"This Is The Only Way To Prepare For What's Coming” | Whitney Webb FINAL WARNING

[00:00:00] everything will have a digital ID. Uh [00:00:02] the tokenization agenda in particular [00:00:05] seeks to tokenize uh not just you know [00:00:07] assets that we traditionally think of um [00:00:10] like real estate for example or or gold [00:00:14] or you know physical assets as well as [00:00:16] digital assets like Bitcoin. uh there's [00:00:19] a a major effort uh connected with [00:00:22] people like like Fank and also people [00:00:23] like Mark Carney who's now uh prime [00:00:25] minister of of Canada to tokenize uh the [00:00:28] the natural world and transform it into [00:00:31] financial assets and there was an [00:00:33] attempt to do this to an extent under [00:00:35] the Biden administration I believe [00:00:36] through this the department of interior [00:00:38] uh with natural asset corporations but [00:00:40] that has not gone away uh and there are [00:00:43] groups um for example uh one of the [00:00:46] creators of the ETF F uh model [00:00:49] originally uh which Black Rockck now now [00:00:51] owns Eyesshares. His name is Peter Kz I [00:00:54] think is how you pronounce it. is trying [00:00:56] to turn um the Amazon rainforest uh into [00:01:00] a a digital commodity uh sort of similar [00:01:04] to bear uh Bitcoin in terms of like the [00:01:06] the scarcity uh idea that you know each [00:01:09] hectare of the Amazon rainforest would [00:01:11] represent um you know a token and then [00:01:14] and then financialize it that way and [00:01:16] then each hectare would then be have its [00:01:18] unique identifier right on on the on the [00:01:21] blockchain [00:01:23] >> and and would be you know serviced [00:01:26] uh by surveillance drones and all sorts [00:01:28] of stuff. So even our most like natural [00:01:31] the places we conceptualize as the most [00:01:33] natural places on earth. these people [00:01:35] want to come and uh play surveillance [00:01:37] technology and you know tokenize it and [00:01:39] put it on a blockchain and use it to um [00:01:42] you know I would argue in the case [00:01:44] particularly of natural asset uh [00:01:46] corporations and the group behind it the [00:01:48] intrinsic exchange group um they just [00:01:50] want to open up a huge new asset class [00:01:52] they call it nature's opportunity so [00:01:54] that they can continue engaging in the [00:01:57] same type of uh bad behavior that for [00:01:59] example bought us brought us the 2008 [00:02:01] financial crisis u by you [00:02:05] uh quintupling basically the amount of [00:02:07] assets currently in play. So apply this [00:02:10] now to the the phrase that we all heard [00:02:12] during the co era, you'll own nothing [00:02:14] and be happy. Well, there's certain [00:02:16] people that want to own everything and [00:02:19] that includes things that have never [00:02:20] been able to be owned before that were [00:02:22] considered [00:02:23] >> things like the public commons like [00:02:26] rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural [00:02:29] forests, all sorts of it. These people [00:02:30] want to put all of that um into the [00:02:33] financial system, fractionalize it, [00:02:36] tokenize it, and sell piece of sell [00:02:38] pieces of it around. Uh you know, use it [00:02:40] to speculate on. I mean, it's it's it's [00:02:44] very bonkers. So, [00:02:46] >> yeah. And so, this is just one aspect of [00:02:48] the the digital currency play. [00:02:50] Obviously, there's a lot more than that [00:02:52] just going on as well. Um I would argue [00:02:54] that a lot of this push particularly in [00:02:56] the US um for dollar stable coin [00:02:59] supposedly being better than a central [00:03:01] bank digital currency also falls into [00:03:03] this uh paradigm we talked about earlier [00:03:06] of you know moving from the public to [00:03:08] the private of the public private [00:03:11] partnership because um a lot of these [00:03:13] stable coin issuers you know if the [00:03:14] concern the big concerns about uh CBDC's [00:03:18] was that they're seizable they're [00:03:20] surveillable and they're programmable [00:03:22] well all of Those three things also can [00:03:24] apply to stable coins. The only [00:03:26] difference is that you would have the p [00:03:27] a private company issue it and control [00:03:30] it. But we've seen time and again how a [00:03:33] lot of these private entities are [00:03:34] willing to do that. Uh when contacted, [00:03:36] just look at how Bank of America behaved [00:03:38] with January 6th. Uh people accused of [00:03:40] wrongdoing on that day, for example. Um [00:03:43] you know, they have no qualms in doing [00:03:44] that uh and engaging in in those type of [00:03:46] activities. reason the biggest uh dollar [00:03:49] stable coin issuer uh Tether which just [00:03:52] hired Bo Hines uh from the White House [00:03:55] um they have uh openly said that they [00:03:58] are uh a close partner of the US [00:04:01] government for dollar hegemony uh [00:04:03] globally and have uploaded uh the FBI, [00:04:05] the Secret Service and other aspects um [00:04:08] of the US government onto its platform [00:04:10] directly and have seized uh tethers you [00:04:13] know from people uh just because you [00:04:16] know the government told them to and [00:04:17] this was during the Biden [00:04:18] administration. So, they obviously are [00:04:20] willing to do that under any [00:04:21] administration and it's uh essentially [00:04:23] functioning as a de facto public private [00:04:25] partnership even though we're being told [00:04:28] um it's a it's much better than a CBDC [00:04:30] but in terms of its impacts on civil [00:04:32] liberties you know that's not [00:04:33] necessarily true. So again vigilance is [00:04:35] is important here. Webb explained how [00:04:38] the war on domestic terror has been [00:04:40] expanded by successive US [00:04:42] administrations to justify invasive [00:04:44] surveillance and predictive policing [00:04:46] technologies. [00:04:48] She detailed the legal frameworks [00:04:49] enabling pre-rime arrests and the use of [00:04:52] AI to monitor and control populations, [00:04:55] highlighting the dangers of vague [00:04:56] definitions that could target anyone who [00:04:58] resists government overreach. Um, yeah, [00:05:01] I don't think it's crazy, but what it [00:05:02] does remind me of is something that [00:05:03] happened several decades ago, mainly in [00:05:05] Europe, that was called Operation [00:05:07] Gladadio. I don't know if you're [00:05:08] familiar, but it basically involved [00:05:10] intelligence agencies, uh, organized [00:05:13] crime and elements of the Vatican um, [00:05:16] funding uh, terror attacks against [00:05:18] civilians. Um and they were framed in [00:05:22] that particular case as being terrorist [00:05:24] attacks from the left. But the ultimate [00:05:27] goal uh was to create so much terror [00:05:30] that people would give up their uh [00:05:31] liberty for feeling of security feeling [00:05:34] it was safe to take the bus again that [00:05:36] it was safe um to live a semblance of a [00:05:41] normal life. It's sort of similar to [00:05:43] what happened during co people would [00:05:44] give up so much, right? Take um the [00:05:47] injections, get the vaccine passport [00:05:49] just to have a a semblance of a normal [00:05:51] life, right? But this is the same way to [00:05:54] do that but with violence. Um and who [00:05:56] ultimately wins at the end of of the [00:05:58] day, I think, is what we should be [00:06:00] asking here. And we need to keep in mind [00:06:02] too that particularly in the United [00:06:04] States, every president since September [00:06:06] 11th has opted to expand um the [00:06:10] so-called war on domestic terror. [00:06:12] >> Mhm. [00:06:12] >> And uh you know, you'll have a Democrat [00:06:16] president in and they'll weaponize it [00:06:17] against the right and vice versa. And we [00:06:21] have and but either way, the more it [00:06:23] grows, the more it endangers our [00:06:25] constitutional rights. Correct. And so I [00:06:27] think it's very important um to uh again [00:06:31] be extra vigilant um about that because [00:06:35] ultimately what they want what what the [00:06:37] powers that be uh want is that same [00:06:40] Hegelian dialectic of problem reaction [00:06:43] solution they want to solicit that [00:06:44] reaction are which has us consent to the [00:06:48] solution uh that they wanted to [00:06:50] implement anyway. And so I fear that [00:06:53] because of the increased power of an [00:06:55] entity like Palunteer in the US [00:06:57] government now that the the next shoe to [00:07:00] drop will there will be a huge push uh [00:07:02] for pre-rime predictive policing as [00:07:05] discussed earlier and uh Trump nearly [00:07:09] fell for that trap in uh 2019 when there [00:07:11] were a spate of mass shootings. So, [00:07:14] William Bar, who was an attorney [00:07:15] general, uh it got barely any media [00:07:18] coverage, but he created the uh the [00:07:21] legal infrastructure for pre-rime in the [00:07:24] United States through a program called [00:07:25] DEP. Uh DEP is an acronym. I forget [00:07:28] exactly what it stands for, but it's [00:07:30] like deterring. It's something about [00:07:32] deterrence [00:07:34] with through early detection or [00:07:35] something like that. Uh but basically [00:07:37] the legal infrastructure set up by [00:07:39] Billbar there was that you could [00:07:41] ostensibly um arrest someone before they [00:07:44] committed a crime preemptively and there [00:07:46] have been only a handful of arrests [00:07:48] through deep via my understanding but [00:07:51] because it's there anything could happen [00:07:53] that could make it uh be deployed at [00:07:56] scale and so that was particularly [00:07:58] concerning at the time because after [00:08:00] that uh because of the outrage about the [00:08:03] spade of shootings at the time that I [00:08:04] think began with the El Paso Walmart [00:08:06] shooting of that year. Um, Trump said [00:08:10] that social media platforms need to [00:08:12] develop tools uh where uh they look at [00:08:16] what users are saying and uh determine [00:08:18] who will be a shooter before they can [00:08:20] commit an act of violence. I'm [00:08:22] paraphrasing [00:08:23] there. Um and then uh his uh [00:08:27] administration was considering but did [00:08:28] not implement um a uh health focused [00:08:33] version of of the Pentagon's DARPA. they [00:08:36] were calling it HARPA and that the pilot [00:08:38] program of uh the proposed HARPA would [00:08:41] be another acronym and I'm sorry that I [00:08:43] don't remember what it stands for but [00:08:45] it's quite long. It's called Safe Homes [00:08:47] and uh the biggest uh lobbyists of this [00:08:50] to the president at the time were Jared [00:08:52] Kushner and his daughter uh Ivanka. Um, [00:08:54] and basically what that program proposed [00:08:57] was for an AI to go over all of American [00:09:00] social media posts and determine what [00:09:03] they called early warning uh early [00:09:05] warning signs of neurossychiatric [00:09:07] violence. And if that and if a user's [00:09:11] profile was flagged, all sorts of things [00:09:13] could be triaged from that, including [00:09:16] uh, you know, courtordered physician [00:09:18] appointments and all sorts of things [00:09:20] that sound terrible. Uh Trump, according [00:09:24] to the Washington Post, liked the idea, [00:09:26] but he ultimately didn't pass it. So, [00:09:28] you can take the post reporting uh [00:09:31] however you want, I guess. But what did [00:09:33] happen, the Biden administration did [00:09:35] create HARPA, but they created it under [00:09:37] another name. They called it ARPAH and [00:09:40] they framed it as uh this is how we're [00:09:42] going to cure cancer. But a lot of the [00:09:45] same uh programs are still there. The [00:09:48] same architects of that HARPA proposed [00:09:50] to Trump for those purposes in 2019 were [00:09:53] also involved in the creation of AARPA H [00:09:57] uh which has been pushing for uh you [00:09:59] know uh people to wear wearables for [00:10:01] example which are you know [00:10:02] >> Mhm. [00:10:03] you could it theoretically uses [00:10:05] surveillance devices but you wear them [00:10:07] on your body right um and they might you [00:10:11] know Palanteer runs a lot of that same [00:10:14] data as well and if they were ever to [00:10:17] combine and end the silo between [00:10:19] healthcare and law enforcement since [00:10:22] they contract to both there is a [00:10:23] potential for very very um you know [00:10:26] Orwellian uh terrifying stuff when it [00:10:29] comes to predictive policing and [00:10:32] predictive analytics [00:10:33] Uh so you know it it again depends on [00:10:37] who is around the president and how much [00:10:39] he listens to them. Uh but I think it's [00:10:42] uh since that happened in 2019 you know [00:10:44] there was an attempt to get him to [00:10:46] implement that program then and if there [00:10:49] is a big enough um event again uh that [00:10:53] could uh lead to huge calls to do [00:10:56] something [00:10:57] um you know we can see that be marketed [00:11:00] as the quote unquote solution. And who [00:11:02] wins there? Well, the big tech oligarchs [00:11:04] that control all of the infrastructure [00:11:06] that would be behind pre-rime and the AI [00:11:09] algorithms. And what's troubling too [00:11:11] about the war on domestic terror um is [00:11:14] that it the definition for it, the [00:11:16] government's definition for it across uh [00:11:19] uh administrations is incredibly [00:11:20] incredibly vague. M [00:11:22] >> so one example is that you can be [00:11:24] defined a domestic terrorist if you feel [00:11:26] like you have to um uh stand up against [00:11:30] government perceived government [00:11:31] overreach is the term. [00:11:34] >> So that could very easily be anyone on [00:11:36] either side of the political aisle. [00:11:39] >> Everyone knows Dogecoin, the memecoin [00:11:42] that broke the internet. But what if the [00:11:45] meme became the movement that defines [00:11:47] the next era of finance? Meet House of [00:11:51] Doge, the corporate arm of the Dogecoin [00:11:54] Foundation, now trading on NASDAQ as [00:11:57] TBH. This isn't another crypto gamble. [00:12:00] This is Dogecoin, rebuilt for realworld [00:12:04] utility. Led by payments veteran Marco [00:12:06] Margiata, House of Doge is turning Doge [00:12:09] into a global payments powerhouse. [00:12:11] They're partnering with Robin Hood and [00:12:13] 21 Shares to launch ETFs, payment [00:12:16] systems, and yield products that bring [00:12:18] Dogecoin to the mainstream. Behind it [00:12:20] all is Zoe, the official Dogecoin [00:12:23] treasury, managing over 600 million [00:12:25] Doge, backed by Elon Musk's lawyer, Alex [00:12:28] Spyro, and the Dogecoin Foundation. [00:12:31] Together, TBH and Ze are building the [00:12:34] future of Dogecoin, not just as a meme, [00:12:37] but as real money for the world. [00:12:40] Despite the dark realities she [00:12:42] describes, Webb emphasized that these [00:12:44] systems depend on public consent and [00:12:47] participation to function. She urged [00:12:49] individuals to critically evaluate these [00:12:51] technologies, resist convenience-driven [00:12:54] compliance, and build resilient local [00:12:57] alternatives. For web, the future hinges [00:13:00] on awareness and active resistance to [00:13:02] preserve human agency in an increasingly [00:13:04] digital and