📄 Extracted Text (19,136 words)
[00:00:00] And I saw Ian Carol came out today on a
[00:00:04] live stream pleading with me to join in
[00:00:07] on the conspiracy.
[00:00:09] If you think that, I feel sorry for you
[00:00:13] because you are [ __ ]
[00:00:16] Actually, Nick, I wasn't pleading with
[00:00:19] you to join in on anything. I was
[00:00:22] asking or encouraging you to clarify
[00:00:25] your position on this whole thing. And
[00:00:27] oh boy, did you clarify it. And I
[00:00:32] suppose the only way that I can put it
[00:00:34] is that you clarified that you stand
[00:00:36] firmly with the fed slop narrative that
[00:00:39] Tyler Robinson is the guy and Tyler
[00:00:42] Robinson alone apparently murdered
[00:00:44] Charlie Kirk. And honestly, like I
[00:00:47] wasn't on I wasn't trying to call you a
[00:00:49] fed. I wasn't trying to [ __ ] on you. I
[00:00:52] was trying to actually be quite gracious
[00:00:54] and quite kind. Um, I praised you
[00:00:56] multiple times throughout that segment.
[00:00:58] Um, but in the spirit of your response,
[00:01:01] in the spirit of calling people [ __ ]
[00:01:04] who have been going through the evidence
[00:01:06] for months where I have seen you produce
[00:01:09] zero, I thought that I would put it all
[00:01:12] very plain and very clear for you, Nick,
[00:01:14] where if you want to see the evidence,
[00:01:18] I'm about to show you a whole bunch of
[00:01:20] evidence. And I'm also gonna go through
[00:01:22] your response and um
[00:01:25] just break down how weird and [ __ ]
[00:01:28] honestly fedcoded it is. Your response
[00:01:32] read a lot like a Snopes article and it
[00:01:35] was very uncomfortable to watch because
[00:01:38] I was not expecting it to be quite that.
[00:01:43] Um,
[00:01:45] so
[00:01:47] real quick, because this is the
[00:01:49] internet, we'll start with a quick cut
[00:01:52] of the whole thing, the evidence, and
[00:01:56] then we'll get into your response and
[00:01:58] breaking that down and then we'll get
[00:02:00] into all the evidence step by step in
[00:02:03] one long go. This is going to be fun.
[00:02:06] >> Conspiracy [music] theories are entering
[00:02:08] a danger.
[00:02:09] >> Information is the oxygen of the
[00:02:11] democracy. There's so much evidence out
[00:02:13] there that even if less [music] than 1%
[00:02:16] is true,
[00:02:18] that will be enough to collapse the
[00:02:19] current paradigm and change the whole
[00:02:22] planet.
[00:02:28] >> Ian Carol says, "We're all over here.
[00:02:31] Where's our general? Where's our guy?"
[00:02:34] >> I was just being kind, Nick. You're not
[00:02:36] our general. You're just a kid in a
[00:02:39] studio.
[00:02:40] We're all just individuals out here with
[00:02:42] cameras and I was just trying to extend
[00:02:44] a hand to offer for you not to do this
[00:02:47] to yourself because we all have the
[00:02:50] internet and we can all look up sources
[00:02:52] based on what they've told us, their
[00:02:55] crime, their evidence, their narrative,
[00:02:58] the one that you're shilling for, Nick.
[00:03:00] It relies on a few very critical pieces
[00:03:04] of evidence. Remember, Nick, this is the
[00:03:06] narrative that you're shilling for. and
[00:03:09] the sources putting it out are the
[00:03:11] sources that your perspective is
[00:03:13] apparently aligned with. I'm not saying
[00:03:15] you need to believe what I believe. I'm
[00:03:17] definitely not saying you need to agree
[00:03:18] with Candace Owens. And you're going to
[00:03:20] notice as you watch this video that none
[00:03:22] of the evidence I'm going to present is
[00:03:24] Candace Owens saying things.
[00:03:26] >> And I would say with Ian Carol, where's
[00:03:28] the evidence? What even is that?
[00:03:31] >> Sit tight. We got it coming here for
[00:03:33] you, bud. So, let's start with the
[00:03:37] gunshot. His head fell off.
[00:03:41] I want to remind us all that at the
[00:03:44] actual scene of the actual crime, there
[00:03:47] was no exit wound. There was no blood
[00:03:49] splattered across the white backdrop.
[00:03:52] Nothing. And the round enters and just
[00:03:57] absolutely goes through the roast,
[00:03:59] through the bone of the roast, through
[00:04:01] the back of the roast, through the
[00:04:02] orient strand board. So, if this 3006
[00:04:06] had hit Charlie in the neck the way
[00:04:08] we're told, it still could have gone
[00:04:11] through a concrete wall behind him and
[00:04:14] hit someone on the other side of the
[00:04:16] concrete wall.
[00:04:20] That was 3/8 inch.
[00:04:23] Clean through quarter inch steel.
[00:04:27] clean through 3/8 inch steel and half
[00:04:31] inch steel
[00:04:33] almost or actually it potentially did
[00:04:35] actually blow out the side of that. Oh,
[00:04:46] >> the 30 6. Ladies and gentlemen,
[00:04:55] >> did you see the spine fly out the back
[00:04:57] of his neck?
[00:04:59] >> Is it possible that a 306 round was
[00:05:02] stopped by Charlie's neck vertebrae? No,
[00:05:04] it's not. There's a 0% chance of that
[00:05:06] happening. I'm not sure you know the
[00:05:08] information on this case, Nick, because
[00:05:10] if you did, you wouldn't have stuck your
[00:05:12] neck out like this on a [ __ ] take
[00:05:15] like this because it was just a bad
[00:05:18] move. It was dumb. People want to point
[00:05:21] out, oh well, he was leaning in the
[00:05:24] other direction.
[00:05:26] He wasn't leaning in the other
[00:05:28] direction. Jewish donors play into all
[00:05:31] the stereotypes. I cannot and will not
[00:05:35] be bullied like this, leaving me no
[00:05:38] choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause
[00:05:43] because he was this close to telling the
[00:05:45] truth and he died for it. So what
[00:05:48] changed in those four days exactly?
[00:05:51] [snorts]
[00:05:52] >> What changed in those four days, Nick?
[00:05:55] >> Um this happened the last 10 years.
[00:05:58] >> Counting or not counting gang violence.
[00:06:00] Great.
[00:06:03] Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck,
[00:06:07] >> but that was not an entry wound that we
[00:06:08] saw. We saw an exit wound. So, where'd
[00:06:10] that bullet come from? You don't bleed
[00:06:11] like And I've shot guys closer than the
[00:06:13] camera was. Uh, and an an exit an entry
[00:06:16] wound doesn't look like that. An exit
[00:06:17] wound does.
[00:06:18] >> Do you know how many tens of thousands
[00:06:20] of global war on terror veterans there
[00:06:22] are? They know exactly what it looks
[00:06:24] like when a high-powered rifle round
[00:06:26] hits a human body, especially in an area
[00:06:28] like soft tissue in the neck. You know
[00:06:30] how many people hunt out there and know
[00:06:32] exactly what a 30 six round does to a an
[00:06:35] elk skeleton? As we pull the protractor
[00:06:38] off, what's the first huge glaring issue
[00:06:40] you guys are going to see here? Oh, is
[00:06:43] uh that would have hit him in the teeth
[00:06:46] right in the [ __ ] face. This is not
[00:06:49] possible obviously and these things
[00:06:52] matter because if it's not possible then
[00:06:54] they have the wrong guy and they are
[00:06:56] prosecuting a path seat.
[00:06:59] But Nick, I would love to hear your
[00:07:01] evidence
[00:07:03] of how this is possible. I would love to
[00:07:05] see your analysis. I would love to see
[00:07:07] your sources which I've never seen any
[00:07:09] of
[00:07:11] you. If you're calling people like me a
[00:07:13] conspiracy theorist right now for
[00:07:15] looking at this story and looking at
[00:07:16] posts like that and going that's total
[00:07:19] [ __ ] Guys, I'm sorry, but this is
[00:07:22] from top to bottom, start to finish,
[00:07:24] this entire thing has been pathetic from
[00:07:26] the FBI.
[00:07:28] >> Remember Nick, this is the narrative
[00:07:30] that you're shilling.
[00:07:31] >> If you believe that,
[00:07:34] God bless your little heart. So, Nick,
[00:07:37] now that you've seen some evidence,
[00:07:40] which I'm sure you already were very
[00:07:41] familiar with, I'd love to hear your
[00:07:44] stance on why it's probably Tyler
[00:07:46] Robinson, and the feds are probably
[00:07:48] telling the truth. And that's really all
[00:07:51] you need to know to know that you're
[00:07:53] [ __ ] Nick.
[00:07:56] So, real quick, right off the bat, let's
[00:07:59] address the Fed [ __ ] I'm [snorts] not
[00:08:01] here to call Nick a fed. That is not my
[00:08:03] goal. Um, that was not my goal in my
[00:08:05] original video or stream. That is not
[00:08:07] the goal of this video. Y'all can make
[00:08:09] up your own mind. Personally, uh, based
[00:08:11] on my understanding of Co-Iintel Pro and
[00:08:14] Fed infiltration of organic spaces,
[00:08:18] I'm of the belief that you can't trust
[00:08:19] anyone. You can't trust Nick. You can't
[00:08:22] trust Tucker. You can't trust Candace.
[00:08:24] You can't trust me. You can't trust
[00:08:26] anyone except for yourself and God. And
[00:08:29] so it's kind of meaningless to try to
[00:08:32] call people feds unless you have like
[00:08:33] literal clear hard proof. And you should
[00:08:36] just operate under the assumption that
[00:08:38] everyone is a Fed. And the way I see it,
[00:08:40] that's a lot like asking an AI a
[00:08:42] question. It doesn't mean [ __ ] [ __ ]
[00:08:45] unless they can show you sources. Unless
[00:08:48] they can show you where you can go to
[00:08:50] corroborate the information that they're
[00:08:51] sharing with you. So, as I always do in
[00:08:55] all of my videos ever since I very first
[00:08:58] started on TikTok way back, well, not
[00:09:00] that far back. Let's be real. [snorts]
[00:09:03] I'm just going to show you the evidence
[00:09:04] and I'm going to show you where I'm
[00:09:06] sourcing my information from. And you
[00:09:08] can make up your own mind because maybe
[00:09:10] I'm a Fed. Who [ __ ] cares? Like,
[00:09:13] nothing I'm going to say is going to
[00:09:14] convince the Gropers otherwise. Nothing
[00:09:16] I'm going to say should convince you
[00:09:18] otherwise. You should just take
[00:09:19] everything with your own grains of salt
[00:09:21] and look up look it all up for yourself.
[00:09:24] I haven't seen Nick produce any evidence
[00:09:25] on his show at all. And I'm not saying
[00:09:28] he is I'm not saying he's [ __ ] I'm
[00:09:30] not saying he's not intelligent. Quite
[00:09:32] the contrary. I'm saying Nick is very
[00:09:33] intelligent. And that's why this
[00:09:35] response is really [ __ ] weird. And
[00:09:37] that's why I made the stream that I did.
[00:09:40] Because if anyone should understand
[00:09:42] what's going on with American Jews right
[00:09:44] now, American Jewish billionaires,
[00:09:46] Zionist donors, and the Jewish state
[00:09:49] right now, what's exactly going on
[00:09:51] inside of TPUSA right now, it should be
[00:09:53] Nick Fuentes. And the fact that Nick is
[00:09:57] shoveling the Fed slop narrative that
[00:09:59] Jack Pobic and Benny Johnson and Tim P
[00:10:03] and Brandon Tatum are all shoveling is
[00:10:06] really [ __ ] weird.
[00:10:08] So,
[00:10:11] if Nick wants to do it, we'll do it.
[00:10:15] We'll go through his response and then
[00:10:18] we'll show him the evidence that he
[00:10:20] claims doesn't exist or that he's never
[00:10:23] seen or that he
[00:10:26] something.
[00:10:29] And I saw Ian Carol came out today on a
[00:10:32] live stream pleading with me to join in
[00:10:36] on the conspiracy.
[00:10:38] wasn't pleading with you, bro. I was
[00:10:40] just asking you to clarify where you
[00:10:42] stood and you very thoroughly clarified
[00:10:47] where you stand.
[00:10:49] Ian Carol, the conspiracy theorist, he's
[00:10:51] making videos about the conspiracy
[00:10:53] behind Red Lobster, the conspiracy
[00:10:55] behind. So, first note that Nick is
[00:10:59] doing what the mainstream media does
[00:11:01] where he attaches a little a little like
[00:11:04] fed jacket to the start of your name.
[00:11:06] Alex Jones, the crazy conspiracy
[00:11:08] theorist. Nick Fuentes, the anti-semitic
[00:11:10] Nazi. Ian Carol, the conspiracy
[00:11:13] theorist. Actually, Nick, what you're
[00:11:15] referring to is the fact that
[00:11:17] corporations often engage in collusion,
[00:11:19] conspiracy, corruption, and all sorts of
[00:11:21] other [ __ ] And you're referring to a
[00:11:23] really dope episode that I did when I
[00:11:25] was hosting Candace's show while she was
[00:11:26] on maternity leave where I tied together
[00:11:29] the fact that Red Lobster had colluded
[00:11:31] with their shrimp supplier in order to
[00:11:33] manipulate prices, extort cash. And it
[00:11:36] actually ties directly into a global
[00:11:39] marketplace of slavery that is fueling
[00:11:41] the entire shrimp industry and the fact
[00:11:43] that every time you buy shrimp at the
[00:11:45] grocery store, you're almost certainly
[00:11:47] buying slave farmed shrimp. And it's
[00:11:50] [ __ ] wild. And once you learn about
[00:11:52] that story, you'll never eat shrimp the
[00:11:54] same way again. But I'm digressing into
[00:11:57] talking about journalism. And you were
[00:11:59] talking about something else.
[00:12:02] Speaking of corporations doing shady
[00:12:04] [ __ ] I thought I'd drop an ad on you
[00:12:06] for the buyer app
[00:12:08] designed by yours truly to help you
[00:12:11] figure out who the hell you're giving
[00:12:12] all your money to when you go to the
[00:12:14] grocery store. You can download it for
[00:12:15] free on the Google Play Store today.
[00:12:17] coming soon to the iOS store, too, once
[00:12:19] they figure their [ __ ] out.
[00:12:22] And you can use it to scan any product
[00:12:24] in the grocery store and find out who
[00:12:26] actually owns that product and who are
[00:12:28] you actually giving your money to. So
[00:12:30] that if you don't want to be giving your
[00:12:32] money to Black Rockck, Vanguard, State
[00:12:33] Street, all the banks that own basically
[00:12:36] everything and would rather support a
[00:12:38] family or founder own company, someone
[00:12:39] that actually cares about what they're
[00:12:41] feeding you, what they're putting in
[00:12:42] your skin and on your body. Buyer app is
[00:12:45] here to help. We don't take any paid
[00:12:47] ads. There's no strings attached. We
[00:12:48] have no investors. We own the thing
[00:12:50] outright and we made it for you so that
[00:12:52] you can get a little more informed about
[00:12:54] what the hell is going on in the grocery
[00:12:55] store and who is taking your money.
[00:12:58] That's the kind of ad I like to run.
[00:13:00] Founder owned supporting founder owned.
[00:13:02] I hope it helps. Now, back to the video.
[00:13:07] Applebee's the conspiracy behind Burger
[00:13:10] King. See, I've never talked about
[00:13:12] Applebee's or Burger King. He's just
[00:13:14] doing a little label to try to character
[00:13:17] assassinate before he gets into his
[00:13:20] arguments.
[00:13:21] >> He does a live stream tonight and says,
[00:13:24] "Where where are you, Nick? We're all
[00:13:27] aligned on this against the Jews and you
[00:13:30] are agreeing with Crowder and Tim Pool
[00:13:31] and everybody else." I'm not against the
[00:13:35] Jews. I'm aligned towards the narrative
[00:13:38] makes no [ __ ] sense. We have plenty
[00:13:40] of evidence to say the narrative doesn't
[00:13:42] make sense. And when you look around to
[00:13:43] see who the most likely culprit is once
[00:13:46] that narrative doesn't make sense,
[00:13:49] there's pretty much an obvious answer.
[00:13:52] And we don't have proof of that. We
[00:13:53] haven't solved the case yet. That's what
[00:13:55] journalists do is they try to figure
[00:13:57] [ __ ] out.
[00:13:59] You're welcome to join.
[00:14:01] We need you. Why are you with them?
[00:14:05] [snorts]
[00:14:06] And I would say with Ian Carol, where's
[00:14:08] the evidence? What even is that?
[00:14:11] Sit tight. We got it coming here for
[00:14:13] you, bud.
[00:14:15] [snorts]
[00:14:16] >> Everything other than evidence. They're
[00:14:18] going to say, "Well, Israel kills
[00:14:19] everybody else."
[00:14:20] >> Nope. That's not what anybody's saying,
[00:14:22] Nick.
[00:14:24] >> Okay. People die all the time, actually.
[00:14:27] >> No [ __ ]
[00:14:28] >> People die all the time. And so this is
[00:14:30] called a straw man argument where when
[00:14:33] you don't want to argue the actual
[00:14:35] points or the actual evidence, you stand
[00:14:38] up a straw man in the field and pretend
[00:14:40] like that's the argument that you're
[00:14:41] opposed to and that the other person's
[00:14:43] arguing. Then you knock it over like,
[00:14:44] "Ha, I won the argument." No sir, that's
[00:14:48] a straw man.
[00:14:50] >> And there are a lot of school shootings
[00:14:52] and assassinations. This stuff happens
[00:14:54] with regularity.
[00:14:56] Was Israel behind Luigi Manion? Straw
[00:14:59] man argument has nothing to do with this
[00:15:01] and by my understanding no haven't seen
[00:15:04] any evidence that Israel was behind it.
[00:15:05] Luigi Manion.
[00:15:07] >> Why or why not
[00:15:09] was Israel behind the school shooting in
[00:15:12] Colorado that happened on the same day?
[00:15:14] Straw man argument. Haven't seen any
[00:15:16] evidence. Haven't looked into it nearly
[00:15:18] as deeply. I have no idea.
[00:15:20] >> Why or why not?
[00:15:23] Was Israel behind the shooting of Trump?
[00:15:26] Why or why not? straw man argument. But
[00:15:28] on that case, actually, I have questions
[00:15:31] about who was behind that because it was
[00:15:33] a seriously obvious cover up. So, Israel
[00:15:37] would be a suspect in my mind, but
[00:15:40] I don't know.
[00:15:44] I don't know if any of those people
[00:15:46] blamed Israel for the shooting of
[00:15:49] >> No, I don't think so. Really,
[00:15:50] >> Trump? Was Israel behind the Las Vegas
[00:15:53] shooting?
[00:15:54] >> Straw man argument. Nope. And I've
[00:15:56] produced content about that and you
[00:15:58] could have watched it and realize that I
[00:16:00] did not blame Israel for it. It's
[00:16:02] possible that they're involved because
[00:16:03] it kind of seems like some complicated
[00:16:05] geopolitics going on,
[00:16:08] but I don't know.
[00:16:10] >> Why or why not?
[00:16:12] Because the heristic seems to be Israel
[00:16:14] is behind literally everything.
[00:16:17] >> Nope. No one's saying that, Nick. That's
[00:16:19] a straw man argument. And it's pretty
[00:16:22] [ __ ] funny coming from you.
[00:16:24] literally everything. Not most things,
[00:16:28] not things we can demonstrate with
[00:16:29] evidence. No, they're
[00:16:30] >> See how he actually almost got to what
[00:16:33] people actually say is things we can
[00:16:35] demonstrate with evidence. But no,
[00:16:37] that's not what the argument is. I'm
[00:16:38] putting up a straw man so I can knock it
[00:16:40] down.
[00:16:41] >> Behind literally everything. And if
[00:16:43] they're behind literally everything in
[00:16:44] the past, then it's safe to assume
[00:16:46] they're behind literally everything in
[00:16:48] the future.
[00:16:49] >> No one's saying that.
[00:16:53] And that is ridiculous.
[00:16:56] That doesn't make any sense. Why?
[00:16:59] Charlie Kirk was Israel's top guy.
[00:17:05] >> Yeah. Go on.
[00:17:08] >> I don't know how much more clear you
[00:17:11] could make it. And here's a perfect
[00:17:13] example. Hey, Ian Carol.
[00:17:15] >> Actually, real quick, before we get to
[00:17:17] his Max Nordau talking points, [snorts]
[00:17:19] let's review something.
[00:17:22] Charlie Kirk was Israel's top guy. And
[00:17:26] then we got a leak coming out of
[00:17:28] Harrison Smith saying, "I'm not going to
[00:17:30] name names, but I was told by someone
[00:17:32] close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie
[00:17:34] thinks Israel will kill him if he turns
[00:17:36] against them." That was tweeted on
[00:17:38] August 13th of this year, a month before
[00:17:42] Charlie Kirk was assassinated by Lord
[00:17:44] knows who. And I might point out that
[00:17:47] it's a reply to a video where I was
[00:17:49] supporting Nick and calling out Charlie
[00:17:51] and Ben Shapiro for not debating Nick.
[00:17:55] First piece of evidence drops in, but
[00:17:57] it's just a rumor
[00:18:00] until it was corroborated by multiple
[00:18:03] sources, by multiple other journalists,
[00:18:06] multiple angles. Albeit, this reporting
[00:18:09] was after Charlie Kirk was killed. But
[00:18:11] let's just say that journalism has been
[00:18:14] picking up this vibe pretty thoroughly
[00:18:16] for quite some time.
[00:18:19] You can read into some of this reporting
[00:18:21] and I know Nick Fuentes hates our boy
[00:18:24] Max Blumenthal and the Gropers will say
[00:18:26] he's a Jew. Reporting is reporting and
[00:18:29] he's got a pretty good track record, but
[00:18:31] feel free to discount it and move on to
[00:18:33] the next source. [snorts]
[00:18:35] Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding
[00:18:37] offer was frightened by pro-Israel
[00:18:38] forces before death. Friend reveals a
[00:18:41] Trump insider and longtime friend of
[00:18:42] Charlie Kirk tells the Grey Zone how the
[00:18:45] assassinated conservative leaders
[00:18:46] turning point on Israeli influence
[00:18:47] provoked a private backlash from
[00:18:49] Netanyahu's allies that left him angry
[00:18:51] and afraid. Charlie Kirk rejected an
[00:18:54] offer earlier this year from Israeli
[00:18:55] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to
[00:18:57] arrange a massive new infusion of
[00:18:58] Zionist money into his Turning Point USA
[00:19:01] organization. In the weeks leading up to
[00:19:04] his September 10th assassination, Kirk
[00:19:06] had come to load the Israeli leader,
[00:19:08] regarding him as a bully. The source
[00:19:09] said Kirk was disgusted by what he
[00:19:11] witnessed inside the Trump
[00:19:12] administration, where Netanyahu sought
[00:19:14] to personally dictate the president's
[00:19:16] personal decisions.
[00:19:18] Kirk strongly warned Trump last June
[00:19:20] against bombing Iran on Israel's behalf.
[00:19:22] Charlie was the only person who did
[00:19:24] that. They said he was afraid of them.
[00:19:26] The source emphasized.
[00:19:29] Or
[00:19:31] the other thing you could do, Nick, if
[00:19:33] you wanted to clarify exactly how
[00:19:36] Charlie felt about Israel is you could
[00:19:39] read his own text messages,
[00:19:42] which I can't help but notice that you
[00:19:44] seem to never mention.
[00:19:46] And I can't help but notice that you
[00:19:48] were on the same side as all the people
[00:19:51] dog piling, saying that this is
[00:19:53] [ __ ] Like we had all these Zionists
[00:19:56] coming out and trying to whitewash
[00:19:57] Charlie's perspective on Israel, just
[00:19:59] like you might expect in this scenario
[00:20:02] until Candace Owens dropped these text
[00:20:04] messages.
[00:20:07] Quote, "Jewish donors play into all the
[00:20:10] stereotypes. I cannot and will not be
[00:20:12] bullied like this, leaving me no choice
[00:20:15] but to leave the pro-Israel cause."
[00:20:19] He sent that to a group text chat with a
[00:20:22] bunch of his big Jewish donors in it.
[00:20:25] You think he was just kidding around?
[00:20:30] Or does this not qualify as evidence to
[00:20:33] you? But right, he was Israel's number
[00:20:37] one guy.
[00:20:39] You know how you know a lot about the
[00:20:42] history of
[00:20:44] Jewish organized crime, Nick, the mob.
[00:20:49] You know what happens to someone when
[00:20:51] they try to leave the mob? When they try
[00:20:54] to walk away,
[00:20:56] let alone when they become a traitor.
[00:20:59] In fact, his closeness to the whole
[00:21:02] situation. His closeness to Israel is
[00:21:04] one of the best and biggest arguments
[00:21:07] for why Israel is a suspect. Similar to
[00:21:10] how when a wife is killed, you should
[00:21:13] probably look at her husband.
[00:21:16] And it's something like 40% of married
[00:21:19] women that are killed are killed by some
[00:21:22] form of lover. I don't know how much
[00:21:24] more clear you could make it. And here's
[00:21:27] a perfect example. Hey Ian Carol, why
[00:21:30] did you on se
[00:21:31] >> this part's amazing?
[00:21:33] >> September 7th tweet at Charlie Kirk,
[00:21:38] you're working for the Jews that killed
[00:21:40] Jesus on September 7th, 2025. You
[00:21:45] tweeted that Charlie Kirk is working for
[00:21:47] the Jews that killed Jesus.
[00:21:51] Was I wrong?
[00:21:54] And I didn't say the Jews who killed
[00:21:56] Jesus. You know what I said
[00:21:58] >> on September 11th? You were absolutely
[00:22:01] certain that Israel killed him.
[00:22:05] Actually, that's not what I tweeted. But
[00:22:07] first, Nick,
[00:22:13] isn't it kind of weird that you're using
[00:22:15] a Max Nordau and Yosi Guestinter
[00:22:22] and Leo Terrell talking point?
[00:22:26] Isn't that
[00:22:28] [snorts] a little weird?
[00:22:36] I think that's a little weird, Nick.
[00:22:39] But let's look at what I actually
[00:22:41] tweeted.
[00:22:44] Yesterday was a turning point for Israel
[00:22:46] US relations. Less than 24 hours and the
[00:22:49] internet already figured out who the
[00:22:52] most likely culprit is.
[00:22:57] the most likely culprit. Sorry, I said
[00:23:01] was.
[00:23:03] He was their friend. He basically
[00:23:05] dedicated his life to them and they
[00:23:06] murdered him in front of his family.
[00:23:08] Israel just shot themselves.
[00:23:13] And Nick, I don't think I need to
[00:23:14] educate you about being a little
[00:23:16] bombastic on the internet.
[00:23:21] And I stand by this tweet
[00:23:24] because he was this close to telling the
[00:23:27] truth and he died for it. So what
[00:23:30] changed in those four days exactly?
[00:23:33] [snorts]
[00:23:34] >> What changed in those four days, Nick?
[00:23:37] Um, this happened
[00:23:38] >> in the last 10 years, counting or not
[00:23:40] counting gang violence. Great.
[00:23:45] >> Right.
[00:23:47] Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck.
[00:23:55] What irrefutable proof did you get
[00:24:00] in those four days on September 7th? You
[00:24:04] said Charlie.
[00:24:07] >> No one said irrefutable proof, but I'll
[00:24:09] let you finish your sentence.
[00:24:10] >> Kirk is working for the Jews that killed
[00:24:12] Jesus. On September 11th, the day after
[00:24:16] he was killed, you were certain beyond a
[00:24:19] shadow of a doubt that Israel.
[00:24:22] >> That's actually not what I said.
[00:24:24] >> Killed him to silence him. How does that
[00:24:26] even happen before we had a suspect? Be
[00:24:30] >> Actually, Nick, we'd already had two
[00:24:32] suspects
[00:24:34] if you recall.
[00:24:37] One of them was this guy.
[00:24:43] We don't know if it's him or not.
[00:24:50] >> On September 11th,
[00:24:53] we were fed this critical piece of fed
[00:24:56] slop, which you appear to be defending,
[00:25:00] a bolt-action rifle, which this
[00:25:02] technically is actually not a photo of
[00:25:04] the weapon, which will become very
[00:25:05] relevant later. This is just some other
[00:25:08] photo that the news agencies dug up, but
[00:25:11] the FBI and law enforcement told us on
[00:25:14] that day that Charlie was shot with a
[00:25:16] 306.
[00:25:19] And that's really all you need to know
[00:25:21] to know that you're [ __ ] Nick. And
[00:25:24] I'm going to get into all the evidence
[00:25:25] about that in just a little bit. But no,
[00:25:30] I did not say we have irrefutable proof
[00:25:33] that Israel has done it. I said that the
[00:25:35] world had pretty much figured out who
[00:25:37] the most likely culprit is. And that's
[00:25:39] because we had already figured out that
[00:25:41] the narrative that the feds were giving
[00:25:42] to us, you know, the really trustworthy
[00:25:45] FBI that you're shilling the narrative
[00:25:48] of, their narrative was already
[00:25:50] obviously [ __ ] 24 hours later. And
[00:25:53] we had plenty of evidence by then, if
[00:25:56] you'd been paying attention, to presume
[00:25:58] that
[00:26:00] [snorts]
[00:26:01] >> before we knew any of the facts, any of
[00:26:04] it.
[00:26:04] >> Actually, Nick, when you're doing
[00:26:06] journalism, the things that happen each
[00:26:09] and every moment of an investigation, of
[00:26:12] a coverup, those are facts, too. Facts
[00:26:15] aren't just what the FBI tells you are
[00:26:18] facts. Facts are what the FBI does along
[00:26:21] the way, what citizen journalists do
[00:26:23] along the way, what videos come out, all
[00:26:26] information. And by then, we had 24
[00:26:28] hours of it. And that's all we needed to
[00:26:31] know.
[00:26:34] You knew for sure they did it. So, do
[00:26:38] you have ESP?
[00:26:40] Are you omnisient? Do you have
[00:26:42] telepathy?
[00:26:44] >> See his uh rhetorical techniques here?
[00:26:48] I don't think so.
[00:26:51] This is a grift.
[00:26:54] Who do you think makes more money
[00:26:56] online, Nick? You or me?
[00:27:00] This is a grift. It is intellectually
[00:27:04] lazy.
[00:27:06] Then I presume that because you're not
[00:27:08] intellectually lazy, you'll watch this
[00:27:10] entire video to the end and watch all of
[00:27:13] the sources that I'm going to show you.
[00:27:15] And maybe you'll even read some sources
[00:27:17] for yourself.
[00:27:19] >> It is dishonest.
[00:27:22] >> Nope. Haven't lied.
[00:27:25] >> You are making assumptions that you
[00:27:29] cannot rationally make. Let's keep that
[00:27:31] in mind. Assumptions you cannot
[00:27:34] rationally make.
[00:27:37] Rationality is going to be a big part of
[00:27:39] this conversation.
[00:27:41] [snorts]
[00:27:41] And if you want to destroy your
[00:27:43] credibility, that's fine.
[00:27:47] Not bothered. Very proud of the content
[00:27:49] I put out. About to be very proud of the
[00:27:52] content I'm about to put out.
[00:27:55] Have at it. Show us your sources, Nick.
[00:28:00] If you want to destroy your credibility
[00:28:02] by blaming Israel for killing the number
[00:28:05] one Israel defender in America, that is
[00:28:08] your business.
[00:28:10] But don't try to rope me into it and
[00:28:13] guilt me or whatever it is you're trying
[00:28:15] to do. Saying we
[00:28:17] >> actually Nick, I was trying to extend a
[00:28:20] hand to you under the assumption that
[00:28:22] you're an honest and good actor to
[00:28:25] encourage you to look at the evidence
[00:28:27] before you do this
[00:28:32] because we all know the evidence. and
[00:28:35] you seem to be under the impression that
[00:28:37] I'm on I'm arguing right now that
[00:28:39] Candace Owens is right about everything.
[00:28:42] And that is not at all what I'm arguing.
[00:28:44] And you're going to notice as you watch
[00:28:46] this video that none of the evidence I'm
[00:28:48] going to present is Candace Owens saying
[00:28:50] things. It's actually almost all sourced
[00:28:54] from before she even said a word because
[00:28:56] she took a whole week off and we were
[00:28:59] all busy figuring this [ __ ] out before
[00:29:02] she even entered the fray.
[00:29:04] We're all on this side and you're over
[00:29:07] there. I've been over here, bro. Where
[00:29:09] were you? I've been over here. I was at
[00:29:12] Charlottesville. Kind of a funny
[00:29:15] [laughter]
[00:29:16] kind of a funny point, [snorts] but
[00:29:18] you're right, Nick. You've been in the
[00:29:21] game for a long time. And you might have
[00:29:24] noticed that I specifically praised you
[00:29:27] for how long you've been in the game.
[00:29:30] I've been pretty outspoken in my support
[00:29:32] of Nick Fuentes. I've been pretty um
[00:29:35] pretty into Nick's rise and
[00:29:38] you know, regardless of disagreements
[00:29:40] about specific things that Nick says, uh
[00:29:42] I'm pretty much generally excited that
[00:29:44] Nick is entering the mainstream and the
[00:29:46] normal conversation. I like how Nick
[00:29:48] forces us all to challenge our ideas and
[00:29:51] forces people to think more critically
[00:29:53] about ideas that we didn't even realize
[00:29:55] we should be thinking about. I like that
[00:29:57] his ideas are controversial. I like that
[00:29:59] they're complicated and they're backed
[00:30:00] up by a uh intense intellect and I like
[00:30:03] that he uh has the backstory of 10 years
[00:30:06] of hard work to make it happen. There's
[00:30:09] a lot of things I like about Nick and
[00:30:12] obviously the thing that most of us like
[00:30:15] the most about Nick is his stance on
[00:30:17] Israel.
[00:30:20] I need to kind of amend that statement
[00:30:21] now that you've made a more complete
[00:30:24] one.
[00:30:27] We really admire and like, at least I
[00:30:29] really admire and like you the intense
[00:30:31] intellect you apply to your opinions
[00:30:33] usually.
[00:30:35] Except this one is a glaring departure
[00:30:37] from that norm, Nick. And it's kind of
[00:30:40] awkward. And that's why I'm saying this
[00:30:43] because it's really [ __ ] weird, dude.
[00:30:47] It's really weird. And I know I'm not
[00:30:50] the only one that is noticing.
[00:30:55] Lest I remind you, where were you in
[00:30:57] 2017? Were you at Burning Man? Sorry.
[00:31:00] Were you in some commune in Portland? I
[00:31:03] was at Charlottesville in 2017. I love
[00:31:06] this part. I actually I'll tell you
[00:31:07] where I was in 2017 in just a second.
[00:31:09] And Nick's not super far off the mark,
[00:31:11] which I think is hilarious.
[00:31:13] [snorts]
[00:31:13] >> He goes, "We're all over here fighting
[00:31:16] the good fight. You and who?" Um, real
[00:31:19] quick,
[00:31:22] let's just remember, you can be based,
[00:31:25] you can be cool, you can be red pill
[00:31:27] distributing for generations as far as
[00:31:30] I'm concerned, and you can make one
[00:31:32] wrong handshake, one wrong mistake
[00:31:36] and sell your soul. And I'm not
[00:31:39] suggesting that Nick has shook the BB
[00:31:42] hand, so to speak. That's not what I'm
[00:31:44] suggesting. I'm just pointing out that
[00:31:47] plenty of based [ __ ] have
[00:31:49] fallen off. And just because you've been
[00:31:51] here for 10 years doesn't mean you get a
[00:31:54] free pass on telling everyone what we're
[00:31:57] supposed to feel about Israel, Zionism,
[00:32:00] Jews, Charlie Kirk, etc. You're going to
[00:32:02] need to show some evidence each and
[00:32:04] every time because I don't trust you. I
[00:32:07] don't trust anyone and none of you
[00:32:09] should trust me. You should all judge
[00:32:11] the tree by its fruits. And when the
[00:32:14] tree starts shaking the wrong [ __ ]
[00:32:16] hands and hanging out with some fetty
[00:32:19] [ __ ] [ __ ] you should ask some
[00:32:21] questions.
[00:32:23] Okay.
[00:32:24] Um, now, as for where I was in 2017,
[00:32:28] Nick is going to love this part, but
[00:32:31] I'll tell you. Um, where did I pull
[00:32:34] these up?
[00:32:36] Now, I think this part's hilarious
[00:32:38] because Nick's not super far off. I
[00:32:40] mean, I grew up as a leftist. I was
[00:32:41] living in Washington State before this.
[00:32:43] And in 2017, I painted my Subaru
[00:32:46] Outback. Yes, that is correct. With a
[00:32:49] mural of the mountains from where I came
[00:32:52] from and some [ __ ] trippy hippie yard
[00:32:54] on the top and I hit the road with all
[00:32:56] my rock climbing gear and I went down to
[00:32:58] Utah to Indian Creek, pulled into the
[00:33:00] creek, did a whole bunch of crack
[00:33:02] climbing down there, met a bunch of
[00:33:04] homies. I was totally solo. This is
[00:33:05] before I had a dog. Climbed a whole
[00:33:07] bunch of red rock. Then I drove down to
[00:33:10] Mexico and climbed in Potrero Chico. Um
[00:33:13] this was like across several months,
[00:33:15] maybe three, four months. Um took a huge
[00:33:18] fall in Potro Chico and hurt my back. Um
[00:33:21] [snorts]
[00:33:21] [ __ ] super scary. Drove all the way
[00:33:23] down to Guatemala. I have a photo of
[00:33:25] that here somewhere. Went down to
[00:33:27] Guatemala. Hung out of Guatemala for a
[00:33:28] while. Um worked at a treehouse hotel,
[00:33:31] avocado farm down there for a couple of
[00:33:33] months through the Christmas holidays.
[00:33:34] Had a crazy [ __ ] drive down through
[00:33:36] Mexico on the way down there. Um,
[00:33:38] [snorts]
[00:33:39] I got stories we're not going to get
[00:33:40] into. And then on the way back up, I
[00:33:42] visited Yoseite and I went to a whole
[00:33:44] bunch of music festivals on the way back
[00:33:45] up, actually. And I worked harm
[00:33:47] reduction at a bunch of music festivals
[00:33:49] where you roam around all night and save
[00:33:50] kids that took too much [ __ ] drugs.
[00:33:52] Um, and it's a really fun job and I'm
[00:33:55] super [ __ ] good at it and I had a
[00:33:56] great ass time and um, but I didn't go
[00:34:00] to Burning Man. Um, Burning Man is a
[00:34:02] whole other thing. [snorts] Um, and then
[00:34:05] eventually I made it back to Bellingham.
[00:34:08] And this was by then it was 2018. So
[00:34:10] that's where I was in 2017. Nick, in
[00:34:13] case you wanted to know, you and Candace
[00:34:15] Owens who was working at Daily Wire last
[00:34:18] year,
[00:34:20] you and Canens who was working at Daily
[00:34:23] Wire, you and Tucker Carlson who was
[00:34:25] working at Fox News in 2017. Actually,
[00:34:29] Nick, there's a whole bunch of other
[00:34:31] people that you would we we would all
[00:34:33] know to be sort of like in your camp, in
[00:34:36] the griper camp, in the Jay-hilled camp.
[00:34:39] There's a lot of them that are on to
[00:34:42] what's really going on with Charlie
[00:34:43] Kirk. And I'm not going to try to name
[00:34:44] everyone's names and pull them into it.
[00:34:46] They can choose if they want to jump in
[00:34:47] here into the mud with us or not. But
[00:34:51] yeah, but I'm proud to be over here with
[00:34:54] Candace. I'm proud to be here with
[00:34:55] Tucker. Proud to be here with you.
[00:34:56] Anyone who's on the side of truth and
[00:34:58] evidence and information, I don't care
[00:35:00] if they're feds. I don't care if they're
[00:35:01] [ __ ] I don't care if they're black,
[00:35:03] white, [ __ ] new, old, whatever. Ben
[00:35:06] Shapiro could come join us over here and
[00:35:08] I would be stoked. I don't care.
[00:35:12] 17, 10 years ago, I was at
[00:35:14] Charlottesville. In 2019, I led the
[00:35:17] Groper war against Charlie Kirk, calling
[00:35:20] him an Israel shill.
[00:35:23] It is 2025. Nothing has changed for 13
[00:35:28] years.
[00:35:28] >> Actually, Nick, Charlie Kirk got shot in
[00:35:32] the neck.
[00:35:33] Actually, Nick, a few things have
[00:35:35] changed.
[00:35:38] X got purchased by Elon. Think of that
[00:35:40] what you will. You got let back on X.
[00:35:43] You started going all the mainstream
[00:35:44] podcasts.
[00:35:47] All sorts of things have changed
[00:35:48] actually, Nick.
[00:35:52] And that's kind of why we're having this
[00:35:54] conversation, isn't it?
[00:35:57] >> From the time Charlie founded Turning
[00:35:59] Point until today, that organization was
[00:36:02] owned by Israel. And ser
[00:36:05] >> This part is amazing because Nick starts
[00:36:07] actually making my points for me without
[00:36:10] really realizing it.
[00:36:12] >> Israel and everyone knows that. In June
[00:36:15] of this year, Charlie texted Desh Duza
[00:36:19] and said, "Nick Fuentes is vermin. We've
[00:36:22] been fighting him for six years. He's
[00:36:24] anti-Semitic. In August, he said I'm
[00:36:27] anti-Semitic garbage. And
[00:36:30] >> I mean,
[00:36:36] uh, do you consider yourself an
[00:36:37] anti-semite? A noted anti-semite?
[00:36:40] >> No.
[00:36:41] >> Okay.
[00:36:42] I guess Charlie got that one wrong.
[00:36:45] >> I need to be censored. And he would
[00:36:47] never debate me. That was in August.
[00:36:52] People want to point out, "Oh, well, he
[00:36:55] was leaning in the other direction."
[00:36:58] He wasn't leaning in the other
[00:37:00] direction. He
[00:37:02] He wasn't leaning in the other
[00:37:05] direction.
[00:37:07] Jewish donors play into all the
[00:37:10] stereotypes. I cannot and will not be
[00:37:13] bullied like this, leaving me no choice
[00:37:16] but to leave the pro-Israel cause.
[00:37:30] All right, Nick.
[00:37:33] >> His right-hand man, Andrew Kov.
[00:37:35] >> I love this part
[00:37:39] comes from Salem Media.
[00:37:41] >> We know
[00:37:43] Andrew Kulit, you know, the one that
[00:37:47] tried to cover this text message up
[00:37:49] after Charlie got killed.
[00:37:52] The one that we've all been suspicious
[00:37:54] of from the start of this whole thing.
[00:37:58] Yeah.
[00:38:01] this Andrew Kulovit, right? To address
[00:38:04] some of the things that have been going
[00:38:06] around on public, namely about a text a
[00:38:09] group text chain that has been made
[00:38:11] known uh and released uh by Candace
[00:38:14] Owens. And I just want to address it
[00:38:16] headon because uh you know that was a
[00:38:20] text grab a screen grab that I had
[00:38:22] shared uh with people. So, it it is
[00:38:24] authentic and I want to go into it
[00:38:26] because I actually am really excited
[00:38:27] that the the truth is out there. Can't
[00:38:30] you tell how excited he was that the
[00:38:31] truth was out there now that he was
[00:38:34] exposed as having had that text message
[00:38:36] for weeks and letting the smears of
[00:38:38] Candace go on and on and on. Despite
[00:38:41] knowing for a fact that Charlie had told
[00:38:44] the Jewish donors that he was going to
[00:38:46] abandon the pro-Israel cause, he just
[00:38:49] let
[00:38:51] Josh Hammer and all of these [ __ ]
[00:38:53] shills, Rob McCoy, all of them try to
[00:38:57] whitewash Charlie's legacy.
[00:39:00] Benjamin Netanyahu, he let Benjamin
[00:39:02] Netanyahu try to whitewash Charlie's
[00:39:04] legacy.
[00:39:07] That Andrew Kovitnick, is that the one?
[00:39:10] the one that
[00:39:12] we might have some questions about.
[00:39:14] >> Look at who's involved in Salem media.
[00:39:17] >> Oh, we have
[00:39:18] >> it is a Christian Zionist outfit. It is
[00:39:21] in bed.
[00:39:23] >> Some of the people involved with Salem
[00:39:24] media are in the comments of our
[00:39:26] exchange here, Nick, defending you
[00:39:28] because you're arguing their points
[00:39:32] >> with Israel. You want to know how I know
[00:39:34] that? Melissa Strait used to work there
[00:39:37] from Prager University. She also used to
[00:39:40] work for unit 8200.
[00:39:42] >> Oh, we know
[00:39:43] >> in the IDF. That's where Andrew Kovit
[00:39:46] comes from. And he was Charlie Kirk's
[00:39:49] right-hand man.
[00:39:53] Not sure what we're proving by saying
[00:39:54] that Charlie was in a den of vipers
[00:39:57] surrounded by Zionists.
[00:40:00] That's kind of the point.
[00:40:03] Charlie Kirk appointed Andrew Kov to
[00:40:05] lead their struggle session about Israel
[00:40:08] after the Turning Point SAS conference
[00:40:10] in July. When Israel bombed Qatar in
[00:40:15] contravention of Trump's own foreign
[00:40:16] policy, who did Charlie Kirk invite on
[00:40:19] the show to do Hazbara and explain the
[00:40:21] party line? Ben Shapiro.
[00:40:25] Nick acts like Turning Point is as
[00:40:28] simple to run as his show and that
[00:40:30] there's no oversight. There's no joint
[00:40:33] decisions. There's no complexity at all.
[00:40:35] It's just Charlie makes every decision
[00:40:37] purely, purely, purely. I don't know how
[00:40:39] that decision was made. Nick, speaking
[00:40:41] of bombing places, what did Charlie do
[00:40:44] when we were talking about bombing Iran?
[00:40:48] Do you know what Charlie did when Trump
[00:40:50] was going to bomb Iran?
[00:40:53] Well, Charlie Kirk played devil's
[00:40:55] advocate. He lended his platform to Ben
[00:40:58] Shapiro to give Israel's position. And
[00:41:01] on Wednesday, the day he was shot,
[00:41:02] Charlie Kirk met with his rabbi
[00:41:06] to prepare him to defend Israel at
[00:41:08] Provo.
[00:41:11] He also allegedly sent a text the day
[00:41:13] before saying that he was afraid Israel
[00:41:16] was going to kill him.
[00:41:19] Might have even said tomorrow, depending
[00:41:21] on what those texts say. We haven't seen
[00:41:23] them yet. I suspect they're out there,
[00:41:26] but we'll find out, won't we?
[00:41:30] as he was writing his forthcoming book
[00:41:33] about the Jewish Sabbath. And this is
[00:41:35] the guy that was martyed for fighting
[00:41:37] Israel.
[00:41:39] Yeah. Yeah, it is.
[00:41:42] Because you damn well better kill him
[00:41:44] before he flips. And we have all the
[00:41:47] proof we need to know that he was
[00:41:51] flipping
[00:41:52] hard.
[00:41:58] That's exactly the time when Israel
[00:42:01] might kill him. Let alone if he was
[00:42:03] offered a shitload of money by Benjamin
[00:42:05] Netanyahu and turned it down. If there
[00:42:07] was a quidd proquo in there. If there
[00:42:09] was something disclosed to him about how
[00:42:12] that money might get transferred if he
[00:42:14] might have learned something that is not
[00:42:16] okay for him to talk about.
[00:42:19] That's exactly the kind of thing you
[00:42:21] might kill him about. and the urgency
[00:42:24] with which you might need to kill him as
[00:42:26] you watch this flip happen, as you see
[00:42:28] this text message go out, that urgency
[00:42:30] is going to play into the evidence that
[00:42:32] we're about to go over here.
[00:42:38] If you think that, I feel sorry for you.
[00:42:42] Appreciate it, bro,
[00:42:42] >> because you are [ __ ]
[00:42:45] Ian Carol says, "We're all over here.
[00:42:48] Where's our general? Where's our guy?"
[00:42:51] I was just being kind, Nick. You're not
[00:42:53] our general. You're just a kid in a
[00:42:55] studio. We're all just individuals out
[00:42:58] here with cameras. And I was just trying
[00:43:00] to extend a hand to offer for you not to
[00:43:03] do this to yourself because we all have
[00:43:06] the internet and we can all look up
[00:43:08] sources. And a lot of people are going
[00:43:10] to agree with you and that's fine. A lot
[00:43:13] of people are going to call me names.
[00:43:14] That's fine. Not worried about it
[00:43:18] because I cite my sources.
[00:43:21] and I stand by them. And if you have a
[00:43:23] better set of sources and a better
[00:43:25] understanding,
[00:43:27] then I'll agree with you.
[00:43:29] And you've convinced me of many topics
[00:43:32] in the past where you had a great take
[00:43:34] and I looked up the sources to try to
[00:43:36] corroborate your take and I changed my
[00:43:37] mind. And something tells me that that's
[00:43:40] not what's going to happen on this one.
[00:43:44] I'm right here where I've always been,
[00:43:46] following the facts, following the
[00:43:48] money.
[00:43:51] You sound like Cash Patel, bro.
[00:43:53] >> I'm right here where I've always been.
[00:43:55] Following the facts, following the
[00:43:57] money, looking at the information.
[00:43:59] >> Looking at the information.
[00:44:02] That's what got
[00:44:03] >> Looking at the information. Hey, Nick.
[00:44:05] Hey, Nick. If we were sitting down right
[00:44:07] now live and I asked you about the
[00:44:10] information of this case, do you think
[00:44:11] you would know it? Do you think you
[00:44:13] would know any of it? Would you know
[00:44:16] about the evidence that was mentioned in
[00:44:17] the affidavit? Would you know about the
[00:44:20] various video recordings of Tyler
[00:44:22] Robinson's car driving through the
[00:44:24] neighborhood of allegedly Tyler Robinson
[00:44:25] walking through the neighborhood? Would
[00:44:27] you know about the timeline? Would you
[00:44:30] know about the foreign planes? And have
[00:44:31] you actually looked up that data for
[00:44:33] yourself?
[00:44:35] Would you know about the various
[00:44:37] military experts, Green Beretss and
[00:44:40] such, who have been shooting combat
[00:44:42] dummies with 30 sixes and every other
[00:44:44] type of round under the sun to try to
[00:44:46] recreate this shot which is not real?
[00:44:49] [snorts]
[00:44:51] Would you know any of this stuff?
[00:44:54] Because I'm not sure you would. I'm not
[00:44:56] sure you know the information on this
[00:44:58] case, Nick. Because if you did, you
[00:45:00] wouldn't have stuck your neck out like
[00:45:02] this on a [ __ ] take like this.
[00:45:05] because it was just a bad move. It was
[00:45:08] dumb. And you're not dumb. Which is why
[00:45:11] I was so surprised that this was your
[00:45:13] response.
[00:45:15] Got me here light years ahead of you.
[00:45:18] Light years ahead of Candace, light
[00:45:19] years ahead of Tucker Carlson. Now all
[00:45:21] these interlopers are going to come in
[00:45:24] and tell us that our ideology is about
[00:45:26] Netanyah.
[00:45:29] >> That was a really interesting phrasing,
[00:45:31] Nick.
[00:45:34] Now all these interlopers are going to
[00:45:35] come in and mess with my cult and tell
[00:45:38] us how to think. I'm the only one that
[00:45:41] can say how we're supposed to think
[00:45:42] about the Jews.
[00:45:46] That's a weird phrasing, bro.
[00:45:51] And I'm certainly not saying that I'm
[00:45:53] the one that's going to tell you how to
[00:45:54] feel about the Jews. I'm just a guy. I
[00:45:57] think you should probably do your own
[00:45:58] research and come up with your own
[00:46:00] conclusions about how to feel about the
[00:46:01] Jews,
[00:46:06] but you should probably be careful of
[00:46:08] gatekeepers,
[00:46:10] especially when it comes to a topic like
[00:46:12] the Jews.
[00:46:16] So, just think carefully out there,
[00:46:18] guys, for yourselves.
[00:46:21] And don't let people gatekeep
[00:46:22] information.
[00:46:26] because that was really weird wording.
[00:46:29] >> Yahoo and Israel's foreign policy and
[00:46:32] this kookery.
[00:46:33] >> Oh, and actually this is a good point
[00:46:35] too. Let's rewind.
[00:46:36] >> Years ahead of Candace, light years
[00:46:38] ahead of Tucker Carlson. Now all these
[00:46:40] interlopers are going to come in and
[00:46:42] tell us that our ideology is about
[00:46:45] Netanyahu and Israel's foreign policy
[00:46:48] and this kookery. Actually, Nick,
[00:46:52] I specifically elucidated that that is
[00:46:55] not your ideology and that yours is much
[00:46:57] more complex than that, much more
[00:46:59] interesting than that.
[00:47:02] And it had actually changed my mind when
[00:47:04] you have spoken about it. This specific
[00:47:07] issue right here,
[00:47:09] this issue
[00:47:12] is the exact example of why your point,
[00:47:15] specifically your point that it's not
[00:47:17] just the Israeli government. It is also
[00:47:20] American Zionists, American Jewish
[00:47:22] Zionists and this network that they have
[00:47:24] built inside of America on behalf of
[00:47:26] this foreign state. Because that's what
[00:47:28] TPUSA is is exactly. If there's any
[00:47:32] moment in time when America has a direct
[00:47:35] obvious example of what you've been
[00:47:37] championing for years, it's right now
[00:47:40] with Turning Point USA.
[00:47:44] And suddenly everyone else is gone. Like
[00:47:46] everyone else has gone off to fight it
[00:47:49] and you are not there.
[00:47:54] Right?
[00:47:56] This is the perfect example of your
[00:47:58] espoused ideology. At least what I've
[00:48:00] been hearing you say on your show for
[00:48:03] the last months and months and months.
[00:48:08] This is the perfect example of American
[00:48:12] Jews subverting America from the inside
[00:48:15] from within our institutions using their
[00:48:18] American Jewish money on behalf of
[00:48:20] Israel. And it is the perfect example of
[00:48:23] why the issue is more complex than just
[00:48:26] the government of Israel, just BB
[00:48:27] Netanyahu.
[00:48:30] So, where are you? Why aren't you
[00:48:34] pointing at it? I'm not saying you need
[00:48:37] to believe what I believe. I'm
[00:48:38] definitely not saying you need to agree
[00:48:40] with Candace Owens. I'm not even saying
[00:48:42] you need to think that Israel had
[00:48:45] anything to do with killing Charlie
[00:48:46] Kirk.
[00:48:48] I just can't help but notice that you're
[00:48:50] not even using this opportunity
[00:48:53] to point out your exact point using the
[00:48:57] biggest story in the country in our at
[00:49:00] least in our recent lifetimes.
[00:49:04] Probably since 9/11,
[00:49:08] although you could argue that.
[00:49:11] No, sorry. Absolutely not.
[00:49:15] That's totally ridiculous.
[00:49:20] Totally ridiculous. Oh, it's totally
[00:49:23] ridiculous.
[00:49:25] So,
[00:49:27] while Nick is out here following the
[00:49:30] facts, looking at the information,
[00:49:35] following the money.
[00:49:38] Um,
[00:49:40] I've been compiling sources that you all
[00:49:43] can double check for yourselves.
[00:49:45] because it seems to me like we have a
[00:49:48] distinct lack of sources in Nick's video
[00:49:53] and I kind of wonder if he has any.
[00:49:58] So now let's get into the second half of
[00:50:00] this whole situation. The evidence. The
[00:50:03] evidence that Nick you seem to claim
[00:50:06] there's none of the evidence that you
[00:50:08] seem to be familiar with and familiar
[00:50:11] that there's none of it.
[00:50:14] So, let's lay some ground rules here.
[00:50:16] We're not going to cite anything from
[00:50:18] Candace Owens. We're not going to try to
[00:50:20] evidence Candace Owens's theories at all
[00:50:22] because actually that's not at all what
[00:50:24] we're talking about. And let me briefly
[00:50:26] explain why that is and why that matters
[00:50:29] and how I see it. You are all welcome to
[00:50:32] see it however you want. And then we're
[00:50:34] going to take a trip down memory lane
[00:50:36] back to the early weeks and months of
[00:50:38] this investigation and remind us all
[00:50:41] what the base layer issue with the Fed
[00:50:44] slop narrative is because I think we've
[00:50:46] all lost track of that while we followed
[00:50:49] the story forwards into trying to figure
[00:50:51] out what did happen. But before we tried
[00:50:54] to figure out what did happen, we all
[00:50:56] worked on figuring out what didn't
[00:50:58] happen. and pretty much everyone under
[00:51:01] the sun with any expertise as long as
[00:51:04] they weren't Jewish, a Jewish Zionist, a
[00:51:06] Christian Zionist, paid by TPUSA or
[00:51:09] Israeli or our own government, as long
[00:51:12] as they were not those things. They
[00:51:14] pretty much all came to the conclusion
[00:51:16] pretty much that this shot was not the
[00:51:19] shot they said it was. That the rifle
[00:51:21] could not possibly have been the rifle
[00:51:23] and that basically everything about this
[00:51:25] screamed a cover up of something much
[00:51:28] bigger than a lone gunman.
[00:51:31] Let's assume that you didn't know
[00:51:33] anything about JFK or the history of
[00:51:35] political assassinations. Let's assume
[00:51:36] that you didn't know anything about a
[00:51:38] pathy or how that works. Sean Ryan. Um
[00:51:41] let's assume that you were naive to all
[00:51:43] of that. that already might have gotten
[00:51:45] you suspicious. And let's just take it
[00:51:47] back to basic facts, ballistics,
[00:51:49] evidence, science, you know, stuff that
[00:51:52] we can all see and understand.
[00:51:55] So clarification,
[00:51:59] the FBI told us a very specific
[00:52:02] narrative, not immediately, but over
[00:52:04] time they developed it and then they
[00:52:06] produced an affidavit and they charged
[00:52:07] Tyler Robinson with the crime alone
[00:52:11] based on what they've told us, their
[00:52:14] crime, their evidence, their narrative,
[00:52:17] the one that you're shilling for, Nick,
[00:52:19] it relies on a few very critical
[00:52:22] [snorts]
[00:52:22] pieces of evidence And those specific
[00:52:25] pieces of evidence are some of the
[00:52:27] weakest and most flimsiest flimsiest
[00:52:29] ones in the entire thing. [snorts] And
[00:52:32] so what I'm endeavoring to do here is
[00:52:35] not to prove Candace Owens is right. I
[00:52:38] don't even think Candace is right about
[00:52:39] everything. And I don't think that
[00:52:41] Candace even thinks that Candace is
[00:52:42] right about everything. This has nothing
[00:52:44] to do with her. What I'm here to do is
[00:52:46] to prove that you're [ __ ] if you
[00:52:50] think that Tyler Robinson took this shot
[00:52:52] with no help from anyone else. And
[00:52:54] especially if you think that the FBI is
[00:52:56] telling you the truth.
[00:52:58] Okay, fair. Because you very clearly
[00:53:02] laid out that that is your belief.
[00:53:05] Unless I'm misunderstanding your words.
[00:53:08] I would hope that I am somehow wildly
[00:53:11] misunderstanding your words and you're
[00:53:14] not this [ __ ] Nick. [snorts]
[00:53:17] So, some of the key pieces of evidence
[00:53:20] in the Fed narrative, the way that I see
[00:53:23] it, is first and foremost, the rifle.
[00:53:26] This is standard for any murder
[00:53:28] investigation, the weapon. The weapon
[00:53:31] that links the killer to the crime.
[00:53:35] Okay, we'll get to that in a second. In
[00:53:38] this investigation, we have footage,
[00:53:41] which is pretty significant, but it
[00:53:43] might not be the most conclusive for
[00:53:45] either side of the story. Tyler Robinson
[00:53:48] allegedly confessed to his parents, and
[00:53:50] that's going to be a big piece of this
[00:53:52] story because obviously a confession
[00:53:55] would be a very big thing if we had
[00:53:58] evidence that it had happened. Him
[00:54:00] turning himself in would be great
[00:54:02] evidence, but we have questions about
[00:54:04] that as well.
[00:54:06] He sent a bunch of text message
[00:54:07] confessions to Lance Twigs, which we'll
[00:54:09] talk about. He had Discord logs where he
[00:54:12] allegedly confessed to the crime, which
[00:54:14] we'll talk about. He left a note under
[00:54:16] his keyboard, which we'll talk about.
[00:54:18] And there was DNA left at the scene of
[00:54:20] the crime on a screwdriver, allegedly,
[00:54:23] sort of, on the rifle, the towel,
[00:54:27] and
[00:54:29] I guess that's it. The screwdriver is a
[00:54:31] little fuzzy. and then his car was seen
[00:54:34] on doorbell cams near the scene, etc.
[00:54:36] There's a few other pieces of evidence,
[00:54:38] but these are some of the main pieces of
[00:54:39] evidence that link Tyler Robinson to the
[00:54:41] scene of the crime. If I missed any, let
[00:54:43] me know. I just threw this together for
[00:54:46] memory this morning and then compiled
[00:54:48] all of these from my other notes.
[00:54:51] So, let's start with the gunshot, the
[00:54:54] very first thing that the whole world
[00:54:56] saw. And the gunshot was, in my opinion,
[00:55:01] suspicious to begin with. Getting shot
[00:55:04] in the neck could indicate human error.
[00:55:07] I didn't get the vibe, but I'm no
[00:55:09] expert. So, we're going to consult some
[00:55:11] experts. But once the FBI told us what
[00:55:15] rifle was used,
[00:55:17] told us where the shot was taken from,
[00:55:21] [ __ ] gets downright impossible. And so,
[00:55:24] let's look at a little bit of evidence.
[00:55:28] And once again, I'm no expert. I am no
[00:55:32] combat veteran. I'm no marksman. I don't
[00:55:34] own rifles. So, we're going to defer to
[00:55:37] the experts, which Nick, I'm sure you're
[00:55:39] not one of. [snorts]
[00:55:42] This is from the channel OneShot TV.
[00:55:45] We got six ball round blew through 20
[00:55:47] lbs of meat and two beef femur bones.
[00:55:49] So, those are not easy to stop. I'm
[00:55:52] hoping this one will give us a slightly
[00:55:53] different result. And I'm going to aim
[00:55:55] towards the front left of our ballistic
[00:55:57] dummy neck. 45 degree angle. And we are
[00:55:59] shooting slightly downward as well. So I
[00:56:02] also have to hit the vertebrae because
[00:56:03] that's allegedly what redirected this
[00:56:05] bullet.
[00:56:16] I can see the neck fall out onto the
[00:56:18] ground from here. Well, we definitely
[00:56:21] penetrated our water jugs, and I don't
[00:56:24] think this is going to help to stop the
[00:56:26] conspiracy theories. His head fell off.
[00:56:35] I want to remind us all that at the
[00:56:38] actual scene of the actual crime, there
[00:56:40] was no exit wound. There was no blood
[00:56:43] splattered across the white backdrop.
[00:56:46] Nothing.
[00:56:48] The bullet apparently was lodged inside
[00:56:50] of him. And we'll talk about the autopsy
[00:56:52] in a little bit.
[00:57:05] Did you see the spine fly out the back
[00:57:07] of his neck?
[00:57:16] But I want to go to his actual channel.
[00:57:18] >> Welcome back. Thank you for watching and
[00:57:20] watch a couple sections of his actual
[00:57:21] video because there's a lot more that he
[00:57:23] does in that than just that clip.
[00:57:24] >> Set this one up. I have our ballistic
[00:57:25] dummy bust on a table in the front. I do
[00:57:27] have it slightly angled so we can hit
[00:57:29] the target that we're aiming for. Behind
[00:57:31] it, I have three 5gallon water jugs just
[00:57:33] in case the bullet overpenetrates. Maybe
[00:57:36] we'll get lucky and actually capture it.
[00:57:38] Unfortunately, for this video, I'm not
[00:57:40] going to be able to take the shot at 140
[00:57:42] yards. I got too many cameras to
[00:57:43] operate. Trust me, it's a chip shot.
[00:57:46] There's going to be almost no difference
[00:57:48] between 30 or 40 and 140. It's a,000
[00:57:51] yard gun. So, we might be gaining a few
[00:57:54] feet per second, but ultimately the
[00:57:56] result will be very similar.
[00:58:10] So to clarify,
[00:58:12] when the shot was first shown on camera,
[00:58:17] if you were experienced with guns,
[00:58:19] marksmanship, this sort of thing, you
[00:58:21] could have ascertained that there was no
[00:58:24] exit wound, there was no blood splatter
[00:58:26] behind him on the white backdrop.
[00:58:28] And almost every rifle round, you would
[00:58:31] expect some sort of blood splatter. You
[00:58:33] would expect a lot more carnage from
[00:58:35] this shot if it was a rifle.
[00:58:37] And
[00:58:40] that not existing, but it being the type
[00:58:42] of shot that it was, but apparently no
[00:58:44] shooter in the crowd with a handgun gets
[00:58:46] pretty weird pretty [ __ ] fast. So, it
[00:58:48] was a pretty suspicious shot right from
[00:58:50] the start, let alone once they told us
[00:58:53] that it was a 30 six. One of the biggest
[00:58:55] rounds that people use. Now, one thing I
[00:58:58] do want to say is we know how realistic
[00:59:00] the bones are in these ballistic
[00:59:01] dummies. We've proven it time and time
[00:59:02] again in a million videos. They usually
[00:59:04] react exactly like you would expect and
[00:59:06] they stop a lot of calibers. One caveat
[00:59:09] I do want to give is I would imagine on
[00:59:11] a real human spine there's a lot of
[00:59:14] muscles and tendons and discs and I mean
[00:59:17] that's what supports the whole human
[00:59:18] body. So, I would imagine a real spinal
[00:59:20] cord is probably a little tougher than
[00:59:22] one of these. But, I mean, you can see
[00:59:25] how thick that bone is. And they do even
[00:59:28] have like simulated spinal cord rods
[00:59:31] running through there as well. So this
[00:59:34] is the thickest bone in the ballistic
[00:59:36] dummy and it was no match for the 30 6.
[00:59:39] Now I also want to say I think the
[00:59:40] ballistics gel in front of the spinal
[00:59:42] cord on these ballistic dummies is
[00:59:44] probably tougher and denser than a real
[00:59:47] human neck. If you relax and just push
[00:59:48] on your neck, it's extremely soft and it
[00:59:51] wouldn't do anything to slow down a
[00:59:52] bullet. The ballistic gel on these is,
[00:59:54] you know, pretty firm. And you can see
[00:59:58] the damage that we have before it even
[01:00:01] got to the bone. So,
[01:00:04] so let's watch some more shots.
[01:00:08] >> Shot. So, hopefully we're not too far
[01:00:10] off.
[01:00:10] >> This is full metal jacket.
[01:00:12] >> They're the same bullet weight. We
[01:00:13] should be able to hit it,
[01:00:19] dude. Well, that was insane.
[01:00:23] I don't even know if it hit the bone to
[01:00:25] be honest with you. Yeah, the point of
[01:00:26] impact was a little bit higher on that
[01:00:27] one. So, we didn't even hit the bone.
[01:00:29] We'll try it one more time.
[01:00:35] Well,
[01:00:38] the fact that I saw the spinal bone fly
[01:00:40] up in the air and then I heard bone
[01:00:41] fragments landing on the table, it's not
[01:00:44] a good sign. [laughter]
[01:00:50] to the shoulder. So, I've got it in a
[01:00:52] cinder block propped up on the table
[01:00:54] about as good as I can get. For this
[01:00:56] one, we are going to use the 150 grain
[01:00:59] Hornady. Let's see how effective a 30 6
[01:01:02] actually is.
[01:01:12] >> Wow.
[01:01:17] You might also notice how loud the sound
[01:01:20] is
[01:01:24] the mist, dude. I hope you guys could
[01:01:26] see that on camera. You probably
[01:01:27] couldn't. When I took the shot and stood
[01:01:29] up, the air was just filled with a blue
[01:01:32] mist. [laughter]
[01:01:34] I think that was a good hit.
[01:01:47] the 300 6. Ladies and gentlemen,
[01:01:53] I will reiterate what I said earlier. I
[01:01:55] fully agree. A 300 6 stopping in the
[01:01:58] body, especially the neck, is extremely
[01:02:00] unlikely, but I still don't think it's
[01:02:03] impossible. We don't even know what kind
[01:02:04] of bullet was used yet. So, it's hard to
[01:02:06] say for sure that they're lying about
[01:02:08] that. I would give it like less than a
[01:02:10] 1% chance. very unlikely, but that
[01:02:13] doesn't mean it's impossible. And just
[01:02:15] to be clear, I'm not saying that they're
[01:02:17] not lying or there aren't
[01:02:18] inconsistencies in this story. There
[01:02:20] clearly are, but as far as the caliber
[01:02:22] debate itself, um I don't think it's
[01:02:25] completely impossible. I think
[01:02:27] >> pretty impartial guy. This next piece is
[01:02:30] really important, though.
[01:02:32] >> It's extremely unlikely. I'll go ahead
[01:02:34] and quickly tell you my thought process
[01:02:35] on this. You can call me naive, whatever
[01:02:37] you want to say, but if this was a
[01:02:38] planned assassination, you know, name a
[01:02:40] foreign country, government, agency,
[01:02:42] whatever. Why would they lie about the
[01:02:44] caliber? Like, if they planned the
[01:02:45] entire thing, why not just plant the
[01:02:48] correct rifle on the pathy that you've
[01:02:50] chosen and then say that was the caliber
[01:02:52] that was used? Why? That's not a naive
[01:02:55] question. That's a super intelligent
[01:02:57] question, actually. And [snorts] in
[01:02:59] order to answer it, I believe that you
[01:03:01] need to have a firm grasp of the history
[01:03:04] of assassinations and of how psies get
[01:03:07] set up because setting up a pathy is not
[01:03:10] easy. It's actually super [ __ ]
[01:03:11] difficult. And in order to get all of
[01:03:13] the pieces in place that you need in
[01:03:15] order to have a pathy in the right place
[01:03:18] at the right time under the right
[01:03:19] circumstances where the case will
[01:03:21] actually look legitimate and stick is
[01:03:24] hard, especially when you have to
[01:03:26] navigate it on short notice to a
[01:03:29] specific event. And so if we found out
[01:03:33] that Charlie Kirk was changing his
[01:03:35] stance or was knew something on that he
[01:03:38] couldn't say or there was some reason
[01:03:39] why this hit and needed to go through,
[01:03:42] you would have a time clock start and
[01:03:44] you would need to have him in a place
[01:03:46] where you have a pathy prepared within a
[01:03:48] certain amount of time. And I suspect
[01:03:51] that the type of network that authorized
[01:03:53] this hit has paths kind of in the works
[01:03:56] around the United States and maybe
[01:03:58] around the world kind of at all times.
[01:04:00] But you still would need to get them
[01:04:01] into position. And if the schedule is
[01:04:05] the schedule, the events are the events.
[01:04:07] You got to work with whoever you got
[01:04:08] wherever he's going. And Utah, I guess,
[01:04:11] was the best place. My presumption is
[01:04:14] that Tyler Robinson was the closest best
[01:04:17] fit to the bill. and he happened to have
[01:04:19] this rifle that would really clearly pin
[01:04:21] the crime on him. This is just my
[01:04:23] theory.
[01:04:25] So, you have to now match the crime to a
[01:04:27] 306 as best as you can.
[01:04:31] And the complexity of doing that is why
[01:04:36] big political assassinations tend to be
[01:04:38] super [ __ ] weird and tend to not
[01:04:40] actually fit the narrative that the feds
[01:04:42] give us. Think JFK for example, which
[01:04:45] Nick, I'm sure you're familiar with JFK
[01:04:48] and the magic bullet.
[01:04:50] And it's kind of weird that here we are
[01:04:52] in 2025 with another magic bullet
[01:04:56] and a rifle that is an heirloom
[01:04:59] handme-down to Tyler Robinson that
[01:05:01] explicitly links him to the crime, but
[01:05:05] somehow doesn't exactly just perfectly
[01:05:07] match the crime. And somehow we
[01:05:10] magically don't have any bullet from the
[01:05:13] crime scene in order to confirm that it
[01:05:17] was fired from that gun. And they paved
[01:05:20] over the crime scene 5 days later on a
[01:05:23] Sunday, no less, but we'll get to that a
[01:05:26] little later.
[01:05:28] Great question, great video. Oneshot TV.
[01:05:31] Hit subscribe,
[01:05:34] like, and maybe share it if you want to.
[01:05:37] I'm going to go and get another drink
[01:05:39] real quick and then we'll get to the
[01:05:40] next one. And just a quick second to
[01:05:42] remind us all. Why am I belaboring the
[01:05:44] point of these shooting videos that
[01:05:46] happened ages ago? This is old news.
[01:05:48] Right. Right. Exactly. That's the point.
[01:05:50] Because if the bullet from the gun that
[01:05:54] we're told was used, the gun that links
[01:05:57] Tyler Robinson to the scene, the story
[01:06:01] that the official narrative has put
[01:06:03] forward as their evidence to put this
[01:06:05] man in jail and maybe give him the death
[01:06:07] penalty, if that bullet cannot possibly
[01:06:10] create the wound that we saw for
[01:06:12] multiple reasons, then the whole thing
[01:06:14] is [ __ ] fake. Okay? It only takes one
[01:06:18] break in this official narrative,
[01:06:20] especially one this big, a hole this big
[01:06:22] in the narrative, so to speak. That one
[01:06:25] hole in the story makes the whole story
[01:06:26] [ __ ] Okay? And it makes the whole
[01:06:29] thing a cover up. It doesn't mean that
[01:06:31] Israel did it. It doesn't mean that
[01:06:32] Candace is right. It doesn't mean any of
[01:06:34] those things, but it means that the
[01:06:35] official story is [ __ ] And it's not
[01:06:38] hard to figure out that the official
[01:06:40] story is [ __ ] And that's why we're
[01:06:42] belaboring the point going back to the
[01:06:43] original evidence, which I'm sure you
[01:06:45] watched, Nick.
[01:06:49] And I'm purposely letting experts tell
[01:06:51] you all about it because I'm not an
[01:06:52] expert.
[01:06:55] This is what we would call evidence.
[01:06:58] Next, we're going to watch a video from
[01:07:00] one of my favorite people on the
[01:07:01] internet and especially on this topic,
[01:07:03] Nate from Valhalla VFT, who is a trained
[01:07:06] combat medic, an ex green beret,
[01:07:09] multiple tours of duty. He knows his
[01:07:12] [ __ ] And you couldn't get a better
[01:07:15] expert opinion than a guy like Nate. And
[01:07:18] Nate ran some tests. All right, we did
[01:07:21] the pumpkin. Next up, the sheep shoulder
[01:07:23] blade. Definitely thick bone. About
[01:07:26] twice the meat mass of a human neck.
[01:07:31] [laughter]
[01:07:34] That's straight through.
[01:07:36] >> Doesn't surprise.
[01:07:37] >> That's the bone was going through there.
[01:07:40] Yeah. So, as we can see,
[01:07:43] the uh the sheep shoulder blade
[01:07:45] annihilated.
[01:07:46] >> 300 6 basically ripped this entire thing
[01:07:50] in half straight through. No [snorts]
[01:07:52] bullet. Now, we're going to attempt
[01:07:56] these beef vertebrae, which are you look
[01:08:00] at these things,
[01:08:02] incredibly thick, 2, three inches thick
[01:08:05] at some of the bigger parts. Brian was
[01:08:07] telling me that butchers can use
[01:08:09] concrete saws to saw through this. So,
[01:08:12] little bit stronger than a human neck.
[01:08:14] We're going to check that out next. All
[01:08:15] right. So, here we go. Next test. Cow
[01:08:19] neck vertebrae.
[01:08:24] So, as you can see, the cow neck
[01:08:29] vertebrae
[01:08:31] uh stood no chance.
[01:08:33] >> Ripped in half. And as you can see, even
[01:08:36] clean through damage straight through
[01:08:38] the cardboard again. And you can see how
[01:08:41] thick this bone is, guys.
[01:08:44] It's almost 2 inch thick. Straight
[01:08:46] through. All right. So, here is the real
[01:08:49] test. This is a cow femur.
[01:08:53] Let's give it a shot.
[01:08:57] Yeah, that's a little go.
[01:09:00] >> Maybe I did miss.
[01:09:05] No exit wound,
[01:09:08] no blood splatter. All right, so let's
[01:09:10] see the damage. Uh, it's literally in
[01:09:14] pieces.
[01:09:17] So, here you go. Where Brian hit that
[01:09:19] directly in the center,
[01:09:22] literally exploded that cow femur in
[01:09:25] half. Blew straight through. More.
[01:09:29] Now,
[01:09:32] we're not only going to take a cow
[01:09:33] femur, but for anybody that says, "Wow,
[01:09:35] there's no there's no meat." We're going
[01:09:37] to slap on a fat 4 in of beef in front
[01:09:42] of the cow femur and see what happens.
[01:09:44] Then give him a thick skin.
[01:09:45] >> A bone significantly stronger and
[01:09:48] thicker than Charlie's spine. A bunch of
[01:09:51] meat significantly thicker and stronger
[01:09:53] than the front of Charlie's neck. tape
[01:09:56] for skin. Significantly stronger than
[01:09:58] Charlie's skin.
[01:10:00] >> Skin like Nate.
[01:10:03] >> All right, last test on the meat again.
[01:10:05] Cow femur, bunch of beef, thick tape,
[01:10:08] and then we're going to move up to the
[01:10:09] steel. Here we go.
[01:10:13] Well, [laughter]
[01:10:15] >> well, the every everything exploded.
[01:10:18] >> All right, let's check it out.
[01:10:26] All right, so let's take a look at the
[01:10:28] crime scene. As you see, the entire
[01:10:30] thing exploded on us. Our camera got
[01:10:32] knocked down, flew through this, as you
[01:10:35] can see.
[01:10:36] All right, here we go.
[01:10:39] Here's our cow femur.
[01:10:42] the damage to that
[01:10:45] literally snapped in half and then
[01:10:50] our our neck
[01:10:52] remember that was like a regular looking
[01:10:54] roast
[01:10:55] >> that we built solid thick four or five
[01:10:58] inches of meat
[01:10:59] >> absolutely obliterated.
[01:11:02] So yeah. Uh so yeah, next we're going to
[01:11:06] shoot we're going to test the uh the
[01:11:08] steel the steel theory. So, we're going
[01:11:10] to actually shoot steel and see what
[01:11:12] happens. All right.
[01:11:13] >> So, if Charlie had a neck of steel, as
[01:11:17] we've been told, what would happen if
[01:11:18] you shot a steel neck with a 30 six
[01:11:21] round?
[01:11:22] >> Guys, now we're going to test literal
[01:11:24] steel. 1/4 in 3/8 in steel. Let's see
[01:11:28] what it can do.
[01:11:38] Nope. You hit it.
[01:11:50] That was 38 inch.
[01:12:01] Bro is a pretty good shot. All right, so
[01:12:02] let's check out what 30 O 6 did to
[01:12:04] literal steel. Here we have our
[01:12:08] and thank god we got an actual
[01:12:10] >> You can tell that they purposely put the
[01:12:11] shots all as one take so they could show
[01:12:13] you how good of a shot he is
[01:12:17] competition shooter here to hit this 2
[01:12:19] in x 2 in plate from 100 yards. uh which
[01:12:21] I probably would have been able to clean
[01:12:23] through quarter inch steel.
[01:12:26] Clean through 3/8 inch steel and half
[01:12:30] inch steel
[01:12:32] almost or actually it potentially did
[01:12:34] actually blow out the side of that. So
[01:12:41] yeah,
[01:12:43] guys, final thoughts. Literally nothing
[01:12:47] we brought out here today could stop a
[01:12:48] 30 six round.
[01:12:50] Literal steel can't stop a 30 odd six
[01:12:53] round. So, actually the whole man of
[01:12:55] steel argument doesn't even make sense,
[01:12:58] does it? So, uh yeah, uh we just wanted
[01:13:01] to bring this one to you guys, show you
[01:13:03] uh what a 30 odd six round can really do
[01:13:05] and so we can sort of kind of stop the
[01:13:07] confusion about if this was possible or
[01:13:10] not. And uh yeah, hope you guys enjoyed
[01:13:12] this one. We'll catch you in the next
[01:13:14] one.
[01:13:16] So, you see why as soon as this event
[01:13:19] occurred,
[01:13:20] all the military men, all the hunters,
[01:13:23] like half of America immediately had
[01:13:26] some serious questions about what we
[01:13:28] were being told.
[01:13:30] Yeah. So, if you're not familiar with
[01:13:32] Dr. Chris Martinson, this video is much
[01:13:35] longer, much more all-incclusive. He's a
[01:13:38] very thorough man, very much more
[01:13:39] scientifically minded, and he recorded
[01:13:41] his testing and findings much more
[01:13:43] meticulously than most people. Um, and
[01:13:46] he has a couple of really great pieces
[01:13:47] in this and then we'll smash a whole
[01:13:48] bunch of shooting footage together as
[01:13:50] quickly as we can that we understand
[01:13:53] what's going on here. And by the way,
[01:13:55] this is uh cross-section of the human
[01:13:57] neck right about at the C6C7, which is
[01:14:00] lower the lower cervical
[01:14:02] uh bone area there and uh somewhere
[01:14:06] between the C6C7 bone. If this shot came
[01:14:08] in at about a 10° angle, it would have
[01:14:10] missed everything. It would have mainly
[01:14:12] gone through muscle. So that's why we're
[01:14:14] going to use pork roast because we think
[01:14:15] that most carefully mimics the m
[01:14:18] >> Did you catch that? Based on the
[01:14:20] location of the shot and the location of
[01:14:22] Charlie, which earlier in the video he
[01:14:24] meticulously angles out and shows why
[01:14:27] this is probably a relatively accurate
[01:14:29] representation of where the shot would
[01:14:30] have hit the neck. There's actually not
[01:14:32] a lot of indication that it should have
[01:14:34] hit the bone in the first place. It very
[01:14:36] well should have gone straight through
[01:14:38] his neck muscles and tissues and not
[01:14:40] even hit the vertebrae.
[01:14:43] making this an even more problematic
[01:14:45] question. But just for good measure,
[01:14:48] people are testing the bone part out,
[01:14:50] too, because
[01:14:52] that's the only way you could ever
[01:14:53] possibly imagine that there was no exit
[01:14:55] wound. And because all the TPUSA leakers
[01:14:58] have told us that the autopsy says that
[01:15:00] it hit the vertebrae and then traveled
[01:15:02] down his spine and obliterated him.
[01:15:05] [snorts] Muscle structure that you would
[01:15:07] find in a human neck. This is where the
[01:15:10] bullet would have gone. For it to go
[01:15:12] into the body, we have to believe it
[01:15:13] would have done two things. It would
[01:15:15] have had to take a hard turn in towards
[01:15:17] the center of the body and then
[01:15:19] impressed by or stopped by these bones
[01:15:22] here enough to get deflected down into
[01:15:24] the body. And we're going to show that
[01:15:26] that's just not a realistic possibility
[01:15:29] here. I would encourage you to go and
[01:15:31] watch Chris Martins's full video if you
[01:15:32] want to really get the context here. Um
[01:15:34] because he explains the setup of
[01:15:36] everything. He shows all sorts. He's
[01:15:37] very very thorough and I would encourage
[01:15:39] you to support his work and to watch the
[01:15:41] whole video, but we're just going to
[01:15:42] montage a whole bunch of shots now. So
[01:15:45] now we want to dial it up a little bit.
[01:15:46] And we have these roasts which had the
[01:15:48] bone in. This is an inch and a quarter
[01:15:51] bone. A leg bone of a pig is a lot more
[01:15:53] dense than the cervical neckbones of a
[01:15:56] human. This bone has to hold a lot of
[01:15:58] weight. It's got a big fat quarter inish
[01:16:01] wall around it, you know, before you get
[01:16:03] to the marrow. These are very hard
[01:16:05] bones. Uh, and they're solid, one piece.
[01:16:07] So, you would think if anything was
[01:16:09] going to deflect this. Here's what would
[01:16:11] happen. So, now this was shot with 180
[01:16:14] grain hollow point. Uh, the bone was
[01:16:17] hit. It was shattered. You see this huge
[01:16:19] hole that came out the backside here.
[01:16:21] And that's because the bullet came in.
[01:16:24] It probably mushroomed a bit, but the
[01:16:26] bullet went straight through, but it was
[01:16:27] carrying so much of the bone material
[01:16:29] with it that that too punched through.
[01:16:31] This is a/2-in oriented strand board and
[01:16:34] it's just astonishing turd and you can
[01:16:36] figure out roughly what the hole was in
[01:16:38] the in the back stop. But man, these
[01:16:41] things blew giant holes out of the back
[01:16:43] stop. Um, so it's kind of hard to get it
[01:16:45] exactly right. So now here we're going
[01:16:48] to watch a 220 grain bullet, which is a
[01:16:51] big heavy thing, right? And look at the
[01:16:55] giant monster hole it made in the back
[01:16:57] of this. And by the way, Nick put a
[01:16:59] cinder block here to back stop it
[01:17:01] because I just said, "Can anything stop
[01:17:03] these rounds?"
[01:17:08] >> It went through the cinder block. Wow.
[01:17:09] >> Through the first wall of the cinder
[01:17:10] block.
[01:17:10] >> Great camera. So glad we have this. So
[01:17:12] now we know it took this whole cinder
[01:17:14] block and shoved it. So just watch this
[01:17:17] happen again
[01:17:18] from here and the round enters and just
[01:17:23] absolutely goes through the roast
[01:17:25] through the bone of the roast through
[01:17:27] the back of the roast through the
[01:17:28] oriented strand board and into the
[01:17:31] cinder block. And by the way, it pushes
[01:17:33] and shoves that whole cinder block
[01:17:35] backwards cuz these things are carrying
[01:17:37] just an enormous amount of force.
[01:17:40] Um,
[01:17:43] here's what H.
[01:17:45] >> So, if this 306 had hit Charlie in the
[01:17:49] neck, the way we're told, it still could
[01:17:52] have gone through a concrete wall behind
[01:17:55] him and hit someone on the other side of
[01:17:57] the concrete wall. Okay?
[01:18:01] And [snorts] I mean, literally, like a
[01:18:02] literal concrete wall is stronger than a
[01:18:04] cinder block, but you get what I mean.
[01:18:06] What happened? this front of that cinder
[01:18:08] block had a big old hole with a concave
[01:18:10] pattern because it was struck from this
[01:18:12] side and it did the bullet actually did
[01:18:14] stop um on the back side of the cinder
[01:18:18] block. So that's kind of what it takes
[01:18:19] to stop a 30 odd six round. So then um
[01:18:23] here's uh just variety of things we just
[01:18:25] shot over and over again. Spoiler, 38
[01:18:27] shots were taken. None of them were
[01:18:29] stopped by any of these roasts. This one
[01:18:32] here is roast number five. I believe
[01:18:34] this one has been just been shot with a
[01:18:35] 220 grain. Uh, I think that's what this
[01:18:38] one is. I'd have to check the show notes
[01:18:40] again. 38 shots were taken. None of them
[01:18:43] were stopped.
[01:18:45] Next,
[01:18:50] people got really into
[01:18:53] um this whole process of testing out
[01:18:57] different ways of doing the shot. And
[01:18:58] Range Day Bro even set up a theoretical
[01:19:01] shot of what a lot of people were
[01:19:03] suspecting was that it had actually been
[01:19:05] a shot from behind. And he tested that
[01:19:06] out too with a ballistic dummy, which
[01:19:08] we're not going to get into because it's
[01:19:09] a theory that is not the point right
[01:19:11] now. Um, but there's all sorts of stuff
[01:19:13] out there to give different evidence to
[01:19:16] this whole thing. This is actually a
[01:19:17] clip from a video that is no longer on
[01:19:19] YouTube. I'm not sure why. Um, but it is
[01:19:22] preserved inside of one of Valhalla
[01:19:24] VFT's videos. It's from a channel that
[01:19:27] was I guess called US Overwatch where he
[01:19:30] does a different version of the test
[01:19:31] >> a day ago. Very good video. Let's check
[01:19:33] it out. I'll put his link in the pin
[01:19:35] comment and description if you want to
[01:19:36] watch the whole video.
[01:19:37] >> So, our first shot will be a cold bore
[01:19:39] shot and we will just see what kind of
[01:19:42] results uh we are able to duplicate.
[01:19:45] >> All right. So, he's got some very thick
[01:19:47] bone here across the strap of this
[01:19:48] dummy. Obviously, this would be far
[01:19:50] thicker and stronger than a human
[01:19:52] vertebrae in the neck. I know the bone
[01:19:54] doesn't look super it looks hollow, but
[01:19:57] this is way stronger than a human
[01:19:58] vertebrae in a neck.
[01:20:00] >> Let's uh let's see what this 30 odd six
[01:20:02] rounds does to it.
[01:20:08] >> Wow.
[01:20:08] >> Yeah.
[01:20:11] All right. From this angle, as you can
[01:20:12] see here,
[01:20:16] huh?
[01:20:19] Not only does it go through that bone,
[01:20:20] it explodes the bone.
[01:20:22] Now we're going to give it uh reset it
[01:20:25] back up and put the uh ballistic plate
[01:20:30] in front of it and see if we can't
[01:20:31] duplicate that shot as well.
[01:20:33] >> Right now he actually shoots a ballistic
[01:20:35] plate with 30 art six round
[01:20:39] destroys the plate.
[01:20:44] Secy's there just ripped the entire half
[01:20:46] of that plate off. So, this was back
[01:20:48] when people were still speculating that
[01:20:50] Charlie was wearing some ultra concealed
[01:20:51] body armor, which we have multiple
[01:20:53] versions of confirmation that he was
[01:20:54] not, but just to give you a sense for
[01:20:56] how powerful these rounds are. Now, the
[01:20:58] autopsy,
[01:21:00] which we still haven't seen, because
[01:21:02] yes, this is actually what is being put
[01:21:06] out. So, yeah, here you go. Fox News
[01:21:07] today. Man of Steel, Charlie Kirk's body
[01:21:10] stopped a bullet that would typically
[01:21:11] just go through everything. Remember,
[01:21:15] Nick, this is the narrative that you're
[01:21:17] shilling for.
[01:21:19] >> And it was an absolute miracle nobody
[01:21:20] else was killed.
[01:21:22] >> And the sources putting it out are the
[01:21:23] sources that your perspective is
[01:21:25] apparently aligned with. So, just pay
[01:21:28] attention to who's putting this
[01:21:29] information out and what it is they're
[01:21:31] saying.
[01:21:32] >> His surgeon told Turning Point USA. And
[01:21:34] another one, surgeon says Charlie Kirk's
[01:21:36] neck stopped Bullet from killing anyone
[01:21:37] else. He's like the man of steel. I I'm
[01:21:40] blown away by how stupid this is. They
[01:21:42] are now going to tell us that Charlie
[01:21:44] Kirk took a 30 O six round to the neck
[01:21:48] from 150 yards
[01:21:51] and his neck stopped the bullet. No exit
[01:21:53] wound, no pass through. They found the
[01:21:55] bullet just beneath the skin. Guys, I'm
[01:21:58] going be honest. Had some people send me
[01:21:59] this last night when it first dropped. I
[01:22:01] remember sitting on the couch next to my
[01:22:03] wife. She showed it to me. I read it and
[01:22:04] I said, "Oh, that's so dumb. That's
[01:22:06] obviously fake. There's no way that's
[01:22:08] real." And I just moved on with it. uh
[01:22:09] because it was just this was so
[01:22:11] outrageously stupid that there was no
[01:22:13] way there was no way that this was a
[01:22:14] real post. And then I wake up this
[01:22:16] morning to hundreds of you guys emailing
[01:22:18] me and messaging me this exact thing
[01:22:21] that yes, this is in fact real. And I
[01:22:24] believe, as far as I know, Andrew Kovet
[01:22:26] here is the executive producer at
[01:22:29] Turning Point and he put this post out
[01:22:31] last night. Let's make our way through
[01:22:32] it. All right, here we go. I want to
[01:22:34] address some of the discussion about the
[01:22:36] lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I'm
[01:22:38] usually not interested in delving into
[01:22:39] most of this kind of online chatter and
[01:22:41] I apologize this is somewhat graphic but
[01:22:43] in this case the fact that there wasn't
[01:22:45] an exit wound is probably another
[01:22:48] miracle and I want people to know I just
[01:22:51] spoke with the surgeon who worked on
[01:22:52] Charlie in the hospital that seems weird
[01:22:54] because that's a violation of HIPPA. Uh
[01:22:56] but okay let's keep moving. He said the
[01:22:58] bullet absolutely should have gone
[01:23:01] through which is very very normal for a
[01:23:03] highowered high velocity round for a 306
[01:23:06] round. Yes it is. I've seen wounds from
[01:23:07] this caliber many times and they always
[01:23:10] just go through everything. This would
[01:23:13] have taken a moose or two down, an elk,
[01:23:18] etc. Yes, a 30 six round can penetrate
[01:23:22] through and through an elk. We'll talk
[01:23:24] about that here in a little bit. But it
[01:23:26] didn't go through. Charlie's body
[01:23:27] stopped it.
[01:23:31] I mentioned to his doctor that there
[01:23:33] were dozens of staff, students, and
[01:23:34] special guests standing directly behind
[01:23:36] Charlie and other side of the tent. And
[01:23:37] he replied, "It was an absolute miracle
[01:23:40] that someone else didn't get killed. His
[01:23:42] bone was so healthy, and the density was
[01:23:44] so so impressive that he's like the man
[01:23:47] of steel, it should have just gone
[01:23:49] through and through. It's likely would
[01:23:51] have killed those standing behind him,
[01:23:53] too." In the end, the corner did find
[01:23:55] the bullet just beneath the skin. Even
[01:23:59] in death, Charlie managed to save the
[01:24:01] lives of those around him. Remarkable.
[01:24:04] Miraculous.
[01:24:05] >> You guys know howing stupid that whole
[01:24:07] thing is, right?
[01:24:09] >> Um here's here's what's crazy to me.
[01:24:11] >> Do these people not realize
[01:24:15] >> who's in America? What we did for the
[01:24:18] last 20 years? Do you know how many tens
[01:24:20] of thousands of Global War on terror
[01:24:23] veterans there are that know exactly
[01:24:25] what it looks like when a high powered
[01:24:27] rifle round hits a human body?
[01:24:29] Especially in an area like soft tissue
[01:24:31] in the neck. You know how many people
[01:24:32] hunt out there and know exactly what a
[01:24:35] 30 six round does to a an elk skeleton
[01:24:39] or bone?
[01:24:41] We're not dumb. This ain't going to
[01:24:43] work. This this man of steel his bone
[01:24:47] density. Let's talk about this. Okay. He
[01:24:49] got shot here in the corateed. If that
[01:24:51] did hit a vertebrae in his neck, let's
[01:24:54] understand that neck vertebrae is some
[01:24:56] of the most fragile bone in the human
[01:24:58] body because it's so flexible to handle
[01:25:02] what we do with our neck. So what
[01:25:04] they're telling you is a 30 odd six
[01:25:06] round
[01:25:08] which can blow through elkbone
[01:25:10] was stopped by Charlie Kirk's neck and
[01:25:14] avertebrae. If you believe that,
[01:25:17] God bless your little heart.
[01:25:20] >> Remember, this man has shot a lot of
[01:25:22] people and he's treated a lot of bullet
[01:25:24] wounds in combat, out of combat, pretty
[01:25:27] much all of it. You can't get a better
[01:25:30] expert testimony than Nate
[01:25:33] [snorts and clears throat]
[01:25:33] round. And it's not just me. I looked at
[01:25:37] every single one of these posts and I
[01:25:38] went to the comment section. What do the
[01:25:39] what do the regular populists think
[01:25:41] about this when they heard this? All
[01:25:42] right, so from the post from the
[01:25:43] right-wing angel, turning point USA
[01:25:46] spokesman Andrew Kovette said Saturday,
[01:25:47] Charlie Kirk surgeon called an absolute
[01:25:49] miracle. And the very first comment,
[01:25:52] [ __ ] button. That's not how bullets
[01:25:54] work. Bro, ain't no way you believe
[01:25:57] this. I follow this account just to see
[01:25:59] the lack of critical thinking and laugh.
[01:26:00] This is a fantasy feelood.
[01:26:03] >> Remember, Nick, this is the narrative
[01:26:06] that you're shilling.
[01:26:07] >> Makes no sense. But now, here's the
[01:26:09] problem. because you're actually going
[01:26:10] to have tons of people out here that are
[01:26:11] going to leave this type of comment.
[01:26:13] Wow, amazing how many people follow you
[01:26:15] who can't believe in a miracle. God was
[01:26:17] at work through the life of this man,
[01:26:19] Charlie Kirk. This is so unbelievable
[01:26:21] for those who can't see God in his
[01:26:23] creation. This got me thinking. I
[01:26:26] watched this clip and and you guys might
[01:26:27] not think there's not that much to it,
[01:26:28] but I think there is. All right, you
[01:26:30] might think at first, oh, this isn't
[01:26:32] that big of a deal. So, what we have
[01:26:33] >> and Nick, because you've reviewed all
[01:26:35] the evidence so much, I bet you already
[01:26:37] know who Adam Bartholomew is and you
[01:26:39] know his live stream and you've watched
[01:26:40] his footage a whole bunch. You're
[01:26:42] already familiar with that. And if you
[01:26:43] saw this footage, you'd immediately know
[01:26:45] it was from Adam Bartholomew because
[01:26:46] you're so familiar with the evidence
[01:26:48] >> have here is a kid being interviewed
[01:26:50] when the gunshot rings off and a little
[01:26:52] bit of an aftermath. But I want you to
[01:26:54] watch it. And there was something I
[01:26:55] noticed about this
[01:26:56] >> because just from that description,
[01:26:57] before you even see the footage, you
[01:26:59] already know that it's Adam
[01:27:00] Bartholomew's footage because that's the
[01:27:02] only footage that matches that
[01:27:03] description that Nate just gave.
[01:27:11] >> Okay. Why is this important? Pretty
[01:27:13] weird. You hear the gunshot ring off.
[01:27:15] It's not that loud.
[01:27:17] The kid being interviewed and the people
[01:27:19] behind him don't even flinch. They don't
[01:27:21] move. They don't go, "What the was
[01:27:23] that?" I'll play it again.
[01:27:27] >> What was that?
[01:27:30] >> All those people still on the balcony.
[01:27:31] One kid kind of just like, "What was
[01:27:33] that?" Kid being interviewed didn't even
[01:27:35] sound like he even heard it.
[01:27:37] [snorts] You guys realize if a 30 That's
[01:27:40] basically an amphitheater, right? Dug
[01:27:42] down into the ground, big buildings
[01:27:43] everywhere. The acoustics on this would
[01:27:45] be insane. You guys realize if a 306 and
[01:27:48] we know it wasn't a suppressed 306.
[01:27:50] We've seen the FBI picture of the
[01:27:51] weapon. If a 306 would have gone off
[01:27:54] within 100 meters or so of these kids,
[01:27:58] everyone in that amphitheater would have
[01:28:00] immediately gone boom. It would have
[01:28:02] sound like a bomb going off. But these
[01:28:05] kids didn't even flinch. Which tells me
[01:28:08] it was most likely a small caliber round
[01:28:11] or suppressed round. Be it a pistol
[01:28:13] round be He had a suppressed 5.56 round.
[01:28:18] That's what that reaction tells me. That
[01:28:20] reaction from those kids, none of them
[01:28:22] barely even flinched when that gunshot
[01:28:24] went off. So, here here's where we're
[01:28:25] at. Is it possible that the autopsy
[01:28:28] report showed that Charlie was shot in
[01:28:30] the neck and the bullet potentially
[01:28:33] didn't make it through? Sure. If it was
[01:28:35] maybe a pistol round, is it possible
[01:28:38] that a 306 round was stopped by
[01:28:41] Charlie's neck vertebrae? No, it's not.
[01:28:43] There's a 0% chance of that happening.
[01:28:45] That's not possible. It's not a thing.
[01:28:48] So, here lies the problem. Okay. FBI, we
[01:28:52] now have supposedly the coroner and the
[01:28:54] surgeon saying that bullet didn't pass
[01:28:56] through. It lodged just below the skin.
[01:28:59] Okay. So, now we know it wasn't a 30 odd
[01:29:01] six.
[01:29:03] So, who's the shooter? FBI. Where's
[01:29:06] >> Yeah. Who's the shooter? And where the
[01:29:08] [ __ ] is the gun?
[01:29:11] And why is everyone trying to cover it
[01:29:13] up? Nick,
[01:29:17] >> if you if you're calling people like me
[01:29:19] a conspiracy theorist right now for
[01:29:21] looking at this story and looking at
[01:29:23] posts like that and going, "That's total
[01:29:25] bullshit." Guys, I'm sorry, but this is
[01:29:29] from top to bottom, start to finish,
[01:29:31] this entire thing has been pathetic from
[01:29:33] the FBI. Again, I don't know if it's
[01:29:35] nefarious or if it's just extreme
[01:29:37] incompetency.
[01:29:38] Um, and now with these posts, the the
[01:29:41] surgeon saying it's it's a miracle that
[01:29:43] Charlie's the man of steel, his bone
[01:29:45] density and his vertebrae is strong
[01:29:47] enough to stop a 30 six round. Off,
[01:29:50] dude. That's where I'm at at this point.
[01:29:52] I think uh the American public deserves
[01:29:56] some truth because I think we're all
[01:29:58] just super tired of being lied about.
[01:29:59] The same FBI that continues to cover up
[01:30:01] the Epstein files up even up until
[01:30:03] yesterday. cashel saying never traffic
[01:30:06] children to anyone now. I mean this this
[01:30:09] is just it's outrageous all of this.
[01:30:12] >> Yeah.
[01:30:12] >> Wound is which is here.
[01:30:14] >> Pretty outrageous.
[01:30:16] >> All right. First thing we're going to
[01:30:17] take a look at is what this report says.
[01:30:20] >> Um my understanding from speaking with a
[01:30:23] couple of people high up at Turning
[01:30:24] Point USA, they let me know that the the
[01:30:28] injury took place right below the jaw in
[01:30:31] the C2. Uh
[01:30:32] >> oh. The bullet crashed through C2 all
[01:30:35] the way through C7
[01:30:37] >> and then they found the bullet lodged in
[01:30:40] that meaty area around T1, the thoracic
[01:30:44] first vertebrae.
[01:30:45] >> All right. So, I don't know Steven
[01:30:46] Gardner. I don't really watch his stuff.
[01:30:47] I'm going to assume he's operating in
[01:30:49] good faith here and that he actually
[01:30:50] heard what he heard. And, you know,
[01:30:52] somebody else also came out and said
[01:30:53] that they've seen or supposedly heard
[01:30:55] about this same autopsy report.
[01:30:57] >> I confirmed. So both Brandon Tatum and
[01:31:01] Steven Gardner are very closely
[01:31:02] affiliated with TPUSA and you could say
[01:31:06] they're TP USA mouthpieces in this
[01:31:07] regard because they are the ones being
[01:31:09] given the information to release to the
[01:31:10] public. And this was released after we
[01:31:13] had a lot of time for the internet to
[01:31:15] speculate about how weird the shot was
[01:31:18] and how none of it made sense. And so
[01:31:21] the release of this information through
[01:31:22] these channels is was even more
[01:31:24] suspicious at the time. But I'm sure you
[01:31:25] were watching, Nick, so I'm sure you
[01:31:27] know all about that.
[01:31:29] >> Obviously, because I have connections
[01:31:30] and I confirmed that the autopsy was
[01:31:32] done. I don't want to say too much, but
[01:31:34] >> the autopsy yielded where the entry
[01:31:36] wound was
[01:31:37] >> and how the bullet killed him. It's
[01:31:40] already been determined. They found the
[01:31:42] bullet lodged in his body. They can tell
[01:31:44] you exactly where, what was severed,
[01:31:47] what killed him, where the bullet
[01:31:49] traveled from his neck down through his
[01:31:51] body. They have it all. Fragmentation of
[01:31:54] the of of the round that that spouted
[01:31:56] through his body. They have all of that
[01:31:58] in.
[01:31:59] >> Okay, they have it all. They've got it
[01:32:01] proved. Let's see if this even works
[01:32:04] mathematically or scientifically. Let's
[01:32:06] jump into it. All right, guys. So,
[01:32:08] basically a middle school math problem.
[01:32:10] This isn't that hard to figure out. We
[01:32:11] know that according to the medical
[01:32:12] examiner report, this 30 six round came
[01:32:15] in, hit him in the C2, traveled down.
[01:32:17] All right, you guys are going to notice
[01:32:19] some huge problems with this right away,
[01:32:22] but let's go ahead and, you know, just
[01:32:24] look at this objectively. All right, we
[01:32:26] got our protractor out. Let's put that
[01:32:28] right here on the C2. Okay, we do know
[01:32:32] again from where Tyler Robinson was
[01:32:33] shooting, it was a 9° slope with a 90°
[01:32:35] offset essentially meaning almost
[01:32:37] directly on uh at a 9° slope, which we
[01:32:40] can travel out from our protractor from
[01:32:42] the C2 here at 9°. Perfect. Right. As we
[01:32:46] pull the protractor off, what's the
[01:32:48] first huge glaring issue you guys are
[01:32:50] going to see here? Oh, they want to tell
[01:32:52] you the medical examiner report confirms
[01:32:55] he was first hit in the C2 vertebrae
[01:32:58] right below the base of the skull.
[01:33:00] Biggest problem I see with that from the
[01:33:02] angle Tyler Robinson shoots him from is
[01:33:05] uh that would have hit him in the teeth,
[01:33:08] right in the [ __ ] face. And you might
[01:33:11] make the argument that this didn't come
[01:33:12] from the FBI. This came from TP USA.
[01:33:15] It's not the same.
[01:33:18] These narratives need to align. If
[01:33:19] everyone's telling the truth, these
[01:33:21] narratives need to align. And it's
[01:33:24] clearly TPUSA leaking out this
[01:33:26] information from the autopsy to try to
[01:33:28] allay people's conspiracy theories. And
[01:33:30] it's just making the conspiracy theories
[01:33:32] worse.
[01:33:34] That autopsy, by the way, is in the
[01:33:36] hands of Erica Kirk right now,
[01:33:39] but we haven't seen it.
[01:33:41] But if it says what they say it says,
[01:33:44] what Brandon Tatum and Steven Gartner
[01:33:46] seem to say it says,
[01:33:48] this is not possible obviously and these
[01:33:51] things matter because if it's not
[01:33:53] possible, then they have the wrong guy
[01:33:55] and they are prosecuting a path seat.
[01:33:59] But Nick, I would love to hear your
[01:34:01] evidence
[01:34:03] of how this is possible. I would love to
[01:34:05] see your analysis. I would love to see
[01:34:06] your sources, which I've never seen any
[01:34:08] of
[01:34:10] or even above the teeth. Uh there is no
[01:34:14] possible way that this round came from a
[01:34:16] 90° angle and a 9° slope uh and hit the
[01:34:20] C2 way. Now, we can make this work for
[01:34:23] the location of the shot if it enters
[01:34:25] and hits the C5, but that's not what
[01:34:28] they're saying. They're saying it hit
[01:34:29] the C2, traveled down all his vertebrae.
[01:34:32] This is it doesn't work. Next thing with
[01:34:33] this, we're talking about a 306 round.
[01:34:36] Right now, you have this 30 O6 round
[01:34:37] traveling at 24 to 2700 feet per second
[01:34:39] or even less, doesn't even matter. Hits
[01:34:41] him, let's say, hits him in the C2 if
[01:34:44] this magic bullet that doesn't go
[01:34:45] through his face somehow. Uh, that then
[01:34:47] refracts straight down into the T1. Uh,
[01:34:52] yeah, that's not what a 30 six round is
[01:34:55] going to do. If a hu hits a human neck
[01:34:57] bird, we know it's going to blow right
[01:34:58] through. But even if there was some
[01:35:00] weird refraction, bullets aren't going
[01:35:01] to refract almost 90 degrees. We've
[01:35:03] talked about that. And then keep their
[01:35:04] actual velocity to be able to do that
[01:35:06] much damage. Not really a thing.
[01:35:07] >> And you can just get footage after
[01:35:09] footage of operator after operator,
[01:35:12] green berets and Navy Seals, military
[01:35:15] ballistics experts all over the place
[01:35:18] pointing out all the problems with this
[01:35:21] narrative. But that was not an entry
[01:35:23] wound that we saw. We saw an exit wound.
[01:35:24] So where'd that bullet come from? We
[01:35:26] don't bleed like and I've shot guys
[01:35:27] closer than the camera was. Uh, and an
[01:35:30] an exit an entry wound doesn't look like
[01:35:31] that. An exit wound does. So, that's
[01:35:34] enough of experts talking about bullets.
[01:35:37] I'm sure we beat that horse to death.
[01:35:39] I'd love to see your evidence, Nick, of
[01:35:40] otherwise. And remember that if the
[01:35:43] bullet and the gun don't match the
[01:35:45] wound,
[01:35:47] then Tyler Robinson is not your killer.
[01:35:51] Um, but let's look at the rest of the
[01:35:53] evidence that the FBI put out. some of
[01:35:55] the glaring issues in that. Just want to
[01:35:57] remind us all of this video and I want
[01:35:58] to go to the exact direct original
[01:36:00] source, the FBI's official website.
[01:36:03] We've all seen it. Zoomed in security
[01:36:06] camera footage of the figure running
[01:36:07] across the roof behind this popup part.
[01:36:11] Then he emerges from the right hand
[01:36:13] side, apparently carrying something,
[01:36:15] runs across the reflective white part
[01:36:18] where he clams down and jumps down with
[01:36:20] the grainy zoom. A lot of people argued
[01:36:23] over what's inside of that towel. Is it
[01:36:25] a mouser?
[01:36:27] Could be. Who knows? I'll concede that
[01:36:30] maybe. Maybe maybe that floppy thing
[01:36:33] could be a mouser.
[01:36:36] I don't personally think so. But you
[01:36:40] know what?
[01:36:43] You can decide whatever you want to
[01:36:44] decide about this.
[01:36:47] But you remember when Dr. Chris
[01:36:49] Martinson read the affidavit and they
[01:36:51] said that they had video footage of him
[01:36:52] getting into position and then they said
[01:36:54] Charlie Kirk was shot and then they said
[01:36:57] they had video footage of him leaving
[01:36:58] the position.
[01:37:01] Well, the wording that they used was
[01:37:03] pretty interesting because I've been to
[01:37:05] the scene of the crime and I know this
[01:37:07] is actually a still frame from my own
[01:37:09] footage. This is the camera where that
[01:37:12] video footage we just watched came from.
[01:37:14] This is taken as a still from my own
[01:37:16] camera footage when I went there to do
[01:37:18] some journalism.
[01:37:21] And this is Google Earth screenshotted
[01:37:24] with the camera that I just showed you
[01:37:27] down here in the bottom of the frame. It
[01:37:29] is located on this corner of this
[01:37:30] building right here. and it is
[01:37:32] overlooking the entire roof of the Los
[01:37:35] Ci center and clearly would have
[01:37:38] recorded the shot being taken.
[01:37:40] But they decided not to show us that
[01:37:43] very substantial proof that that figure
[01:37:46] in that video is the one that took that
[01:37:48] shot with that rifle that they told us
[01:37:50] that he had.
[01:37:53] And that's a little weird.
[01:37:56] That's a little weird. But let's talk
[01:37:59] about the photos that they put out.
[01:38:02] because they were kind of weird, too.
[01:38:05] Here's the video,
[01:38:07] and here's the photos.
[01:38:09] And you might notice that here his right
[01:38:12] leg is bent, and here his left leg is
[01:38:16] bent. But we were told that he had a
[01:38:19] rifle down his pants, down his skinny
[01:38:21] jeans. And there was exhaustive
[01:38:24] arguments about whether or not a rifle
[01:38:26] would fit down the skinny jeans. But
[01:38:27] just let's add this to the pile of
[01:38:30] things that are a little suspicious
[01:38:34] on top of the fact that the rifle could
[01:38:36] never have created the wound that we saw
[01:38:37] in the first place.
[01:38:40] Because there's another reason why we're
[01:38:42] looking at these photos. How much face
[01:38:45] do we see in these six photos? because
[01:38:48] these are all the photos that we had
[01:38:53] when
[01:38:57] a certain critical part of the story
[01:38:59] occurred.
[01:39:04] I have the affidavit directly quoted
[01:39:06] here in my document
[01:39:09] highlighted the camera capturing the
[01:39:11] individual running across the roof low
[01:39:13] crawling into the area etc. Just like we
[01:39:15] saw
[01:39:18] this is talking about the surveillance
[01:39:19] where they got the photos. Throughout
[01:39:21] the surveillance, the suspect keeps his
[01:39:23] head down and rarely raises his head
[01:39:24] enough to get a clear image of his face.
[01:39:26] As he proceeds across the campus, he is
[01:39:28] seen walking with an unusual gate. He
[01:39:30] walks with very little bending in his
[01:39:32] right leg.
[01:39:35] despite the fact that this is his right
[01:39:38] leg bent right there
[01:39:42] walking up the stairs. He also had to
[01:39:45] clamber over a railing with his
[01:39:46] unbendable right leg, but [snorts]
[01:39:48] that's not what we're getting at.
[01:39:52] Um onto the roof where he leaves the
[01:39:54] camera's view. He assembles the rifle,
[01:39:55] goes takes a shot.
[01:40:00] We'll come back to DNA consistent with
[01:40:02] Robinson was found on the trigger. or
[01:40:03] other parts of the rifle, the fired
[01:40:05] cartridge casing
[01:40:07] and the towel.
[01:40:10] Notice in the affidavit, they didn't
[01:40:12] mention this mysterious screwdriver that
[01:40:14] we kept getting told about, which I'm
[01:40:16] sure you remember, Nick, because you
[01:40:17] followed the case so closely. The
[01:40:19] screwdriver was critical to the
[01:40:21] narrative of the rifle being
[01:40:22] disassembled in his pants and then being
[01:40:23] reassembled on the roof. Um, and at a
[01:40:26] moment at early on, they actually told
[01:40:27] us that he disassembled it on the roof
[01:40:28] and then reassembled it in the woods.
[01:40:30] But that's not what happened. And we all
[01:40:31] know that cuz they gave us the footage
[01:40:33] of him running away right after the
[01:40:35] shot. But here's the critical piece.
[01:40:42] Robinson's mother saw the photo of the
[01:40:44] shooter in the news and thought the
[01:40:46] shooter looked like her son. Robinson's
[01:40:49] mother called her son and asked him
[01:40:50] where he was. He said he was at home
[01:40:52] sick and that he had also been at home
[01:40:53] sick on September 10th. Robinson's
[01:40:55] mother expressed concern to her husband
[01:40:56] that suspected the shooter looked like
[01:40:58] Robinson. Robinson's father agreed.
[01:41:03] So, from these six photos,
[01:41:07] this random mother in Utah said, "Oh my
[01:41:10] gosh, that looks so much like my dear
[01:41:12] son that I'm going to suspect my son of
[01:41:15] murder."
[01:41:19] Do you think there's any mother in the
[01:41:21] world that's going to see these photos
[01:41:24] and think, "I suspect my son of murder."
[01:41:29] Maybe if he wears that exact outfit.
[01:41:35] Maybe.
[01:41:37] But it gets better.
[01:41:40] Oh boy, does it get better.
[01:41:43] Robinson's father reported that when his
[01:41:46] wife showed him the surveillance image
[01:41:48] of the suspected shooter in the news, he
[01:41:50] agreed that it looked like her, like
[01:41:52] their son. He also believed that the
[01:41:54] rifle that police suspected the shooter
[01:41:56] used matched a rifle that was given to
[01:41:59] his son as a gift.
[01:42:04] So, this is from the affidavit that came
[01:42:05] out much later, but remember this is his
[01:42:07] father recounting how he knew it was his
[01:42:11] son
[01:42:12] at the time.
[01:42:15] Okay.
[01:42:17] Do I have that rifle in here?
[01:42:20] No. I have to go to the rifle over here.
[01:42:24] There it is.
[01:42:26] That rifle.
[01:42:28] That's the rifle that Tyler Robinson's
[01:42:30] father apparently saw in the news and
[01:42:33] then suspected that it was his son
[01:42:35] because it's an heirloom rifle. But the
[01:42:37] one problem is that's not the rifle that
[01:42:40] Tyler used. And we know that because the
[01:42:43] news outlet that put this photo out told
[01:42:46] us that later. that they were told that
[01:42:48] it was a certain type of rifle and then
[01:42:51] they went and used a stock image of a
[01:42:54] similar rifle for their news story. And
[01:42:57] we to this day have never seen a photo
[01:42:59] of the actual rifle and neither has
[01:43:02] Tyler Robinson's family, at least not in
[01:43:05] the news. And so
[01:43:09] in the affidavit itself, they actually
[01:43:11] include information that illegitimizes
[01:43:15] their own narrative. He also believed
[01:43:18] that the rifle that police suspected the
[01:43:20] shooter used matched a rifle that was
[01:43:22] given to his son as a gift
[01:43:25] despite the fact that no such photo was
[01:43:27] ever published.
[01:43:30] Awfully convenient though that there's
[01:43:31] this heirloom rifle that perfectly ties
[01:43:34] Tyler Robinson to the scene of the
[01:43:36] crime. The kind of thing his crazy
[01:43:39] boyfriend might have had access to. The
[01:43:41] kind of thing that anyone might have
[01:43:43] been able to get from his apartment and
[01:43:44] plant at the scene of the crime.
[01:43:47] possibly.
[01:43:50] So then they go and get their they they
[01:43:52] convince Tyler Robinson to come in. He
[01:43:54] kind of admits to them. All this weird
[01:43:56] [ __ ] happens. We're not going to go
[01:43:57] through all of it. [snorts]
[01:44:00] The family friend, remember? So I'm sure
[01:44:02] you remember, Nick. I'm sure you
[01:44:04] remember that that his parents got in
[01:44:08] touch with him. They were sure. They
[01:44:09] were like, "Oh my gosh, our son is a
[01:44:11] killer. We can tell because of the photo
[01:44:12] of the gun that we haven't seen before."
[01:44:15] And so then they convince him to come
[01:44:16] over to the house. He kind of sort of
[01:44:18] admits to them that he was the killer.
[01:44:20] They kind of convince him not to not to
[01:44:22] off himself. And then they have a friend
[01:44:25] who used to be in law enforcement or
[01:44:26] something come over to convince Tyler
[01:44:29] Robinson to turn himself in. And he
[01:44:32] agrees. And this part is really weird.
[01:44:34] The family friend spoke to police and
[01:44:36] reported telling Robinson that it would
[01:44:39] be best if he brought all the evidence
[01:44:41] with him to the sheriff's office to
[01:44:43] avoid police having to search his
[01:44:45] parents' home.
[01:44:49] If he was ex law enforcement, you'd
[01:44:51] think he would realize I mean, hey, I'm
[01:44:54] no law enforcement expert, but I would
[01:44:55] assume that you're not going to trust
[01:44:58] the the killer to bring all the
[01:45:00] evidence. you're going to go out and
[01:45:02] look for all the evidence, right? So,
[01:45:04] that's a kind of weird piece of the
[01:45:06] narrative. Just Just Tyler, bring all
[01:45:08] the evidence that they're going to need
[01:45:09] in order to convict you with you. Let's
[01:45:12] just bring all the right stuff so they
[01:45:13] can convict you. But you know what you
[01:45:16] can't bring?
[01:45:17] He asked Robinson if he had the clothes
[01:45:20] that were related to what he did. But
[01:45:22] Robinson replied a little conveniently
[01:45:25] that he had disposed of the clothes in
[01:45:28] different areas.
[01:45:31] Now,
[01:45:33] I'm just thinking to myself that if it's
[01:45:36] not actually Tyler Robinson in that
[01:45:38] surveillance footage, if there's
[01:45:39] something fishy going on here, those
[01:45:42] clothes might have someone else's DNA on
[01:45:44] them. And it's probably best that they
[01:45:47] get disposed of in other areas, don't
[01:45:50] you think? Because Candace wound up
[01:45:54] surfacing a photo given to her by the
[01:45:55] public, which has never been
[01:45:56] discredited, of Tyler Robinson wearing a
[01:45:59] totally different outfit, a maroon
[01:46:00] shirt, over in a Dairy Queen just a few
[01:46:03] hours after the shooting, just having
[01:46:04] food in front of a bunch of cameras, not
[01:46:06] stressed out at all. Kind of weird, but
[01:46:09] I promised that we wouldn't get into
[01:46:10] anything related to canvas, so let's
[01:46:12] just forget about that. Okay,
[01:46:15] next up, the text message thread. very
[01:46:19] incriminating text message thread of him
[01:46:21] admitting that he did this thing. I
[01:46:23] don't think I need to tell the internet
[01:46:25] about how [ __ ] these text messages
[01:46:26] are. You all remember the text messages,
[01:46:29] right?
[01:46:31] Why did I do it? Yeah, I had enough of
[01:46:34] his hatred. Some hate can't be
[01:46:36] negotiated out. If I am able to grab my
[01:46:38] rifle unseen, I will have left no
[01:46:40] evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve
[01:46:42] it again. Hopefully, they have moved on.
[01:46:44] I haven't seen anything about them
[01:46:46] finding it.
[01:46:47] How long have you been planning this?
[01:46:51] Let me just ask all the right questions.
[01:46:53] Let me just respond with all the perfect
[01:46:56] perfect stuff to incriminate myself in a
[01:46:59] text message thread while I talk about
[01:47:02] how how I was trying to get away. I'm
[01:47:03] trying to get away with this. I almost
[01:47:05] got away with no evidence. I just left
[01:47:08] the rifle at the scene of the [ __ ]
[01:47:10] crime, which we're going to talk about
[01:47:12] here in a second. So now let me leave a
[01:47:14] digital trail
[01:47:17] that is me admitting to the crime.
[01:47:21] This kid had a 4.0 GPA
[01:47:24] and uh what was his score again on the
[01:47:27] ACT?
[01:47:28] He scored a 34 out of 36 on the ACT,
[01:47:32] placing him in the top 1% of
[01:47:34] intelligence.
[01:47:37] And while we're at it, this is a
[01:47:39] screenshot from my own footage of going
[01:47:42] to the location where the rifle was
[01:47:44] dumped because I went there to do some
[01:47:46] journalism, Nick. [snorts] And you know
[01:47:48] what you immediately realize when you
[01:47:50] walk into that little space behind that
[01:47:52] chicken coupe where the rifle was
[01:47:53] allegedly found. You're under complete
[01:47:56] concealment in every direction and no
[01:47:58] one's going to see you. And you could
[01:48:01] hang out there for hours probably. I
[01:48:03] mean, the manhunt complicates that, but
[01:48:06] Bro could have gotten weird back there,
[01:48:07] and no one would have known. I mean, he
[01:48:09] allegedly changed his clothes there. But
[01:48:12] he didn't think to try to disassemble
[01:48:14] the rifle and hide it again the way that
[01:48:16] he had it hidden when he entered the
[01:48:18] scene and take it with him. He didn't
[01:48:21] think to try to hide it in his backpack.
[01:48:23] He didn't think to try to bury it at
[01:48:25] least, or hide it in all the ivy and
[01:48:27] bushes or anything else. He just decided
[01:48:30] to leave it there because he was in a
[01:48:33] big rush to get to Dairy Queen and eat
[01:48:35] ice cream.
[01:48:37] That was interesting.
[01:48:40] Um, while we're here, maybe we'll talk
[01:48:42] about the note that he left under his
[01:48:44] keyboard.
[01:48:46] This good old note. I love how Cash
[01:48:49] Patel explains this note.
[01:48:50] >> He has not confessed to um to
[01:48:52] authorities. He he is he is uh he is not
[01:48:55] cooperating. Uh but
[01:48:56] >> DNA analysis. And again, Nick, I'm sure
[01:48:58] you've already seen all this evidence
[01:48:59] because you're so familiar with all the
[01:49:01] evidence [snorts] and it somehow backs
[01:49:04] up your theories, but I just figured
[01:49:06] we'd watch it again together. And once
[01:49:09] we decisions and uh I'm sorry, Brian, I
[01:49:11] forgot your other question.
[01:49:12] >> You had a written note. Was there Did he
[01:49:13] write a written note before uh before
[01:49:16] the assassination attempt? That's what
[01:49:17] the governor said yesterday. And what
[01:49:19] did that say? If you could
[01:49:20] >> So, what I'm able to say I'm sorry. So,
[01:49:23] what I was what I'm able to say is I I I
[01:49:25] addressed it partially earlier is that
[01:49:27] the written note we believe what did
[01:49:29] exist and we have evidence to show what
[01:49:32] was in that note which is um and I'm
[01:49:35] going to uh summarize basically saying I
[01:49:37] the suspect wrote a note saying I have
[01:49:39] the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk
[01:49:41] and I'm going to take it. That note was
[01:49:43] written before the shooting. um evidence
[01:49:46] of existence we now have learned existed
[01:49:48] before the shooting was in the location
[01:49:50] um in the suspect and partner's home.
[01:49:53] But we have since learned that the note,
[01:49:55] even though it has been destroyed, we
[01:49:56] have found forensic evidence of the
[01:49:58] note. And we have confirmed what that
[01:50:01] note says because of our aggressive
[01:50:04] interview posture at the FBI.
[01:50:07] So, whatever the [ __ ] that means,
[01:50:11] that's another piece of confession that
[01:50:13] was not planted
[01:50:17] by the feds or whoever, right? Um,
[01:50:20] [snorts]
[01:50:22] I don't know what the [ __ ] that
[01:50:23] >> he's not confessed to.
[01:50:31] And then let's briefly mention Discord
[01:50:33] because we had these Discord logs that
[01:50:35] allegedly he went into Discord and he
[01:50:37] admitted to all of his friends that he
[01:50:38] had done it. Um but then like Discord
[01:50:42] came out and denied that that was true
[01:50:44] and then the whole thing kind of went
[01:50:46] away until Turkey Tom got some really
[01:50:48] weird leaks later on which was also very
[01:50:51] suspicious. Discord said, this is a
[01:50:54] quote from this article that you can
[01:50:55] look up for yourselves on the Daily
[01:50:56] Beast. Discord said Friday that Tyler
[01:50:58] Robinson, the 22-year-old suspect, did
[01:51:00] have an account, but that he did not use
[01:51:02] it to plan the shooting Wednesday
[01:51:04] afternoon at Utah Valley University.
[01:51:06] That directly contradicted Utah Governor
[01:51:08] Spencer Cox, who had said at a news
[01:51:10] conference Friday morning that
[01:51:11] Robinson's roommate had shown
[01:51:13] authorities messages on Discord from
[01:51:14] Robinson. The messages referenced in
[01:51:17] recent reporting about planning details
[01:51:19] do not appear to be Discord messages.
[01:51:20] The spokesperson said these were
[01:51:22] communications between the suspect's
[01:51:23] roommate and a friend after the shooting
[01:51:25] where the roommate was recounting the
[01:51:27] contents of a note that the suspect had
[01:51:29] left elsewhere.
[01:51:31] So, I think that we have sort of beaten
[01:51:34] a few of these points to death. And we
[01:51:35] could go on and on and on and on and on
[01:51:38] and we have over months and months and
[01:51:39] months without you, Nick. But let's just
[01:51:42] review. The rifle and the gun, the shot,
[01:51:46] the bullet, all of it doesn't [ __ ]
[01:51:49] work. And I'd love to see your sources
[01:51:51] that make it work because if the rifle
[01:51:55] doesn't work, none of it works. And
[01:51:58] quickly you start to ask yourself, who
[01:52:01] would be the most likely culprit? Who
[01:52:03] would be capable of this kind of cover
[01:52:05] up of this kind of planning of getting a
[01:52:08] pathy of all the things that we have
[01:52:11] seen?
[01:52:13] Who would have motive?
[01:52:16] A
[01:52:19] the footage. I would argue there's a lot
[01:52:22] of problems with the footage,
[01:52:24] but maybe we'll find out in court. You
[01:52:26] know, the court trial that they're going
[01:52:27] to not show anyone anything about that
[01:52:30] one. Maybe they'll show us the footage
[01:52:32] in court. His confession to his parents.
[01:52:34] There's [ __ ] holes literally in the
[01:52:37] official affidavit that prove that
[01:52:40] there's lies in the affidavit that we
[01:52:42] all know there there are lies there. Him
[01:52:45] turning himself in. Oh, yeah. I forgot
[01:52:46] to mention that someone foyed and asked
[01:52:49] for um the footage of Tyler Robinson
[01:52:52] turning himself in at the police station
[01:52:54] and that police station replied and said
[01:52:56] that they had lost or deleted the
[01:52:59] footage.
[01:53:02] How surprising? How coincidental? How
[01:53:04] convenient. I'm sure it's nothing. Love
[01:53:06] to see your evidence on how it's
[01:53:08] nothing. Text messages to Lance Twigs.
[01:53:12] I do your best. His Discord logs maybe,
[01:53:17] could be,
[01:53:20] but the rifle needs to also work. Note
[01:53:23] left under his keyboard. I don't [ __ ]
[01:53:26] know what Cash told us about it. I don't
[01:53:27] understand what like I'm pretty sure he
[01:53:30] said that there used to be a note. There
[01:53:31] was once a note, but then it got
[01:53:33] destroyed probably by our guilty
[01:53:36] suspect, Tyler Robinson, and he
[01:53:37] destroyed the note. But we we had an
[01:53:39] aggressive interview posture and we
[01:53:41] determined for sure that the note used
[01:53:43] to exist. So, it used to be evidence and
[01:53:45] now it's evidence again when we talk
[01:53:47] about it. There was DNA on the
[01:53:49] screwdriver, which now is no longer
[01:53:51] being mentioned for reasons that aren't
[01:53:52] explained. There was DNA on the towel
[01:53:54] and the rifle, which there's no reason
[01:53:56] there could ever be Tyler Robinson's DNA
[01:53:58] on a towel and on his own rifle that I'm
[01:54:01] sure he put on the scene. And his car
[01:54:04] was seen on doorbell cams near the
[01:54:05] scene, which we're not going to get into
[01:54:06] because that's a whole other video,
[01:54:07] which I've made a few of. [snorts] Um,
[01:54:10] so if you can't tell, I do have a bias.
[01:54:15] My bias is based off of all of the
[01:54:18] reporting that I've done, all the
[01:54:19] evidence that I've seen, and a little
[01:54:21] bit of preconceived bias about Israel,
[01:54:23] and my understanding that Israel is the
[01:54:24] world's foremost assassinator,
[01:54:27] that Israel is the most shitty [ __ ]
[01:54:29] country on the planet, that Israel is
[01:54:31] conducting a genocide. So, do take my
[01:54:33] bias into account while you watch this
[01:54:35] video, okay?
[01:54:37] That's fair.
[01:54:39] Um, you can call me a fed. You can call
[01:54:42] me a plant. You can say that I'm like
[01:54:45] trying to character assassinate Nick or
[01:54:47] whatever you want to do. I'm just trying
[01:54:49] to share my sources and my evidence and
[01:54:52] Nick went at me and I didn't see any
[01:54:55] sources or evidence from Nick. I just
[01:54:57] saw a lot of ad homonym and straw man
[01:54:59] attacks and very weird suspicious things
[01:55:01] to say,
[01:55:02] but no evidence. So, Nick, now that
[01:55:06] you've seen some evidence, which I'm
[01:55:09] sure you already were very familiar
[01:55:10] with, I'd love to hear your stance on
[01:55:13] why it's probably Tyler Robinson and the
[01:55:16] feds are probably telling the truth and
[01:55:19] why you're not interested in developing
[01:55:21] your own understanding of what happened
[01:55:24] and asking your own questions about
[01:55:27] TPUSA and who murdered Charlie Kirk
[01:55:31] and why we're getting all this reporting
[01:55:34] about Benjamin Netanyahu offering him
[01:55:35] giant sums of money and why Benjamin
[01:55:37] Netanyahu was one of the first people to
[01:55:39] report that Charlie was dead and then to
[01:55:41] eulogize him over and over and then to
[01:55:43] talk for days and days about how Charlie
[01:55:45] was so loyal to Israel despite the text
[01:55:48] messages saying that he was objectively
[01:55:50] going to leave the pro-Israel cause.
[01:55:52] Didn't even mention the ones where he
[01:55:53] said he was thinking of inviting
[01:55:54] Candace.
[01:55:57] I would love to know how any of this
[01:56:00] squares with the message that you have
[01:56:02] been preaching for ages for since
[01:56:06] Charlottesville. Since you were in
[01:56:08] Charlottesville and I was at Burning
[01:56:10] Man. How is it that you have it so right
[01:56:14] all of a sudden after years
[01:56:17] and all the evidence is just
[01:56:21] I'm misunderstanding it,
[01:56:24] I guess.
[01:56:27] Because let's be clear, I'm just going
[01:56:29] to be honest. I did my live stream just
[01:56:34] gently, kindly proddding at what seemed
[01:56:37] a little off. It just didn't seem like
[01:56:39] the way you've been speaking before. And
[01:56:41] it just was confusing. And so I gently
[01:56:44] prodded it like, "Where you at, dog? I
[01:56:47] like you. I like your [ __ ] I like your
[01:56:48] content. I like your messages. Even the
[01:56:51] ones I don't agree with. I like how it
[01:56:52] challenges my thinking."
[01:56:55] And that's all that was.
[01:56:57] No one told me to do it. Wasn't paid to
[01:56:59] do it. I had no ulterior motive around
[01:57:02] that moment. I just wanted a good lead
[01:57:05] into my show. And my show was about the
[01:57:07] anti-semite of the year competition. And
[01:57:09] you didn't win it.
[01:57:12] And I thought it was a good idea. I knew
[01:57:15] it was going to be a little
[01:57:16] controversial for sure. And I was
[01:57:18] curious how you'd respond.
[01:57:20] And I figured you would respond
[01:57:22] intelligently.
[01:57:25] And then the response that you gave was
[01:57:28] the most [ __ ] suspicious and weird
[01:57:30] [ __ ] thing I have ever seen.
[01:57:34] Just to be honest.
[01:57:37] And I think we have some questions now
[01:57:40] about why the [ __ ] is that your opinion
[01:57:42] and where is that coming from?
[01:57:47] And so now I have more questions than I
[01:57:49] had at the start. And I don't know, like
[01:57:51] I'm not a fan of I'm not trying to make
[01:57:54] direct accusations. I'm just like, what
[01:57:55] the [ __ ] bro?
[01:57:58] What the [ __ ]
[01:58:04] Um, so I'm sure I'll get a lot of heat.
[01:58:07] I'm sure that I'll get called all kinds
[01:58:08] of names. I'm sure there'll be all sorts
[01:58:10] of faceless frog accounts
[01:58:13] using all of the usual smears against
[01:58:16] me, as they're already doing in the
[01:58:17] comments.
[01:58:19] I would recommend that you all read the
[01:58:21] comments, especially on X, and note
[01:58:24] which accounts are defending Nick's
[01:58:26] current take
[01:58:28] and how many of them are
[01:58:31] Jewish and Israeli.
[01:58:33] And notice the types of tactics that
[01:58:36] they're going to level at me and who's
[01:58:38] doing it.
[01:58:42] Don't trust me. Just double check my
[01:58:43] sources. Double check my reporting. Come
[01:58:45] up with your own perspective, your own
[01:58:46] opinions based on the evidence. Don't
[01:58:48] trust Candace. If you want to watch her,
[01:58:51] watch her and come up with your own
[01:58:52] opinion based on the evidence that she's
[01:58:54] sharing. Because a lot of what she's
[01:58:56] sharing is just her trying her best to
[01:58:59] solve the murder of her friend.
[01:59:02] And Charlie wasn't my friend, but I'm
[01:59:04] trying my best to solve his murder
[01:59:06] because it matters to America and to me
[01:59:08] as an American. And it matters to the
[01:59:11] future of our nation, especially if
[01:59:13] Israel was involved. Hey, Nick.
[01:59:17] And I said in my last video that Nick,
[01:59:19] if you were killed, I would devote the
[01:59:22] same amount of resources to solving your
[01:59:24] murder because it would be equally
[01:59:26] important, especially in these charged
[01:59:29] times.
[01:59:34] So,
[01:59:38] that's where we're at. That's how I feel
[01:59:41] and I'd be curious how all of you feel.
[01:59:43] I'm sure that the comment section is
[01:59:45] going to be [ __ ] wild.
[01:59:47] Nick, if you want to debate this on a
[01:59:49] live stream ever, I'd be happy to debate
[01:59:51] the murder of Charlie Kirk on a live
[01:59:53] stream.
[01:59:56] I just felt like this recorded format
[01:59:58] was best for presenting evidence because
[02:00:01] evidence matters. And
[02:00:05] yeah, I'd love to see yours.
[02:00:08] So,
[02:00:11] now that we've said all that,
[02:00:15] let's close with one last important
[02:00:16] piece
[02:00:22] about him lying about knowing his dad
[02:00:23] was CIA. Ian Carol spends less than two
[02:00:24] minutes brushing it off at the end of
[02:00:25] his stream. Invaluable for determining
[02:00:27] intentions. Praying for you and America.
[02:00:29] >> Well, you know what? I was being harsh
[02:00:31] on Ian for effect. I like Ian. I like
[02:00:33] Ian a lot. I hope he doesn't take it
[02:00:35] personally. Um, but I like Ian Carol. I
[02:00:38] think he's a good guy.
[02:00:42] >> You know what?
[02:00:44] I was being harsh for effect
[02:00:47] and I like Nick. I think he's a good
[02:00:49] guy. Um, I I like Nick and [snorts] so I
[02:00:52] hope he doesn't take it personally
[02:00:55] or whatever.
[02:00:57] >> Conspiracy [music] theories are entering
[02:00:59] a danger is the oxygen of the deoxy.
[02:01:03] There's so much evidence out there that
[02:01:05] even if less [music] than 1% is true,
[02:01:09] that will be enough to collapse the
[02:01:11] current paradigm and change the whole
[02:01:14] planet.
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
yt_TBmJe1I9BLE
Dataset
youtube
Comments 0