PROOF The Jeffrey Epstein Birthday Book Is A HOAX

[00:00:00] This week, Congress released the Epstein [00:00:02] files to the public. This included a [00:00:04] birthday book allegedly containing a [00:00:06] note written by Donald Trump. I am [00:00:10] shocked at the horrible news reporting [00:00:12] we have seen because I'm going to show [00:00:14] you proof that the birthday book is a [00:00:16] hoax. [00:00:18] [Music] [00:00:34] If you watch my channel, you know that I [00:00:36] have been extremely critical of Donald [00:00:39] Trump on his handling of the Epstein [00:00:41] files. I think it is ridiculous that [00:00:44] Trump was blocking the release of the [00:00:45] files and then made fun of his [00:00:47] supporters for asking about them. So, I [00:00:50] am the last person you would expect to [00:00:53] take Donald Trump's side. But the claims [00:00:55] about this birthday book, in my opinion, [00:00:58] are so unbelievable that I agree with [00:01:01] Trump. This document looks like a hoax. [00:01:05] And I am shocked that no one in the [00:01:07] mainstream media is looking at these [00:01:09] claims with a critical eye. Now, I will [00:01:12] admit I am not a forgery expert, but I [00:01:16] have eyes and a brain. So, let's look at [00:01:20] the document. The document we received [00:01:23] is an electronic PDF file of threebound [00:01:26] books that were allegedly given to [00:01:27] Jeffrey Epstein on his 50th birthday in [00:01:30] 2003. The book contains a table of [00:01:32] contents which includes a list of people [00:01:34] who included personal letters in the [00:01:36] book. On the list, we see Donald Trump's [00:01:40] name. When we get to Donald Trump's [00:01:42] letter, we see a typewritten poem, the [00:01:44] drawing of a naked woman, and Donald [00:01:47] Trump's signature where the woman's [00:01:48] private parts would be. [00:01:51] Let me explain why I believe this is a [00:01:53] hoax. [00:01:55] I have worked in many different office [00:01:57] settings, and if you have ever worked in [00:02:00] an office before, let me know if you [00:02:02] relate to this. What typically happens [00:02:05] on someone's birthday is there will be a [00:02:07] card that will get passed around the [00:02:09] office. You will write out a note and [00:02:11] sign your name and go back to your work. [00:02:15] That is what busy business people do for [00:02:17] a birthday. Now, imagine Donald Trump in [00:02:20] 2003. He was renovating the General [00:02:23] Motors building in Manhattan, which he [00:02:25] sold in 2003 for $1.4 billion, [00:02:29] the highest price paid for a North [00:02:31] American office building, making himself [00:02:34] a fortune. He is a busy business person [00:02:37] running a massive real estate empire. So [00:02:41] he allegedly gets this request to write [00:02:43] Jeffrey Epstein a birthday note. [00:02:46] And you are telling me that this busy [00:02:49] business person stops to write a poem, [00:02:52] type it out and draw a picture? [00:02:56] I just don't believe it. So let me ask [00:02:58] you this question and be honest. When [00:03:01] any of you received a birthday card to [00:03:04] sign at your office, did you ever write [00:03:06] out a poem, type it out, and draw a [00:03:10] picture? [00:03:12] No, of course you didn't, because that [00:03:15] would be ridiculous. This sounds to me [00:03:18] like a hoax. Now, I also think most [00:03:21] people have forgotten what was happening [00:03:23] in 2003 and how emotionally charged it [00:03:27] was. The World Trade Center collapsed in [00:03:30] 2001. In 2003, the US invaded Iraq. At [00:03:34] the same time, Donald Trump started [00:03:36] making statements against the Iraq war. [00:03:40] Now, think about this. Donald Trump is [00:03:43] in New York. Emotions are high. People [00:03:46] want revenge. And Donald Trump stood [00:03:50] against the war against popular opinion. [00:03:53] He didn't have to do that. He was a [00:03:56] business person. He could have just kept [00:03:58] his mouth shut. but he thought it was an [00:04:02] important issue and it turned out he was [00:04:05] right. Now, just to emphasize this, I'm [00:04:08] going to show you footage from 2016 when [00:04:10] Donald Trump first ran for president [00:04:12] talking about what he was doing in 2003. [00:04:16] And you can see how more than a decade [00:04:19] later, people are still so emotionally [00:04:22] charged about it. Obviously, the war in [00:04:25] Iraq was a big fat mistake. All right. [00:04:29] Now you can take it anywhere you want. [00:04:30] And it took Je took Jeb Bush, if you [00:04:33] remember, at the beginning of his [00:04:35] announcement when he announced for [00:04:36] president, took him five days. He went [00:04:38] back. It was a mistake. It wasn't a [00:04:40] mistake. Took him five days before his [00:04:43] people told him what to say. And he [00:04:45] ultimately said it was a mistake. The [00:04:47] war in Iraq, we spent $2 trillion, [00:04:50] thousands of lives. We don't even have [00:04:52] it. Iran is taking over Iraq with the [00:04:54] second largest oil reserves in the [00:04:56] world. Obviously, it was a mistake. So [00:04:58] George Bush made a mistake. We can make [00:05:01] mistakes, but that one was a beauty. We [00:05:03] should have never been in Iraq. We have [00:05:05] destabilized the Middle East. [00:05:07] >> But so [00:05:07] >> I just want to say at least on behalf of [00:05:09] me and my family, I thank God all the [00:05:11] time that it was George W. Bush in the [00:05:13] White House on 911 and not Al Gore. [00:05:21] And [00:05:25] you can I think you can look back in [00:05:26] hindsight and say a couple things, but [00:05:28] he kept us safe. And not only did he [00:05:29] keep us safe, but no matter what you [00:05:32] want to say about weapons of mass [00:05:33] destruction, Saddam Hussein was in [00:05:35] violation of UN resolutions, an open [00:05:37] violation, and the world wouldn't do [00:05:38] anything about it. And George W. Bush [00:05:40] enforced what the international [00:05:41] community refused to do. And again, he [00:05:43] kept us safe. And I am forever grateful [00:05:45] to what he did for this country. [00:05:46] >> How did he keep us safe when the World [00:05:48] Trade Center came? [00:05:52] The world, excuse me, I lost hundreds of [00:05:55] friends. The World Trade Center came [00:05:57] down during the rain of Georgia. [00:06:00] >> He kept us safe. That's not safe. That [00:06:02] is not safe, Mark. [00:06:04] >> All right. [00:06:05] >> Do you see the emotion in that room? [00:06:08] This is what Donald Trump was dealing [00:06:10] with in 2003. [00:06:13] His mind was so far removed from [00:06:16] thinking about Jeffrey Epstein. Trump [00:06:18] was thinking about global world [00:06:21] politics. [00:06:22] He was running a real estate empire and [00:06:25] speaking out against the war in Iraq. [00:06:29] That is what was going on in 2003. On [00:06:32] top of that, the first episode of The [00:06:34] Apprentice aired in January of 2004. [00:06:39] This was a very busy person. So, it [00:06:43] makes sense why Donald Trump gets so [00:06:45] shocked when reporters ask him about the [00:06:47] birthday book because it is so [00:06:49] ridiculous to him that he had anything [00:06:52] to do with it. Look, the whole thing is [00:06:55] a hoax. It's put out by the Democrats [00:06:57] because we've had the most successful 6 [00:06:59] months in the history of our country. [00:07:02] And that's just a way of trying to [00:07:04] divert attention to something that's [00:07:06] total bull. [00:07:08] It's not my signature and it's not the [00:07:10] way I speak. And anybody that's covered [00:07:12] me for a long time know that's not my [00:07:14] language. It's nonsense. [00:07:16] >> I do not believe Donald Trump had the [00:07:18] time to write a poem to Jeffrey Epstein. [00:07:22] It does not make any sense. It sounds to [00:07:25] me like a hoax. Let's look at the [00:07:29] document. The first thing that stands [00:07:31] out to me is that it is typed. This is [00:07:35] the first red flag. If any of you have [00:07:38] seen any movie about kidnappers, you [00:07:41] know that criminals often type out [00:07:44] ransom notes. Why do they do that? [00:07:47] Because they want to hide their [00:07:49] handwriting. The same thing indicates [00:07:52] that this is a forged document. [00:07:55] I do not believe that a busy businessman [00:07:57] like Donald Trump would have typed out a [00:07:59] note. He would have handwritten it much [00:08:03] like we see with Bill Clinton. If we go [00:08:06] to Bill Clinton's message in the [00:08:08] birthday book, we do see his handwriting [00:08:10] in a creepy message to Jeffrey Epstein. [00:08:14] This is more believable for what a busy [00:08:17] executive would do. And by the way, why [00:08:20] is the mainstream media not covering [00:08:22] Bill Clinton's creepy message? They're [00:08:26] only talking about Donald Trump and [00:08:28] ignoring Bill Clinton. That doesn't seem [00:08:31] right. So the typing itself makes this [00:08:34] seem unbelievable. [00:08:37] But there is something else strange [00:08:38] about the type. [00:08:41] I have looked at this closely. It looks [00:08:44] to me like this page was typed using the [00:08:47] same machine as the table of contents. [00:08:51] Whether it was with a typewriter or a [00:08:53] computer, it looks like it was made on [00:08:55] the same machine. [00:08:58] There are other typed pages in this [00:09:00] document that are clearly on different [00:09:02] machines, but the type on Donald Trump's [00:09:05] alleged letter and the table of contents [00:09:07] looks exactly the same. Look [00:09:10] specifically at the spacing between the [00:09:12] T and the R and the U. Do you notice how [00:09:16] there is a little spacing between the T [00:09:17] and the R, and then the R and the U are [00:09:20] much closer together. Those are telltale [00:09:23] signs that these were typed using the [00:09:25] same machine. [00:09:27] Now, I cannot tell this for sure because [00:09:29] we are just looking at a blurry PDF [00:09:32] file, but it certainly looks very [00:09:34] suspicious to me. Why would Donald Trump [00:09:37] be typing out his letter and the table [00:09:40] of contents of the book? It sounds more [00:09:44] likely that this is a hoax. Something [00:09:47] else strange is the drawing. Now, Donald [00:09:50] Trump famously signs his name with thick [00:09:52] black markers like Sharpie pens. But [00:09:56] what is strange about this page is that [00:09:58] it looks to me like the drawing and the [00:10:00] signature are made by two different [00:10:03] pens. If you look at the drawing, the [00:10:06] lines are darker and thicker than the [00:10:08] signature. It looks like the pen that [00:10:11] was used for the signature was made with [00:10:13] a pen that was more dry and with a pen [00:10:15] tip that was not as wide because the [00:10:18] line is not as thick. [00:10:20] It looks pretty obvious to me that this [00:10:23] was made with two different pens. [00:10:26] Just look at it. You can see it with [00:10:29] your own eyes. It looks like it was [00:10:32] drawn with two different pens. [00:10:36] Now, why would Donald Trump use two [00:10:38] separate pens to do the drawing and the [00:10:41] signature? [00:10:43] He wouldn't. [00:10:44] It seems more likely to me that this was [00:10:47] forged. [00:10:49] It looks to me like one person used one [00:10:52] pen to make the drawing and a second [00:10:54] person used a second pen to forge the [00:10:56] signature. It looks to me like this is a [00:11:00] hoax. And of course, we have to talk [00:11:02] about the signature itself. People have [00:11:05] already commented that this does not [00:11:07] look at all like Donald Trump's famous [00:11:09] signature. That is pretty clear. But to [00:11:13] be fair, people have gathered Trump's [00:11:14] signatures on other letters that appear [00:11:17] similar. They show the name Donald with [00:11:20] a long tail. Now again, I'm not a [00:11:23] signature expert, but just looking at [00:11:25] these signatures, I can already see [00:11:28] several differences between the Epstein [00:11:30] document and the other letters. For [00:11:33] instance, on the Epstein letter, the [00:11:35] upward stroke on the D has a weird kink [00:11:38] in it. It's not a straight line. It's [00:11:41] not a curved line. It's more of a [00:11:43] kinkedked line. We do not see this in [00:11:46] any of Donald Trump's signatures and it [00:11:49] is a sign of a forgery. [00:11:52] Also, the tail is significantly [00:11:55] different. The tail on Donald Trump's [00:11:57] signatures looks like he used pretty [00:12:00] consistently applied pressure, but the [00:12:02] tail on the Epstein letter is thinner in [00:12:04] the middle, indicating that lighter [00:12:07] pressure was used midway and then more [00:12:09] pressure was applied at the end. This is [00:12:12] another indication of a forgery. [00:12:16] I don't think this is Donald Trump's [00:12:18] signature. It looks to me like this is a [00:12:21] hoax. Another strange thing is the [00:12:24] paper. Now, we do not have the original [00:12:27] book to inspect. All we have is the [00:12:30] electronic PDF file. It seems strange to [00:12:33] me that this looks like it was made on [00:12:36] clean, crisp white paper. This is [00:12:39] strange when you look at the other pages [00:12:41] of the book. The other pages look like [00:12:44] the paper is old and aging. You can also [00:12:47] see the curvature from the binding. [00:12:51] Why does Donald Trump's page look so [00:12:53] clean and crisp compared to the other [00:12:55] pages? Could it be that Donald Trump's [00:12:58] page was added to the book recently as a [00:13:01] forgery? [00:13:03] It looks to me like this is a hoax. Now, [00:13:06] a lot of reporters have been pointing to [00:13:08] the fact that this was part of a bound [00:13:10] book. So, therefore, it could not have [00:13:13] been a forgery. [00:13:16] Let me tell you something. [00:13:18] When I was younger, I used to work at a [00:13:20] library and I know a little something [00:13:22] about bookbinding. [00:13:24] It is possible to rebind a book. People [00:13:29] do it all the time. In fact, it's very [00:13:32] easy to add a page to a bound book. The [00:13:37] fact that it is bound is not proof at [00:13:39] all that it is not a fake. To me, this [00:13:43] looks exactly what you would do if you [00:13:45] were creating a hoax. But what is really [00:13:48] shocking about this whole story is that [00:13:50] the electronic PDF file of the book was [00:13:53] turned over to Congress by the Epstein [00:13:55] estate. [00:13:57] To my knowledge, no one has actually [00:14:00] inspected the actual physical copy of [00:14:03] the book. [00:14:05] Hello. [00:14:07] Am I the only person who thinks this is [00:14:09] strange? [00:14:11] No one has actually looked at the [00:14:13] physical book. All these allegations [00:14:16] against Donald Trump are being made [00:14:19] based off an electronic PDF file that [00:14:22] can easily be faked. [00:14:26] How dare these people make accusations [00:14:29] off a PDF file? For all we know, someone [00:14:33] could have just added a new page into [00:14:35] the PDF file that wasn't even in the [00:14:38] book. Why is no one demanding to see the [00:14:42] actual physical book? [00:14:44] I would be very curious to see why [00:14:47] Donald Trump's page looks so clean and [00:14:49] crisp compared to the other pages. But [00:14:53] perhaps the biggest red flag with the [00:14:54] birthday book is when you start asking [00:14:56] the question, is there someone with a [00:14:59] motive to create a hoax? The answer is a [00:15:03] resounding yes. [00:15:05] In fact, it is all the same people who [00:15:08] created a hoax before. The Russian [00:15:11] collusion hoax where they created fake [00:15:14] documents to make Donald Trump seem like [00:15:16] he was involved with something he had [00:15:18] actually nothing to do with. This [00:15:20] involved Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, [00:15:23] the former head of the CIA, John [00:15:25] Brennan, and the former head of the FBI, [00:15:27] James Comey. They are all under [00:15:30] investigation currently for serious [00:15:32] crimes for the Russian collusion hoax. [00:15:35] They have an enormous incentive to try [00:15:38] and do the same thing again to try and [00:15:40] take out Donald Trump. [00:15:43] I find it an extremely likely [00:15:45] possibility that someone from the CIA [00:15:48] created a forged page and inserted it [00:15:51] into this book. And I have to say I'm [00:15:54] not the only person who thinks this. [00:15:57] This is an interview this week by [00:15:59] Democrat Senator John Federman. And [00:16:02] Senator, on the findings from the House [00:16:04] Oversight Committee on this alleged [00:16:06] birthday book, this note that the [00:16:08] president allegedly wrote to Jeffrey [00:16:09] Epstein for his birthday, do you have [00:16:10] any comment on that and the drawing that [00:16:12] goes with that? [00:16:13] >> I I again I I don't think the the [00:16:15] Epstein thing is the big thing. I I [00:16:17] don't know. Release it. I don't But it's [00:16:19] strange. I mean, the Democrats, we've [00:16:21] had that for four years. We didn't [00:16:22] release that. I I don't know why we [00:16:24] didn't do that. So for now, release it. [00:16:27] But I don't think that's gonna, you [00:16:28] know, it's this idea that suddenly [00:16:30] that's going to be the one thing that's [00:16:32] gonna, you know, take out Trump. You [00:16:34] know, I don't believe that that what [00:16:35] that is. Uh he'll still be here. I don't [00:16:38] think it's just a distraction, honestly. [00:16:40] But go ahead and release whatever that [00:16:42] is, but it's not I think that important. [00:16:45] >> So, even the Democrats are saying that [00:16:47] this is a hoax. [00:16:49] Just remember how corrupt Joe Biden was. [00:16:53] He raided the home of Donald Trump. [00:16:57] Do you really think it is believable [00:16:59] that the Democrats had the supposed [00:17:01] letter from Donald Trump for four years [00:17:04] and decided never to bring it up? [00:17:07] Of course, that does not make any sense. [00:17:10] This looks to me like a hoax. Donald [00:17:14] Trump's name is also mentioned in one [00:17:15] other place in the book. There is a [00:17:18] photograph of Jeffrey Epstein holding a [00:17:20] large check with Donald Trump's name on [00:17:22] it. This is obviously not Donald Trump's [00:17:24] signature, and the description clearly [00:17:26] indicates that this was a joke about [00:17:28] Jeffrey Epstein selling a woman to [00:17:30] Donald Trump, but this was an [00:17:33] inappropriate joke created by Jeffrey [00:17:35] Epstein and had nothing to do with [00:17:38] Donald Trump. [00:17:40] If I were to interpret this photo, this [00:17:42] looks to me like Jeffrey Epstein [00:17:44] desperately wanted to be Donald Trump's [00:17:47] friend, and Donald Trump did not want [00:17:49] anything to do with him. So Jeffrey [00:17:51] Epstein resorted to a prank to make it [00:17:54] look like he was friends with Trump when [00:17:56] he was clearly not. [00:17:58] When you are close friends with someone, [00:18:00] it does not look like this photo. I have [00:18:04] just given you a whole long list of [00:18:06] reasons why the Epstein birthday book is [00:18:08] a hoax. Now, I have to say that I don't [00:18:12] know for sure, but what makes me so [00:18:15] angry is that none of the reporting in [00:18:18] the mainstream media mentions any of [00:18:21] these issues. [00:18:23] None of these journalists are looking at [00:18:25] the evidence with a critical eye. [00:18:28] How can they call themselves journalists [00:18:31] when there are obvious indications that [00:18:33] this is a hoax? [00:18:35] And remember that these are the same [00:18:37] people that told us the Russian [00:18:39] collusion hoax was true. They also told [00:18:42] us that if we took the vaccine that it [00:18:44] would stop the spread. That was not [00:18:47] true. They also told us that the Hunter [00:18:49] Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. [00:18:52] That was not true. These people in the [00:18:55] mainstream media hate you. So when these [00:18:59] reporters talk about Epstein's birthday [00:19:01] book, I'm not going to believe them. I'm [00:19:04] going to believe my own eyes and my own [00:19:06] eyes are telling me that this is a hoax. [00:19:10] Now, I want to hear from you. Do you [00:19:12] think this is a hoax? Let me know in the [00:19:15] comments down below. And if you like [00:19:16] this video, don't forget to hit that [00:19:18] subscribe button so you don't miss out [00:19:20] on future videos. If you find my videos [00:19:22] helpful, consider signing up for a [00:19:24] membership on my website, [00:19:25] wolvesenfinance.com. [00:19:27] For $6 a month, your support helps me to [00:19:30] keep making these videos. Thank you to [00:19:32] everyone who has signed up. I'm Zach [00:19:35] from Wolves and Finance. Thank you for [00:19:37] watching. [00:19:41] [Music] [00:19:52] [Music]