. [00:12:30] Jeffrey Epstein's cell was here. The [00:12:33] camera was located here with a massive [00:12:36] blind spot that does not cover Epstein's [00:12:38] cell. Even this diagram is exaggerated [00:12:41] because it shows that the camera covers [00:12:43] the stairs leading to Epstein's cell. [00:12:46] But you can clearly see from the video [00:12:48] that you can only barely see the stairs. [00:12:51] Someone absolutely could go up the [00:12:53] stairs to Epstein's cell without ever [00:12:56] being on camera. [00:12:58] This video does not prove anything. What [00:13:01] is even more disturbing is there is a [00:13:03] minute missing from the video footage. [00:13:06] The video cuts out from 11:58 to [00:13:09] midnight. Why would the DOJ release [00:13:12] video where 1 minute is mysteriously [00:13:15] missing? On top of that, if you look at [00:13:18] the metadata of the video file, you can [00:13:20] see that it was actually spliced [00:13:22] together from two different clips. This [00:13:26] is proof that the video was somehow [00:13:28] edited. You also need to understand the [00:13:31] context of this video. [00:13:34] This is a diagram of all the cameras. [00:13:37] Out of all of these cameras, only one [00:13:40] camera was able to record footage [00:13:42] because there was a problem with the [00:13:44] hard drives. [00:13:46] All the other cameras would have shown [00:13:47] Jeffrey Epstein's cell and the path [00:13:49] leading up to it, but only the camera [00:13:52] with a blind spot was the one that [00:13:54] recorded, and that camera has 1 minute [00:13:57] of missing footage. Pam Bonnie was asked [00:14:00] about the missing minute of footage at a [00:14:02] cabinet meeting on Tuesday. and the [00:14:04] minute missing from the video. We [00:14:07] released the video showing definitively [00:14:11] the video was not conclusive, but the [00:14:16] evidence prior to it was showing he [00:14:19] committed suicide. And what was on that [00:14:21] there was a minute that was off the [00:14:23] counter. And what we learned from Bureau [00:14:25] of Prisons was every year, every um [00:14:28] night they redo that video. It's old [00:14:30] from like 1999. So every night the video [00:14:33] is reset and every night should have the [00:14:36] same minute missing. So we're looking [00:14:38] for that video to release that as well [00:14:40] showing that a minute is missing every [00:14:42] night and that's it on Epstein. She says [00:14:45] there was a minute off the counter. [00:14:48] This is preposterous. [00:14:51] Security systems are not designed this [00:14:53] way. [00:14:55] You're telling me that they [00:14:56] intentionally have one minute of missing [00:14:59] footage every night in a prison? [00:15:03] I just don't believe that. But one of [00:15:06] the most suspicious things about this [00:15:08] memo is one sentence that reads, "The [00:15:10] FBI's independent review of this footage [00:15:13] confirmed that from the time Epstein was [00:15:15] locked in his cell at around 10:40 p.m. [00:15:18] on August 9th, 2019 until around 6:30 [00:15:21] a.m. the next morning, nobody entered [00:15:23] any of the tears in the shoe. This is [00:15:26] new information. This contradicts the [00:15:30] information from their own report from [00:15:32] the Department of Justice. In the [00:15:34] initial DOJ report, it states, "At [00:15:37] approximately 7 p.m., contrary to BOP [00:15:40] policy, but with the permission of a [00:15:41] unit manager, Epstein is permitted to [00:15:44] place an unmonitored telephone call to a [00:15:46] number with a New York City area code, [00:15:48] purportedly to speak with his mother. In [00:15:51] actuality, Epstein speaks with someone [00:15:53] with whom he allegedly has a personal [00:15:55] relationship. After the call, Epste is [00:15:58] returned to his cell where he remains [00:16:00] without a cellmate. Why does the initial [00:16:03] report say that Jeffrey Epste was [00:16:05] brought to his cell after a 7 p.m. phone [00:16:07] call, but this new memo says that [00:16:09] Jeffrey Epstein was locked in his cell [00:16:11] at 10:40 p.m. That is a pretty major [00:16:15] discrepancy that happened right before [00:16:18] he died. What is even more strange, if [00:16:21] we look at the video, something strange [00:16:23] happens around 10:40 p.m. At 10:38 and [00:16:27] 50 seconds, one of the guards gets up [00:16:30] from their desk and walks over into the [00:16:32] blind spot. Then, shortly after, at [00:16:34] 10:39 and 45 seconds, if you look [00:16:38] closely, you can see a few pixels of an [00:16:41] orange jumpsuit of someone walking up [00:16:43] the stairs towards Jeffrey Epstein's [00:16:45] cell. Can you see it now? Now, just to [00:16:49] be clear, prisoners are usually locked [00:16:52] in their cell at night. They don't just [00:16:54] let prisoners walk around the cell block [00:16:57] at 10:40 p.m. [00:16:59] So, who was that person walking up the [00:17:02] stairs to Jeffrey Epstein's cell? I'm [00:17:05] not making it up that someone went up [00:17:07] the stairs because the initial report [00:17:10] also mentioned that they could see this [00:17:12] in the video. They say the Office of [00:17:15] Inspector General determined that at [00:17:18] approximately 10:40 p.m., a corrections [00:17:20] officer, believed to be Noel, carried [00:17:23] linen or inmate clothing up to the L [00:17:25] tier, which was the last time any [00:17:27] corrections officer approached the only [00:17:29] entrance to the special housing unit [00:17:31] tier in which Epstein was housed. I find [00:17:35] this statement bizarre. [00:17:37] They say this person is believed to be [00:17:40] Noel. [00:17:42] You mean they don't know [00:17:45] this is the person they are claiming is [00:17:47] the last person to see Jeffrey Epstein [00:17:49] alive and they're not sure who it is? [00:17:53] How can they then use this person's [00:17:55] testimony to establish the time? And out [00:17:59] of the handful of guards that were on [00:18:01] duty that night, how can you not [00:18:03] determine which one walked up those [00:18:05] steps? [00:18:06] There are not that many people it could [00:18:08] have been. [00:18:11] Do you understand what is happening [00:18:12] here? We have video of some orange [00:18:16] jumpsuit moving up the stairs towards [00:18:17] Jeffrey Epstein's cell at 10:40 p.m. The [00:18:21] DOJ tries to explain this by saying that [00:18:23] a corrections officer was walking up the [00:18:25] stairs carrying inmate clothing. [00:18:28] Why? Where were they taking it at 10:40 [00:18:32] p.m.? Where did they put it? This is [00:18:35] such a bizarre thing. Wouldn't someone [00:18:38] remember why they did that? We can see [00:18:41] in the video that the color is the full [00:18:44] length of a person. So why were they [00:18:46] carrying it unfolded so the camera could [00:18:49] capture the full length of the clothing? [00:18:52] And why were all the other cameras [00:18:54] turned off? This whole explanation does [00:18:58] not make any sense. Or does it make more [00:19:01] sense that this was another prisoner [00:19:04] going to murder Jeffrey Epstein? [00:19:07] I think this video footage raises more [00:19:09] questions than it answers. What makes [00:19:12] matters worse is people keep acting [00:19:14] suspicious. [00:19:16] At the cabinet meeting Tuesday, Trump [00:19:18] said this. Are you still talking about [00:19:21] Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked [00:19:24] about for years. You're asking, "We have [00:19:27] Texas. We have this. We have all of the [00:19:29] things." [00:19:30] >> And are people still talking about this [00:19:32] guy, this creep? [00:19:34] That is unbelievable. [00:19:37] Do you want to waste the time and do you [00:19:39] feel like answering? [00:19:40] >> I I don't mind answering. [00:19:41] >> I mean, I can't believe you're asking a [00:19:42] question on Epstein at a time like this [00:19:44] where we're having some of the greatest [00:19:47] success and and also tragedy with what [00:19:50] happened in Texas. It just seems uh like [00:19:53] a desecration. But you go ahead. [00:19:56] >> Trump calls it a waste of time. He's [00:19:59] trying to dismiss the whole thing. Don't [00:20:02] look over here, people. There's nothing [00:20:04] to see. With the way that Donald Trump [00:20:07] is acting, it's pretty much convinced me [00:20:09] that all the conspiracy theories about [00:20:11] Epstein are true. When you put all this [00:20:14] information together, it looks like, in [00:20:16] my opinion, that Donald Trump is [00:20:18] covering up Jeffrey Epstein and then [00:20:20] using the information to blackmail [00:20:22] people in Washington, DC. [00:20:25] I've said this before. When Cash Patel [00:20:28] and Dan Bonino gave their first [00:20:30] interview on Fox News and said that [00:20:32] Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, this [00:20:34] happened two days before the Senate [00:20:36] unanimously passed no tax on tips. [00:20:40] >> You said Jeffrey Epstein committed [00:20:43] suicide. People don't believe it. [00:20:46] >> You know a suicide when you see one. And [00:20:47] that's what that was. [00:20:49] >> He killed himself. [00:20:51] And now this new memo leaked to the [00:20:53] press just days after the big beautiful [00:20:56] bill was passed. [00:20:59] I do not believe this is a coincidence. [00:21:02] It is unheard of for bills to get passed [00:21:05] like this. I think it sounds like [00:21:08] blackmail. The public is furious about [00:21:11] this. It looks like the Trump [00:21:13] administration is lying to us when so [00:21:16] many facts about Jeffrey Epstein are [00:21:18] wellknown and documented. [00:21:20] As part of our investigation, we spoke [00:21:23] to Arhri Ben Mashani, who is a former [00:21:26] Israeli spy. He said on the record [00:21:29] unequivocally that Jeffrey Epstein was [00:21:32] working for Israeli intelligence [00:21:34] operations, the MSAD, and running a [00:21:37] classic honey trap operation. That is [00:21:40] lure people inside, record their uh [00:21:43] activities, and learn about their [00:21:45] pecadillos and use it to blackmail them. [00:21:49] This is a former spy on the record in [00:21:51] the new book Epstein Dead Men Tell No [00:21:54] Tales. Interestingly, this person was [00:21:57] also the handler of Jeffrey Epstein's [00:22:00] best friend and ex-girlfriend, Gizlane [00:22:03] Maxwell. She was said to have been one [00:22:05] of the women who helped procure the [00:22:07] underage girls for Epstein. She has [00:22:10] denied that. But her father was Robert [00:22:13] Maxwell, a media and press baron who [00:22:16] owned the Mirror News Group in England [00:22:18] and also the New York Daily News. He was [00:22:22] a former MSAD agent. And accord [00:22:25] according to my source Ari Ben Mashari, [00:22:28] the business that Robert Maxwell had was [00:22:31] turned over to Jeffrey Epstein almost in [00:22:34] a switch before uh before Robert Maxwell [00:22:38] died in mysterious circumstances off the [00:22:41] back of a boat in 1991. [00:22:44] >> We also know that Jeffrey Epstein was [00:22:46] working as an informant for the FBI [00:22:48] because it is written in his court [00:22:50] documents from 2008. Here's what Dan [00:22:53] Bonino used to say before he took his [00:22:55] role at the FBI. A year and a half after [00:22:59] that, I'm in a green room at Fox and I'm [00:23:01] not going to say who because they didn't [00:23:02] give me permission to share it, but [00:23:04] well, the show was a story about who [00:23:05] they are. Says, you know, Ebstein's a an [00:23:09] intelligence asset for people in the [00:23:10] Middle East, right? I'm like, no, I [00:23:12] didn't know that. I'm like, you sure [00:23:13] that? the person, let's say, is like, [00:23:16] I'm absolutely sure that that he's [00:23:18] either a witting or unwitting asset, [00:23:21] intelligence asset, meaning his plane [00:23:25] and that island, the cameras, there's a [00:23:27] big assumption out there that these [00:23:28] videotapes were exclusively in the [00:23:30] custody of Epstein. That's a huge [00:23:33] mistake. The reason they wanted this [00:23:35] story to go away is because there's an [00:23:37] assumption like, oh yeah, Epstein had [00:23:40] him. No, he wasn't the only one who had [00:23:43] him according to this source. These [00:23:44] assets, that's why this blackmail story [00:23:46] makes so much sense. Which Middle [00:23:48] Eastern countries they are, I don't [00:23:49] know, but this person who is a very, [00:23:51] very good reporter. I mean, aces, right, [00:23:54] swore Epstein was either a witting or [00:23:57] unwitting intelligence asset, and they [00:23:58] may have had his plane wired up. And [00:24:00] they're the ones who have all this [00:24:02] stuff. So, the point is to sum it up, [00:24:05] how how do you know some of these [00:24:06] countries aren't going to some of these [00:24:08] power players who aren't making [00:24:09] decisions? Hey, you wouldn't want this [00:24:11] video out there, right? [00:24:12] >> Here is Alan Dersowitz, Jeffrey [00:24:14] Epstein's former lawyer from 2008 who [00:24:17] was involved in this whole scandal. [00:24:19] >> So, let me tell you, I know for a fact [00:24:21] documents are being suppressed, and [00:24:23] they're being suppressed to protect [00:24:24] individuals. I know the names of the [00:24:26] individuals. I know why they're being [00:24:28] suppressed. I know who's suppressing [00:24:30] them, but I'm bound by confidentiality [00:24:34] uh from a judge and cases, and I can't [00:24:37] disclose what I know. But I pant to God, [00:24:40] I know I know the names of people whose [00:24:43] files are being suppressed in order to [00:24:45] protect them and that's wrong. [00:24:48] >> Just out of curiosity without names, are [00:24:50] these politicians, business leaders, [00:24:52] both? [00:24:53] >> They're everything. Um, and let let me [00:24:55] tell you, a lot of them are [00:24:58] at least one of them is somebody who was [00:25:01] accused. We want total transparency on [00:25:04] this. Every single document, no [00:25:06] redaction. That's what I've said from [00:25:08] day one. I wave any of my rights of [00:25:10] privacy. Anything there is about me. I'm [00:25:12] happy because it will be exculpatory [00:25:14] because I know I haven't touched a woman [00:25:17] other than my wife from the day I met [00:25:19] Jeffrey Epste. I don't even hug people. [00:25:21] But I was falsely accused and I was able [00:25:23] to prove it and I was able to prove it [00:25:25] through documents. And I want other [00:25:27] people to be able to disprove false [00:25:29] accusations through documents, but these [00:25:32] documents are being suppressed and [00:25:33] withheld. Then we have this painting in [00:25:36] Jeffrey Epstein's home showing Bill [00:25:37] Clinton in a blue dress. This same [00:25:41] artist also painted George Bush playing [00:25:43] with paper airplanes knocking over [00:25:46] towers of blocks. [00:25:48] H I wonder what this could all mean. If [00:25:53] you watch my channel, you know that I'm [00:25:55] very pro-Israel. [00:25:57] We all know that Israel has one of the [00:25:59] best spy agencies in the world. I think [00:26:02] that's a good thing. I think it is good [00:26:05] that the US does joint operations with [00:26:07] them. But if Jeffrey Epstein was [00:26:10] involved in Israeli spy operations and [00:26:13] US spy operations and any of those [00:26:15] operations involved sexual crimes with [00:26:17] children targeting US citizens on US [00:26:20] soil, that crosses a line that crosses [00:26:25] several lines that needs to stop and [00:26:28] these people need to be held [00:26:30] accountable. Now, I have seen some [00:26:32] comments online of people excusing the [00:26:35] cover up, claiming Washington DC is [00:26:38] always going to run on blackmail. If [00:26:41] Trump is doing good things for America, [00:26:43] why does it matter? [00:26:45] Now, it is true that Trump has done [00:26:47] incredible amazing things in his first 6 [00:26:50] months as president. America is already [00:26:53] becoming a better country. But if he is [00:26:56] accomplishing these things through [00:26:57] blackmail, it's a big problem. And let [00:27:01] me explain why these people are [00:27:03] suggesting the philosophy the ends [00:27:06] justifies the means. Besides the fact [00:27:09] that covering up for people committing [00:27:10] these crimes on children is horrible, [00:27:13] there are also very practical reasons [00:27:15] this is bad for Trump. It's a very [00:27:19] short-term perspective. [00:27:21] If Trump can get his bill passed by [00:27:23] lying in the short term, he might get [00:27:25] the immediate victory. But what about [00:27:28] the long term? [00:27:30] If Trump is telling lies, that creates a [00:27:33] weakness that other people can then use [00:27:35] against him. We already see this [00:27:39] happening. On July 5th, Trump's newly [00:27:42] formed enemy, Elon Musk, just posted on [00:27:44] X.com that he is forming the America [00:27:47] Party. Elon Musk keeps posting about [00:27:51] Jeffrey Epstein. He posted, "What's the [00:27:54] time?" Oh, look. It's no one has been [00:27:57] arrested. :00 again with the official [00:28:00] Jeffrey Epstein pedophile arrest counter [00:28:03] showing zero. [00:28:05] I've got to say he has a point. He then [00:28:08] posted this. They arrested and killed [00:28:12] Peanut, but have not even tried to file [00:28:15] charges against anyone on the Epstein [00:28:17] client list. Government is deeply [00:28:20] broken. Once again, Elon Musk is right. [00:28:24] You may remember that I covered this [00:28:26] story. Peanut the squirrel was being [00:28:28] raised as a pet. The government decided [00:28:31] this was not allowed. They raided the [00:28:33] owner's home, took Peanut away, and [00:28:36] killed him by chopping off his head. Is [00:28:39] it fair that we live in a society that [00:28:41] would do this to an innocent squirrel? [00:28:43] And no one is even being investigated [00:28:45] for these horrible crimes against [00:28:48] children. Elon Musk is not the only [00:28:50] person out to get Trump. [00:28:53] Democrat-leaning journalist Jake Tapper [00:28:55] has also been covering the story on CNN. [00:28:59] In case you don't know who Jake Tapper [00:29:01] is, here is an example of his reporting [00:29:04] where he compared Donald Trump to [00:29:06] Hitler. The dehumanizing rhetoric of [00:29:09] Adolf Hitler is once again alive and [00:29:12] well on a national political stage, this [00:29:14] time of course in the United States. And [00:29:17] he uses the term poisoning the blood of [00:29:19] our country. Poisoning the blood of our [00:29:21] country. If you were to open up a copy [00:29:23] of Hitler's minecomf, you would find the [00:29:26] Nazi leader describing the mixing of [00:29:28] non-Germans with Germans as poisoning. [00:29:32] The Jew, Hitler wrote, quote, poisons [00:29:34] the blood of others. This, according to [00:29:37] Hitler, posed an existential threat to [00:29:40] Germany because, quote, all great [00:29:42] cultures of the past perished only [00:29:45] because the originally creative race [00:29:47] died out from blood poisoning. Unquote. [00:29:50] There's really no other way to say it. [00:29:52] Donald Trump's language mirrors this [00:29:55] directly. [00:29:56] >> Now, Jake Tapper is taking on the [00:29:58] Jeffrey Epstein story. [00:30:00] >> So, what's really going on here? I mean, [00:30:02] what's really going on? Well, experts [00:30:04] such as our friend Julie Brown from the [00:30:06] Miami Herald, who's been covering [00:30:07] Epstein for years, say that the notion [00:30:09] of Epstein having an easy to access [00:30:12] client list is likely a red herring. And [00:30:14] that's what the Trump administration is [00:30:16] relying on that there likely isn't a [00:30:18] list per se. But they are also now [00:30:21] relying on the fact that because it's [00:30:22] MAGA influencers who often put forward [00:30:25] so many falsehoods, legacy news media [00:30:27] won't push the point that while there [00:30:30] might not be a list, there are certainly [00:30:32] files that can be released. There's a [00:30:35] trove of information that the Trump [00:30:37] administration is right now refusing to [00:30:40] share. information that could well point [00:30:42] to the powerful folks who availed [00:30:43] themselves of the sex trafficking [00:30:46] victims of Jeffrey Epstein. If you go, [00:30:48] for example, to the FBI vault online, [00:30:52] you can see that there are 22 files [00:30:53] containing thousands of pages. Most of [00:30:56] them are heavily redacted. Now, sure, of [00:30:57] course, redact the names and identifying [00:31:00] characteristics of the victims, but why [00:31:02] not make the victim and witness [00:31:03] testimonies public? As Julie Brown [00:31:06] points out, there's still so much we [00:31:07] don't know from the investigations by US [00:31:09] attorneys in Miami and in New York, [00:31:12] witness interviews in the US Virgin [00:31:14] Islands and New Mexico. Brown writes [00:31:16] that there's still more evidence that [00:31:17] hasn't been published, including quote, [00:31:19] "epstein kept video cameras in most of [00:31:21] his residences. And Epstein's autopsy, [00:31:24] nor the report of the investigation into [00:31:25] his death, has ever been made public." [00:31:28] So, while there may not be an official [00:31:30] client list to be released, as the [00:31:32] administration is now saying, there's a [00:31:34] lot of extra information that is not [00:31:36] being made public, despite Trump's [00:31:38] Justice Department basically now saying [00:31:41] case closed. This isn't going to go [00:31:43] away. The public, you you're being [00:31:46] played for fools here. He makes a good [00:31:48] point. [00:31:50] Why can't we get the autopsy records for [00:31:52] Jeffrey Epstein? [00:31:54] That has nothing to do with any of the [00:31:56] victims. Why is that being covered up? [00:31:59] So, Donald Trump is getting attacked [00:32:01] from the right and the left on Jeffrey [00:32:03] Epstein. He will probably survive and [00:32:06] get through his four years as president, [00:32:08] but he has absolutely screwed over the [00:32:11] Republican party going forward. [00:32:14] I think Trump just lost the Republicans [00:32:16] the election in 2028. [00:32:19] If any Republican campaigns on bringing [00:32:22] fairness and justice to Washington, who [00:32:25] is going to believe them after this? [00:32:28] Everyone is now realizing that Donald [00:32:30] Trump is breaking promises that he made [00:32:32] to us during the campaign. Uh, Bill [00:32:36] Clinton, nice guy, got a lot of problems [00:32:39] coming up in my opinion with the famous [00:32:41] island with Jeffrey Epstein. [00:32:43] >> That island was uh really a cesspool. [00:32:45] There's no question about it. Just ask [00:32:47] Prince Andrew. Now, if all Trump cares [00:32:49] about is himself, maybe he doesn't mind. [00:32:52] But the rest of us are going to face [00:32:54] tremendous hardship when the Democrats [00:32:56] take over everything again in 2028. [00:33:00] Now, there was one person that predicted [00:33:02] that this was all going to happen. That [00:33:05] person is Andrew Tate. Now, I know [00:33:08] Andrew Tate is controversial, but he is [00:33:10] the one person who knew that the Epstein [00:33:13] client list was never going to be [00:33:15] released. So you talk about the Epstein [00:33:18] list. I would argue it's a very similar [00:33:20] scenario. It's all about money. It's all [00:33:21] about who has the money and controlling [00:33:23] the money. Is America as a country [00:33:25] prepared to upset all of its richest [00:33:28] people? [00:33:30] >> I don't know. Is it? And I'm asking you [00:33:32] as a professional, you're in charge of a [00:33:34] country. Your primary objective is to [00:33:36] keep your oligarchy happy, to keep the [00:33:37] wealth inside of your nation, and to [00:33:39] make them obey you when it comes to [00:33:40] sanctions and such other things, and to [00:33:42] ensure that the US dollar becomes and [00:33:44] stays the predominant currency globally. [00:33:46] There's a bunch of bloodthirsty brokies [00:33:48] on the internet who barely pay taxes who [00:33:49] want to go through a list. Who are you [00:33:51] going to prioritize? [00:33:53] Who do you care about? I'm not saying [00:33:56] it's fair, but anyone who believes the [00:33:58] legal systems are fair is a anyway. [00:34:00] >> How did Andrew Tate know in advance this [00:34:02] was going to happen? It could have [00:34:05] something to do with the fact that his [00:34:07] dad was in the CIA and he was taught [00:34:10] growing up how the world really works. [00:34:13] Now, I do strongly disagree with Andrew [00:34:16] Tate that we should just accept this as [00:34:19] something that's okay. That's a very [00:34:21] pessimistic way of looking at the world. [00:34:25] I'm not going to just accept that the [00:34:27] world is crooked and there's nothing we [00:34:29] can do about it. [00:34:30] We should not accept that Trump is [00:34:33] allegedly lying to us. We should not [00:34:36] accept a two-tier system of justice [00:34:39] where rich people are treated [00:34:41] differently than ordinary Americans. [00:34:44] >> And there will be no more political [00:34:46] persecutions and no more two tiers of [00:34:50] justice. And they have liked having two [00:34:52] tiers of justice. They have enjoyed it [00:34:55] and it has helped them. They think in [00:34:59] their political mission they've enjoyed [00:35:02] targeting Catholics. They've enjoyed [00:35:05] targeting parents. But the American [00:35:08] people have said they want no more of [00:35:12] that. And our colleagues know you're [00:35:15] going to clean it up. [00:35:16] >> We should not forget that Jeffrey [00:35:18] Epstein is just one issue that people [00:35:20] are concerned about. How come no one has [00:35:23] been arrested for crimes that happened [00:35:25] during the pandemic? How come no one has [00:35:28] been arrested for what happened during [00:35:29] the election in 2020? How come no one [00:35:33] has been arrested for the January 6th [00:35:34] pipe bomb, which we all suspect was an [00:35:37] undercover US government agent? [00:35:40] All of this is part of the deep state [00:35:43] swamp that Donald Trump was elected to [00:35:45] clean up. It's not fair that these rich [00:35:48] elites are getting a pass when the rest [00:35:51] of us are suffering. America is the one [00:35:55] place in the world that is supposed to [00:35:57] be different. [00:35:59] The Declaration of Independence says, [00:36:01] "We hold these truths to be self-evident [00:36:04] that all men are created equal." [00:36:08] This was enshrined in the 14th amendment [00:36:10] of the constitution that says no state [00:36:13] shall deny to any person within its [00:36:15] jurisdiction the equal protection of the [00:36:18] laws. [00:36:20] We should demand justice. We should [00:36:23] demand equality because that is our [00:36:26] right as Americans. [00:36:29] I think this memo is a joke and I think [00:36:32] everyone involved is a bunch of liars. [00:36:36] Now, I want to hear from you. Do you [00:36:37] think there's a cover up with this memo? [00:36:39] Or do you think the administration is [00:36:41] telling the truth? Let me know in the [00:36:43] comments down below. And if you like [00:36:45] this video, don't forget to hit that [00:36:47] subscribe button so you don't miss out [00:36:48] on future videos. If you find my videos [00:36:51] helpful, consider signing up for a [00:36:53] membership on my website, wolvesen [00:36:54] finance.com. For $6 a month, your [00:36:57] support helps me to keep making these [00:37:00] videos. Thank you to everyone who has [00:37:02] signed up. I'm Zach from Wolves & [00:37:04] Finance. Thank you for watching. [00:37:23] [Music]