Untitled Document

[00:00:00] Please share this video with a friend [00:00:02] because a lot of people don't know this [00:00:04] is going on. Steve Bannon is one of the [00:00:06] most influential men in America. He [00:00:08] hosts a podcast called The War Room from [00:00:11] his studio in Washington DC. Most people [00:00:13] have heard a little bit about the [00:00:15] scandal surrounding Steve Bannon. You [00:00:17] may have heard from the mainstream media [00:00:18] that there was something to do with the [00:00:20] nonprofit and there was fraud involved. [00:00:23] But most Americans are too busy with [00:00:24] their families and their jobs to really [00:00:26] understand what happened. I've done some [00:00:30] research and I'm going to show you what [00:00:32] the news is not telling you. This was an [00:00:36] attack by the Democrats that every [00:00:38] American needs to know about because [00:00:41] just this month, the law is getting [00:00:43] worse. [00:00:45] [Music] [00:01:01] Lawfare has become a major problem in [00:01:04] America. We have recently seen [00:01:06] outrageous abuses of power as the [00:01:08] Democrats tried to throw Donald Trump in [00:01:11] jail. [00:01:12] >> He was said 92 indictments. Jack Smith, [00:01:16] the indictments around Jack Smith, I [00:01:17] think, were 300 years in prison. They [00:01:19] wanted to put Trump in prison. Remember, [00:01:21] they wanted Trump to die in prison. They [00:01:23] want Trump still to die in prison. This [00:01:25] game's not, this fight and battle is far [00:01:28] from over. Um, if Hakee Jeff raises $2 [00:01:32] billion and this all comes down to a [00:01:34] handful of seats in California and New [00:01:36] York in 2026, [00:01:38] and if somehow we don't hold on the [00:01:40] seats, this very thin majority, the [00:01:43] first action Hakee Jeff will take will [00:01:46] be to move to impeach Donald Trump. And [00:01:49] uh and if somehow the election's stolen [00:01:51] in 2028, like they stole it in 2020, uh [00:01:56] the first thing they're going to do is [00:01:57] it's all going to go back again to try [00:02:00] to indict Trump and to try to indict [00:02:01] people around Trump and put Trump in [00:02:03] prison. I say this all the time. It's [00:02:05] quite evident this is a long war. It [00:02:07] took us many, many decades to get here. [00:02:09] It's going to take us many, many decades [00:02:11] to get out. And [00:02:12] >> this is a very serious problem. Since [00:02:15] Donald Trump has become president, he [00:02:16] has taken actions to clean up the [00:02:18] Department of Justice to stop the [00:02:20] lawfare. [00:02:22] Democrats have been outraged and claimed [00:02:24] that Donald Trump cannot interfere with [00:02:26] the Department of Justice. The president [00:02:29] of the United States, the chief [00:02:31] executive, the office of the president, [00:02:33] okay, who is the chief executive [00:02:35] officer, the commander-in-chief, and the [00:02:37] and the chief magistrate and chief law [00:02:39] enforcement officer, they are shocked [00:02:41] that he's in the sacred temple of the [00:02:42] Justice Department. them, right? This is [00:02:46] this is what democracy is about. These [00:02:48] are anti-democratic forces. They have to [00:02:50] be broken. They are shocked because the [00:02:53] president of the United States and worst [00:02:54] of all, Donald Trump actually soiled [00:02:57] their temple by going in there. I happen [00:03:00] to think President Trump should go there [00:03:01] every week and and give a talk about [00:03:03] lawfare. The case against Steve Bannon [00:03:06] is important because it marks the [00:03:08] beginning of when Democrat lawfare got [00:03:10] out of control. [00:03:12] This started in 2020 and I'm ashamed [00:03:15] that I didn't recognize what was going [00:03:17] on back then. I really didn't pay [00:03:19] attention to it because no one [00:03:21] understood what was happening. But we [00:03:23] know now. Let me go through the [00:03:26] timeline. 2016, Donald Trump beat [00:03:29] Hillary Clinton. Steve Bannon worked [00:03:32] with Donald Trump in the White House. [00:03:34] August 18th, 2017, Steve Bannon left the [00:03:38] White House. December 2018, the [00:03:41] government shut down. I don't know if [00:03:44] you remember this. The Democrats in [00:03:46] Congress would not agree to Trump's [00:03:48] requests for the budget bill. The [00:03:50] sticking point was the border wall. [00:03:53] Donald Trump won the election, promising [00:03:55] that he would build the wall, but [00:03:57] Congress refused to fund it. The [00:04:00] government shut down for 35 days, the [00:04:03] longest in US history. [00:04:06] A compromise was eventually reached that [00:04:08] only funded part of the wall. So at that [00:04:11] time, someone named Brian KFage decided [00:04:13] that he would launch his own nonprofit [00:04:15] campaign called We Build the Wall. Now, [00:04:18] this really is a story about America's [00:04:20] quintessential can do attitude. Whether [00:04:23] their leaders fail them, our citizens [00:04:25] take matters into their own hands. Enter [00:04:28] Brian Kfash. He's a triple ampute Air [00:04:30] Force vet who started a GoFundMe page [00:04:33] for the wall. uh you know the wall that [00:04:35] the politicians don't want to fund and [00:04:37] he started this just three days ago. In [00:04:40] that short time, he has already raised [00:04:42] more than $9.7 [00:04:44] million. Now, here to tell us why he did [00:04:48] this, what he hopes to achieve is Brian [00:04:50] himself. All right, Brian. [00:04:51] >> And you know, this is not just about [00:04:53] Republicans and conservatives. There's [00:04:55] an outpouring of Democrats that are [00:04:58] messaging me and giving to this wall [00:05:00] fund. It's from both sides of the aisle, [00:05:02] but you won't hear the liberal media [00:05:03] saying that. This is America coming [00:05:05] together. They want the wall and they're [00:05:07] putting their money where their mouth is [00:05:08] and they're funding it. [00:05:09] >> Now, why why the wall? Why why is this [00:05:12] an issue for you? [00:05:14] >> Well, I mean, the wall is a an important [00:05:17] thing for me. I I feel it's it's near [00:05:18] and dear to my heart and it was a [00:05:21] promise that was made to Americans and [00:05:23] uh you know, this is a very important [00:05:25] part of our our our nation, our country. [00:05:27] We need security. We are law a nation of [00:05:29] laws. We need to enforce these laws. We [00:05:31] can't have people coming across our [00:05:32] border who are unchecked that we don't [00:05:34] know who they are. I mean, we could have [00:05:36] another terrorist attack tomorrow. It [00:05:37] doesn't take many people to to stage an [00:05:39] attack. [00:05:40] >> He raised $25 million to build the wall. [00:05:44] He was shortly joined by Steve Bannon to [00:05:46] help with the project. August 20th, [00:05:48] 2020, the US attorney for the Southern [00:05:51] District of New York unsealed criminal [00:05:53] charges against Steve Bannon and three [00:05:55] of his co-workers at the nonprofit, [00:05:56] accusing them of committing fraud. This [00:06:00] was conveniently right before the [00:06:01] election between Donald Trump and Joe [00:06:04] Biden. [00:06:05] Isn't this strange timing? Could it be [00:06:08] that they were trying to influence the [00:06:10] election? January 20th, 2021. On Donald [00:06:14] Trump's last day in office, he pardoned [00:06:17] Steve Bannon. September 2022, [00:06:20] Steve Bannon was indicted a second time, [00:06:23] this time under New York state charges. [00:06:25] February 2025, Steve Bannon plead guilty [00:06:29] in an agreement with no prison time. [00:06:32] Here are his comments after pleading [00:06:33] guilty. [00:06:35] >> The existential threat is right here in [00:06:37] this city. It is the queen of lawfare. [00:06:40] It's Leticia James right now. Soros has [00:06:42] a DA that's running unopposed. He can [00:06:45] call a grand jury at any time. He can he [00:06:48] can set up criminal charges on the most [00:06:50] bogus efforts. Leticia James runs this [00:06:54] deal. She's got a pliant media right [00:06:56] here. Plantiant leftwing media. She's [00:06:58] got a jury pool of only left-wing [00:07:00] radicals in the upper west side of this [00:07:01] city. And she's got the judges. She's [00:07:04] got all of it. [00:07:05] >> And I'm call Hang on. I'm call I'm [00:07:07] calling on right now the attorney [00:07:09] general, Pam Bonnie, to begin an [00:07:11] immediate criminal investigation into [00:07:13] Leticia James, Alvin Bragg, all of it [00:07:16] for what they did to President Trump. [00:07:17] President Trump on on his true social [00:07:19] day laid it out once again. The [00:07:22] existential threat to his administration [00:07:24] is this queen of lawfare, Leticia James, [00:07:27] and how she and how she and how she has [00:07:29] and how she has absolutely total [00:07:32] control. [00:07:33] >> This is lawfare. It started with Steve [00:07:36] Bannon and it got worse and worse and [00:07:39] worse. We watched as Donald Trump's home [00:07:43] was raided. We watched Donald Trump [00:07:45] suffer through four criminal trials, all [00:07:48] of them with ridiculous charges. [00:07:51] What it looks like to me is that Steve [00:07:54] Bannon was the test case. The Democrats [00:07:57] in New York wanted to see if they could [00:07:59] take four innocent men, charge them with [00:08:01] fake crimes, convict them, and put them [00:08:04] in jail. If the Democrats could pull [00:08:06] that off, they could do it with [00:08:08] President Trump. Now, I understand that [00:08:11] in Steve Bannon's case, a number of [00:08:13] people pled guilty, including Steve [00:08:15] Bannon. So, it's hard to argue that they [00:08:18] are innocent when they plead guilty. [00:08:20] But this is the same thing we saw with [00:08:23] so many of the people involved in the [00:08:25] January 6th protests. [00:08:27] People were forced to plead guilty [00:08:29] because they felt they were trapped in a [00:08:31] crooked justice system. They felt they [00:08:33] were not going to receive a fair trial [00:08:35] and they were going to jail anyway. So, [00:08:37] people pled guilty out of desperation to [00:08:40] shorten their sentences. [00:08:42] The Supreme Court had to step in and [00:08:44] overturn hundreds of convictions because [00:08:47] they were unfair. [00:08:49] Think about that. The Department of [00:08:51] Justice forced hundreds of innocent [00:08:54] people to plead guilty when they were [00:08:56] actually innocent. What I'm suggesting [00:08:59] is that the same thing happened to Steve [00:09:00] Bannon and the others. This was lawfare. [00:09:05] They plead guilty because there was no [00:09:07] other way out. Now, this is all just my [00:09:10] opinion, but I'm going to give you the [00:09:12] facts to back this up. Number one, [00:09:15] jurisdiction. [00:09:17] Let me start with a simple question. [00:09:20] Why was this trial in New York? [00:09:24] Let's go through the people involved. We [00:09:26] have Steve Bannon. Brian Kofage who [00:09:29] started the nonprofit and lived in [00:09:31] Arizona near the border wall [00:09:32] construction. Andrew Badilato was a [00:09:35] Florida based investor. Timothy Sheay [00:09:38] was a businessman from Colorado. From my [00:09:41] understanding, Steve Bannon was more of [00:09:42] a figurehead and the other three really [00:09:45] ran the organization. So we have someone [00:09:47] in Arizona, someone in Florida, and [00:09:49] someone in Colorado. And all the [00:09:51] business operations are taking place [00:09:53] near the southern border. [00:09:56] I will ask the question again. Why was [00:09:59] this trial in New York City? [00:10:02] Doesn't it make more sense to try the [00:10:03] case in a southern district like Arizona [00:10:06] or Texas? Why New York? [00:10:10] In fact, this question came up during [00:10:12] court proceedings and it was determined [00:10:14] that the New York judge had jurisdiction [00:10:16] because the nonprofit's bank was JP [00:10:18] Morgan Chase, which was headquartered in [00:10:21] New York. They claimed that the funds [00:10:24] touched New York. In a court order, the [00:10:27] judge states several calls, emails, and [00:10:30] wire transfers moved through Manhattan. [00:10:34] That seems really suspicious to me. [00:10:37] They are claiming that no matter where [00:10:39] you live in the United States, if your [00:10:41] bank is headquartered in New York, the [00:10:43] Democrats can put you on trial in New [00:10:46] York. [00:10:48] I don't know what you think, but that [00:10:50] doesn't seem very fair to me. Number [00:10:52] two, judges. The judge in the case was [00:10:55] someone named Anaisa Torres. If you [00:10:58] watch my channel, this is someone we [00:11:00] have talked about before because she is [00:11:03] the same judge who oversaw the [00:11:04] politically motivated lawfare case [00:11:06] against Miles Gao. The same Miles Gal [00:11:10] that Hunter Biden viciously attacked in [00:11:12] his latest interview. [00:11:15] Isn't it curious that the same judge [00:11:18] keeps getting all these politically [00:11:19] motivated cases? Isn't that strange? [00:11:23] What is even more strange is that when [00:11:25] Steve Bannon was recharged in New York [00:11:27] State Court, obviously he needed a [00:11:30] different judge. His case was then [00:11:32] assigned to Judge Juan Merchant. This is [00:11:35] the same judge who oversaw the case [00:11:37] against Donald Trump for 34 counts of [00:11:39] falsifying business records in the case [00:11:41] against Stormmy Daniels. This was the [00:11:44] trial that made Donald Trump a convicted [00:11:46] felon. This was the same judge that [00:11:49] oversaw the trial against Donald Trump's [00:11:51] CFO, Alan Weisleberg. This same judge [00:11:55] was assigned three cases involving [00:11:57] Donald Trump and his associates. I will [00:12:00] ask the question again. Isn't it curious [00:12:03] that these same judges keep getting all [00:12:06] these politically motivated cases? [00:12:08] Number three, money. [00:12:11] In a fraud case, we have to look at the [00:12:13] money. What was the actual money [00:12:16] involved? [00:12:18] When we look at the indictment, it [00:12:19] claims the fraud involves improper [00:12:21] invoices that total $350,000. [00:12:26] Now, when I first read that, it seemed [00:12:28] very strange to me. Remember that they [00:12:32] raised $25 million. [00:12:36] It is true that $350,000 is a lot of [00:12:39] money, but not in the context of $25 [00:12:42] million. [00:12:44] This allegation of mismanagement is only [00:12:47] a tiny fraction of that. [00:12:50] I have covered many fraud cases. This is [00:12:54] not what fraud typically looks like. [00:12:57] Do you remember the Bernie made off [00:12:59] Ponzi scheme that involved $65 billion? [00:13:04] Investors were only able to recover $14 [00:13:07] billion. [00:13:09] Do you remember Sam Benerman Freed at [00:13:11] FTX? When FTX went bankrupt, $8 billion [00:13:15] in customer funds were missing. [00:13:18] The case against Steve Bannon does not [00:13:21] sound right to me. New York is claiming [00:13:24] that they raised $25 million and all [00:13:27] that was mismanaged was $350,000. [00:13:31] This does not sound like fraud to me. [00:13:34] This sounds like the prosecutors in New [00:13:36] York decided they wanted to find [00:13:37] something against Steve Bannon. And so [00:13:40] they looked through all his accounting [00:13:42] records looking for any mistakes and all [00:13:44] they found was $350,000. [00:13:49] Now some new sources have claimed that [00:13:51] if you only count the cost of the [00:13:53] materials for the wall, it was only $6 [00:13:55] to 7 million. And so therefore the rest [00:13:58] of the money was misused because it was [00:14:00] spent on contractors and personnel. [00:14:03] This claim drives me insane. [00:14:07] That is so stupid. the wall is not going [00:14:10] to build itself. [00:14:12] Of course, they had to pay people as [00:14:14] part of construction. [00:14:16] This argument is bogus. And if you read [00:14:18] the indictment, the only cost the [00:14:21] prosecutors are able to point to [00:14:23] specifically is the $350,000 [00:14:26] of invoices. Let us also keep this in [00:14:29] perspective. [00:14:30] Most nonprofits spend large amounts of [00:14:33] donation money on administration, [00:14:35] typically between 25 to 35%. [00:14:39] A really outrageous example is the [00:14:41] Wounded Warrior Project. In 2015, they [00:14:44] received over $373 million in total [00:14:48] donations. In 2016, it was reported that [00:14:51] they were only spending 60% of their [00:14:53] donations to help wounded veterans. They [00:14:56] were spending the rest of their [00:14:57] donations for administration expenses. [00:15:01] That is outrageous. [00:15:04] I would argue that is over $100 million [00:15:06] of funds that are being mismanaged. [00:15:10] What I want to know is why the New York [00:15:12] prosecutors are not dragging the Wounded [00:15:15] Warrior Project into court for fraud, [00:15:17] but they are dragging Steve Bannon into [00:15:19] court for this $350,000. [00:15:22] That does not seem right. Number four, [00:15:26] intent. In a criminal case, one of the [00:15:29] most difficult things to prove is [00:15:31] intent. This is especially challenging [00:15:34] in accounting cases like fraud. Did the [00:15:37] people commit the act with criminal [00:15:39] intent or was it an honest mistake? [00:15:43] One of the big problems with this case [00:15:45] is none of the people involved have the [00:15:47] typical criminal profile. These were all [00:15:50] firsttime offenders with no criminal [00:15:52] record. Brian Kofage, Andrew Bodilato, [00:15:56] and Timothy Shea were all small [00:15:58] entrepreneurs. None of them had ever run [00:16:01] a nonprofit before, let alone one that [00:16:03] was worth $25 million. Now, I've not [00:16:07] seen the actual invoices, so I cannot [00:16:09] say if there were mistakes made, but it [00:16:12] seems completely reasonable to me that [00:16:14] maybe they made an honest mistake on a [00:16:16] few invoices. Maybe they didn't know [00:16:19] every single rule about nonprofits [00:16:21] because they had never done it before. [00:16:24] It seems incredibly unfair to assume [00:16:26] that they were acting with criminal [00:16:28] intent. And I have seen no evidence that [00:16:30] proves to me that this was some sort of [00:16:32] criminal plot to steal money. Let me [00:16:35] just give you an example. [00:16:38] One of the examples the prosecutors use [00:16:39] as evidence is they claim that the [00:16:41] invoices were mislabeled and should have [00:16:43] been labeled as personal reimbursements. [00:16:46] Therefore, the invoice was disguised. [00:16:49] Therefore, this proves criminal intent. [00:16:53] That does not even make any sense. [00:16:56] These prosecutors are claiming that [00:16:58] these people conspired together to raise [00:17:00] $25 million so that they could steal [00:17:03] $350,000. [00:17:06] That does not make any sense to me. It [00:17:09] seems more likely that these were [00:17:11] patriots who were trying their best to [00:17:13] build the wall. I'm not even convinced [00:17:16] that there was anything wrong with those [00:17:17] invoices. [00:17:19] But even if there was something wrong [00:17:20] with the invoices, it seems more likely [00:17:23] to me that it would be an honest mistake [00:17:25] and not criminal intent. Number five, [00:17:29] mistrial. This fact is crazy because you [00:17:32] never hear about it in the mainstream [00:17:34] media. [00:17:36] Did you know that this case had a [00:17:38] mistrial? [00:17:40] Here's what happened. Four people were [00:17:43] indicted. Steve Bannon was pardoned. [00:17:46] Brian Kulfage and Andrew Batalado both [00:17:48] entered guilty p. But Timothy Shea said, [00:17:52] "No, I'm innocent. I will not plead [00:17:55] guilty." And the New York prosecutors [00:17:58] took him to trial. Do you know what [00:18:00] happened? It ended in a mistrial. [00:18:05] The jury refused to call this man a [00:18:08] criminal. [00:18:10] Let me repeat that. This was a New York [00:18:13] court with a Democrat-leaning judge and [00:18:15] a Democrat-leaning jury, and they still [00:18:18] refused to convict this man. [00:18:21] Guess what happened next? They held a [00:18:24] second trial. These New York prosecutors [00:18:28] decided, "We're going to take you to [00:18:29] trial over and over again for the rest [00:18:32] of your life until we find a jury that [00:18:35] agrees with us." And it was this second [00:18:37] trial where they found Timothy Sheay [00:18:39] guilty. Now, normally Americans are [00:18:42] protected against this because of double [00:18:44] jeopardy, but double jeopardy does not [00:18:46] apply in the case of a mistrial. This [00:18:49] all seems extremely corrupt and more [00:18:52] like a communist show trial. Number six, [00:18:56] results. One thing that people forget [00:18:58] about this case is that they actually [00:19:00] built the wall. They received $25 [00:19:04] million and built nearly four miles of [00:19:06] new wall along the border in New Mexico [00:19:09] and Texas. [00:19:10] That is a fraction of the cost of what [00:19:12] the government would have spent. In [00:19:14] 2020, it was reported that it cost the [00:19:17] government nearly $20 million per mile. [00:19:21] So, this group of people did it for [00:19:23] roughly a quarter of the cost. [00:19:26] This is not what a scam looks like. If [00:19:29] these people were trying to do a fraud, [00:19:31] they would have built one mile of the [00:19:33] wall and pocketed the rest of the money. [00:19:35] None of this looks like a scam. We can [00:19:39] see the finished product with our own [00:19:41] eyes. It's right there. [00:19:45] How can it be a scam when we can [00:19:47] actually see the end result? [00:19:50] Not only did they build the wall, they [00:19:53] did an incredible job. Number seven, [00:19:56] Bill Bar. Now, a lot of people have [00:19:59] pointed out that when these people were [00:20:01] indicted, it was during Donald Trump's [00:20:02] first term as president. [00:20:05] How could the case be politically [00:20:06] motivated against Republicans if Donald [00:20:09] Trump was the president? [00:20:12] We have to remember that Bill Bar was [00:20:15] the head of the Department of Justice. [00:20:17] Looking back, we now know a lot about [00:20:21] Bill Bar. We know that Bill Bar was sent [00:20:24] evidence of blatant fraud during the [00:20:26] 2020 election and he refused to look [00:20:29] into it. Also, Bill Barr testified for [00:20:33] the January 6 committee, smearing Donald [00:20:35] Trump. Also, Bill Barr has released a [00:20:39] book in 2022, smearing Donald Trump. [00:20:43] Here's Bill Bar explaining his opinion [00:20:45] on the 2020 election. [00:20:47] >> In your book, you cataloged the chaos at [00:20:49] the end of Mr. Trump's time in office. [00:20:51] You had unique access to him. You were [00:20:53] familiar with his thinking, his thought [00:20:54] processes. Did he know he was lying [00:20:57] about election fraud? I have come to [00:20:59] believe that uh he knew that he lost the [00:21:02] election because something I didn't know [00:21:04] at the time uh when I was telling him [00:21:06] that was that his own campaign was [00:21:08] telling him that. In fact, I was [00:21:09] concerned at the time that that maybe [00:21:11] his campaign was feeding some of this [00:21:13] stuff to him. But on the contrary, I [00:21:15] think everyone was telling him he lost. [00:21:18] This is someone who worked for Trump. [00:21:21] This sounds like a total enemy of Trump. [00:21:25] Bill Barr claims that he is an [00:21:26] independent Republican, but most [00:21:28] conservatives view him as part of the [00:21:30] deep state. He is acting as a mouthpiece [00:21:34] for the Democrat party who is trying to [00:21:36] put Donald Trump in prison. [00:21:40] He's accusing Trump of being a criminal [00:21:42] with no evidence. This is no friend of [00:21:46] Trump. Bill Barr is the man who was in [00:21:49] charge of the DOJ when Steve Bannon and [00:21:51] the others were arrested. It sounds to [00:21:54] me like this was absolutely politically [00:21:56] motivated right before the 2020 election [00:22:00] as a way to get Trump. Number eight, the [00:22:03] border. We now also know that the border [00:22:06] was a central part of the Democrat [00:22:09] strategy. The Democrats under Joe Biden [00:22:12] let millions of illegal immigrants come [00:22:14] across the border. Crime was up, drug [00:22:17] use was up, the impact on social [00:22:19] services was up. It has been alleged [00:22:22] that USAD has been giving US taxpayer [00:22:24] dollars to NOS's which then assists [00:22:27] immigrants coming to America by handing [00:22:29] out free cash debit cards, food, [00:22:32] clothing, medical treatment, shelter, [00:22:35] and even transportation. [00:22:37] In New York, the city gave out $3.6 [00:22:40] million in free cash debit cards for [00:22:43] illegal immigrants. [00:22:45] Elon Musk put it best when he posted [00:22:47] this. [00:22:49] Biden's strategy is very simple. Get as [00:22:51] many illegals in the country as [00:22:53] possible. Legalize them to create a [00:22:55] permanent majority, a one party state. [00:22:58] That is why they are encouraging so much [00:23:01] illegal immigration. Simple yet [00:23:03] effective. He then linked this article [00:23:05] from 2021. [00:23:07] Biden to prioritize legal status for [00:23:10] millions of immigrants. [00:23:12] They actually tried to pass a bill in [00:23:14] Congress to do this. This is the context [00:23:18] of the case against Steve Bannon. [00:23:21] Flooding the country with illegal aliens [00:23:23] was essential for the Democrat strategy. [00:23:26] They knew they could not win elections [00:23:28] any other way. And they saw this group [00:23:31] of Republicans who were putting up a [00:23:33] wall. For the Democrats, those people [00:23:36] had to be stopped in any way possible. [00:23:40] Let's go through the facts again. The [00:23:42] jurisdiction of New York is strange. The [00:23:45] judges seem corrupt. It is for an [00:23:48] unusually small amount of money. There [00:23:50] does not seem to be criminal intent. [00:23:53] There was a mistrial. The defendants [00:23:55] delivered results by actually building [00:23:57] the wall. Bill Bar has shown he is an [00:24:00] enemy of Trump. And the Democrat [00:24:02] strategy centered around stopping the [00:24:05] border wall. Now, let me ask you this [00:24:07] question. [00:24:09] If this was a legitimate criminal case, [00:24:12] why are there so many bizarre things [00:24:14] going on? Was this a crime or was it [00:24:18] actually political persecution? [00:24:21] All these facts say to me that these are [00:24:23] innocent men who are victims of lawfare. [00:24:27] The Democrats invented fake charges, [00:24:29] destroyed their lives, threw them in [00:24:31] jail because they were Republican. The [00:24:34] Democrats were practicing the same [00:24:36] tactics that they would later use on [00:24:38] Donald Trump. [00:24:40] Here's a discussion about the case with [00:24:42] podcaster Viva Frey. So, I have huge [00:24:45] problems with the case. I know that it's [00:24:47] different than a lot of other people's [00:24:48] opinions out there, but it's based on [00:24:50] who is bringing it, when they're [00:24:51] bringing it, and the fact that I've done [00:24:52] tons of these cases, and this is the [00:24:54] weakest mail fraud case. I mean, I've [00:24:57] defended people accused of Ponzi [00:24:58] schemes. Few of them maybe, you know, [00:25:01] well, the jury said few of them were [00:25:02] guilty. the uh uh so the uh and some of [00:25:05] them were, you know, got screwed up in [00:25:06] the rest. But I know what a strong case [00:25:08] looks like. I know what a weak case [00:25:09] looks like. This is the weakest case [00:25:11] I've ever seen. And who is bringing it [00:25:13] and when they bringing it make me [00:25:14] believe it's politically contaminated. [00:25:16] What can we do about this? [00:25:18] Just to be clear, since Steve Bannon [00:25:20] plead guilty, the case is over for him. [00:25:23] He received no jail time. But the other [00:25:26] three men, who I believe are innocent, [00:25:29] went to prison. They were all sentenced [00:25:32] after Donald Trump had already left [00:25:34] office. So he was not able to pardon [00:25:36] them. But he is now the president again. [00:25:41] We need to send Donald Trump a message. [00:25:44] He needs to pardon these three men. [00:25:47] Whether you think they are guilty or [00:25:49] not, there was clearly a political [00:25:51] element about this case and that's not [00:25:54] fair. They have already spent years in [00:25:57] prison. It is time to stop the political [00:26:01] persecution of Republicans. [00:26:04] It's time to stop the lawfare. [00:26:07] Please, President Trump, give these men [00:26:10] a pardon. Let me tell you what is [00:26:12] happening right now. Just last month, [00:26:15] Brian KFage was released from prison to [00:26:17] serve the rest of his sentence in home [00:26:19] confinement. In case you don't know, [00:26:22] Brian Kofage is a triple amputee. He is [00:26:25] a veteran who lost an arm and both his [00:26:27] legs during the war in Iraq in 2004. He [00:26:31] was serving his second tour of duty when [00:26:32] a rocket shell exploded 25 ft from him. [00:26:36] This was the result. [00:26:38] >> I wasn't really that down to begin with. [00:26:40] I think it was just cuz the medications [00:26:42] I was on, but uh [00:26:43] >> Cole Fag's sense of humor continues on [00:26:46] even after going through such a horrible [00:26:48] ordeal. He lost both legs and his right [00:26:51] arm eight years ago when a mortar shell [00:26:53] exploded 3 ft away from him in Iraq. [00:26:56] >> I looked at my hand and my hand was just [00:26:57] cut right off. Uh, and I didn't look at [00:27:00] my legs and my I tried to look at him, [00:27:01] but my friend, he came out of the tent [00:27:03] and put his hand in front of my eyes so [00:27:04] I wouldn't see my legs, but my legs were [00:27:06] just completely gone. [00:27:06] >> Throughout that ordeal, the Air Force [00:27:08] airman, now a civilian, realized he was [00:27:10] lucky to be alive. He can still see his [00:27:13] family and get back to his fiance, who [00:27:15] is now his wife. While he was in the [00:27:17] hospital, he also saw others who were [00:27:19] much worse off. [00:27:20] >> They had all their limbs, but you know, [00:27:22] they had they were mentally disabled. [00:27:24] And I was just happy that, you know, I [00:27:26] had my head. I could do everything. It's [00:27:28] just a different way. I could think, I [00:27:30] can eat on my own. [00:27:31] >> It is no surprise that the prison system [00:27:33] did not have the proper facilities to [00:27:35] handle a triple ampute. He has had [00:27:39] serious medical consequences from his [00:27:41] time in prison. He is now pre-diabetic. [00:27:45] He has ruined his last remaining hand [00:27:47] from overuse. [00:27:49] He says, "I'm in the wrong wheelchair [00:27:51] and it's causing me daily excruciating [00:27:53] scheatic nerve pain. They haven't given [00:27:56] me the proper meds for my pain." I don't [00:27:59] know if any of you have experienced pain [00:28:01] from medical problems, but just imagine [00:28:04] being denied pain medication. [00:28:07] He also says, "I haven't had a proper [00:28:10] shower in over a year since I arrived. I [00:28:13] use baby wipes. This is also because [00:28:16] they do not have the appropriate shower [00:28:17] accessibility for a triple amputee. Now [00:28:20] that Brian is on home confinement, you [00:28:22] would think that things would get [00:28:24] better. But what the Bureau of Prisons [00:28:26] is doing to him is cruel and unusual [00:28:29] punishment. They are making him wear a [00:28:32] bulky ankle monitor on his one remaining [00:28:34] good hand. He says, "It's horrible. Like [00:28:39] having a brick duct taped to your hand. [00:28:42] Since it's my only limb, it's constantly [00:28:44] getting in the way of my wheelchair when [00:28:46] I try to roll. It's caused me to fall [00:28:49] multiple times when it interferes with [00:28:50] my hand grip when transferring out of my [00:28:52] wheelchair. It's a disgrace is what it [00:28:55] really is. They should be ashamed to do [00:28:57] such a thing. This makes me sick." [00:29:01] There are lightweight watches they could [00:29:03] have used instead. [00:29:05] Why didn't they give Brian that option? [00:29:08] This is torture. [00:29:11] The prison system is torturing this man. [00:29:15] This is a war hero who gave up three of [00:29:18] his limbs defending this country. [00:29:22] How many of you would give up one limb [00:29:24] for this country? [00:29:26] He gave three. He's a hero and he should [00:29:30] not be treated this way. [00:29:33] I think he's an innocent man. I think he [00:29:36] was wrongly prosecuted. And I think he [00:29:39] was a patriot who just wanted to do his [00:29:41] best to build the border wall. [00:29:45] Why are we allowing torture like this to [00:29:47] go on in the United States? [00:29:50] This is going on right now. This is [00:29:54] wrong and it needs to stop. [00:29:57] Please, President Trump, pardon these [00:30:01] men. Now, I want to hear from you. Do [00:30:04] you think these people should be [00:30:05] pardoned? Let me know in the comments [00:30:07] down below. And if you like this video, [00:30:09] don't forget to hit that subscribe [00:30:10] button so you don't miss out on future [00:30:12] videos. If you find my videos helpful, [00:30:15] consider signing up for a membership on [00:30:17] my website, wolvesenfinance.com. [00:30:19] For $6 a month, your support helps me to [00:30:22] keep making these videos. Thank you to [00:30:24] everyone who has signed up. I'm Zach [00:30:27] from Wolves & Finance. Thank you for [00:30:29] watching. Heat. [00:30:32] [Music] [00:30:43] [Music]